User talk:PCHS Pirate Alumnus

I'm quite busy in real life at times. If you have an important message for me and I don't get back to you here, try leaving me an email. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 20:44, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Archive 1
• Archive 2
• Archive 3
• Archive 4
• Archive 5
• Archive 6
• Archive 7

It states that the school is interested in being contacted in case of vandalism. Unless you (the editor adding the template) has contacted the school, this is a BLP violation. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:18, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at Maryana (WMF)'s talk page. Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:59, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you nom it for AfD, I'd support it. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:37, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just sent it to AfD. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 03:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PCHS Pirate Alumnus. You have new messages at Alex3yoyo's talk page.
Message added 19:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

alex3yoyo (talk) 19:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I hate you....

Khaledmehriz 2 (talk) 04:46, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have started a conflict of interest investigation on IP 161.141.1.1 as that IP is owned by Enbridge corporation and has been doing a lot of pro-Enbridge edits to the Enbridge article. As you have also contributed to that article I thought you might be interested to have a look. Cheers, Djapa Owen (talk) 16:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PGMS2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Punta Gorda Middle School logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:55, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PGMS2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How can you be an editor on Conservapedia and wikipedia? They're like polar opposites. Besides Rationalwiki. Fungal vexation (talk) 15:10, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Assuming good faith) No they're not. Wikipedia follows a neutral point of view whereas Conservapedia follows a conservative POV. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 15:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention one of them seems to value facts and logic most of the time. Fungal vexation (talk) 15:15, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To each his own. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 15:18, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you seem like a nice person, I'll stop trying to aggravate you. Fungal vexation (talk) 15:31, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-) PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 15:37, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your philosophical lectures at WP:AN/I are not helpful. Please do not patronise, nor use such condescending language as "kiss and make up". We aren't children here. Is that how you speak in your place of work? RGloucester — ☎ 03:45, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This didn't need to come here; it could have stayed at the AN/I page, but whatever. It was only a suggestion; you may take it with a grain of salt if you so choose. People in my place of work don't bicker with each other, undo each other's work over and over again, and go to manager both accusing each other of being wrong or being "Marxist propaganda mongerers" and "vandals," I had my fill of that in middle school. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 04:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was merely giving you a recommendation. It is quite right that I did none of those things. Instead, they have been done by this fellow, and I'm seeking redress. At my place of work, people are serious, they take themselves seriously, and they refrain from childish language. RGloucester — ☎ 04:09, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At my place of work, people act as the professionals that we are and take our lack of childishness beyond language. Seriously though, what I see at the surface here is two people who think they're right, and instead of trying to reach some sort of agreement like adults or handling things properly, they start playing tug-o-war with an article a page as a rope and then proceed to accuse each other of personal attacks and vandalism at AN/I. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 04:17, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then you are not seeing very far. This is part of a protracted struggle over the course of months from disruptive editors in Ukraine crisis-related topics, where I do most of my editing at present. A couple of days ago I was accused of being part of a pro-Ukrainian cabal. Now I'm a pro-Russian Marxist covering up a crime equivalent of the Holocaust. I've seen it all, at this point, and I'm not going to take nonsense any longer. I have better things to do. Farewell! RGloucester — ☎ 04:26, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NJROTC, I've just come across the AN/I you felt you had enough of a grasp of to involve yourself in. Not only was your advice unconstructive, you managed to be WP:UNCIVIL towards the editor filing the complaint and, quite evidently, didn't bother to check the diffs properly, or even acquaint yourself with the content in dispute. Consequently, the ANI was closed by the reporting editor rather than having to face any more condescending suggestions and heckling from you. Only one administrator had the chance to weigh in, and other involved editors were denied the opportunity to discuss the new user's disruptive behaviour.

Considering that you don't edit in any controversial areas of Wikipedia, and that you insinuated yourself into an ANI regarding a new contributor to a WP:ARBEE area, I can't help but find myself wondering how you feel you are qualified to take over the incident report and harass the reporter. Essentially, you disrupted the process, did not assume good faith, and turned it into your personal battleground. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how choosing not to take sides in the content dispute (policy dispute, which ever you prefer to call it) constitutes assuming bad faith (I'm sure they both had good intentions), and I fail to see how suggesting the two editors discuss the matter rather than come to AN/I to try and get each other blocked/banned/topic banned/etc was disruptive, but I don't see the sense in arguing about it. Perhaps my choice of words could have been better, but I still don't see how anything I posted was WP:UNCIVIL towards any particular user. As for WP:BATTLEGROUND, I don't see it. What I see is a content dispute that made its way over to dispute resolution, which, IMO, is the proper place for it (either there or ArbCom, since ArbCom is involved in the matter). At any rate, it's history now. I see there's another thread over at AN/I now. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 17:19, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Hospitals

