User talk:Lundgren8

Welcome!

Hello, Lundgren8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Azar Habib. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:31, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lundgren8. You have new messages at SchuminWeb's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Johan Sjöstrand. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Johan Sjöstrand has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 17:58, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lundgren8, Thank you for your interest and efforts in regard to the Lakota language version of Wikipedia; they are much appreciated! It has been quite a while since I have actively participated in the Wikimedia community. My knowledge of the Lakota language is also VERY basic. Please edit it and improve upon it as you see fit. If I think of anything to contribute and have time, I would like to get back into the Wikimedia Foundation to my previous level. Once again, thanks and happy editing!

Ζρς ιβ' ^¡hábleme! 00:11, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. That edit was not correct - Help:IPA for Swedish uses the double stress [ˈɡamːˈla] to denote the second toneme, not a literal double primary stress (although there's a strong secondary stress on [-la]}}). Martin sv 85 (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it is not commonplace to use the primary stress mark to denote the second toneme when transcribing Swedish. It can easily be taken, as you say, as a literal double primary stress. In the literature, a grave accent mark or a superscript digit is usually used. Best, --Lundgren8 (t · c) 10:52, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That may be true, but we'd need to take that to Help talk:IPA for Swedish. Personally, I have nothing against using a superscript 2 to indicate the second toneme, but it'd be better if we had a consensus first. Martin sv 85 (talk) 10:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I had not seen that it was the standard at Help talk:IPA for Swedish to use that type of transcription. I have not encountered it before and it is in my opinion incorrect. A double high pitch curve (which is what characterizes the 2nd toneme) is not the same thing as a double stress. That is, high pitch does not always equal stress, it’s just perceived as such since we are used to marking stress with a high pitch in many Western European languages. In reality, there is only one stress in that word. Best, --Lundgren8 (t · c) 10:56, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, we have good arguments to boldly change it without asking more people. I also haven't encountered such transcription in sources other than Wikipedia. Ok, so:

- Words with the second toneme use the superscript 2 instead of the stress mark: [²ɡamːla]

- We mark the secondary stress in longer words (be it with toneme 1 or 2), so [²stuːʂøː.ʊˌjʉːrɛ]

- Words with the first toneme use the ordinary stress mark.

Is that right? Martin sv 85 (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That looks like quite a good solution to me. Another solution would be using e.g. [gámːla]. I recommend Tomas Riad’s Swedish phonology as source which is very thorough when it comes to prosody and word accents. --Lundgren8 (t · c) 11:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of Riad (2014), but thanks. I think [²ɡamːla] is more neutral, as [²] doesn't tell you how to realize the second toneme (there are a few ways, right?) Anyway, I'll look around and will probably start introducing our transcription soon. I'll start with Help:IPA for Swedish and Swedish phonology. Maybe you can take a look at the transcriptions on Swedish phonology#Sample, I'm probably not knowledgable enough to edit those. Martin sv 85 (talk) 12:02, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The grave accent mark does not tell you have it’s realised either, it’s derived from the fact that the 2nd toneme is usually called ”grave accent” in Swedish, and is therefore marked with a grave accent, but it’s fully understandable that it can be confused with a raising tone. I’ll have a look later. Best, --Lundgren8 (t · c) 12:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. Last question: both försal and spärrnät have the second toneme, correct? Martin sv 85 (talk) 12:20, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, and secondary stress. --Lundgren8 (t · c) 12:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Do you think we need to mark the secondary stress in disyllabic words? The superscript 2 can be easily understood to mean [ˈâˌâ]. The confusion arises only in words with more than two syllables. Martin sv 85 (talk) 13:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it’s not really necessary, but there are disyllabic accent 2 words both with and without secondary stress. If you mark accent, I don’t think it would be unusual to mark secondary stress as well. --Lundgren8 (t · c) 14:26, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lundgren8. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lundgren8. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lundgren8. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mihangel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable first name, not suitable as disambig as only one subject with this name presently has an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lundgren8,

Thank you for creating Jorma Koivulehto.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This has been tagged for three issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 08:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir! Peter Roach having written in English Phonetics and Phonology that it is difficult to confirm these settings scientifically and etc, I do not understand why there is no information about lack of scientific proofs. I am a reader of EnWiki, and, to tell you the exact truth, I think it to be very important to describe all points of views on that. You having edited the article on that, I do not understand why you have not added this point. I believe you to think this conception to be doubtful, therefore there is a controversy. That's why it is evident that the afore-said article is not completely correct. The article being incomplete, I cannot transcribe it.

In a word, I pray you to lay down the conventional point of view in the following article. The phrase Non-native speakers typically find the basis of articulation one of the greatest challenges in acquiring a foreign language's pronunciation. Speaking with the basis of articulation of their own native language results in a foreign accent, even if the individual sounds of the target language are produced correctly. seems not to be conventional.Роман Сидоров (г. Смоленск) (talk) 08:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir! Having an intention to write an article concerning teaching English pronunciation, methinks, it seems to be exceedingly important to know tha authors of the most popular SBs in your country. I think, these are Ann Baker "Tree or three", "Ship or sheep"; English Pronunciation in Use ; Get rid of your accent; O'Connor and Fletcher "Sounds English Am I right, sir?Роман Сергеевич Сидоров (talk) 10:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Norrland dialects, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arnäs. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Norrland dialects, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Predicative and Ostrobothnia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]