User talk:Pgk/archive1

Welcome to the Wikipedia

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

• M:Foundation issues
• Wikipedia:Tutorial
• Wikipedia:Cleanup resources
• Wikipedia:Help desk
• Wikipedia:Five pillars

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be bold!

User:Sam Spade

frbarba 23:09, 2 February 2006 (UTC)i just thought the characters Bloodpack deserve more information since its part of the movie Blade =/[reply]

thanx,i dont know wat a admin does anyway.but please dont block me.--Jayanthv86 14:59, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

I need your help clearing my name! My IP is shared by my school's computers/internet as well, and some kids (I think one of them, Paul Cleverly, is in my grade) went on wikipedia and vandalized a page, I think it was Renaissance. He trolled it by adding remarks and all sorts of things about his friends and whatever, and when I went on the page (The renaissance is our current project in Music and Language Arts so we were reading the page) and so I get on the page and I see "New Messages", and I click, and there are WARNINGS! I was confused! I couldn't even edit pages on my Log-in account to fix spelling errors and whatnot.

I just want to let you know as one of the moderators who had cleared the vandalism caused by those jerks that I would never do something like that and I hope you understand that this IP is shared unfortunately, so please don't ban it!

Thank you so, so much for understanding! --24.128.43.180 00:53, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm new. Umm... Is it just me or does this look like a chat page for teens?? My username is Cmputer.I haven't made a user page yet, though.

It's normal to add new entries to the top of talk pages, and as for a chat page for teens, doesn't seem much chat to me and unfortunatley I left my teens many years ago. Also you should sign your messages with ~~~~ which will fill in your signature and a timestamp. Thanks --pgk^(talk) 12:44, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

hi...

i was jus experimenting wid tht page on red-black trees.... m extremely sorry for that......

this will not happen again!!!!

ravi

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for the timely revert! --Dvyost 20:21, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is not vandalism, I just moved TMNT 1987 Episode 6: Splinter No More to TMNT 1987 Episode 15: Splinter No More, where it belongs. Splinter no more is episode number 15. Maybe it should be a redirect, but I don't think so.

(81.233.220.208)

This is to advise you that a Request for Arbitration has been filed against you by an anonymous user, who seems unable or unwilling to inform you themselves. The details can be found at WP:Arb#67.177.35.25_vs.__Fvw.2C__Pgk.2C__Exabit.2C__Kebron.2C__Lulu_of_the_Lotus-Eaters.2C_Mjpieters.2C_and__Redwolf24. Rob Church ^{Talk | FAD} 22:08, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for welcome message. I am not a vandal. I have been around awhile and am trying to learn the ropes. I was using cryto-derks vandal fighter and saw that someone had erased the do not erase text in the top of the sandbox and replaced it with "super cool" (I think that was the text). If I left the warning in the wrong place I am sorry. I have reverted quite a bit of vandalism but never of the sandbox before. I have a user account but I keep getting logged out which causes only my ip to show. Can be frustrating.-71.28.243.246 16:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It was vandalism.

Thank you for catching the vandalism to my user page! I guess I don't make a lot of friends on RC Patrol among the anon users. :) Best regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 17:00, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my talk page. Like Chairboy said, the anon vandals dont like me very much. Jobe6 19:38, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Me too! thanks for being so quick! how stressful... --Kewp (t) 12:35, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, just returning the favour, either historic or future!! --pgk^(talk) 12:36, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support on my RfA, and for your patience in answering my questions in IRC. Sincerely appreciated. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 15:47, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thank you for reverting edits to Bolton Wanderers F.C., My userpage was also Vandalised. Can ask for some assistance in combating the constant vandalising my userpage gets? Again, thank you for your assistance with Bolton Wanderers F.C. - Bwfc 20:46, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think the anonymous editor you just reverted was on to something. These two rulers are one and the same person, and the two articles seem to be identical. One should be a redirect to the other. I would choose Pedro I of Brazil as the main article and Pedro IV of Portugal as a redir, but I'll leave the decision to your best judgment. Owen× ☎ 17:23, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I noticed that when following up on the user, Edit Summaries, great aren't they. Personally I've no view, the article seems to suggest that it was a short period as IV of Portugal, so I guess it's a Political disctinction which away around it should be. Something I don't want to be in the middle of! I'll ignore it for now and tidy up later --pgk^(talk) 17:27, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA. I never thought I would get so much support! Thanks to your help, my nomination was the 10th most supported RfA in Wikipedia history. Now, please keep an eye out on me while I learn the new tools, ok? Thanks again! Titoxd^(?!?) 17:48, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for removing the vandalism on my talk page --☺Adam1213☺ Talk+|WWW 08:44, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Suspect this is the same user as banned User: NAKEDNED. Likes to vandalize the same articles. —Gaff ^ταλκ 20:59, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your strong resolve to counter vandalism and make Wikipedia a better place, please accept this Barnstar of Reversion for your great efforts. Hall Monitor 18:33, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