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Hospitals for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (shout) @ 09:52, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PCHS Pirate Alumnus. You have new messages at Gilliam's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

– Gilliam (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:PCHS-NJROTC. Would you mind if I delete User:PCHS-NJROTC/EDU? I know you mean well so please don't take offense. However, school IP Talk pages are highly visible and user warnings should be refer to official policies and not to subjective commentary. Alternately you can add Template:Essay at the top and stop adding it to user talk pages. Thanks.– Gilliam (talk) 07:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Beach drifter is at it again, I see. Yes, this is indeed what happens when someone edits as an anon to do his dirty work and then gets away with it (and I fully believe the only reason he took responsibility for the IP's actions is because he knew it wouldn't end well if he didn't and a checkuser had to get involved). But that's ancient history now. That template was a WP:BOLD move, stating the truth, and I personally don't see anything wrong (or against policy) with it. Although school IP talk pages may be seen by thousands of users, I wouldn't consider them highly visible as compared with other pages on Wikipedia, some of which are seen by millions of people (the templates on school IP talk pages like {{Shared IP edu}} are a different story). While WP:OTHERSTUFF isn't the best argument, well, it does. I also distinctly remember another template that said something like "Why do you vandalize the wiki? You're just going to get your school blocked." But, if you don't like it, I'm not going to stop you from deleting it; it's not worth an edit war. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 14:18, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I did link to policy in that template, both the vandalism policy and the blocking policy. Thing is, I would have linked to an official policy for dealing with schools, but there is no such policy. The only other appropriate policy I can think of to link to is WP:AGF, and if anyone thinks that's being actively followed for school IPs, they are delusional (the attitude towards school IPs by admins is that all schools are filled with immature students and therefore need to be blocked; indeed kids will be kids and they're not completely wrong, but that's still not following assume good faith). PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 14:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SCHOOLBAN. Perhaps a single link to that page would give student vandals an idea of the consequences for their actions.– Gilliam (talk) 00:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That page refers to a very specific type of problem, while those kind of IPs do much more than just that. I think linking to that may discourage good faith editors from editing their schools' articles as well, and there are a lot of good faith edits to school articles that come from school IPs. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 21:53, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man - yeah my edit was fine to remove. Would you mind reverting the 2014–15 Football League Championship page to the 17:03 version? Someone added an entry to one of the tables on the page which caused a massive formatting issue with everything below. My "test" was me fumbling around seeing if something would work to fix it. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.219.88.140 (talk) 18:34, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and undid the unreferenced addition that broke the table as a quick fix. Thanks for contributing to the encyclopedia! PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 19:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PCHS-NJROTC! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember what I used as a password for PCHS-NJROTC at Simple English Wikipedia, or even if I made that account. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 15:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the nomination--I was waiting for that article to be created and for a storm like this to kick up. But given the outrage and the coverage, there was no way in which this was ever going to go toward delete: Jesus himself couldn't have pulled that off in the current atmosphere. I hope you understand my closing rationale. Best, Drmies (talk) 01:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the note. I see there was quite a debate going on over there. I'm normally an inclusionist, but if there was ever an example of NOTNEWS (in my opinion). Alas, this is not the consensus of the community. 76.6.194.216 (talk) 01:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Port Charlotte High School.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from Portugal,

about this comment which you removed (please see here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:84.90.219.128&diff=697904018&oldid=697666143), just to notify you that I responded in kind, albeit it less aggressively. This Colombian punk has been subjecting me to vitriolic abuse for two years for a mere difference of opinions on the Quique Sánchez Flores article. Back in the day, several people agreed with my approach and the article had one name, now, after further new evidence, most people agree with his approach, cool with me for I know how WP works after nine years here.

