User talk:Run n Fly

Run n Fly is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

Hi Run n Fly! I noticed your contributions to Viral vector vaccine and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! PrisonerB (talk) 13:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ratna Ghoshal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:46, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ambarish Bhattacharya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198 Online events: New: May Mays | Mental Health Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Women in Europe contest Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman See also: Wikimedia District of Columbia: 100 DC Women contest Wikimedia CEE Spring: Central and Eastern European Women contest The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Don't add any new discussion to existing discussion. That discussion is closed. Nitesh003 (talk) 17:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nitesh003, I have addressed the solutions to your problem at your talk page. Run n Fly (talk) 17:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, further to your comment on my talk page, just to let you know I am suggesting a discussion on this here.--A bit iffy (talk) 12:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Run n Fly, please be aware that an editor with a disclosed conflict of interest is welcome to make talk page edit requests, and to revert obvious vandalism, threats, personal attacks and the like. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

also, per WP:OUTING, do not post someone's place of employment to Wikipedia, unless they have explicitly done so themselves. Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not see that hey have done that. --- Possibly (talk) 21:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cullen328 Possibly, sorry for posting those information. Can anyone of you also remove/redact the same details posted here at User_talk:Jmmeisner#May_2021 Run n Fly (talk) 21:38, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In my experience at COIN it is fine to say "when I google the user's username, I come up with an indication of a COI", as long as you are sure and are not casting aspersions without good reasons. However it's not OK to say X user works at Y employer unless they have explicitly already revealed that. Thanks. --- Possibly (talk) 21:42, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly Ok. Will not post things per WP:OUTING Run n Fly (talk) 21:46, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Run n Fly have are connected with Khorkuto serial. Thank you. Heart ^(talk) 11:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed your edit on Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India. Please check this out and express support if interested. Semanticz0 (talk) 18:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201 Online events: New: Wiki Loves Pride | June Junes | Jewellers & Watchmakers Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Women in Europe contest Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi, please, see Wikipedia:Non-admin closures and in particular, WP:BADNAC. I would suggest you refrain from closing AfDs while you become familiar with the process. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 06:22, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205 Online events: New: July Julies | Finance, economics & banking | Olympic & Paralympic Games New contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: "Mind your elders" Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi Run n Fly, please keep WP:3RR in mind at Khorkuto. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ToBeFree, the IP editors are adding all the cast in lead section which is not required and duplicates information per MOS:LEAD. I have explained clearly why I removed but the IP editors seems to ignore the reasons behind them. Thank you Run n Fly (talk) 18:34, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have semi-protected the page for a month to prevent it from happening again, but please do keep in mind that this isn't vandalism, and thus not exempt from WP:3RR. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:35, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ToBeFree, OK will report to proper venue if I encounter such editing here after warning and discussions and avoid WP:3RR Run n Fly (talk) 18:39, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	You are doing good job. Keep doing good work. Best wishes regards Bapinghosh (talk) 20:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have breached WP:3RR, a policy you're already aware of diff, at ZyCoV-D, reverting five times within 24 hours and 16 minutes. Take care. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Jonathan, Its only 2 times. Where did you find the other 3 times. Please help me to identify. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 12:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not put false accusations. Run n Fly (talk) 12:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1, 2, 3, 4. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.

Sorry, I just saw that you're already aware, as you have recently issued an alert in Special:Diff/1033063750. So this notification was unnecessary.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in and edits about COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Please note that "violating 3RR" is not a valid reason to revert an edit; the only two possible approaches to such a situation are disengaging or discussing on the article's talk page, but not reverting again. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:12, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• diff
• diff
• diff
• diff
• diff

Regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:12, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree and Joshua Jonathan: Thank you for the identifying them. But I feel its totally incorrect as I along with Toddy1 were resolving serious issue with User:Shinjoya at Talk:ZyCoV-D. See the WP:ANI report [1].

Also, ToBeFree I am the person who is actively engaged in maintain WP:COVID-19 articles be it editing, protecting or creating. But I am given a notice of WP:DS so I will not be taking part in them any more. Run n Fly (talk) 12:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it had been a huge, ongoing problem, there would have been a block instead of a warning, so no worries. I just wanted to point out that, technically, by a few minutes, this was indeed a violation of WP:3RR.

