User talk:Plumoyr

Hello, Plumoyr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Darwinek (talk) 17:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Italy South Africa Locator.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While your series of articles on "Country X-Country Y" relations fill a useful niche in the project, would you mind not creating them until you have some content? At the moment many of them simply read "Country X-Country Y relations are relations between country X and country Y"; not very useful or informative. Ironholds (talk) 13:12, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that I used this big template in your User talk wall.

Can you hel me in this article? : People's Republic of China–Hungarian relations ? Thanks a lot ! --Tamás Kádár (talk) 18:54, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks your help! Where can I find the maps which was used by you People's Republic of China–Hungarian relations ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:China_Hungary_Locator.png ?

I would like to use pictures : for this articles:

--Tamás Kádár (talk) 09:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Denmark Israel Locator.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Hungary China Locator.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Hungary China Locator.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Q ^{T C} 00:56, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Denmark Israel Locator.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Italy–Switzerland relations you wrote:

Both countries are full members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, of the European Union and of NATO.

This is clearly wrong, Switzerland is not a member of the EU, and certainly not of NATO. I removed the phrase, be more careful in the future about this kind of mistakes.--Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (talk) 12:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, there is a discussion about your editing at WP:ANI. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed your article creating urge! However, I'm not sure the notability of these are really that big. Therefore, I'm going to nominate most of them for ANI. Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 18:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can you halt for a moment in creating all those international relationship articles? There's a discussion at WP:ANI#New_pages_relating_to_International_Relationships. Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 18:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Luxembourg-Serbia relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

See [1] and WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 18:35, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Greece-Jamaica relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

See [2] and WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 18:35, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Canada–Jamaica relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

See [3] and WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 18:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Canada–Panama relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

See [4] and WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 18:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Canada–Spain relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

See [5] and WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 18:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Canada–Norway relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

See [6] and WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 18:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Canada–Moldova relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

See [7] and WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 18:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Canada–Lithuania relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

See [8] and WP:N

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 18:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned about this before. Several users have noted that these articles, which stand no chance of being expanded to anything more than bare stubs, are probably not helpful to have at Wikipedia. To continue to create them over the objections of these many editors seems disruptive. Please see WP:ANI for a new discussion relating to your behavior. Be aware that this is the second such discussion. If you persist in creating these articles without the support or consensus of other editors, you may be blocked for being disruptive. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 19:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stemming from the discussion at ANI, I have proposed a number of the articles you created for deletion. See the few messages above for the relevant information, as its the same for each one. Grsz¹¹ 22:44, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 72 hours, for continuing the same type of editing that led to blocks under your other account Groubani. I have also blocked Groubani indefinitely as it is being used in violation of our sockpuppetry policy. If you wish to edit from Groubani, I will unblock that account and block this account indefinitely instead. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 22:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that he was creating some articles, some of which looked good, so I had created a few international relations stubs myself. I did not know that has been warned before and I will no longer create stubs if the said entries are systematically refused/deleted from Wikipedia. I am a conservationist however and I would probably not mind keeping them. ADM (talk) 23:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In general these articles aren't systematically deleted. It has been established in deletion discussions that many (maybe not all) are notable. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentina–Singapore relations.

That said, Plumoyr, you must do a better job of citing your sources for your articles, so the silly discussions about them needing deletion will go away. WilyD 00:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As already aluded to, and to respond to ADM's concerns, the issue is not in the creation of a international relations articles, where there are references to support a substantive article. If country A and country B have signed several bilateral treaties, been party to bilateral trade talks, have reports of working together on international issues, held summits together, then by all means, create the article. However, creating articles on every possible combination of two countries, without regard for actually researching or adding any substantive information to those articles, merely to have the complete set of every possible permutation of two countries, well that is not helpful. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Simply creating articles, because one can, without regard for actually having substantive, referenced information to fill that article with is the definition of indiscriminate. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Few if any of the articles created have been shown to be non-notable. Many have been shown to be notable. And I see no allegations that any of the information is unverfiable. There simply isn't a problem here, and I'm puzzled at the number of editors who seem interested in persecuting Plumoyr. WilyD 01:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, its not about the individual articles themselves. Finding one or two or five that may or may not have reliable references is moot. Its the action of creating a plethora of articles indiscriminately, that is without regard for whether or not substantive information exists in the real world to add to the article. The proper method of creating articles is 1) find references 2) create article with those references. This method seems to be 1) pick 2 random countries 2) create an article about their relations 3) rinse and repeat. So far no evidence has been presented that there is any intent on expanding these articles, or indeed whether or not it may actually be possible to ever expand these articles, and the entire enterprise seems to be about saying I can do this because I feel like it and you cannot stop me. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Luxembourg–Serbia relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nick-D (talk) 05:06, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In your series or articles on diplomacy, are the two countries always in alphabetical order? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 09:40, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Canada–Mongolia relations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canada–Mongolia relations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nick-D (talk) 05:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ireland–Zambia relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non-notable topic

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Yilloslime ^T_C 00:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article you created: Morocco–Ukraine relations may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morocco–Ukraine relations.

The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}:

Find sources for Morocco–Ukraine relations: google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

1. List the page on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.

2. At any time, you can ask any administrator to move your article to a special page. (Called userfication)

3. You can request a mentor to help you: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.

4. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. These acronyms don't need to intimidate you. Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: Deletion debate acronyms, which will help you argue that the article should be kept.

If your page is deleted, you also have many options available. Good luck! Ikip (talk) 17:37, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good work or creation of some of the international relations articles. While most are getting deleted, that is only because a group of deletionists band together to destroy stuff. Fight the machine! 65.121.141.34 (talk) 18:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Greece-Kyrgyzstan relations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greece-Kyrgyzstan relations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Stifle (talk) 09:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Croatia – New Zealand relations. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatia – New Zealand relations. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:41, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Iceland–Latvia relations. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iceland–Latvia relations. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Georgia–Spain relations. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia–Spain relations. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Malta–Pakistan relations. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malta–Pakistan relations (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Croatia–Lebanon relations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatia–Lebanon relations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drawn Some (talk) 13:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Israel–Kenya relations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israel–Kenya relations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 02:08, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Iceland–Latvia relations, Belarus–Croatia relations. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iceland–Latvia relations (2nd nomination) for Iceland–Latvia relations, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarus–Croatia relations (2nd nomination) for Belarus–Croatia relations. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Denmark – New Zealand relations. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denmark – New Zealand relations (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Afghanistan Croatia Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:35, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Afghanistan Czech Republic Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Afghanistan Estonia Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Afghanistan Hungary Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Algeria Bulgaria Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Algeria Croatia Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Angola Bulgaria Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:05, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Armenia Ireland Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:10, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Armenia Slovakia Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 14:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Armenia South Africa Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 14:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Armenia Turkmenistan Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Australia Luxembourg Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Czech Republic–Libya relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Czech Republic–Libya relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C679 13:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Denmark Tunisia Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:10, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Georgia Spain Locator.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Plumoyr,

Thank you for creating Italy–Netherlands relations.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, this article needs some references and would benefit from an expansion - I also wonder why it mentions the Italian consulate in Maracaibo, a city in Venezuela (is it because of the proximity to the Dutch Caribbean? Whatever the reason, it should be explained)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kingsif}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kingsif (talk) 19:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Plumoyr

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dclemens1971, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Italy–Montenegro relations, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Italy–Montenegro relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italy–Montenegro relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]