i will not vandalise anymore

70.121.33.237 21:28, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your clear explanation of your reasoning. After reading the Wikipedia rules more throughly, I deduct that your logic and actions were correct. I will take more care in the future, and attempt to contribute more meaningful content, while ensuring that any external links I place are fully relevant. --68.186.126.216 20:16, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Has just vandalised the George W. Bush page. Chooserr

Man - you're fast! Thanks for the revert. --AStanhope 23:38, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My editing of the Iaq article is not vandalism! I enhanced the acuracy of some facts regarding the recvent occupation of Iraq, by labbeling that information as "vandalism" damages the integrety of the term "vanadalism" and is giving wikipedia a non-neutral stance. I take great offence at your calling of the material "nonsense", you are certainly the vandal in this instance! GeorgeBuchanan

Since this goes back a few weeks I had to look for it, and found it here The internationally recognised president of Iraq is not Saddam Hussein, regardless of if that has been done fairly or otherwise. Similarly elections were held and the transitional government selected, if that is "imposed" would be a matter of point of view, please see WP:NPOV so was inappropriate content, though I would agree not necessarily nonsense. --pgk^(talk) 20:42, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:AIV and WP:VIP#IP_Severe --LBMixPro^{(Speak on it!)}

Okay. I forgot to add my four tildes. But as I said before, he's been already warned lots of times already, and it's blatanly obvious the's out to attack that article. I would put a {{test4}} template on, but I'd leave that to a sysop with page protection. --LBMixPro^{(Speak on it!)} 07:16, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That was quick. I hope he doesn't switch IPs and go at it again. After all it's been like that in rapid succession for a while now, with 3 different IPs. --LBMixPro^{(Speak on it!)} 07:23, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So there's an actual "WikiProject" (for lack of better word) that deals in fighting vandalism? That's awesome. I'ma join it. But I'll keep an eye out for the Tila article though. --LBMixPro^{(Speak on it!)} 07:36, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to let you know that I'm nominated at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Lbmixpro to help prevent issues like the Tila article. If you have the time, could you place a vote? Thanks. --LBMixPro^{<Speak|on|it!>} 01:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Likewise: I tried to remove the user's request from WP:AIV only to discover you'd beaten me to it… :-) --RobertG ♬ talk 18:09, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FireFox 18:12, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Very much for your kind support of my adminship. I'll do my best to live up to your and my other supporters' expectations. If you have any comments or concerns on my actions as an administrator, please let me know. Thank you! — MC MasterChef :: Leave a tip — 14:33, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I blocked for a week this time: blatant, nasty vandalism, sneaky edit summary, being lied to. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 21:29, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for supporting my RfA. It recently closed with final tally of 51/1/2. I sincerely appreciate it and I hope I can live up to your expectations. I will try my best to be a good administrator. If you ever need anything, just let me know. Thanks! -- Psy guy (talk) 05:44, 12 November 2005 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my first article. BreakDancingP 18:36, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your strong resolve to counter vandalism and make Wikipedia a better place! {... copied but true!} (COEBA discussion page vandalism) Strbenjr 19:18, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No BJAODN? I'll have to try harder.

