User talk:Luna Santin/Archive 8

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Luna Santin. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

→

Archive 15

Happy Hanukkah Luna Santin I know you're not Jewish but I am so I feal like spreading the Hanukkah feeling. Thanks for getting me unblocked.Sam ov the blue sand 23:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Why did you delete two Price is Right redirects? The admin closing the RfD concerning those two closed it as a "keep". Philwelch 23:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

So what am i supposed to do? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SmokeyPirate (talk • contribs) 16 December 2006.

Hey, thanks for reverting the removals from my talk page archive. Looks like one of the parties didn't want a record of the dispute around. --Maxamegalon2000 16:35, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

As requested here are the AOL netblocks: 62.51.0.0/16 64.236.0.0/16 66.185.128.0/19 149.174.0.0/16 152.163.0.0/16 172.128.0.0/10 172.192.0.0/12 172.208.0.0/14 172.212.0.0/16 172.213.0.0/16 172.214.0.0/16 172.215.0.0/16 172.216.0.0/16 195.93.0.0/17 198.81.0.0/19 204.29.186.0/23 204.140.8.0/22 204.235.112.0/24 204.235.113.0/24 204.235.114.0/24 204.235.116.0/24 204.235.117.0/24 204.235.119.0/24 204.235.120.0/24 204.235.121.0/24 205.188.0.0/16 206.222.224.0/19 207.200.96.0/22 207.200.112.0/20 207.200.112.0/20 217.137.0.0/17 217.137.132.0/22 217.137.136.0/21 211.137.144.0/20 211.137.160.0/19 211.137.196.0/22 211.137.200.0/21 211.137.208.0/20 211.137.224.0/20 211.137.224.0/20 211.137.240.0/21 211.137.248.0/22 211.137.252.0/24 211.137.253.0/24 211.137.254.0/24

Good Luck, Somitho 23:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Please email Essjay using the Special:Emailuser to discuss moderation of this mailing list. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 01:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi! Sorry, to bother you. Could you have a quick look at my talk page and Talk:Wigan. Some of the comments have been fairly un civil at the least, but I would be interested to know if you think if they are personal attacks. Certainly I've got myself dragged into an edit war that is proving very boring. Thanks in advance for any advice. Regan123 04:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for that speedy =) — Deon555^talk_desk 08:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Greetings, you recently posted a message on my talk page about a article I created was deleted, I know of no such thing since the last time a created one was 3 weeks ago. Thanks Sloveniaiscool 16:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Do not remove entries from WP:3O without cause. Entries do not have to fit your definition of "neutral." I have it on my watchlist, so do not try again. KazakhPol 19:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Funny, I see nothing there to justify your removing a valid entry. KazakhPol 19:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I have moved your comment on Pco's talkpage to a new section, as I believe we are discussing separate topics at the moment. Your comment is under the section "untitled." On a separate note, there is an ongoing conversation on Wikipedia talk:Third opinion you may be interested in, KazakhPol 20:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, whats up with removing my request? You must be a friend of Jayjg. Pco 20:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Luna's actions in this matter. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 22:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

You know what I'll keep in mind? You need to fuck off. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rasburried (talk • contribs) 17 December 2006.

You seem to have deleted cold fusion/tmp on Sept 18, 2006. This temporary page was written by a cold fusion researcher, and, as such, contained valuable information. I wanted to have a second look at it to improve the cold fusion article. Why was it deleted ? Was the deletion discussed and approved somewhere ? Is there anyway to find it again ? It would be sad if we could not find it anymore. Pcarbonn 22:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for undeleting it. Where exactly did you put it ? I can't find it. Pcarbonn 17:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi, you've been following the recent controversy at David A. Yeagley? Multiple IPs (most likely sockpuppets) keep deleting the entire article, replacing it with a strongly negative/POV "hatchet job" article. I realize that this individual is political and thus leaves his writings open to scrutiny and commentary, but the continued reversion without collaboration or use of the discussion page (it's been several weeks) is a bit difficult to deal with. Nobody has responded to the posting I made to the biographies noticeboard so I wonder how I should proceed, other than keep reverting the article for an indefinite duration into the future. I suppose the IPs could be considered to be committing repeated vandalism, but your input would be appreciated. Badagnani 04:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Many thanks. Badagnani 09:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