But this will not be tolerated. Remove my message too if you will, I have vented all I had to vent. Happy 2016 --84.90.219.128 (talk) 18:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I have already reverted myself, but the "person", through other IPs, continues with the harassment. I will not stoop to his level now, a promise, only REVERT and IGNORE. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 19:17, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I almost hate to bring this up since you've had your current username for almost 10 years now, but I'm worried that your username might violate the prohibition in WP:username policy on usernames that represent the name of a group or organization (in this case, the Port Charlotte High School Naval Junior Reserve Officers Training Corp). Your previous username, GO-PCHS-NJROTC, seems okay (as per the "WidgetFan87" example in WP:ISU), but your current username seems to be implying shared use. You might want to consider changing it, especially if you plan on seeking administrative privileges as you state on your user page. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:54, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahecht: Fair enough. How about PCHS-NJROTC Alumni? Or DMorris-PCHS-NJROTC? Go-PCHS-NJROTC sounds too much like something a cheerleader would say. I knew each and every one of the cheerleaders on the squad at my school and they were sweet girls, but it seems more of them than not vandalize Wikipedia vs contribute, so I don't want to look like a cheerleader. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages) Jesus Christ loves you!} 23:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alumni is plural. You are an alumnus. But I came here to ask you to please remove the inappropriate religious proselyting from your sig. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you like my new signature better? PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Growing tired of this project day by day.} 17:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is better strictly speaking, though it sort of seems like you are trying to make a point. HighInBC 20:07, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buh da da dah da, I'm lovin' it! TJH2018talk 21:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I take it you're saying you like the signature, but why the otherwise random McDonald's reference? Thought you were a troll at first... PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Growing tired of the bullshit day by day.} 22:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Save a policy based reason, my suggestion would be to ignore flying pigs. John from Idegon (talk) 17:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you consider removing your RfC? It really wasn't properly formatted (there was no specific point to be discussed). With an RfC in place, changes are not supposed to be made to the subject of the RfC til it closes. Which is 30 days. Other eyes are on it now...that should suffice. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 17:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PCHS Pirate Alumnus. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 17:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

TJH2018talk 17:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• @TJH2018: I shot you a reply. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Growing tired of the bullshit day by day.} 19:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:PCHS-NJROTC/MiddleEastBlock, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PCHS-NJROTC/MiddleEastBlock and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:PCHS-NJROTC/MiddleEastBlock during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 04:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Note that I am neutral as to whether this page should be kept. However, I am nominating since evidently at least one user has taken offense. Safiel (talk) 04:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Government block has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 11:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And also:

• Template:Corporate block (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mosque block (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Public terminal block (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Christian church block (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Jewish temple block (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Church block (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

are Tfd'd. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 11:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you got elected to the school board. Awesome job. See you around. Chiigt (talk) 03:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PCHS-NJROTC. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why this site is not valid for citations? Who determines this policy? Is there a list of off-limits sources? RobP (talk) 05:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the words of @Fyddlestix:, "Rational Wiki is user generated. Our policy on reliable sources explicitly rules sources like that out."See here. Rational-Wiki fails WP:RS. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 18:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Will review this page! RobP (talk) 19:48, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know it was a while ago, but thank you for the award. I know I used to annoy you, and it really means a lot to me. Sincerely, LBHS Cheerleader (talk) 01:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Just please stay out of trouble. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 13:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PCHS, I saw your post about open proxy check and did some searching. The only other IP used in the /24 range has been this one. I know the range is much bigger but this might point to your guy as this post combined with this block log indicates that it is the editor for this SPI case. I don't know if this matches to the person giving you problems but it gives you a direction to look. Also, you may try looking at the larger /16 range to see if you spot anything.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 23:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

FuzzyCatPotato (talk) 22:52, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding that discussion, since responding there might strike you as bludgeoning...

I've never read RationalWiki and I don't see how anything I said could be said to represent "fondness". So I'll stick with my idea that I've been misinterpreted. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:04, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I could be thinking of someone else, but today I have not the time nor the interest to hunt down who said what I was thinking you said, so you win. To be blunt, I really don't care about the petty details of who said what or even winning, I care about maintaining a quality encyclopedia, which is what WP:EL is designed to do (the WHOLE policy, which R-W fails in spirit, IMO). I try to be nice to him (and I know he can read this), but I honestly feel this is all about FCP wanting to "win", and that's not what WP is for. Have a nice rest of your day. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 13:21, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've made 5 edits to Talk:Vaginal steaming. You've made 33. I've made 1 edit to WP:ELN. You've made 8. Yet you repeatedly accuse me of WP:BLUDGEON.

I enacted your suggestion to move discussion to WP:ELN. Yet you repeatedly accuse me of WP:WIN.

I've added criticism (and pushed to add more) to RationalWiki. I've disclosed my COI on every post. Yet you repeatedly accuse me of WP:SPAMMER & WP:PROMOTION and threaten me with WP:COIN & WP:ANI.

I had hoped the discussion on Talk:Vaginal steaming would yield consensus on RW's status under WP:ELNO, WP:ELYES, WP:ELMAYBE. Instead it is bogged down with your back-and-forth and your incessant links to WP policy & "embarassing" RW pages.

I believe you are either [1] blinded by your bias or [2] acting in bad faith. I have resolved not to further interact with you.