I agree that we should not advertise RFAs in the topic. Anyone who's going to pass RFA is probably going to pass without much campaigning at all anyway. :) --Phroziac^(talk) 14:45, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry- didn't realize how far back the vandalism went. Thanks for catching it. Kaisershatner 19:25, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An anonymous user you warned today, has today twice vandalised the Demeter article. It is user 142.22.16.56. The user had been warned many times, for other articles: User_talk:142.22.16.56. For your information. Thanks. -- Wikiklrsc 02:58, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

this is a school ip

Thanks for supporting me for adminship. The RfA passed today. I look forward to working with you to make Wikipedia a better place. --Nlu 03:52, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Crystalcherry has been recreated, I believe it lacks notability as per the previous AfD. I got involved in this when User:Cherryrain went "Opps", twice on Avril Lavigne and then requested my assistance after I reverted. I suspect this user has been biten/slighted by the AfD, and is not acting entirely in good faith. Cherryrain mentioned User:Drini's agreement for a rewrite; I'm not optimistic that will be sufficient to satisfy all users involved in this issue. (suggest replies/discussion should be directed to Talk:Crystalcherry) (CC'd to multiple users) - RoyBoy ⁸⁰⁰ 05:59, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find any information on the talk page about Merkeys ties with the DEA. What were you refering to in your comments.

Also,

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Regarding Merkey page. 24.119.59.202 17:34, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As noted on your talk page, the removal of your edits is not vandalism, you are putting material which fails to meet the basic wikipedia policies on the page. You won't find any material on the talk page about Merkey's ties with the DEA since as far as I can find he has none. I've listed this on the article talk page also. --pgk^(talk) 17:43, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have busted some vandals on the Wootton article, I thought you might want to see this comment I left on Wootton's talk page. There has been a lot of vandalism done to Wootton's article and I don't know what to do. Any help you can give is excellent! Thanks. — MATHWIZ2020 ^{TALK | CONTRIBS} 23:17, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your support on my RfA. They promoted me and I have you partly to thank for that. Let em know if you need anything and I'll do what I can to help out. Thanks Again!--MONGO 08:49, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my User Talk page. Glad you caught that... I appreciate it.  :-) eo 21:26, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeesh. Sorry, yes, I'm fixing it now. Rob Church ^Talk 20:37, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, The user 80.89.82.11 is back, adding more vandalism. I think it is time to block (24hrs has not passed) --Master Jay 22:02, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I was just wondering why you have nothing really on your user page.

--Adam1213 Talk + 07:02, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to thank you for your support of my RfA. As I wrote, I was looking forward to feedback from the community, and I would like to let you know that you should please feel free to leave any further feedback for me you may have for me in the future at my Talk page. Thanks again. Jkelly 08:59, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

the vandalism on your user page gets removed anyway. You could just do something basic. I recommend adding <big><big><big>Under construction </big></big></big> or something to your user page

--Adam1213 Talk + 06:28, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your support of my RfA. Thanks, in part, to you, I am now an Administrator, and I pledge to use my newfound powers for good rather than evil. Thanks again!--Sean|Black 07:25, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The vandalism of the Science studies page was my first experience with this type of behavior... the fact that you were there to revert the damage within minutes gives me confidence that it's worth the effort to contribute to Wikipedia. Regards Bryan 14:52, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry about that. If you check Eddie's contributions related to IP tracing, you'll see what I mean. Thanks again!Gator (talk) 21:21, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I just reverted another edit by 24.245.22.221 and noticed you have 3 already. You may know and if you do disregard this but just wanted you to know that 3 is we can in 24 hours cause I am not sure if it is vandalism (don't think it is)(saw it on CDVF). --Dakota ^{t e} 18:15, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. JeremyA 22:53, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thats odd, thanks for telling me, I'll look into it.

Prodego^talk 15:55, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

see user:Pgk`. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 19:02, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Same guy 64.175.127.121 (talk · contribs) still vandalizing but under a registered username, Outdaback (talk · contribs) [2]. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 19:50, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thx a lot for reverting my user page! Olorin28 21:31, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pgk!

You gave me a message a couple of days ago with respect to my editing. Thanks for that.

I'm writing to you to ask you for some help on an article - "Sea of Japan naming dispute". Another administrator, Woohookitty, has been coming in, but I have some differences with him.

I thought that you could introduce introduce some thoughts on a way to resolve the current 'discussion' going on at that site.