Volume 2, Issue 51	18 December 2006	About the Signpost

From the editor: Holiday publication
Elections conclude, arbitrators to be chosen	Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser opens
WikiWorld comic: "Dr. Seuss"	News and notes: Fundraiser plans, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Does it work? [ælfəks] 06:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I am not sure. Can you please check up on it and put a template which notes the blockage? Thanks. Bearly541 10:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I forgot about the log. I don't have access to it, since I am not an administrator. Bearly541 10:54, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Were you going to put this on AfD? I've created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1-5-7-1 and added my arguments for deletion there. I like a lot of the telephony articles on Wikipedia; they were one of the reasons I came here. However I don't think we need an article on what appears to be little more than a voicemail service. Graham87 11:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

This User: 210.5.121.190. You removed vandalism from the Prussian Blue (duo) Talk Page that that User left before. The User left this vile, threatening vandalism before; and I believe they should be blocked for it. By the content of the vandalism, I consider this User to be dangerous. Acalamari 16:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for blocking them. Most vandalism is annoying, but the type of vandalism that the User far, far beyond "normal" vandalism. I gave this User a warning when they first left the threat, but it seems that the User wrote the threat again. We'll see if the vandal keeps doing it after the block. Again, thanks. Acalamari 21:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

I would like to inquire about recent deletion of "Church Of Google" article. The reason given was quite criptic, and I`d like an explanation, please. Alice Shade 22:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Article was placed in Wikipedia according to "Search engine criteria". At the current time, requesting search for "church google" or "church of google" will yield several top-rank search results, which are either highly relevant, either directly connected with subject at hand. (tested at www.google.com and www.yahoo.com)

It was designed primarily not as a reference to particular organisation, but as a summary of religion/philosophy, geared to provide relevant information and refute several common misconceptions. Subject was referenced several times, both by internet resources and press - it could be seen in the search results, which back up earlier claim.

As an example of relevant press - http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/06/29/nyt.friedman/

This article was printed in New York Times, and references to subject as religion/philosophy.

As a side note, article represented a work in progress, and the state it was deleted in, could be described as stub - expansion of it was planned to follow through, along with wikification and compilation of references. It is a joint project, thus it`s compilation was stretched to accomodate contributors from different time zones. Alice Shade

Dhxaluzabm77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) just showed up on recent changes, same MO as the others you blocked. Choess 03:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll hang on RC for a while yet, drop any others I see onto AIV for someone else to handle. Choess 03:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, if it comes to that...

http://www.pandia.com/sw-2004/16-god.html

http://www.webpronews.com/news/ebusinessnews/wpn-45-20040504GoogleFindsReligion.html

Those articles date back to 2004 (another two of top searches for "church of google"), and reference solely to idea of religion/philosophy. They have no connection whatsoever with www.thechurchofgoogle.org - which was founded at summer of 2006. Moreso, those articles reference an Orkut society, which is quite a different medium, then web site.

I think, that this provides enough of proof to state, that the idea of such religion/philosophy is not a singular joke occurance, and had been voiced and researched in several different cases and sociums, which, in my opinion, would be reason enough to provide an outline in Wikipedia.

