User talk:Lewi6400youtubeChannel

Hi, do you want to add more to Deep Dark Ocean. Lemon and Trevor McDonald.62.231.136.1 (talk) 10:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

What can I do now?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company, organization, or clients. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

• Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
• Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
• Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 14:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Lewi6400youtubeChannel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Lewis6400GN'R (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

To replace the youtube channel suffix. If this is not sutaible i do have other ideas.

Accept reason:

Unblocking to allow request for username change. I see a number of good faith edits and I hope these continue. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Thanks. WilliamH (talk) 17:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am a bit confused, what is it i need to do?--Lewi6400youtubeChannel (talk) 23:26, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Camberwell (EP) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Remedy (album)

Focus on Atlantic Jaxx (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Zephyr

Junction (EP) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Acid music

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Sessions (compilation series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jose Nunez and Mark Knight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Kick Horns, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Gray and The Great Escape (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lewi6400youtubeChannel. You have new messages at WilliamH's talk page.
Message added 22:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

WilliamH (talk) 22:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Deejay Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to New wave, Dancing in the Dark and The Politics of Dancing

"Ridgeriders" In Concert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tan Hill

Phil Beer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Exposed (album)

Turf maze (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bath

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Hi thanks for the barnstar Lewis. I return with one for you. Of the articles you've made alone, as well as the ones i helped, they are very good and informative. Well done :) TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 23:46, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lewis. I notice that you were unblocked some months ago in order to request a namechange, but you did not; perhaps you were unable to work out how (it's not the most intuitive system). I'll try and explain, and i suggest you make the request immediately, in order to avoid a further, perhaps longer, block.
You need to go here (click the link i've given you), which is the main page for requesting changes. Read it, then click on the bottom, where it says Simple or, if you like, click here, which will take you to the page to actually make the request. Once there, follow the directions, putting your current name and the one you want in the correct spots. Ideally, once you save your request, a bureaucrat ~ one of the users who has the ability to do so ~ will activate your change. Once you've made the request, do not sign in again with your old name, as i believe that messes things up a bit.
Any further help i can offer you, please ask! Cheers, Lindsay^Hello 13:38, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All of the vandalism on pages with my account was done by some fool. I trusted him but I was there to invert it all immediately with a nice handy 'view history' window also open. --Lewi6400youtubeChannel (talk) 16:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for allowing someone else access to your account by your own admission above, and failing to honor the condition of your last unblock that you change your username. Now that this account has been compromised, it cannot be unblocked. See WP:COMPROMISED for further information concerning what you can do. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:56, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Camberwell (EP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable song

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 17:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Focus on Atlantic Jaxx is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Focus on Atlantic Jaxx until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaxx Unreleased II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaxx Unreleased II until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unreleased Mixes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unreleased Mixes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Remixes (Basement Jaxx EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remixes (Basement Jaxx EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Junction (EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junction (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Span Thang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Span Thang until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 06:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betta Daze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betta Daze until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 06:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Once in a Blue Moon (Phil Beer Band album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]