Would you mind?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks

Cleric71Cleric71 09:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I write this because I saw User:Cleric71 asked for your help on this page. Just in case you decide to get involved, here is what happened so far:

User:Cleric71 showed up and moved the pages Sea of Japan and Sea of Japan naming dispute (repeatedly after reverts) in favor of the Korean minority position (details in the second article). While of course the Korean minority position is respected here on Wikipedia, it remains a minority position until the United Nations will act on their behalf. Well, the moves were reverted and the user was banned. The ban was lifted again to give him another chance, as the ban was too hard on a newbie. Now he tries to win support for his cause on the talk page, but so far everybody is against him. -- Mkill 00:10, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Although my RfA is not over yet, I figured that since so many people voted before it had been posted, I may as well start thanking people before it wraps up. It'll take me that long to thank everyone who voted anyway! Thank you, Pgk, for your support - I'll do my best as an admin to make the reality rise to the level of the dream. BD2412 T 17:33, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I happened to be looking at an article in the Wikipedia when a “You have new messages” message for 199.46.200.238 (talk · contribs)popped up. I was not logged in at that moment, so I saw the message. I am logged now, for purposes of sending you this message. You should be aware the the given IP is a proxy server for the Raytheon Company in Southern California, so there are thousands of users coming through this IP. The company has at least eight gateways, which are, I think, similar IP addresses with the last three numbers 231–238. ◎DanMS 21:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you just reverted vandalism on George W. Bush, and wondered what you thought about the proposals to curb what's going on there. If you have time, check out Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy, and weigh in (there's a bit of a large discussion page, so be prepared.) Hope to see you there. -Mysekurity^{(have you seen this?)} 20:37, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Try and block me. I've got enough IPs. And seriously, why the fuck did Hugo Chavez need to be the Article of the day? Who really cares about this commie POS?

Thanks for reverting the vandalism caused by User:Mockasta. Noelle De Guzman 18:22, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mandan hunter with buffalo skull.JPG

Thanks for your work reverting the vandals on Mandan while it was on the mainpage yesterday! *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 20:03, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Gay vandal you're fighting off has taken to vandalising your user page. Keep your eye on it.

Cheers. Tom Lillis 10:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I must admit my vandalism of an image to someone. I replaced User:Puttyman's goatse pic (Image:Hello.jpg) with a birthday cake. :( --Syrthiss 13:33, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Naughty --pgk^(talk) 13:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The bits at the bottom of both pages:

The whole song is a play on German wedding vows (Wollt Ihr einander lieben und achten und die Treue halten, bis dass der Tod euch scheide? - Do you want to love and respect each other and to remain faithful, until death separates you?). Instead of answering with "Ja" (yes), the singer says "Nein" (no) , finally answering the question he said "nothing" to in the beginning.

If the line "Tod, der scheide" is read as "Tod der Scheide", it means "until the death of the vagina" and not "until death, which would separate". This is another example of Rammstein's play-on-words.

Then why won't you remove Kade's comment? It's about as constructive as mine was.

Thanks a lot for your support on my request for adminship; it passed with 23/0/0 (plus one duplicate support and an oppose from a vandal IP). I'll do my best to exceed everyone's expectations. ^^ // Pathoschild 19:48, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pgk: Thanks for warning that Magic vandal with test4, but bv basically does the same thing: warns for the first and last time. If you see bv or test4, feel free to block (or report it at Vandalism in Progress) for any further vandalism. -Mysekurity^{(have you seen this?)} 20:53, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Pgk! I want to thank you for voting to support me in my RfA. I know I'm very late thanking you, but I've been a bit caught up with college work. I hope I'll live up to the expectations of those who voted for me. Please don't hesitate to let me know if you ever have a problem with any admin action I carry out. Thanks again. Cheers. AnnH ^(talk) 18:13, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. Good to know that the RC patrollers are on the job! :) howcheng [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149; e ] 17:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked the IP address you requested.--File Éireann 23:06, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your support during my RfA – following a 30/0/0 vote I’ve now been made an admin. Do have a Jaffa Cake! Cheers, CLW 13:58, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You caught that nicely! :-) --SarekOfVulcan 19:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How it is possible that people can open user accounts and vandalize pages under numerous names? Couldn't sysops just trace the IP address from any username, and therefore block the IP address completely if this IP is the source of sockpuppets? Just wondering. --Jay (Reply) 21:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC) here.[reply]

Hi Pgk,

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! :)

- Cheers, Mailer Diablo 03:39, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for supporting my RFA, which passed by a margin of 64-2. I hope to use my powers for good rather than evil. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 06:35, Dec. 17, 2005

I was just making in better, sorry 71.57.164.247 16:26, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can you block 195.93.21.101? She/he/they appear to be on a bit of a vandalizing spree. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:26, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see that User:ITAPEVI didn't like that I warned him about his vandalism. Thanks for fixing my user page that he vandalized. --rogerd 19:58, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

When I need a death-ray. Well, thanks for cleaning up, including my user page! Melchoir 21:39, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try other clocks and see if I can get those working, then. Thanks. // Pathoschild 01:50, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage!