The DS notice was unnecessary; I've now seen that you're already aware, as you have issued the same template recently. I have collapsed the unnecessary notification. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ToBeFree, but useful information of "Technology" section is gone now. If a single reader feels "dubious info" and removes data single-handedly from article does that apply to all of us? I think no so. Also TrangaBellam replies Have been here longer than you are. Please go a bit slow, see [2] which is clear violation of WP:SENIORITY. Such behavior should be stopped. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 12:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the relevant policy in such cases is WP:ONUS: The content can only be re-added if a consensus for inclusion is found. An RFC could be the way to achieve such consensus. Selectively messaging/pinging specific users doesn't work the same way, as people are likely to invite others with the same opinion. An RFC is neutrally advertised to many random users with many different opinions instead. Regarding the "seniority" issue, I was a bit disappointed to read this from TrangaBellam, as it's rather incivil to use someone's account age as an argument. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I notify WP:COVID-19 and WP:Medicine about the on-going discussion at Talk:ZyCoV-D for a participation without tagging anyone? A neutral request. I hope its allowed. Run n Fly (talk) 12:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: forgot to add {{Re}} Run n Fly (talk) 12:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to say yes, but you already did so. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree:, again WP:INCIVIL comments about the editors as a whole who contributed at the vaccine pages in comments at Talk:ZyCoV-D by TrangaBellam. See [3] says they are drafted in an encyclopedic language without wanting to come off as pop-science books written to interest grade-fivers.. Should we continue allow this? Run n Fly (talk) 13:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That statement seems to be about the possible audience of the article, not about the Wikipedia editors who wrote it. The "one down" guideline section specifically refers to secondary, undergraduate and postgraduate education, and "grade-fivers" are an example for early secondary students, or pars pro toto for secondary education in general. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For clear-cut violations of username policy like this one, please report them directly to WP:UAA noticeboard instead of warning. --Ashleyyoursmile! 06:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

- TheresNoTime ^😺 19:52, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Run n Fly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do not have any active account on Wikipedia other than this. I edit as per norms and rules of English Wikipedia. I had an account User:Amkgp earlier but I retired using that account long ago and do not have access to the password of the account. I also never desire to be associated with the previous account due to wanting a clean start are recognizing past mistakes, and avoiding harassment per WP:CLEANSTART. I started my contributions via this new account as per WP:CLEANSTART. I have never used both the accounts simultaneously. I also never wish to retrieve the past account and contribute using this account only. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 03:20, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Three CUs have said you're editing logged-out in a way that constitutes socking. I'm inclined to trust their judgment. Further, CLEANSTART isn't worth much if you left under a cloud and are resuming the previously problematic behavior. Declined. GeneralNotability (talk) 22:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheresNoTime - When you're available, can you email me or PM me in IRC or Discord? I'd like to get more information about this block and what you saw with the technical evidence you retrieved. Thanks man! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:29, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheresNoTime and Oshwah, I was aware about this clean start, as have been at least one other checkuser and Nick, the administrator who arguably caused the clean start to happen. I was also relatively strict regarding this ([4]) and kept an eye on the situation ([5]). The block isn't entirely surprising, as maintaining a proper clean start is tough. If there are non-public details that can at least be shared with administrators, I'd like to receive a copy. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(or, if the only non-public thing here is the now-public connection between Amkgp and Run n Fly, please remove the checkuser template from the block, publicly provide the remaining evidence of disruption and open this up for a normal block review.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:51, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree, TheresNoTime, and Oshwah:, User:Amkgp was closed with a notice {{retired}} last logged on 10 March 2021 17:34 UTC. A month later I thought of creating pages of well known film and TV personality like of the show Khorkuto which passes WP:ENT and WP:GNG. Later, I was encouraged on coverage of Indian women, including Bengalis through WikiGap Kolkata. See the article in The Indian Express through WP:WOMRED. See this

I created and started editing from this account on 6 April 2021 at 10:30 UTC. I have followed the instructions stated at How to "clean start in WP:CLEANSTART. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 11:06, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah and ToBeFree: there are some additional elements that the above now-public connection, which I can't share on-wiki, but Oshwah in absence of being able to get in touch with you prior to responding, I would suggest reviewing this and my below questions.