Alice Shade 11:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Oops, indeed! That'll teach me for making sneaky edits while at work. Thanks for letting me know. :) Sarah Ewart 12:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Church_of_Google. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Alice Shade 16:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for unblocking me, it made my day! I'm thankful there are people on the Wikipedia that are willing to be reasonable. Happy Holidays too. Tblore 18:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Luna, what is the process of an admin being de-syopsed? Don't worry, I am not talking about you. Bearly541 20:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, because this admin was rude to me on this incident [1]. He has been stalking me since a prior incident. Bearly541 21:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello Root_Exploit, Thanx for your co-operation in being big discussion on Ankit Fadia Talk Page. I have answered your queries on. Please Check :

[2] http://kalpeshsharma.wordpress.com/2006/12/15/wikipedia-administrators-ankit-fadias-relatives/#comments

Thnaks a lot ! Kalpesh Sharma —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.95.201.77 (talk) 20 December 2006

Er, sorry, but I'm not sure what you're referring to? If we've had some communication in the past, I may need you to jog my memory. Luna Santin 21:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

why did you block "wikimaster,beter than you"??????????????????????????????? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.41.12.21 (talk) 20 December 2006

Thanks for ur help, I will make sure I keep calm and talk sense. regards. Mak82hyd 00:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I will, Thanks very much for ur warm advise and help. regards, Mak82hyd 00:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Did you notice on RC that there are (-152) and (+155) on the changes? What do they mean? Bearly541 00:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

The numbers mean how many characters are being added or removed. A character is each letter/number/symbol - for example, cat has three. (+572) means 572 characters were added to the article, whilst (-176) means 176 were removed. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 10:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Luna, can you please protect Selena since she is a FA? Vandalism is currently occuring there. Bearly541 00:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays, Luna Santin! Wishing you a very happy holidays, full of laughter and good times! Hope you have an awesome beginning to 2007 as well! Best regards! --lovelaughterlife♥talk? 01:34, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

please don't change the failure passage back to the normal one. im trying to do this funny thing for my math teacher and when you change it it messes everything up —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Madery23 (talk • contribs) 20 December 2006.

how do you do that? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Madery23 (talk • contribs) 20 December 2006.

i got it nevermind. thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Madery23 (talk • contribs) 20 December 2006.

I cant stand this user and the crap hes posting on here. I cant allow such anti-diversity, anti-racial, anti-ethnic things tobe posted on Wikipedia because even thoug hhe thinks hes doing something good, all it does is feed far-right, fascist, racists opionons who fear of losing their distinct identities, cultures and other features. Im sorry, but people like Wobble are a waste of air. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.157.107.88 (talk) 21 December 2006

Ok, I will try to make an official complaint about him with the measures you suggested. I like Wikipedia, and I only wish for it to have the most valid, factual, correct information and sources as well as trying to better human society rather than negatively and faslely altering or affecting peoples perceptions of the truth. 69.157.107.88 11:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

This user has a history of making personal attacks and has specifically targeted me for some reason. He has been blocked in the past for this sort of behaviour.[3] I don't know what his problem is, but he never participates in discussions on talk pages, and seems to think that all of the changes he doesn't like are somehow down to me (when often the changes were nothing to do with me). Often when changes are made they are the result of a discussion on the talk page. Alun 12:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

• And you Wobbs have been consistently warned and near-blocked for vandalism and POV pushing. Read what I said above and that is my problem with you. Some of your opinions are dangerous and unwanted and I'll do everything I can on Wikipedia to stop someone from you pushing such an agenda. Your views insult aspects of peoples identity and distinctivess that they value, and such views need to be stopped. 69.157.107.88 12:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Replied there.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  20:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

thank you for that however i would still like to see some type of news or something posted in the athletic section. Because currently what is there tells me nothing. If I am new and I look at the athletic section all i can say is ok they have sports there. Please tell me a way to get something on there that is interesting and will let others look at a page that has some character about it.71.76.199.201 23:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Your decision to eliminate the article "Bill Rane" based on lack of notability is in error. You should check this in greater detail. While Bill Rane is not known extensively in some places, he is, in the opinion of many, the most notable artist to come out of Art Colony Taos, NM in the entire last half of the twentieth century. You need to google "Bill Rane" and go through the many articles in the Taos newspapers to really understand just how important he is to the Taos Art Colony. This is a mistake that hurts wikipedia, and does not help it. Wikipedia is the appropriate place for speicialized knowledge. Just because you are not personally familiar with Bill Rane does not justify your deletion on notability grounds. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.35.122.142 (talk) 07:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC).