FireFox 16:42, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page!

FireFox 16:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't dream of editing your user page. Kindly refrain from doing so to mine. deeceevoice 20:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Pgk! Thanks for your support on my RfA. The final outcome was an unanimous (45/0/0), so I am now an administrator. If you need help, or have a question, please don't hesitate to let me know! Again, thanks! :D --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:37, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think I killed it... I told it to speak and then it excessed-flooded. Any chance of you restarting it (in both en-vandalism and especially en-cvu, where I can give it extra attention!) :-) Dan100 (Talk) 12:30, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PS love the curly brackets!

I think they're a bit garish, myself. 10% ornamentation is a ridiculous ratio. ;) // Pathoschild 14:37, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks pgk! Dan100 (Talk) 15:35, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

When both is made to talk in two channels at once, it excess flood consistently, so I moved it to en-cvu as not to interfere with coolcat's bot (it still excess flood when several triggers happen quickly, but ... that an't be avoided) -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 17:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway you can just block the guy vandalizing the Singapore page? Thanks--Looper5920 11:32, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I've semi-protected Singapore. Only non-new logged in users can edit the article for now. -- Fuzheado | Talk 11:52, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.. thanks for reverting a vandal attack on User page... because of your quick reaction, I haven't even noticed it was vandalized until now (it happend on 21. November) :) -- Obradović Goran (ta^lk 15:45, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For last year's words belong to last year's language

And next year's words await another voice.

And to make an end is to make a beginning.

T.S. Eliot, "Little Gidding"

Happy New Year! ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 20:24, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Someone told me to ask you if you could program your bot to detect Vanity entries? They said you're programming it for word content and well, reply to my user talk page. Thanks. --Shultz 03:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. That's what happened. The block created a xerox of itself. :) Yeah, I'll look into it. --Durin 21:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the administrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the Main Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new administrators' how-to guide helpful. Cheers! -- Cecropia 01:11, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey let me be the first to offer my congratulations. Good job! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 01:18, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you're first, I'm second. I'm glad to see you made it. I was rooting for you!--ViolinGirl^♪ 01:39, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congragulations, a final outcome of 80/3/0! That makes my 55/1/1 look petty in comparison ;-) Izehar 11:15, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats Pgk! I'm sure you will rise to the challenge, and won't be dissapointing anybody! Cheers Banes 11:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, and you're very welcome! --King of All the Franks 12:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck! Ian¹³_ID:540053 13:16, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats and good luck! --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 15:40, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Congratulaions and good luck.--Dakota ~ ε 16:34, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, man! Have fun with your shiny new admin powers! ^_^ Mo0[talk] 17:29, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on your adminship, you're welcome! ComputerJoe 13:49, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Add my congratulations to the list. Well deserved. --GraemeL ^(talk) 14:52, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome and congrats. PJM 15:21, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Congratulaions and good luck.--Dakota ~ ε 16:36, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on adminship! -- Jbamb 23:04, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations and good luck — TheKMan^talk 02:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to support. I only support those who I feel deserve it. Your final score says it all. (80 supports, wow!). Congradulations! -- §Hurricane ERIC§ archive -- my dropsonde 21:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hello Pgk,

you helped revert a change by the user above on the article South Tyrol. the user keeps pushing his POV, the edits had to be reverted at least four times in the last 24 hours [3], which amounts in IMO to a violation of the Three-revert rule. is there any proper procedure as to what to do next, do you have any advice, ideas...? with kind regards Gryffindor 23:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

