User talk:Photoloop

Hello, Photoloop! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! DThomsen8 (talk) 13:30, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply] Thank you. I do need help so I can do a better job, but in the past 3-4 weeks since your message, I've been trying to fix a problem that is destroying my business - and I'm not doing well at all. I will be back. Photoloop (talk) 10:59, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philip Kapneck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 14:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Photoloop, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 14:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philip Kapneck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 11:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Philip Kapneck, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- Thank you HasteurBot I'm having trouble getting the original documents I've been waiting for - official letters from the state of Maryland. Someone is working on it and they say I could get them this month. These letters are official appointment letters. The subject of the entry stayed away from the media throughout his 40 year tenure, so that is why there is almost nothing in the media about him, that I can find, especially online. I will make an edit to the page today, if I can, and follow up on the official documents to get a status in the coming week.

Hello, Photoloop. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Philip Kapneck".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 10:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Photoloop. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Philip Kapneck".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Philip Kapneck, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Philip Kapneck, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Photoloop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philip Kapneck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 18:59, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads more like a eulogy of the person with all the glowing praise statements from the companies that worked with him. This needs to be more neutral and cite the more objective/neutral news sources. You could have an Awards and recognition section if he was given any notable formal awards for his service.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philip Kapneck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Philip Kapneck, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:28, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Photoloop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philip Kapneck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:25, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Photoloop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philip Kapneck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Photoloop/Kathleen Lawrence and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Photoloop/Kathleen Lawrence, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Photoloop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kathleen Lawrence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 07:26, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shlomo Rechnitz. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TransporterMan (TALK) 19:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:TransporterMan for looking at my dispute with Smntstatus over Shlomo Rechnitz page. I never wanted to go to war, but he seems intent on harming the subject of the page. I didn't see that as war, because I wrote reasons for my actions, but if that is the Wikipedia definition of war, thank you for educating me.

After my initial deletion and his undo, I put my intentions in the Talk page. I said I would work one paragraph at a time. He did not respond, so I did a paragraph deletion. He had no comeback on that because the man was never mentioned in the lawsuit or the sources for what he wrote and it wasn't about him, it was about a company and other people. So I did the next one and that is the one we are going back and forth on. I believed his arguments did not stand up to scrutiny.

Smntstatus personally added ALL of the negative content about the Brius company that is partly owned by the page subject - and companies that entity owns. So Smntstatus defends all of his own biased text. He wrote that he suspected I was being paid to undo it but I am not. He did that of course because he wanted to make me afraid to do anything, but I am nearly 70 and not scared by people trying to trash me so they can get me to go away - cancel culture does not work on me - unless I am kicked off Wikipedia and I will try not to do something that warrants it. He is a good writer and has mostly written this entry in a way that it looks reasonable, but I am an editor and I am used to reviewing and investigating written work. After looking at his previous work, I think I understand his motivation, but I didn't want to say it and start a war. All I wanted was to have others look at this entry and tell me whether it is allowed to libel a person for things done by administrators or others in companies owned by the company, or things that were allegations subsequently proven untrue by state audits. There is a lot more, but I am trying to unpick the junk he put in there, one piece at a time. I originally wanted to delete that whole section because it is about companies not the man. I have been using Wikipedia since it started, but I am not an expert editor here and I don't know much about the protocols and procedures. What I do know is that I've trusted Wikipedia in my research and it is not the place to damage people because you don't like them or their opinions (I believe that's what is going on here). The Controversies section contains two subsections - the company and religion. I believe that is at the heart of why this is being done to the man. I may be wrong, of course, but it looks fairly obvious to me, after researching it.

At the top of the Shlomo Rechnitz page it says this: "It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view."

The current state of that page is anything but a neutral POV. It is basically a hit-job lifted straight out of a website that was set up to attack the man and his management company. I want to correct that.

Is the company part of the Controversies section valid in this page? Is my position on this wrong? (i'm not asking you to side with me against him, I'm just asking for a third opinion.)

Hello, Photoloop. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kathleen Lawrence (scholar), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Napolitano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Voice. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Photoloop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philip Kapneck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:16, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Photoloop. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Philip Kapneck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:20, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Photoloop,

I believe that this article has been restored five times already. There is a limit to how many times a deleted draft article will be restored and I think you have reached that limit. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Liz, I've been distracted by other things going wrong. I know life wasn't meant to be easy, but life gets in the way of doing things!.

Philip Kapneck passed away before I cound get all of the information I wanted, so it has been hard trying to get more information.

Can you please give me one more shot at it? Photoloop (talk) 22:34, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]