User talk:Paucabot

Hi, Could you please provide sources that justify your renaming of the "Antonio Maura y Montaner" article to "Antoni Maura Montaner" [1]? I've checked several English-language sources, and the former name seems to be the preferred one (e.g. see [2].) Regards, Jmgonzalez 10:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. According to this, the "most commonly used name in English" is always preferred. Being Mr. Maura a politician from the beginning of the 20th Century, he's unlikely to be popular in today's media. So I checked reference works and google's English-language media archive. In the first case, both Britannica and Columbia use "Antonio Maura y Montaner". As anecdotal evidence, I also did some browsing in my library. Payne uses "Antonio Maura" ("The Franco Regime, 1936-1975", The University of Wisconsin Press, 1987, ISBN 0299110702). For the English-language media, a quick search on google's news archive produces only "Antonio Maura."

Note that your arguments can also be used to support the use of "Antonio Maura:"

• on the origin: Spanish is also spoken in Majorca. Mr. Maura's family may have Spanish speakers, or just preferred the Spanish-language form.
• on the foundation, there's also a Fundación Antonio Maura, but this one was created by his family, which sort of supports the use of the Spanish name.

Jmgonzalez 19:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's not too much I can say. I find your arguments varying between the specious (whether Mr. Maura's mother language was Catalan, which you haven't provide evidence for, doesn't mean he was Christened using the Catalan form, or that he preferred it to the Spanish form) and the ludicrously irrelevant: Spain may or not respect language minorities more than other countries (I'd argue she does, at least more than the average Western European country). But, this is by no means a valid argument in this discussion. Finally, you should elaborate what you mean by "spanish (sic) [not being] the own language of the island."

Anyway, I'm having doubts we're going to reach any agreement here, so let's not waste more of my time or your time. I sent a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves, and copied my arguments to Talk:Antoni Maura Montaner. You may want to provide your POV in the latter.

Jmgonzalez 19:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there; can you please tell me why you have been removing the Category:Spanish footballers from a number of articles recently? GiantSnowman 06:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But they are still Spanish footballers; please leave them in the parent category. Thanks, GiantSnowman 06:40, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because they all footballers have a nationality category. If you have any more issues with this, please raise it at WT:FOOTY, but I assure you, they will tell you the same as me. GiantSnowman 06:43, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Having both an autonomous community category and the national category is fine; replace one with the other is not. Info about football articles can be found at WP:FOOTY. GiantSnowman 06:50, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure where the guideline is, it was probably just gained by consensus at WP:FOOTY. GiantSnowman 06:57, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am only really involved in football editing, but I would say that it should be universal - after all, categories are meant to be accurate, and seeing as both regional and national categories ate accurate, they should both be used. Hope this helps! Thanks, GiantSnowman 07:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, if you have any issues with this, ask at WP:FOOTY. GiantSnowman 07:10, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. A very classical language indeed. I shall make every effort. Karnan (talk) 09:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bona tarda. I don't think A3 is appropriate, that's intended for articles with no real content. Although this is a very short stub, it has genuine content, if only in terms of this grass's taxonomic placement. On en-wiki, we decided that all credible species are notable by definition, so the English article couldn't be deleted on those grounds either. There are many animal articles on en-wiki created by a bot that basically created a taxobox, added a line or two of text and a reference. They all stay, although obviously many have been subsequently improved.