== concerning User:Gryffindor == and Trentino-South_Tyrol

hello pgk,

i read an invitation you made for having a vote on Trentino-South Tyrol and South Tyrol. I've since seen that User:Gryffindor has canceled the vote on Trentino-South Tyrol, but its ironic isn't it that he made a move a few months ago with no vote. Now he takes control, cancels the new votes. Even on the South Tyrol vote, the user Nightstallion is already dictating how -he- will count votes. As an admin, please take control of this situation. The User:Gryffindor and many Austrian/German Nationalists are turning WP into a farse. Its about learning, now about pushing political agendas. Rossifumi-gp 08:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And this user, by whatever name he currently goes, is massively sockpuppeting. Any way to deal with that, apart from striking out sockpuppet votes in the RM discussion? —Nightstallion (?) 08:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? This is my one and only account. sockpuppeting, eh? Is this what you all did on previous votes. Interesting method. Funny how you show up. Why don't you explain how you have stated on another page that you will dictate how decisions are made. Is this how WP is run now? I've seen logs where Gryffindor moved pages with -no- vote. Address this if you will instead of making personal attacks and accusations. Rossifumi-gp 08:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove this user from the vandalism list? S/he has vandalised several articles today, has had many warning, and been blocked quite a few times in the recent past. ---Benne ['bɛnə] _(talk) 21:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was just annoyed at the number of times the user had vandalized in such a short span of time (with no end in sight...), especially considering that users kept reverting it. I do in fact usually start off with a test1 or 2. My bad. Comics 17:02, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was creating a page for my admin vote, I was just thinking what to say, please check before you delete my nomination! Now it looks as if I am spamming the page entering it again. Thanks -- User:Dueyfinster 20:48, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my bad. I forgot to actually give him a block warning. I wasn't going to clear the stuff from my page until he'd stopped as it would save doing it multiple times. Ben W Bell 09:25, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I find it frustrating sometimes that I can spend ages chasing vandals around Wikipedia reverting their edits. Thank you for the block, all I can do it report them. Ben W Bell

Many thanks for your help. I have to close for a bit.-- Op. Deo 13:10, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the discussion on the Cfd page, I would ask you to reconsider your vote. Cool Cat acted unilaterally and beyond his authority, without any kind of discussion or even a comment to those of us who are members of CVU. Please also see the discussion on the CVU Talk page. I appreciate your time. --nihon 08:43, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a policy for handling this sort of thing? OhnoitsJamie 18:11, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That wasnt me who did that. That was one of my friends.

User:Fighterforfreedom did leave a comment at the bottom of the page. Scroll down to see it. WP:NPA block may be warranted. Jkelly 19:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I unblocked them both and reblocked them so that should take care of that. howcheng {chat} 19:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

real cute first you block then you vandalize my comments. do it agan and i will report you, pov pusher. Extc

• Your edits were vandalising a consensus notice, which you have been warned about and have since done again. Additionally I didn't block you someone else did. --pgk^(talk) 21:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage!

Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 21:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Btw. If you'd like to opine at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters, I could use some support in a close vote (with many opponents drawn from a political agenda not so much different from my vandal's).

I just completely redid the access lists on #vandalism2...as your bot is somewhat affected by channel access masks, please review the new list and see if there are any that are out of line, also feel free to add more as needed. Thanks, xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 03:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ,thanks for opening my eyes.I am such a loser,I dont even know what a admin does and i have nominated myself.from now on,i will leave edit summaries.I am barely two months old in wiki and i was audacious enough to ask for adminship.Sorry for wasting your time.--Jayanthv86 15:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please don't revert Something in pywiki spacepadded to 500 chars on some articles leaving files of 40-100K. I'm getting them back via a 2-step process of first replacing 64 spaces with QQ and then replacing that. Thanks for checking ! Dlyons493 Talk 21:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for catching and correcting GMaxwell's vandalism in my workshop! Chris 21:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A page you have recently edited, User:EdvonSchleck/Bilder, has been nominated for deletion. Please feel free to discuss this matter at It's MfD entry here. Thank you, xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 22:18, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do any of those edits/vandalizings I am accused of! I swear! I'd never do it, this is not in my interest anyway! Purple Rose 10:01, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Has something happened to this page so that we may no longer edit it? --Bob 20:10, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see any sort of protection on the page, are you getting a problem? --pgk^(talk) 20:20, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, It is the only page where I don't seem to be able to get an edit box when clicking on edit. It tells me that I can edit, but no edit box shows up. I have cleared the caché from my system and cookies as well. It doesn't seem to be a problem from my end. Also, the user bars at the top right and left are also missing. Any help would be appreciated. --Bob 20:28, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for catching the vandal who blanked out this article! — ArkansasTraveler 18:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

01. You can't delete evidence
02. You must take legal responsibility for libel and censorship
03. You should understand the following sentence in English : if justice is a threat for you, then what is lack of justice ?

IN DELETING INCONVENIENT USER PAGES YOU TAKE PERSONAL LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR LIBEL AND CENSORSHIP!