Have a nice day. FuzzyCatPotato (talk) 16:23, 15 August 2017 (UTC):[reply]

I have to agree that you personally have not been committing WP:BLUDGEON, but others have (who may not even be Rat-Wikians, but for whatever reason have strong opinions on the matter). I'm sorry to hear that dealing with shenanigans from that site pouring over into Wikipedia for the past eight years (before I even knew that Conservapedia or Rational-Wiki even existed) makes me a biased person, but I care too much for the integrity of the encyclopedia to watch this kind of controversy happen over and over again. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 16:43, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had a friend over last night and briefly showed them the wiki-drama. They must've [1] added the "trolling and then [2] got cold feet and undone the edits. I didn't even notice until this morning. I don't know why I'd troll you -- you'd just use the trolling as evidence against me. (I also don't know why I'd troll myself.) I genuinely wish to wash my hands of you, politely. FuzzyCatPotato (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure that's also what happened when you added the link to your own website after a previous discussion had just concluded that your links don't belong on Wikipedia, right? PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 21:16, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. I added that link because I thought it was relevant. You seem to ignore that Talk:Michel_Chossudovsky#RationalWiki_link was settled because of WP:BLPEL rules, rather than WP:EL rules. I cannot imagine why. FuzzyCatPotato (talk) 22:07, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Virtual Times 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Hi PCHS-NJROTC! Questions about the above “Alert”? I wrote a quick & dirty FAQ—check it out here. If you have any questions about policies or editing or anything else just ask me on my talk page :-) – Lionel^(talk) 08:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PCHS-NJROTC. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:PCHS-NJROTC|<font color="red" face="Comic Sans MS">PCHS-NJROTC</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:PCHS-NJROTC|<font color="black" face="Comic Sans MS">(Messages)Have a blessed day.</font>]]</sup> : PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.}

to

[[User:PCHS-NJROTC|<span style="color: red; font-family: Comic Sans MS;">PCHS-NJROTC</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:PCHS-NJROTC|<span style="color: black; font-family: Comic Sans MS;">(Messages)Have a blessed day.</span>]]</sup> : PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.}

—Anomalocaris (talk) 08:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Test [User:PCHS-NJROTC|PCHS-NJROTC]] ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 12:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Test2 PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 12:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 01:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey PCHS, I'm looking for some help updating articles for Craig B. Thompson, José Baselga, and Joan Massagué Solé, who are all executives at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The articles' overall quality was a little lacking, so I've been working on adding content and supporting it with better references. I saw you're a member of WP:HOSPITAL and I was wondering if you could check out some of my suggestions, even if the articles are somewhat tangentially related. I've posted on their respective talk pages, as well as the WP:ACADEMICS talk page, but I've been having trouble getting any kind of feedback from anyone. I've got their respective sandboxes here: Thompson, Baselga, Massagué. If you've got the time to take a look, even at just one of the articles, I'd greatly appreciate it.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 23:57, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@FacultiesIntact: I will see what I can do, but I'm awfully busy with school right now. A lot of the time when I'm editing it's when I'm at work and it's slow; I have ADHD and recent changes patrolling on Wikipedia stops me from pointlessly walking in circles, but the web filters there make research for article building practically impossible. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 03:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries if you don't have the time! I wouldn't want to pile onto your workload. If you find a chance, that's fantastic, but I'll keep looking for someone who's got more free time on their hands.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 03:52, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! I've been working on some updates to Hedvig Hricak, another one of MSK's doctors. Do you have time to take a look? I posted on the talk page, but haven't found anyone who could help yet. As always, any feedback is appreciated!--FacultiesIntact (talk) 17:57, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was the one making the constructive changes on the FPHS website. However one of my classmates that sits next to me saw me editing the page and decided to add his own (the addition of "Mike Hawk" which was a joke). I believe you were concerned with "Kelly Green" as one of the schools colors, however Kelly Green is an actual color. I was not vandalizing when it came to adding the achievements of the Cyber Patriot and Crew team, and I cited a source to it. I took your advice and created an account as to differentiate myself from the schools IP Address. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chef ardy (talk • contribs) 14:33, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Charlotte Regional Medical Center Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

