User talk:Qxz/Archive 6

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Qxz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

I know you probably get a heap of these but... I think your ad banners are really great :) Keep up the good work, --Spebi 11:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually I mostly just get requests for new ones :) Thanks! – Qxz 11:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

I love the ad banners! Great idea! I hate to bug you, but could you get one for WikiProject Video games? Thanks a lot! Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:58, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your suggestion; I'll see what I can do – Qxz 22:58, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

– Qxz 23:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting that kids edit of my userpage. He lives down the street from me and thinks he's a comedian. Slayerofangels 02:52, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

The image was taken from de:Image:BBC.svg and was reported there as ineligible for copyright. Is this a mistake on their entry as well? — cBuckley (Talk • Contribs) 02:58, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I am not a copyright lawyer and don't have a perfect understanding of these things, but to summarize, to the best of my knowledge, the German Wikipedia seems to consider logos ineligible for copyright; we don't. Note also the license tag on Image:BBC Logo 1997-Present.png. Thanks – Qxz 03:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Qxz -- your ads certainly are a nice addition to the project ... a very cr eative way to point people toward useful ways to help out. Thanks for all your hard work. -- Pastordavid 03:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

As soon as I realized my signature was in the text, I removed it. Kinda new at this. RJ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bigwig77 (talk • contribs) 05:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

Definitely as sad day. Well... Farewell, I wish you the best of lucks, and I hope you'll come back to us one day. I was getting used to see your signatures on the pages I read :). Take care :) -- lucasbfr ^talk 10:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Are you sure? My signature is quite possibly the most boring one ever devised, I'm surprised you even noticed it – Qxz 15:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Could you explain why you've just hit every single RFA with an oppose vote and an insult? Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 10:13, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

For the lulz, obviously. (No, don't panic, I'm not going to ED) – Qxz 15:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

I think you might have got irritable because you haven't had enough sleep recently: you contributed for over 24 hours with breaks of no more than 2 hours recently. Please think things through for a bit before you make any rash decisions; you may feel better after you get more sleep. --ais523 10:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Rest assured I rested assuredly (interesting that this attempt to explain my departure seemed to be favoured by several people over the one I provided myself...) – Qxz 15:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Qxz, this just isn't like you. Now I'm starting to think that someone has hacked your password, and is using your account, and if now, then I have some advice: Just get some sleep. RyGuy 12:13, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Now I know that someone else is using this account for two reasons: 1. Qxz is never on at this time. 2. the "attitude". Please stop the disruptive edits. I am afraid I have to report you for incivility reasons. RyGuy 12:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Indeed; when you can't accept what's happening, make up increasingly desperate alternatives and rationalize those instead. I believe RyGuy does, in fact, know why I left; someone showed him an email I sent them and told them not to show to anyone else (see how well that worked! :/) – Qxz 15:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

IAR or piqued messages on the talk page in this case. OK I'm sure you'll erase this looking at the previous few, but at least I know you'll read it. Whatever has got your riled up, please don't throw the toys out of the cot. Take a break, you've spent a lot of time here and done a lot of valuable work on the templates and have been a very valuable contributor and you have yourself at somepoint thought it worth your time. If there's anything ..... well anyway. Take it easy ^Khukri 17:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Maybe you'll deleted this message too. Anyway, at least read it ;-): you've spent too much time here, but you're really one of the kind of contributors that make wikipedia something I really love. You've done great things here, and your work is appreciated. Why leaving? I'm sure you should reduce the amount of time that you've spent here, but... Wikipedia is worth of our and your time. How many times I (and maybe you) have used it? I think that helping this project isn't a waste of time. You aren't the first fine contributor to leave, but usually the others have spent longer period on the project. Try with a wikibreak ;-) I hope you'll come back, one day. Snowolf ^(talk) _CON ^COI - 18:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Would you be saying the same thing if I'd been here for eighteen months, not two? If so, bear in mind that I had. – Qxz 15:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure why Z.E.R.O. feels the need to go around the talk pages of departed users announcing the departure on their behalf with the aid of an ugly and badly-coded template. Then again, his comments on this talk page have been a little odd (see below) – Qxz 15:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Hmm conciliatory overtones... are we seeing a thaw? :-) ~~~~

No, what you were seeing was increasing frustration with people who insist on leaving comments, and a further attempt to make them go away... – Qxz 15:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Qxz, I just wanted to express to you that I think Template:Qxz-ads is very, very, very cool, so long as it is used on user and user talk pages. I've thoroughly found your development of that template awesome. Hope you come back. (→Netscott) 23:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Did you notice that within hours of my departure Xaosflux had stripped the credit line from it? Doesn't make a lot of difference from my point of view, my username being in the template name anyway, but I bet AzaToth is a bit miffed.

Well we can only hope so, I tried to e-mail you last night but your e-mail isn't enabled. Send me an e-mail if you get a chance. Khukri

Did it not occur to you that the reason someone might have disabled their email is that they don't want to be emailed? I only sent The Transhumanist one because he was threatening to try and "console" me *shudder* – Qxz 15:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Drop me an email, please. The Transhumanist   08:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Said email was dropped, but it turned out to be just someone confusing the ability to make animated GIFs and a basic understanding of CSS with substantial programming and web design experience. As Arthur C. Clarke once said, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – Qxz 15:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop posting uncivil oppose votes to other users' RfAs. All oppose votes should remain as civil as possible. — zero » 04:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

 	 
Suggest user goes and does something useful with their life instead

Oh, I see you've done this before, too. It is blockable if you keep this up. — zero » 04:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Next time you place an uncivil RfA oppose vote on RfAs, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — zero » 04:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

-

Mm, I don't think Qxz will. He seems to be gone for good for a while. I hope it is only temporary. --Iamunknown 04:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Sadly it is permanent. And yes, it is blockable. However, the block had been imposed, lifted, re-imposed and re-lifted five days before the above posts. I only hope Z.E.R.O. isn't in the habit of doing this with anonymous vandals. Here, nobody cares, but warning an IP address 5 days after the fact could easily cause confusion – Qxz 15:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Qxz,

It looks like something bad has been going on; I hope it wasn't too unpleasant for you!

I have a favor to ask of you. I remember fondly our work together on Wikipedia and I hope that you can help me with the Encyclopædia Britannica article, which is now a featured article candidate. It's received a few excellent reviews, but overall it's received surprisingly little attention. Could you maybe look it over and make ruthlessly constructive suggestions? Thanks muchly! :) Willow 22:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Replied at User talk:WillowW

I'm sorry for all of the talk page protection bullshit. You did a lot for the project, I hope you don't regret the effort that you put into it. Some people still share the delusion that Wikipedia might be worth a damn. You might be right, I might be wrong, but there is cause to fight for making this place better. Peace, -anetode