Storm clouds ...	and silver linings	Thank you for your support on my RfA.
		Unfortunately, it failed to reach consensus. Nonetheless, it proved an opportunity to establish contacts and cooperation with many supportive editors, which will be beneficial to editing Wikipedia in the future. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters (t @)

Hey, Pgk, great job with reporting vandals to WP:AIV. I just wanted to let you know that if you find an account that you reported to WP:AIV is blocked, could you wait a few minutes, and then remove it if the blocking admin doesn't do it first? I ran into some strange problems with the article history when I tried to remove the four IP reports for IPs that I blocked because other folks removed those reports first. I wanted to save some time having to remove reports one by one, and instead remove them all at once. :-) Thanks, --Deathphoenix 18:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

so, wen someone rewrites an article so that killing children is 'not murder' and 'self defense', i guess thats ok. but using a swear word, holy god! better crack down!

actions like yours are destroying wikipedia.

i edited that article in the past, in fact, i have written/edited dozens of articles, (not all under this IP) and often when i write something that are merely facts that make the subject look bad, i come back later and find my edits have been deleted.

noone has lifted a finger to protect the truth in these situations.

apparently it is acceptable to silently sprinkle lies and garbage all over wikipedia, as long as you dont cuss about it. but if you try to write something true, and add the f bomb or two, you get instantly censored within mere seconds.

theres nothing neutral about that. its called protecting the status quo under a misleading guise of neutrality.

Yes but consider the people editing the page or looking at the diff. I made this to "ease their eyes".

• No Template: —This user has left wikipedia 11:48 2006-01-28

• W/ Template: —This user has left wikipedia 11:48 2006-01-28

This page is 61 kilobytes long. This may be longer than is preferable. --GraemeL ^(talk) 17:11, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandal from my use page--Ugur Basak 15:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Thanks, Pgk! fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 00:43, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The block is slightly broken, since you appear to have blocked for 3 hours and then indefinite with no unblock inbetween, as normal the shorter takes effect... --pgk^(talk) 21:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The three hour block was a slip of the mouse, I did mean indefinite. Does the greater block not just "cancel out" the 3 hour one? -- user:zanimum

Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 16:28, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
please send your ssh-public-key and your favoured accountname to kate and you will have an toolserveraccount soon. Welcome :-). --DaB.

P.S: Perhaps you can speak with nl:User:Gebruiker:WebBoy, which will build a simular tool. --DaB.

For your kind support of my Rfa, which passed. If you should ever have any complaints about my admin actions, please let me know. Also, should you ever need my help with anything, please do not hesitate to ask! Thanks again! All the best Banez 17:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

frbarba 23:41, 2 February 2006 (UTC) i just thought the characters Bloodpack deserve more information since its part of the movie Blade =/[reply]

Hey, thanks for your vote on my RfA. Despite the fact it was negative, I have gained feedback from it - and I appreciate that. Later. ComputerJoe 21:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pgk, I was wondering if you could semi-protect the article Muslim from furthur vandalism. — Moe ε 15:41, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you deleted a diatribe by EffK from a talk page. (Did you understand what he was saying? If so, could you summarize it for me?) Welcome to what EffK does. Maybe within a week, things will change. Robert McClenon 16:29, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. I was more or less being sarcastic when I asked if you could summarize. EffK is not happy with his dealings with the ArbCom, or with the Catholic Church for its role with the Nazi Party, or with me, or with Str1977. I have not been happy with EffK's disruptive behavior. Do you say that you blocked an IP address that he was using? Since he has not been banned yet, why was he using an IP address? Are you an admin? Do you think that his recent behavior, which is apparently attempting to destroy the ArbCom record, is sufficiently disruptive to warrant a block? Robert McClenon 19:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You say that bulk removal of content is considered disruptive and warrants a block. Thank you. I think that EffK's whole use of Wikipedia has been disruptive. It appears that the ArbCom agrees with me. Robert McClenon 19:29, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Waya sahoni 19:18, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to your post, sorry for the delay. Check it out. Your bot basicaly does everything mine does (kinda). Anything I missed that my bot does and yours does not? Also do you have a "smart" way to process lists or do you stuff everything to one list ad read entier file? --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 00:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• This page was modified to semi-automatically substitute templates using Pathoschild's template list. // Tawker 20:32, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]