Obviously you are not bound by the English Wikipedia's consensus, let alone my opinion. All I can say is that even I, a self-confessed deletionist, wouldn't speedy, prod or AfD a short stub for an extent species, although I might tag it for improvement

I hope this helps, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Notability (natural sciences) is all I could find, you will note that it didn't achieve consensus. I've never come across a deletion of a species/genus, but obviously that doesn't mean that it's never happened. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:55, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

• Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi ^{t | c} 17:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed this edit and was wondering whether you have any plans to add Commonscat to suitable articles more systematically. I am especially interested in pages in the areas of biomedicine and biodiversity. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 17:19, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 14:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Paucabot", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because It may mislead someone to think that the account is a bot account. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. AmaryllisGardener ^talk 18:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AmaryllisGardener: Hi. I've been using this username since 2005 and nobody has told me anything about this rule. It's not a caprice, as Cabot is my surname. Furhermore, I have a unified username and some hundreds of thousands edits. I think this rule should not be applied in my case. Thanks, Paucabot (talk) 20:18, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then. Thank you. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 21:10, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as a contributor of this page, could you please help us and participate in the talk page ongoing discussion? Thanks in advance!--Kippelboy (talk) 08:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paucabot. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		Welcome to... Women's History Month multi-language online editathon Facilitated by Women in Red
		March 2017 Featuring: "Art+Feminism" and "The Women You Have Never Met" We hope you will help to improve coverage of women on Wikipedia Contribute in your own language Inform your communities of the need for their support. Apologies for cross-posting and sending in English (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 08:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paucabot. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paucabot. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Paucabot!

T'escric aquí perquè em vas bloquejar. No vaig trobar com enviar-te un missatge per correu electrònic i veig que, passats alguns dies després que t'havia escrit a la Viquipèdia en anglès, no m'hi has respost. Veig que, a més de bloquejar-me per "abusos reincidents" (cosa que encara no m'explico ben bé, perquè no acabo de comprendre quals serien precisament els abusos que hauria comès - potser no vaig llegir amb prou atenció les normes d'edició - i perquè no vaig rebre cap advertència), m'has esmentat, ensems a d'altres usuaris, com a titellaire de dos comptes titella. Em faries el favor d'explicar-me aquesta teva teoria i en què consistirien aquells "abusos reincidents" que m'imputes?

Gràcies

Огненный ангел (talk) 01:29, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Leuconostocaceae indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you blocked the above user at ca.wiki a couple of days ago for "Abusos reincidents". I'm not quite sure what that means (socking?). In any event, the user started editing here on September 21. Putting aside some disruptive WP:GAMING edits they made to get autoconfirmed, they have focused mostly on promoting Motxila 21 and all 15 members of the band. I was hoping you could shed some light on the basis of your block of the user at ca.wiki. Thanks very much.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:06, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, user:Bbb23. "Abusos reincidents" means aproximately socking. This user seems to be a teenager that has been self-promoting and writing articles about maths without knowing catalan like ca:MatemAbril, ca:Acció de juliol , ca:Onofre Monzó, ca:Societat d'Educació Matemática Al-Khwarizmi, ca:Federació Espanyola de Societats de Professors de Matemàtiques, ca:Javier Gómez Serrano, ca: Dia Escolar de les Matemàtiques, ca:Problema 2 IMO 2011 , ca:Geoff Smith, ca:Federació d'Entitats per l'Ensenyament de les Matemàtiques a Catalunya, ca:Bernat Ancochea Millet, ca:Sociedad Navarra de Profesores de Matemáticas Tornamira, ca:Fòbia a les matemàtiques, ca:Blas Méndez and ca:Adrián Macías. Some of the other puppets I have blocked are ca:User:Marigraciel, ca:User:Garimani, ca:Cantorparadise and ca:User:Remitbuber. My guess is that this kid is ca:Nicolás Atanes Santos, promoter of ca:Virus Matemático.

It seems a very different topic to write about, but reading his deleted autobiography, it seems that, besides being born in Burgos, now he is living in Pamplona, the capital of Navarra. It seems he has only changed topic. Paucabot (talk) 05:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! I am familiar with this sockmaster. However, this focus on that group and their members is, as far as I know, completely new. I could have asked a CheckUser to confirm, but I spent the last while reviewing Banzhowen's contributions here and at Commons, as well as reviewing some of the more recent blocked socks, and I found enough behavioral tie-ins to make me comfortable blocking the sock.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]