User talk:PCP MC

Welcome!

Hello, PCP MC, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Alhutch 20:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add some of your edits to Hip hop music to the History of hip hop music as your edits are mostly history and we are trying to trim that to get Hip hop music back to featured. You can add other edits, but sourced please per WP:CITE. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 19:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is regarding the page Golden age hip hop. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. Λυδαcιτγ 21:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see you really wanted to revamp the whole History of hip hop music system. It's going to take me a while to go through all your edits, but first I want to say thanks for your work. In the meantime, please leave things the way they are, with History of hip hop music as a summarized version of Golden age hip hop, Old school hip hop, etc. Λυδαcιτγ 21:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I see why you made so many changes. How about this: we delete History of hip hop music, and move all the good content to Hip hop music. You seem to have started towards that by creating separate articles for Hip Hop's Diversification, for example. Sound OK? Λυδαcιτγ 22:02, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, how about we do the reverse, and move all the good content from Hip hop music to History of hip hop music? The main reason for that is because Hip hop music is a long article already. Λυδαcιτγ 22:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I just ripped though History of hip hop music... Hope you don't mind. And don't get discouraged about being WP:BOLD - your edits were what prompted all this. What do you think of the current state of the history section? Λυδαcιτγ 01:28, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Λυδαcιτγ 01:51, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And you know what, the more I look at your contributions, the more I'm impressed. So:

		The Hip Hop Barnstar
		I, Λυδαcιτγ, award the Hip Hop Barnstar to PCP MC for excellent and thoughtful edits to History of hip hop music, among other articles, and even more importantly, as a reward for being bold. Congratulations!

Haha, I got the message from you just as I was finishing working on the barnstar! Λυδαcιτγ 01:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In my mind: Hip hop music#History (most general) -> History of hip hop music (somewhat specific) -> Olf school hip hop, Golden age hip hop, etc. (specific) -> Artist/album pages themselves (very specific). I think the biggest problem right now is that History of hip hop music is too specific, and Golden age hip hop is not specific enough. Λυδαcιτγ 01:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Λυδαcιτγ 02:34, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For this statement. I realize you know a great deal about hip hop, but it seems that this statement is controversial, so it would be great if you could find a good source for it. Thanks, Λυδαcιτγ 23:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; I'll do the citation. For future reference: {{cite book}}. Λυδαcιτγ 03:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure it's "Straight Out of Hollis"? That turns up no meaningful hits on Google. Λυδαcιτγ 03:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, cited. Thanks! Λυδαcιτγ 04:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Created at List of G-funk musicians, along with List of G-funk producers. I used the old version of the G-funk article, but didn't create a List of G-funk albums, since this seemed less important. If you think it would be useful, feel free. Λυδαcιτγ 20:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say thanks for helping with the cleanup on the article. MrBlondNYC 22:13, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Oh, My God (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Oh, My God (album). Mdsummermsw (talk) 16:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Elzhieuropass.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated We Mean Business, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Mean Business. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ukexpat (talk) 19:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Euro-Pass (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 01:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I must ask, why you would delete all the other sections and sub-sections to make one large one that doesn't seem to fit all the information? They're all different issues, they deserve to be in different sections and sub-sections. It just doesn't seem right. (And you've screwed up the refs.) --HELLØ ŦHERE 17:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it looks horrible and very unprofessional and very unencyclopedic. I'm not saying my version was the best, and we should definitely work to improve it. But I personally think your edit takes away much needed information. --HELLØ ŦHERE 17:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm preparing a possible version, once I'm done, I'll set up a subpage, then link you. Sound fair? Then we can work on it. But even removing much of the article just to "get my attention" isn't right because it could hurt other readers perception of the articles and Wikipedia as a whole. --HELLØ ŦHERE 18:03, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a rough version, but it's a start. --HELLØ ŦHERE 18:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's one of my only problems: The Wu-Tang forum. We're not supposed to use forums and it doesn't really seem like a legit post. Know what I mean? But other than that, thank for you correcting my grammar mistakes, and it needs a tiny more bit of work, but yeah, seems good. --HELLØ ŦHERE 19:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because I couldn't find another source, I've kept the forum link in there for now. But I have attempted to clean up a little more. --HELLØ ŦHERE 19:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I don't know, we're getting into a lot of speculation there. but, with the way the page is right now, if you don't have any objection, I'm gonna move it into the mainspace. --HELLØ ŦHERE 22:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Slaughterhouse Group Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you put those people you added to the template in alphabetical order.--Yankees10 19:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--Yankees10 22:49, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Slaughterhouse Group Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wu Chamber Music Album Ad.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Initially, I was led to believe that the whole Meth, Ghost & Rae thing was a separate group. After checking out several websites, I realized that it is not. I added quotes and citations to the Wu-Massacre page to prove this claim false, which now leads to 2 things;
1.) The Meth, Ghost & Rae page should be deleted
2.) Chronologies. I originally protested Wu-Massacre on single members’ chronology's, but now that it's been proven that it is simply a collaboration (kind of like the Grandmasters album) , it probably does make sense to include it (you were right). What are your thoughts? --Blastmaster11 (talk) 18:05, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated DR Period, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DR Period. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ToxicWasteGrounds 19:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wu-Tang Clan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AZ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dan56. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Only Built 4 Cuban Linx..., but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Hitmen (production team) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A whole lot of stuff sourced to a single blog post. Sean Combs / Bad Boy Records is where the notability is.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:23, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]