User talk:Qwef1234

Hello, Qwef1234. You have new messages at Talk:Tabeer (1975 TV series).
Message added 17:19, 13 September 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Qwerfjkltalk

Hello, Qwef1234,

Thank you for creating Shaam Se Pehlay.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references to meet WP:TVSERIES requirements for notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Bisaat (TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 20:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ibn-e-Hawa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NenChemist (talk) 07:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234,

Thank you for creating Hammad Shoaib.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This unassessed article is currently only a dictionary entry, As presented this is a list-class article (filmography) with notability issues

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Otr500}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Otr500 (talk) 06:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Haroon Shahid. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 26#Haroon Shahid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:17, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bisaat (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bisaat (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234,

Thank you for creating Mor Moharan.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Three of the supplied references are user generated sources. You will need to supply more references to meet notability guidelines.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 22:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aaj Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koyal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jo Bache Hain Sang Samait Lo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 10:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bisaat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Dilara (TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 11:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Aik Hai Nigaar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onmyway22 talk 10:55, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ajnabi Lage Zindagi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 09:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you write ALL the dramas Syed Mohammad Ahmed saab had acted in please 82.18.156.9 (talk) 17:36, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Aik Mohabbat Kafi Hai.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Lamhay (A-Plus TV series), was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Digiuserca (talk) 12:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Rafay Rashdi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rafay Rashdi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafay Rashdi (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:09, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nimra Bucha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manto.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rafay Rashdi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafay Rashdi (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AAhap³⁶ (talk • contribs) 07:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What about Syed Mohammad Ahmed saab other drama he was in that you missed which are: Doraha (2008), Mata-e-Jaan Hai Tu (2012), Silvatein (2013), Khan (2017) and Badnaam (2017) aswell 82.18.156.9 (talk) 18:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234,

Thank you for creating Badzaat.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section detailing reviews of the series in reliable sources when available

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 06:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jackson Heights (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jackson Heights.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234,

Thank you for creating Chaudhry and Sons.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the series in reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 23:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Amna Malik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amna Malik. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 13:00, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sang-e-Mah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234,

Thank you for creating Fraud (TV series).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the series in reliable sources when available

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 00:19, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Hassan Noman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please review WP:NACTOR - there's no evidence of any significant roles played, let alone multiple. Ravensfire (talk) 13:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dumpukht - Aatish-e-Ishq, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Queen of Vanguard has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

H.S (talk) 09:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ghalib (film).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234

Thank you for creating Kamli (2022 film).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ghunghat (1962 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santosh Kumar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234

Thank you for creating Paristan (TV series).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Qwef1234

Thanks for creating an important film from Pakistan – Naila. I just now saw it and tried to further improve your created article by adding an archived reference to it. Also I made a minor correction to the music director's name. Changed it from Inayat Hussain Bhatti to Inayat Hussain. Easy to confuse those names because they are similar. I happen to know this for sure because I did create the original article for Inayat Hussain back in 2017. Hope you continue creating these valuable Wikipedia articles. Best Regards and my Salaams ...Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wasalam... Thanks for your appreciation. Thanks alot, Jazak'Allah Qwef1234 (talk) 10:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234

Thank you for creating Koel (film).

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:37, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your consistent and valuable contributions to Pakistani film and television articles on Wikipedia. Hope you continue your efforts. Wassalaam and Best Regards Ngrewal1 (talk) 21:34, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have also noticed that you are already starting to use 'archived references' from both 'Pakistan Film Magazine' website and 'The Hot Spot Film Reviews' website for giving references on Nigar Awards for films. I also have been trying to provide 'archived references' for the last couple years, whenever possible. I personally was getting tired of having to replace 'references' that had gone dead on me that I myself had spent time giving only a couple years ago. We all know these archived references will be more durable and long-lasting... Cheers Ngrewal1 (talk) 22:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fahim Burney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahim Burney (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

North8000 (talk) 17:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asad Mumtaz Malik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asad Mumtaz Malik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shazia Wajahat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shazia Wajahat (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ibn-e-Hawa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234

Thank you for creating Anarkali (Pakistani film).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234

Thank you for creating Eid Mubarak (film).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slywriter, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Dil Tanha Tanha, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slywriter}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks! Slywriter (talk) 18:55, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234

Thank you for creating Tum Se Kehna Tha.