@Run n Fly: I will however state that regardless of a clean start (which itself states "Changing accounts to avoid the consequences of past bad behaviors is usually seen as evading scrutiny"), you (Run n Fly) have also engaged in some actions which clearly indicate you are evading scrutiny. So let me ask you this, plainly - have you been accidently editing logged out recently? If we can have an honest discussion, then perhaps this can be kicked back to a normal unblock review. - TheresNoTime ^😺 11:19, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TheresNoTime, Yes once for submission of Ambarish Bhattacharya via WP:AFC but that was before the creation of new account (but that time I was not sure whether I should join back, and I had already declared that I have created a new account and will contribute from this account when tried to seek help from editor and admin. See the proof here). I found that IP editing has a lot of limitations, so started an account with WP:CLEANSTART and continuing till today. Run n Fly (talk) 11:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since the account created I have not edited logged out. Run n Fly (talk) 11:47, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Run n Fly: Are you absolutely sure? No Wikipedia:Articles for deletion votes or anything? I personally think the better outcome in most blocks is that the editor can return to constructively contributing, and I'd really prefer to be able to hand this back over for a normal block appeal. I won't do that until I'm sure you're being honest with us (and thus, will be honest in a block appeal). - TheresNoTime ^😺 11:53, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TheresNoTime, Yes, recently I only participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera. There you can see I have voted and engaged in a constructive discussion from this account only. Are you suspecting the keep vote from the IP editor from me? I can say clearly that I have not voted that logged out. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 12:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing to do Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera. I worked to make it WP:NTV thats why I participated from this account only. Its upto the community to decide whether to keep, delete or draftify. Run n Fly (talk) 12:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's from the same IP range you use when you do your routine log-out commenting in the Wikipedia namespace. It's also the same range you used when you used to complain about backlogs shortly after filing requests at RFPP and it's the same range you used when complaining about backlogs shortly after filing permission request at PERM. And after the behaviour you exhibited when you were still Amkgp, trust in your explanations is running in negative figures right now. Nick (talk) 12:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheresNoTime, Oshwah, and ToBeFree:, I have not contributed a single thing that makes anything negative from (Run n Fly) or break Wikipedia policies. Why the account (Amkgp) is dragged into this when reviewing (Run n Fly) and create WP:DRAMA. I already have disconnected in all respects from (Amkgp) and made a clean start. I would request you all to please consider my request as I have answered all your queries. Also I never used (Run n Fly) to report backlog of RfPP or PERM at WP:ANI while logged out. I use mobile internet that is not static but dynamic in nature. Some other person may also be allotted the IP range when disconnected. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 13:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your clean start within the first couple days and turned a mostly blind eye to it because I hoped you would be able to contribute constructively, though the clean start was arguably borderline illegitimate in the first place (the AN thread was quite the cloud to resign under, compounded by the fact that you then continued to edit projectspace, including AfD's for articles you created as Amkgp, as an IP, which only ended when I called you out on it). Your clean start was also not truly clean; there are 70 instances of overlap between your old and your new account (and for what it's worth, you also continued violating copyright as Run n Fly, albeit on Commons). That alone would have been justification to file an SPI, and it would not have been unreasonable for an administrator to block you for evading scrutiny. I didn't, and I kept my mouth shut about it, aside from privately pointing out the clean start to some previously involved parties.