imo I think if one user did generally the same kind of edit after a warning is already given, a "more strict" warning should be added to let this user realized it is really inappropriate for its edit. Is my thinking incorrect? But I think I also should think maybe a few of my warning is too strict in this point... --Stang 13:53, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Stang: For one thing it's Broward County Public Schools, one of the largest school districts in the United States, so prior edits probably aren't the same person that did the most recent edit. For another thing, it's probably just some middle or high school kid messing around, not someone on a plot to undermine the encyclopedia; since they're not plastering people's names on articles or anything, I think one level one warning should suffice for now (usually with schools if someone posts something really bad I call and report it rather than go for a widespread block, but that's just me). PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 13:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per your request, I have removed the rollback feature from your account. Thank you for your past contributions with it. Mz7 (talk) 02:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. I did not realize that... I hope you can forgive me. I am just gonna take it that I was right. I hope to discuss my issues with you there. Sorry, Joshua --Kingdamian1 (talk) 01:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If your email address is linked to your Wikipedia account, there is an option to "email this user" in the toolbox on the left of your screen (if you are editing from desktop; it's in a different spot in mobile). There is no need to post someone's email address (or other off-wiki contact information) on-wiki to verify that it is correct. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 01:40, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As per the editnotice, there's a relatively recent restriction only allowing two questions per user on an RfA. You could probably get away with joining the first two questions together though. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 21:03, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing that out. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 21:07, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, Seemed like a conversation not-too-relevant to the RFA, so I thought we could continue here. If you're running into issues with hardblocks (it sounds like you have) - WP:IPBE is always an option. I 100% understand not wanting your IP to be out there - especially if it's possibly something that gives away an employer. If you have the need for IPBE, I am more than happy to talk privately about granting that right. I wasn't sure if you were aware that this option is out there - and any admin can grant it. Feel free to email me if you want - I'm happy to help. SQL^{Query me!} 02:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that. Actually, I was aware of the process to get a hard block exemption, but fortunately the only time I ran into the problem was from a wi-fi hotspot, and I didn't have a great enough need to edit from there to request one or request the IP block be reduced to a softblock. Because I don't care to discuss the matter with the person in question and create unproductive drama (in my experience here, people get mad when I question their blocks whether it's on their own talk page or elsewhere), I'm not going to name him unless I have to, but I was looking over one of the CheckUser's blocks and I noticed quite a few hardblocks issued. I'm a checkuser on Conservapedia, so I can appreciate the need to sometimes hardblock, but I don't want to see average administrators start blocking IPs with thousands of users because apparently no one legitimately edits from there or few people legitimately edit from there. Just because no one edits from there now doesn't mean a newcomer might desire to start editing from there, and the harder we make it for newcomers, the less likely they are going to be bothered creating an account. Chances are, no one edited from my home IP a month ago because it belonged to someone else then, but that changed when it got assigned to me. I don't know if anyone else edits from my employer's IP or not, but it is softblocked and is shared by thousands of people. One good side effect of the softblock is that it nearly eliminates the chances of the IP being subject to an autoblock, but it also reduces the chances of us getting newcomers from there. Once upon a time, there were more than one person legitimately editing with accounts from Charlotte County Public Schools and the Charlotte County Library System, but now people rarely even edit from the Charlotte County Library System anonymously, and I doubt anyone else editing with accounts there either, so when we actually do get newcomers, I don't think we should be discouraging them. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 03:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cross country and Chorus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Westlake, Ohio, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I have added a citation in order to retain it. In the future, please include a citation when you add the information. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 21:14, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the template message, but I am well aware of that policy. It was more out of laziness than anything else; the information was already cited in the wikilinked article, and the other companies listed there were not cited either. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 21:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have to plead laziness on the templating, too! I added a cite for the company you added, as well as for the other uncited ones. TJRC (talk) 22:18, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, good job! PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 22:35, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No, removing warning templates from one's own talkpage is not generally considered disruptive.[1] Please see WP:REMOVED. Bishonen | talk 10:59, 23 September 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you for that, @Bishonen:. I wasn't aware of that the first time I reverted him, but after he reverted my revert I reviewed the policy and I saw I was incorrect, hence why I didn't get after him for edit warring. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 18:11, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PCHS Pirate Alumnus. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Doug Weller talk 12:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PCHS-NJROTC. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and got rid of that so it would no longer be visible. Hope you don't mind.-- Deepfriedokra 20:32, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c)Yes, I put it there. I put that on there because Keegscee sometimes will do things like create articles about me or add my real name to the notable alumni list of my high school as a form of harassment (it doesn't really bother me though). I don't know if he does that with anyone else or not. My real name is published on my user page, so it's not a big deal. (Sorry I'm at work and got interrupted when I was trying to reply to you) PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 20:58, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey PCHS,

Just stopping by to wish you a happy holidays. I hope 2020 is a great year for you! 2600:100C:B22B:9FDB:8C5:F3AF:60B6:881F (talk) 02:18, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you too. Dexter's playing on ShoTime right now, good stuff. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 02:23, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Venice High School (Venice, Florida) (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Steven Anderson (pastor) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Psiĥedelisto (talk) 13:45, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Steven Anderson (pastor), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pastor Steven Anderson has been banned from dozens of countries due to his controversial beliefs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Steven Anderson (pastor). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Steven Anderson (pastor)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

schools

Thank you for quality article work around schools such as Port Charlotte High School and educators such as Steven Anderson (pastor), for "Preparation, Respect, Integrity, Determination, and Excellence" and "I'm in the mood to play along", - David, repeating (from 10 years ago): you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2349 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:32, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Thank you! PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 12:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not waste admins time with jokes.Slatersteven (talk) 12:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

K PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 12:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Both your ANI thread and your wp:spi, at least one user has already been sanctioned for wasting the projects time on pranks.Slatersteven (talk) 13:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it, but I did not know that. Something along those lines should probably be added to Wikipedia:Rules for Fools, because that page more or less encourages it. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 13:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Jokes that are hateful, discriminatory, and/or are intended to make others feel unwelcome will not be tolerated", whilst it might be debatable if accusing someone of socking is not a violation of this, calling someone a Nazi is.Slatersteven (talk) 13:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Slatersteven, Joke? That was an WP:NPA deserving of a WP:BOOMERANG WP:INDEF wasn't it? Tacking an april fool to the end doesn't make it OK. Cabayi (talk) 13:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is why I warned him.Slatersteven (talk) 13:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well I appreciate it, like I said I kind of feel like some of these pages encouraging these kind of things shouldn't exist if it causes problems for administrators. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 13:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its kind of easy, if its an insult don't do it. Example [[2]] is an April fool that harm's no one. [[3]] would not be acceptable if made by someone else.Slatersteven (talk) 13:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it was an overstep on my part, but I kind of assumed that Mr. Godwin wouldn't be offended by a pun on his own invention. If he were, well, that's the problem with assumptions. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 13:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note I am not a Nazi, and anyway I was on holiday at the time and that was my twin brother, and I might have only been following orders anyway.Slatersteven (talk) 13:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you did there. If this silliness on my part comes up in any discussions in the future I was on Mars and somehow my dog got access to the computer. ^{[April Fools!]} Jokes aside, I've actually seen people try that excuse in discussions... PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 13:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the space of just a fw minutes, you've managed to get yourself formally warned for trolling by a Wikipedia administrator, bureaucrat and sitting arbitrator. That is...quite the achievement, even for today :D ——SN54129 13:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Serial Number 54129, you make it sounds like I'm three different individuals at once. :p I wouldn't call it a formal warning for trolling, but more of a gentle request to troll without calling editors Nazis or spamming SPIs... Maxim_(talk) 13:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So much for RfA for a while. ;) It's weird seeing template messages on my talk page when I'm used to issuing those kind of warnings. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 13:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Jimbo Cabal, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cabayi (talk) 13:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the SPI, PCHS-NJROTC. There are many better and less disruptive ways to troll on April Fools' than calling someone a Nazi and spamming SPI... Maxim_(talk) 13:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with the deletion. With this brought to light, what about some of these AfD's that I'm seeing that are WP:BLP violations? I just nominated two BLP-violating jokes for CSD. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 13:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PCHS-NJROTC, I'm not entirely sure what to do about those two AfD and I'll leave for other eyes. There's traditionally more leniency for joke AfDs especially if they're set up such that they don't go into the main queue (in contrast with SPI). A few comments are decidedly meh-of-centre, but most of it is what we've put up with in the past. Maxim_(talk) 13:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I took the Donald Trump one to MfD to let the community decide. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 13:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is that if you're not that comedic, maybe don't show up to open mic night. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman: Actually I am, but I'm autistic, so... In a way that kind of seems like a personal attack, but I'm not going to make a big deal about it, although other people might. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 22:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bipartisan Report Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Charlotte County Sheriff's Office at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Awsomaw (talk) 16:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charlotte County Sheriff's Office, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after the mishandling of a call to the Charlotte County Sheriff's Office that might have prevented a woman's murder, Florida mandated additional training for 9-1-1 dispatchers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charlotte County Sheriff's Office. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Charlotte County Sheriff's Office), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Wug·a·po·des​ 00:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC) 00:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Punta Gorda Middle School logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Punta Gorda Middle School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punta Gorda Middle School (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 22:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Punta Gorda Middle School logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey buddy,

It's been a while. I started rewatching dexter again. It's just as good the 2nd time. Hope your lady friend has been treating you right. ;). Doggeedoggee (talk) 20:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Doggedoggee: Season four is my favorite, probably seconded by the season with Jordan Chase, but really the whole series is kick-ass. And I love my lady friend. ❤️ Hope you’re doing well with those snow storms in your state. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 01:37, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS, The ending was kind of sad. As a government employee myself, it’s a shame that Dexter didn’t marry Hannah before faking his death so she could receive his FRS benefits, what a shame those went to waste. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 01:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm watching the Jordan Chase season now. I was thinking to myself 'PCHS only likes this season because of Lumen' but then I realized you're a 'pardon my tits' type of guy! Ooooh doggy we would have a good time together at the bar. Doggeedoggee (talk) 04:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lila was gross, I have no idea what Dex saw in that... Actually I go for the goodie two shoes types, like Rita. Have a nice day. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 18:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I thought we were getting along? Why did you report my last account when I wasn't doing any harm?