User:Slywriter, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Could use some reviews

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Slywriter}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slywriter (talk) 21:41, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sonia Nazir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia Nazir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 16:40, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asad Jabal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asad Jabal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{- Signed by} NeverTry4Me ^Talk 16:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lamhay (A-Plus TV).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ibn-e-Hawa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:05, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Waada (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fateh Ali Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Saat Lakh.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dil Tanha Tanha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dil Tanha Tanha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ovinus (talk) 21:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rashid Mehmood (actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashid Mehmood (actor). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nooran.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Hernaam Kaur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 06:34, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DoubleGrazing, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Qasim Ali Mureed, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoubleGrazing}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alif Allah Aur Insaan

added a link pointing to Kotha

Yaqeen Ka Safar

added a link pointing to Mani

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qasim Ali Mureed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qasim Ali Mureed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alif Allah Aur Insaan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kotha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hajra Masroor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afsana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Because you wrote most of the content on Agar (TV series) I just wanted to let you know that I've moved it to the draft space. Unfortunately only one of the sources, Galaxy Lollywood meets WP:GNG for this production. I suspect though that this is very likely a case of WP:TOOSOON, and that shortly after the first episode of the series airs on 25 October there will be some reviews that give enough in-depth coverage of the show to meet GNG. Sideswipe9th (talk) 21:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234,

Thank you for creating Diya Jalay.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article! Though, could you demonstrate how this passes WP:GNG, the general notability guideline? There is only one ref from Dawn that constitutes of significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV), the rest are an interview, a collection of episodes, and a nomination for an award. IMO these other three refs fail the significant coverage requirements and my WP:BEFORE search didn't find sources that contribute to notability. Still, thanks for your work![

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 21:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. Thank you for your work on Kaiser Khan. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:12, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Aik Sitam Aur

added a link pointing to Noor

Kaiser Khan

added a link pointing to Makan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Farar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:15, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mohabbat Karne Walon Kay Naam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:33, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dil Hai Chota Sa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dil Hai Chota Sa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:15, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Aao Kahani Buntay Hain, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 05:46, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dil Hai Chota Sa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dil Hai Chota Sa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:08, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

03222544648 2404:3100:1C00:2B22:1:0:1B02:A2BA (talk) 16:28, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. Thank you for your work on Maha Hasan (actress). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Hopefully you will create more in the future! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Aik Gunnah Aur Sahi.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Chingari (Pakistani film), is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chingari (Pakistani film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hernaam Kaur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Yunhi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Like other countries, we are also in need of establishing a "project page" regarding reliable and unreliable sources for Pakistan-related topics. I have prepared an initial draft for the purpose. Please, contribute and share your opinions and assessments on the talk page, so that a consensus can be reach out before moving it to the mainspace:

Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan/Pakistani sources

Thanks. Insight 3 (talk) 13:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Salma (Pakistani film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM, tagged for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:43, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kakuliyat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hernaam Kaur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:39, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Mera Ghar Meri Jannat, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 14:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dil Hai Chota Sa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dil Hai Chota Sa (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baji (1963 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Allah Rakha and Santosh Kumar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Uraan (2019 TV series).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dil Ke Tukre.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baaji (1963 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Outlook.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Azra (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as zero reviews found in a BEFORE. Wikipedia is not intended to be an IMdB mirror.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 17:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Beti (1964 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as zero reviews found in a BEFORE. Wikipedia is not intended to be an IMdB mirror.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 17:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234,

Thank you for creating Sassi (film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Coverage appears routine, have not tagged for deletion via prod or AFD because of the age of the film meaning sources are more difficult to find, pls check Pakistani newspapers or consider moving to draft yourself if they cannot be found because as it stands this may not survive a deletion discussion if someone else nominates?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MaxnaCarta}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MaxnaCarta (talk) 23:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Surraya Bhopali, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. Thank you for your work on Sassi (film). User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice job on this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:18, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Qwef1234, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Kakuliyat, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Author has not requested deletion, or other users have added substantial content. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jangloos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khuda Ki Basti.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Qwef1234, Hope you are safe and doing great. I wanted to request you to create a redirect for Hum 2 Hamaray 100, Meri Guriya (2022 TV series) and Ishq Nahin Aasan as I'm unable to do it. I'll be thankful to you. Jockey456 (talk) 11:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm good and hope you will be fine too. To create redirects, you should use [[Wikipedia

Articles for creation/Redirects and categories]] instead. Thanks

Qwef1234 (talk) 13:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Qwef1234. Jockey456 (talk) 20:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mohabbat Karne Walon Kay Naam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hazaron Saal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neela Parbat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decca.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. Thank you for your work on Dishonored (1966 film). User:AngusWOOF, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

It's not clear this is the correct translation for badnaam. please confirm

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:02, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Shahpar (TV series). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 1TWO3Writer (talk) 14:49, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Qwef1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