You were given a substantial amount of rope, and you used it to rappel right down the chasm that got you blocked last time. The logged out socking is, as Nick points out, essentially proven (with or without CU evidence), and your denial is disheartening. When Tony blocked you for logged-out editing, you stated that you again went through all the points of WP:PROJSOCK policy and found where I was doing wrong and I promise that this will never ever occur next time. There is no way that !vote wasn't you, and there is no way it was inadvertent. The only path towards an unblock that I see is to wait for some time and then appeal as Amkgp, without any further socking in the meantime. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:23, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blablubbs, TheresNoTime, Oshwah and ToBeFree, I was upset and scrambled my password and delinked my e-mail. I do not remember the password of Amkgp. I also don't want to connect to the past account anymore. You can permanently block Amkgp. Run n Fly (talk) 13:30, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have not engaged in any socking after I recognized the policy from (Run n Fly). Regarding commons I was unsure whether scanning is allowed or not. That I also rectified. Its looks like its going to more WP:DRAMA. I have never ever edited logged-out from (Run n Fly). It looks the discussion is going somewhere other. Run n Fly (talk) 13:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheresNoTime and Oshwah: I request with folded hands that I have not edited logged out anytime via (Run n Fly). Please help to come to a conclusion. I don't want to get associated with mistakes of (Amkgp). It is creating problems for me. Continuous allegation based on Amkgp to attack contributions of Run n Fly when I have clear and honest intention of continuing per WP:CLEANSTART. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 13:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. I came across this on accident by following up on one of my past cases. I can confirm that you've edited logged out in violation of policy without commenting on any given IP or range. They underlying IP ranges here are extremely busy so I can't tell how much you've done so, but there's at least one recent example of IP socking in project space in violation of policy that was clearly you and not an accident, plus multiple other logged out edits that I ordinarily wouldn't care about in mainspace and some project boards, but are worth noting since you claimed never to have edited logged out. It's also worth noting that editing logged out in project space was what got you blocked the last time (by me) and where you stated that you would not do it again. That's entirely seperate from the question of whether or not this is a valid clean start (I don't think it is as you quit while you were under discussion at a noticeboard, but that's a different discussion.)

Anyway, I'm not going to decline the unblock since TNT and Oshwah were already discussing this, but I have no problem confirming that you are not telling the truth about your logged out editing, and that it was intentional and not just a mistake in at least one instance. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TonyBallioni, I have never edited logged out since I created this account. Those you mention were from (Amkgp). I am telling the truth. I have no interest to speak lies here. I have done mistake and violations from past account that why I made a clean start. Run n Fly (talk) 04:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true. You have edited logged out within the last month in a way where you would have known it to be a violation of policy. I can say this very confidently. Like I said above, I am not able to comment on any specific IP address publicly and I am not going to do so, but I can say that your claim to not have edited logged out since the creation of this account is false with a high degree of confidence. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyBallioni, TheresNoTime, and Oshwah: All the complaints made are from (Amkgp) which I have already dis-associated myself. I have never edited anywhere logged out from (Run n Fly). I not saying any lies. I have not done any of my editing from (Run n Fly) that is being said. What more can I say, everybody seems to judge from based on (Amkgp) activities which I have never attempted from (Run n Fly). I am not commenting any more and leave to you all to take the call. Thank you Run n Fly (talk) 04:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This will be my last comment unless another CU or admin pings me:

1. You are the same person as Amkgp, as you have already admitted. I'm not sure if you meant to do this, but the way you keep using both names can come off like you're saying that you are different people. I just want to note this point for anyone else following at home.
2. WP:CLEANSTART says If you attempt a clean start but are recognized, you will be held accountable for your actions under both the old and new accounts. So trying to bifurcate your conduct between the two accounts is actually the exact opposite of what the policy you're appealing to says will happen if its discovered that you made a clean start. Your actions under both usernames are supposed to be taken into account when someone is reviewing the unblock.
3. It is my opinion as an uninvolved CheckUser that you have logged out in violation of policy since abandoning your former account and while editing from the Run n Fly account. I've sent Oshwah and TNT what link I was able to draw technically via email. They are independent of me (and I am independent of them) and they can draw their own conclusions. I was not the blocking admin/CU here, but I was able to find evidence that contradicted the claims you made in this unblock without going through all the ranges that you edit from.

