User talk:Pure conSouls

This user may have left Wikipedia. Pure conSouls has not edited Wikipedia since 18 June 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Giving you something I wish someone had given me when I started out: WP:VGRS. Cognissonance (talk) 18:37, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, re: these edits, though I think you meant well, there were a few issues. 1) Per WP:TVLEAD, even if a TV series (or in this case, web) has ended/been canceled, we still describe it as "is", not "was". 2) Your edit introduced a grammatical error, "Two TV specials was aired". 3) It's unclear why you reordered the video game platforms. That seems totally arbitrary, and arbitrary changes should be avoided in favor of whatever the status quo is. Thank you and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:18, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, re: this, I don't have a problem with alphabetical. The previous version was a bit random. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:55, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Before I revert it, I'd like you to show me the source which claims Code Vein is an open world game, because none of the sources provided on that article states such.Dohvahkiin (talk) 13:04, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dohvahkiin: You've been at the open world thing for a long time now. Sometimes on the same articles multiple times. One thing that would really help you is if you didn't use user talk pages for this. Open a discussion at the article in question, and ping the editor you need to interact with. If you do it that way, you can point to the talk page in the future if the topic comes up again with different editors. When you use user talk pages, most people won't see the discussion. -- ferret (talk) 13:14, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, alright ferret, thank you for the advice.Dohvahkiin (talk) 13:17, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pure conSouls: I’d like to point out that your recent edit has no sources to back it up. The Polygon article that’s provided does not call this game open world. Neither do any of the sources provided.24.47.204.97 (talk) 16:29, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pure conSouls: I added additional info and sourced it. We’re similar in that we both don’t like vandalism. But that’s why I fact check and make sure everything has had a source provided for the info. I don’t revert unless the information provided doesn’t match up with the sources provided. In this particular case, there weren’t any sources to back up the info, but I dug a little and found a recent article to back up the info. For future reference though, sources should be provided for every new bit of info added. I think you’re doing a great job as an editor. Just remember that I’m here to help and make sure everything is accurate, as you’re doing. I’m sure we’ll speak again eventually. Till then, well stay Gold :) 24.47.204.97 (talk) 16:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the WikiTiger community! This newsletter is for all WikiTigers that have joined. What we WikiTigers aim to do is teach newcomers our policies, guidelines, dos and don'ts, etc. Our edits should always be in good faith and never direct anything negative towards another editor. Things that are looking to be made for the WikiTiger page are to make it more appealing to other editors so that they may want to join. At the end of each month at 00:00 every WikiTiger is looked over to see what awards they should receive and if they need to be warned for bad faith. You are also invited to share your ideas for this project here!: WP:WTDB You have received one award!

♠Dinah♠ 🎤 11:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I know how dedicated you are when it comes to vandalism here, so I just wanted to ask you if you’d be able to restore the Ark: Survival Evolved article to its original version. I checked and noticed an IP Address had blanked 3 sections of the article. I restored the two most recent edits, but not the 3rd, as that has to be done manually. I alerted AdrianGamer to this on his talk page as well, but I figured I may as well let you know, because I know you also would be willing to help. Here’s the history for the article for additional details: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ark:_Survival_Evolved&action=history. Thank you.Dohvahkiin (talk) 13:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, someone already fixed it.Dohvahkiin (talk) 13:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had reverted your edit without fully appreciating its nature. I have now made the correction - my humble apologies as you were right. William Harris • (talk) • 11:27, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message of understanding. At the time I was so busy fighting vandals that I did not think about your edit properly. However, my mind would not let it go because you appear to be a good and competent editor. So I went back and double-checked. Happy editing :-) William Harris • (talk) • 11:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Watch Dogs 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Season pass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dynasty Warriors 9. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
To avoid edit wars, you should immediately start leaving messages on article talk pages or user talk pages once it is apparent you are in a disagreement with someone. Carefully and civilly explaining Wikipedia's guidelines, such as MOS:VG, in a talk page message is oftentimes far more effective than communicating strictly through edit summaries. Mz7 (talk) 19:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pure conSouls. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]