Hey, there. I have no objection to a review of my actions -- if what you say is true, then it's possible I've acted in error. A discussion has been started at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Rane so that the community can have more input and develop a consensus as to what should be done. If you haven't already, you may wish to read about our deletion policy, about the AfD process in particular, and perhaps how to use a discussion page, so that you can have your say in the discussion. I highly encourage you to direct your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Rane. Thanks for your time. Luna Santin 09:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Does this statement mean that you approve IRC-motivated blocks? It is not the first time that I face this problem and I think it legitimate to investigate what's going on there. If you find some hidden political agenda underneath it all, you are welcome to share your apprehensions. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 10:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Hey, would you rather me put "Texan Tyrant" or "The GoatseMan" there? I could have easily done the latter. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AaronFX (talk • contribs) 22 December 2006.

hi luna, sorry for the edit reverts without explanation . kindly go to the page. the discussion wsa put up two months back and the editors had agreed to test out the changes. a new page called "iipm controversy" has been active since almost a year back but strangely the "iipm" page completely repeats text from that page into this page. after a lot of discussion, the reverts were made . unfortunately the people who are reverting back wish to keep text in two places, which is not acceptable. but we'll work towards a concensus. thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.65.248.234 (talk) 15:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC).

Thanks... I left the code blank because I didn't see one for "User swears he's not a sockpuppet and I'm inclined to believe him based on circumstantial evidence so I thought I'd be nice and request a checkuer since he is on indef block and his request for unblock was denined". Maybe that should be G?  :) --Isotope23 16:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Please, be respectful and civil when you come to my page - I do not expect you say me Hey. I was never involved in Battle of Konotop. When is illuminated complete country - that is blanking vandalism.--Vladyslav Savelo 19:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

I was PERSONALLY ATTACKED by the below user on my user page; here;s what he wrote: The main Dune page is already long, this and other articles were purposely split off the main one. In the case of Dune planets, many minor Dune planet links redirect here, if you checked the "What links here". Why is List of One Life to Live characters deserving of its own article and this one isn't? Because you're crazy. TAnthony 01:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

He should be reprimanded! Yrgh 01:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)yrgh

Is anything being done about that user!?

Luna, hi, I was trying to delete the page regarding killercop.com and you blocked my IP (wheresericat). I created the page and decided to delete it. I was not vandalizing it. Any questions email me at wheresericat AT gmail DOT com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.127.246.120 (talk) 23 December 2006

User:Bearly541/christmastemplate

December 24th message of the day: "Luna, you got this page in Simple English? Also, I redirected your name, because it gets confusing for me! Bearly541 14:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing my user page. First time it's been vandalised, and it's not a nice feeling. I see that the perpetrator was warned earlier yesterday. Tony 15:28, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Hey, there! Wondering if you had any thoughts or comment regarding this user's current unblock request -- they seem to be claiming that they left their account open, and someone was abusing it. They do seem to have a prior edit history, at least. Any thoughts? Luna Santin 10:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi Luna!