Like I mentioned: I won't be reviewing this since Oshwah and ToBeFree were already talking with TNT. What I am saying is that as an uninvolved CheckUser, it is my opinion that the claims you are making in this unblock discussion are not true. I've provided other CUs (both the blocking CU and another one who commented here) the relevant technical details. I'm happy to leave this to their and ToBeFree's discussion, but that discussion should take place with all the relevant facts being known. One of those relevant facts is that you are continuing to make claims that technical evidence shows is unlikely to be true. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had said I wont comment, but I have somethings to say:

• First of all, I never edited logged out after WP:CLEANSTART. If I would done so I would have accepted it. But forcefully making someone to accept it when not committed is totally unfair.
• I use mobile internet to access Wikpedia, and the ISPs generally allocate dynamic IPs, thus the IP may have been allocated to someone else, and I am 100% confident about it since I have switched on-and-off my mobile phone many a times and each time they have allocated a new IP address. I have checked my claims through (https://whois-referral.toolforge.org/gateway.py)
• Is the CheckUser results 100% accurate? I have encountered a case that shows No. Also, technical evidence have been ignored earlier for various reasons. For e.g. see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Walrus Ji/Archive where it is said and concluded

  while CU may show a potential technical link between ତୁମ୍ଭର ପିତା ଓ ରାଜା and എപ്പോഴും രാജാവ്, I don't see evidence of abuse (overlap/tagteam/etc), so I don't see a reason to take action. It might be the same person, but one stopped before the other started, so it could be as simple as a forgotten password.

And here I have declared that I don't posses the password of (Amkgp). I have never abused or cause damage to the project but rather helped in every possible way. I leave to the CUs and admins to decide whether to accept or decline the request. Hope I will get justice. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 11:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting that given the above, I will not be stepping this down from a CheckUser block. Please review the block appeal process - TheresNoTime ^😺 19:31, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the {{help me}} template appropriately. The {{help me}} template is for help in using Wikipedia, not for unrelated issues. If you would like to ask such a question, replace the code {{help me-inappropriate}} on this page with {{help me}} to reactivate the help request. Alternatively, you can also ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance.

I request any editor in good faith to replace the July 2021 with 26 July 2021 in the lead section and | first_aired = 26 July 2021 at {{Infobox television}} in Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera, as the dates has been announced.^[1] Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 20:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

•  Not done per WP:PROXYING. --Blablubbs (talk) 21:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  but WP:PROXYING also mentions clearly

  they are able to show that the changes are either verifiable or productive and they have independent reasons for making such edits.

  are permitted and I have provided WP:RS that verifies the claim and in good faith. Anyways, I accept the decline. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 21:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  And what independent reason would Blablubbs have had for making that edit ? Nick (talk) 21:46, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I would like to request any admin to help in closing an Old Afd discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera. I would also like to draw/update a fact that the draftify option is now not applicable as the dates of the show is announced and will start from 26 July 2021.^[1] I am not subject to WP:COI nor WP:UPE, but I worked a lot to improve the article and participated in the AfD. Taking this, I am making the request. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 20:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

•  Not done per WP:PROXYING. Do this once more and I will remove your talk page access. Nick (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207 Online events: New: Indigenous women | Women's leadership & empowerment Contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Olympic & Paralympic Games | Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Interwiki Women Collaboration Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajanya Mitra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajanya Mitra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bapinghosh (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pandab Goenda (TV series) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208 Online events: New: Women writers & their works Contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Women's leadership & empowerment | Olympic & Paralympic Games Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Interwiki Women Collaboration Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Learn more about our proposed one-day online recruitment initiative in October. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211 Online events: New: Women in STEM New Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman Special event: 12 October: Ada Lovelace Day 24-Hour Global Edit-a-thon See also: Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Vial of covaxin.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213 Online events: New: Film + Stage | Endocrine health Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Wikipedia Asian Month 2021 Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216 Online events: New: "Double the lede!" | Women who died in 2021 Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Women in Climate Change and preparations for our 2022 Climate initiative Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Convidecia vial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219 Online events: New: Climate (year-long initiative) | Women in business | US territories Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2021 Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month. Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222 Online events: New: Black women | Hong Kong and Macau | Women in sport Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Convidecia logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sannyasi Deshonayok (poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Roilo Pherar Nimontron poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sokhi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bou Kotha Kao (TV serial) poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Medrxiv has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]