I was just looking at the memorial you made for me at LTI. It's nice, but I really need to up my game. Some of those LTI accounts are legends! I guess that can be my 2021 goal.

Anyway, see you around.

MaggieShagnasty (talk) 05:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @MaggieShagnasty: Does "Honeybear" know that you harass minors on the internet and continue harass said minors 11 years into adulthood, or do you keep that a secret like Dexter kept his activities from Rita? PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 20:51, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Alfie Oakes at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pamzeis (talk) 10:00, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alfie Oakes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alfie Oakes sued a school district for US$50 million in response to alleged cancel culture? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alfie Oakes. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Alfie Oakes), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 12:03, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"This statement isn't actually in the source I'm citing" is usually a reason to not use the statement.

Thanks. DS (talk) 13:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Babcock Ranch Community Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Gerda Arendt:. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 04:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CHS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlotte High School. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CHS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlotte High School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'd like to help improve articles about Florida schools. Can you recommend where I should start? Bengdrip (talk) 02:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bengdrip: A good starting place would be Category:High schools in Florida by county, find an article there that could benefit from updating, expansion, or clean up. Also, check out the links on the welcome template I'm about to leave on your own talk page for general information about contributing to the encyclopedia. Welcome to Wikipedia! PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 04:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hope God kept you safe during the hurricane. TBomar93 (talk) 23:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He did. Minimal damage to the house or my neighbor’s (also a believer) despite a tornado going between the two houses; no roof damage, no water damage, and despite the neighbor on the other side losing their roof. People I care about are also okay; lady I love in Fort Myers is okay despite that area being annihilated. Church infrastructure is relatively okay considering the locations of the different IFB churches, despite the rumors that one of the hospitals even is a tear down. God is good, and I praise him! PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 17:01, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to know where silliness starts or ends sometimes in this rather odd place... you are indeed accurate in one point, but then cultural mores are so weird, from the perspective people who are not of some cultures see offence and stupidity in what are not in their culture, and so on... thanks for identifying the silliness, in fifteen years only two quite valid trout slaps is hardly a statistical tendency, but then... whatever that arose from - good hunting! may you find more to root out!! it seemed that your identification has seen the subsequent block, so well done... JarrahTree 00:49, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: No problem, nobody is perfect and I've had my share of WP:TROUT in my 15 years as well. I found this because I was reading the editing history of an article out of curiosity (I do that a lot), and that name jumped out at me because it was advocating gun violence, so I checked just to make sure it was blocked, but it wasn't. To be honest, I've seen worse though; doing RC patrol I've seen kids (or adults acting like kids) literally express in Wikipedia articles their desire to commit a school shooting (especially in the immediate aftermath of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School massacre, I immediately report those edits to the Foundation. Frankly, had I seen User:ShootThePolice two years ago when they were active I probably would have alerted the Foundation. But alas... happy editing fellow Wikipedian! PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 01:28, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Deland logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 16:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

PCHS Pirate Alumnus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 71.215.117.14. I was just assigned this IP address after installing a new modem, which is on a dynamic range. It is no longer being used by a VPN provider.

Accept reason:

IPBE granted. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 17:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 16:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NJROTC. I've granted IPBE for three months. The IP has been blocked several times over the last several months, but it's also dynamic so who knows. If you need it then, just ask again. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 17:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heart of Florida - Public 24.227.66.21 (talk) 18:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect HGP Industries has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 8 § HGP Industries until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:03, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking to publish a new Wikipedia page. It is the Arlin R. Horton Sports Center (User:Wjenkins96/sandbox). I don't have any associations with the college, rather I'd heard about this facility through another website that ranked their waterpark as the #1 college campus waterpark. I saw that you took photos of the facility, and I have chosen three of them for the proposed article. The reasons why I think this would qualify for a Wikipedia page are that the arena portion has over 3,100 seats (more than sixty NCAA Division I arenas), and because the waterpark features were ranked #1 on the article that I found (as seen in one of the sources on the page). Also, their rival school has Wikipedia articles for both their soccer stadium and basketball court. If you are wondering how I got to a capacity of 3,196 for the arena, feel free to consult me and I'll explain. Wjenkins96 (talk) 18:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wjenkins96: nice work so far! I don't really have any tie to PCC other than I considered going there a few years ago, and I was unaware of the specifics, but I do know it is a quite impressive facility. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 15:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey.

I stumbled upon the food court article while searching for other possible notable alumni or faculty at Port Charlotte High School. At first I was very confused but once I saw the photo I knew it had to be you who put it there, and as I suspected it was in fact you.