Thanks for your note. I have declined to unblock this user; from the very beginning his edits were vandalistic or nonsense; I've left specific examples on the user's talk page. If someone else unblocks, he or she will have to watch this user very carefully. Best wishes, Firsfron of Ronchester 19:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

==User:Meisterchef I just wanted to drop you a thank you for your swift attention to the issue you resolved for me. It's good to know that there are administrators here that are willing to do the right thing.

meisterchef 06:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Pile-on. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Frotz661 06:16, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the undelete. Pile-on is a bit of a mess, so I'll go ahead and adopt it for a while. Frotz661 09:22, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Can you do something to stop the current revert warring being made on edits I am making regarding spelling mistakes. I would hate to see anyone brought before ARBCOM for their endless reverts because they dont like using non regional spelling. "Snorkel | Talk" 12:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

That was fast! Thanks :-) -SpuriousQ 14:14, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the blanking of the Criticism section of this article. I looked up the IP address of the user 64.80.202.67 who made the edits and got "The Institutes (IAHP), Glenside, Pennsylvania, US". Is there a specific warning for organisations who edit their own article to remove all criticism? Of course, it may have been a "well meaning" non-staff member using their computers, but in that case they have an issue with abuse of their computer network. -- Colin°^Talk 08:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Just want to thank you for your advice on my talk page - that user has been going around deleting other stuff too - see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_Jersey&diff=prev&oldid=97866938 for another example - the New York one had a {{disputed|date=December 2006}} tag on it - shouldn't the disputed text be left until the result is found out? Sorry if these are dumb questions - I am (obviously) really new here. Alucard (Dr.) 22:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Please can you shorten the line of small font so that it apears as one line instead of two for most screen res settings. Thanks. frummer 00:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello Luna Santin. I am just wondering about penguins on your user page. What is penguin for? Is the penguin that I am mentioning is mascot of Linux? Or the other operating system's mascot? Just curious about penguin on your user page. Cheers! Daniel5127 <Talk> 00:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for catching yet another spoofer of myself. I got a couple others for you: User:Perpan poe pal and User:Persian prostitute poet.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

This user:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/69.157.107.88

is acting as if he owned Wiki, going around deleting information, making arbitrary changes and insulting people. Veritas et Severitas 03:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[4] -- I didn't realize anyone else was watching. There's three very good reasons for thinking it's the Lucille Ball vandal, but you know what they are.  :) Antandrus (talk) 05:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 1	2 January 2007	About the Signpost

Effort to modify fair use policy aborted	Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
WikiWorld comic: "Thagomizer"	News and notes: Fundraiser continues, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

I wish to complain about this person: 82.28.41.229 who seems intent on attacking me on my Talk Page. Thanks.

(Ravenfire 07:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC))

Talk – Sandbox – Suggestions

This is an archive of past discussion. Please do not modify it. If you need to continue or revive one of these discussions, feel free to start a new thread on my talk page.

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 1 « 7 ‹ Archive 8 › 9 » 28

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For knowing when to welcome a user and when to rangeblock an entire ISP, for your anti-vandalism efforts, for your general ability to get stuff done, for your attempts to calm down the petty squabbles about IRC on the incidents noticeboard, and for being a more experienced administrator than me despite making your first edit only six months ago, when I was already at RfA, you get another barnstar to add to your collection. – Gurch, 24 December 2006

Yes, I know you said don't give me any more barnstars, but that was nearly three months ago, and you haven't had this one before. And more importantly, you deserve it. Oh, and Merry Christmas.

Hmmm, my rather long explanation makes a mess of your nice barnstar table. You can trim it down a bit if you like, I don't mind :) – Gurch 11:07, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

I hate edit conflicts :-) I'd an {{unblock reviewed}} typed in with wording just about 100% the same as yours, and then I found you'd beaten me to it by about 30 seconds :-) I see the user has once again blanked all the warnings - I think protection on that talk page might be called for until the block expires. Shall I protect it and add instructions to take it to WP:RFP when the block expires, if you think that's OK? Tonywalton  | Talk 10:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Khoikhoi's run a checkuser on Technajunky and warned him/her about sockpuppetry; that one was blanked as well. I've protected it now. Merry Xmas, by the way! Tonywalton  | Talk 10:23, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

You might be interested in this: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Permanently blocked User:Technajunky Jayjg ^(talk) 19:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi,

I was just having a go at a BiancaMed page. I am hoping to do something along the lines of ResMed (who happen to be an investor) without being spam-like. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Biancamed (talk • contribs) 25 December 2006.