223.123.11.207 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

autoblock message

• Blocking administrator: ST47ProxyBot (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: Confirmed p2p proxy. See Template:Blocked p2p proxy for more details. Yamla (talk) 10:27, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwef1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 223.123.15.139. Qwef1234 (talk) 16:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'd refer you to WP:IPECPROXY to make an email request for IPBE as I often do in these cases, and you certainly could do that. But you seem to have recorded edits two hours ago, so I'm not sure you're as blocked as you think. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Qwef1234 (talk) 16:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jannat (Pakistani TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG, tagged for notability since 2022

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 11:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. Thank you for your work on Arslan Naseer. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Great job on the article, but please revise sentences like 'The comics under the tag CBA which means Comics By Arslan led him to popularity and encouraged him to make his own website.' Also, eliminate any unnecessary puffery, and then I'll mark it as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 03:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. Thank you for your work on Aina Asif. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work on the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 15:59, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Baandi (2012 TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:06, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i redirected the page. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jurm (2023), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OLI 18:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Taar-e-Ankaboot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG, tagged for notability since 2022

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 17:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I redirected the page in this case also. Best, --My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Taar-e-Ankaboot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Basti (novel), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Aamir Qureshi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Notability is not inherited. Sources are just passing mentions. Maliner (talk) 15:55, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aina Asif is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aina Asif until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Maliner (talk) 16:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Basti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kakuliyat".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shanaas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raima Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raima Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions are good. Please take a look at Draft:Namak Haram and other unmade projects article dramas 223.123.18.179 (talk) 05:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taar-e-Ankaboot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taar-e-Ankaboot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 13:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amna Mufti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pinjar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Taar-e-Ankaboot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nauman335 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nauman335. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 12:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwef1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe that I was banned due to some misunderstanding. Please, clarify and confirm the technical reasons again. Along with the areas of interest (which could be confirmed from edit history and list of created articles), the behaviour is also very much. :* I often add the edit summary which never start from capital letter, and usually contains more symbols like comma, &, +, ± etc. While, the user mostly has the edit summaries which doesn't explain much about the edit like "add words" and "Fixed typo" (His F is always capital). :* The user has edited the cricket related and politics articles like Six-Day War, Israel–Hamas war and 2015 Pakistan Army Mil Mi-17 crash etc. I never edited these pages and the pages that range in such categories. :* This user reverts the edits usually, on average after every 20 edits like 1, 2 and 3. But, I have never reverted any edits by other user. Merely, the reverted edits done by me would be five to eight only. :* I believe that I'm the only Wikipedian who adds the reception section in Pakistan television articles like as I added in Breaking News, Gunaha (TV series), Ishq Murshid, Kabuli Pulao and Neem (TV series). No other user does this.Qwef1234 (talk) 11:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicated by declined request below, and in any event as stated behavioral evidence isn't the only basis for this block. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I often add th capital letter, and usually contains more symbols like comma, &, +, ± etc. While, the user mostly has the edit summaries which doesn't explain much about the ed
• The user has edited the cricket related and politics articles like Six-Day War, Israel–Hamas war and 2015 Pakistan Army Mil Mi-17 crash etc. I never edited these pages and the pages that range in such categories.
• This user reverts the edits usually, on average after every 20 edits like 1, 2 and 3. But, I have never reverted any edits by other user. Merely, the reverted edits done by me would be five to eight only.
• I believe that I'm the only Wikipedian who adds the reception section in Pakistan television articles like as I added in Breaking News, Gunaha (TV series), Ishq Murshid, Kabuli Pulao and Neem (TV series). No other user does this.

Qwef1234 (talk) 11:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwef1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a sock of any other account. I joined Wikipedia in September 2021, and using this account since then. You accused me because I have more edits related to Pakistani television, as the other sockpuppet. Just on the base of a common area of interest, you has blocked me. But you could see the clear differentiation between our areas of interest in the list of pages created by me and my edits, which include Old Pakistani cinema articles, some literature related edits and a few Hindi cinema edits as well. For further clarification, you could check our IP addresses. Qwef1234 (talk)

Decline reason:

This block is not just based on your editing behavior, but also on technical information. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kashif Nisar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanni.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see this a lot in check user blocks, "I believe that I was banned due to some misunderstanding." Not sure why. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

=== Differentiation ===

Alerts (8)