Coincidentally, I have also visited the food court featured in the first picture in Montréal. Because of you I have somehow visited and ate at 50% of the food courts featured as pictures in this article.

I just thought it was funny and I felt like sharing. Have a wonderful day/night! Raskuly (talk) 03:15, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Raskuly: Cool! I hope you also have a wonderful day, and Happy New Year! PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 04:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: thank you! PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 21:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

• Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
• Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
• Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
• Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
• Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
• Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
• Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
• Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
• Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
• Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
• Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
• Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
• Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
• Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
• Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
• Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
• Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

• Proposals 2 and 9b (phase II discussion): Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA and Require links for claims of specific policy violations
• Proposal 3b (in trial): Make the first two days discussion-only
• Proposal 13 (in trial): Admin elections
• Proposal 14 (implemented): Suffrage requirements
• Proposals 16 and 16c (phase II discussion): Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs and Community recall process based on dewiki
• Proposal 17 (phase II discussion): Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions
• Proposal 24 (phase II discussion): Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process
• Proposal 25 (implemented): Require nominees to be extended confirmed

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Effects of Hurricane Ian in Florida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Port Charlotte.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has your name ever been challenged? It would appear to violate our standards around impersonation... PCHS-NJROTC would appear to suggest that this account is representing the Port Charlotte High School Navy Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps outfit and I'm wondering if there was ever a community consensus to give you an exception? I'm also wondering whether you have a COI with Port Charlotte High School based on the name and editing history. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a declared connection on Talk:Port Charlotte High School and the connection is that I graduated from there in 2010. My original user name was GO-PCHS-NJROTC, which I changed because I later felt that was too promotional (and the change was approved at the time). I made the account years ago and selected the name because I decided I didn't want to use the same name I used at the time on other platforms because I did not want flame wars (which seemed to be common at the time) spreading across multiple platforms. I would have more of a COI editing school articles from Sarasota County because I work for them, and therefore they have the power to retaliate if I write something negative, although I can create another account for that under WP:SOCKLEGIT if I ever think I'm going to have any problems with that (or I can just go use a wi-fi hotspot somewhere and edit as an IP). I actually want to change my user name to "PCHS Pirate Alumnus" as it keeps me associated with the identity I have held on Wikipedia since 2008 while not giving the impression that I am a high school student or an ROTC instructor. I just have never gotten around to submitting a request for it, for the same reasons I haven't tackled numerous article building projects I want to take on. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 16:47, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would get around to it, it still is a bright line violation of WP:ORGNAME. I would also warn against editing the Port Charlotte High School page directly, editors with COIs are supposed to make talk page edit requests rather than edit the article directly. Both together put you in some pretty serious jeopardy "A user who both adopts a promotional username and who engages in inappropriate advertising or promotional edits or behaviors – especially when made to their own user space or to articles about the company, group, or product – can be blocked from editing Wikipedia, and are often blocked much sooner than users who engage in only one of the two behaviors." Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted the request as we speak. People with connections to a subject are encouraged, but not required, to use the talk page. Please review WP:COIEDIT. Whenever I am in question as to whether I am biased about something, I request a second opinion. For example, I really wanted to delete the bit about the transgender person suing Liberty University in a recent edit, but because I know there is potential for bias as a graduate from Liberty, I decided to mention Liberty's doctrinal positions on transgenders in a factual, straightforward manner instead. In the past I have been told by User:Spintendo that I was more cautious than I needed to be when editing The Gideons International (which I also have a connection with as an unpaid member). If I can make contribute to an article about an organization I am actively involved in without problem, I can contribute to an article about an institution I am 14 years removed from without problem. But I appreciate your comments. PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 17:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COIEDIT says, "you are strongly discouraged from editing affected articles directly;" not "you are encouraged to use the talk page" so your characterization of it is inaccurate. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:43, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to withdraw from this discussion now, which I find to be nonconstructive at this point. If you have an issue with my editing of an article, which brought it from start class to good article status, you are free to take the matter to WP:COIN (and probably get yourself a fish dinner as I have in the past for less-silly complaints). PCHS-NJROTC ^{(Messages)Have a blessed day.} 17:50, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit you made at Liberty University[4] I might actually bring to COIN, it seems like you added undue background which skews the paragraph in the University's favor. That is exactly the sort of edit that we don't want to be made. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to drop a quick apology for my rv, appreciate your patience. My brain must not be functioning properly this morning - haha. glman (talk) 18:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Glman: It's okay, I've done my share of that, I call it "editing before coffee." The original edit is at WP:COIN now. (sigh) PCHS Pirate Alumnus (talk) 18:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New Anonblock has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Virtual Times 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Virtual Times 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]