User talk:Qwef1234: Difference between revisions

User page

Talk

Unwatch

View history

Contributions

Edit

Browse history interactively

← Previous editNext edit →

Visual

Wikitext

Revision as of 11:50, 4 February 20242 DAYS AGO

Qwef1234

EXTENDED CONFIRMED USERS

7,541EDITS

→‎Blocked as a sockpuppet: Reply

== Blocked as a sockpuppet ==

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwef1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe that I was banned due to some misunderstanding. Please, clarify and confirm the technical reasons again. Along with the areas of interest (which could be confirmed from edit history and :* I often add the edit summary which never start from capital letter, and usually contains more symbols like comma, &, +, ± etc. While, the user mostly has the edit summaries which doesn't explain much about the edit like "add words" and "Fixed typo" (His F is always capital). :* The user has edited the cricket related and politics articles like Six-Day War, Israel–Hamas war and 2015 Pakistan Army Mil Mi-17 crash etc. I never edited these pages and the pages that range in such categories. :* This user (Nauman335) reverts the edits usually, on average after every 20 edits like 1, 2 and 3. But, I have never reverted any edits by other user. Merely, the reverted edits done by me would be five to eight only. :* I believe that I'm the only Wikipedian who adds the reception section in Pakistan television articles like as I added in Breaking News, Gunaha (TV series), Ishq Murshid, Kabuli Pulao and Neem (TV series). No other user does this.Qwef1234 (talk) 6:50 am, 4 February 2024, last Sunday (3 days ago) (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add topic Qwef1234 (talk) 12:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked due to some resemblance with the socks who have also the same articles of interest i.e. related to Pakistani television. I do edit articles realted to it but I also do edits on Pakistani cinema and had some edits in Urdu-literature as well. The User:CNMall41 is blocking many users just on the same areas of interest of theirs. Although, the reason of some technical aspects was also given, but it was not disclosed that which technicality the user had observed. More than one week has passed, and no solid evidence has been provided by th user that I'm a sock but he had suspected me on such weak bases.

I would do some things differently like I would increase the areas of my interest as I intend to create articles on places, literature and Indian cinema.

The constructive edits that I would make will be the expanding of filmography and careers of actors/ filmmakers with references and adding the reviews of the film and television productions (mainly of Pakistani origin) to a few.

I was blocked due to some resemblance with the socks who have also the same articles of interest i.e. related to Pakistani television. I do edit articles realted to it but I also do edits on Pakistani cinema and had some edits in Urdu-literature as well. The User:CNMall41 is blocking many users just on the same areas of interest of theirs. Although, the reason of some technical aspects was also given, but it was not disclosed that which technicality the user had observed. More than one week has passed, and no solid evidence has been provided by th user that I'm a sock but he had suspected me on such weak bases.

I would do some things differently like I would increase the areas of my interest as I intend to create articles on places, literature and Indian cinema.

The constructive edits that I would make will be the expanding of filmography and careers of actors/ filmmakers with references and adding the reviews of the film and television productions (mainly of Pakistani origin) to a few. Qwef1234 (talk) 06:14, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked due to some resemblance with the socks who have also the same articles of interest i.e. related to Pakistani television. I do edit articles realted to it but I also do edits on Pakistani cinema and had some edits in Urdu-literature as well. The User:CNMall41 is blocking many users just on the same areas of interest.

. Although, the reason of some technical aspects was also given, but it was not disclosed that which technicality the user had observed. More than one week has passed, and no solid evidence has been provided by th user that I'm a sock but he had suspected me on such weak bases. I would do some things differently like I would increase the areas of my interest as I intend to create articles on places, literature and Indian cinema. The constructive edits that I would make will be the expanding of filmography and careers of actors/ filmmakers with references and adding the reviews of the film and television productions (mainly of Pakistani origin) to a few. User:331dot please, review this case and do what is right. Qwef1234 (talk) 18:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My review of your earlier request puts an end to my involvement with this. You may make a new unblock request for someone else to review(you must format it as one or no one will see it). 331dot (talk) 19:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwef1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe that I must be unblocked because I'm not related to the mentioned user at all. All of my visual behaviour my edits summaries, areas of interest, approach to edit and added datas are different.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Qwef1234 (talk) Qwef1234 (talk) 15:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qwef1234. Thank you for your work on Jaan-e-Jahan. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwef1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe that I was blocked by some misunderstanding. I joined the Wikipedia in September 2021. I have no connection with the mentioned user (User:Nauman335, which one can clearly differentiate by comparing the style of editing and areas of interest. There is clear differentiation between the accounts mentioned in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nauman335 and my behaviour. Please, re-consider my case and unblock me so that I could contribute to Wikipedia. Qwef1234 (talk) 17:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. Please take your spam somewhere else. Talk page access revoked. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Qwef1234 (talk) 17:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aamna Malick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamna Malick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Baddua has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 20:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Idiot (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 20:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Working Women (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Working Women (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Idiot (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idiot (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Umer Naru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umer Naru until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Neem (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:College Gate.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baddua is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baddua until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 13:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evernew Pictures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evernew Pictures until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Taj Mahal (1968 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Aurat Aur Char Devari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this passes WP:GNG or WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:38, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Aurat Aur Char Devari.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aamna Malick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aamna Malick (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aina Asif is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aina Asif (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 01:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Khushhal Khan (actor), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikibear47 (talk) 15:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]