Hi, I wish you to please restore the articles Allah Ditta lunewala or at lest give the the stuff so that I may re-create it and add some more information to it He is famous regional singer. Abulfazl 09:25, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

what is your problem —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mcgillismusic (talk • contribs) 26 December 2006.

Looking at the deleted revisions, I believe that the band article Explosion (band) doesn't fall under CSD A7 - they were claimed to have toured multiple countries, which certainly satisfies WP:MUSIC. Secondly they had at least one member who later joined a notable(?) band - Menudo. Finding sources for these claims is another thing, but the mere presence of a plausible claim is enough for the article to escape speedy. Please restore the page. Kimchi.sg 11:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I was looking at Explosion (the band) which Mcgillismusic had moved explosion to - that was the one you deleted as CSD A7. But the content is identical. :] I'll undelete the "(band)" version since it's the proper disambiguated title, and list at AfD for input.

(I do think there are WP:COI and WP:SPAM concerns with the Mcgillismusic user, but I think the article is re-writeable if there are enough sources so I'm letting more eyes take a look. OTOH if everyone wants the stuff to be deleted we'll have a consensus to do so. ;-) Kimchi.sg 12:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Done. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explosion (band). Kimchi.sg 12:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi,

Thank you for your help with the puppet account User:IanFuller (block log). I was wondering if you mind deleting Image:SIA Cabin Crew.jpg? Since the purpose of the puppet account was to give the impression of being the copyright holder, I thought that it seemes unnecessary to wait for the image to be deleted as a orphaned fair use image.

Sincerely, Oden 14:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

thanks for advice. btw, i am wba at irc. cheers, West Brom 4ever 00:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

You have reverted several vandal attacks by User:Ranceturd, and blocked him/her, apparently on the grounds of an inappropriate username. This vandal has already been banned several times for making identical attacks -- see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Szamuels, Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Fumigate, Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/RanceRol. S/he sets up frequent new user ids, apparently using an anonymiser or proxy server, solely with the purpose of posting abuse about Roland Rance. S/he clearly looks at my contributions history, using this as a guide to where to post this abuse -- there is no other logical explanation for posting comments on Farouk Kaddoumi, Gilad Atzmon and Roberto Rosselini; the only connection is that I had recently edited all of them.

This person is stalking me on Wikipedia, and abusing the project as a whole. Is there any way that s/he can be stopped? --RolandR 00:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Can you please kill [5] - a clerk action of moving the case page resulted in an unneeded redirect :) Cheers, Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 02:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Merry Christmas (I love entei 05:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC))

Weekly Delivery

Volume 2, Issue 52	26 December 2006	About the Signpost

Seven arbitrators chosen	Wikipedia classroom assignments on the rise
WikiWorld comic: "Molasses"	News and notes: Stewards appointed, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

You may be interested in this. MER-C 13:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

You might also want to remove his comment at the bottom. --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 00:06, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello-- I have no idea what's going on with this page-- When you were doing your revert I also was reverting it to remove that image and take it back to an earlier version. I note that on your edit a link to the image still appears. I don't know if there was anything of value eliminated, but it would be a small price to pay to get rid of that image. Regards, Kablammo 00:12, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for watching this. I have to sign off now; I hope the vandal can be blocked before more damage is done. Kablammo 00:15, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Luna, not sure what to do about this - Joelr31 (talk · contribs) (admin) hasn't been around over Christmas, and it looks like the Salsa vandal is trying to create the impression of being Joelito. Sandy (Talk) 00:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

When Joelito gets back, he may have some sock ideas. Sandy (Talk) 00:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for protecting his talk page - things now seem to have gone quiet. Squeezeweasel 00:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi. If you don't have admin access on the Commons, ask me if I can be of assistance in deleting/blocking image vandals using the Commons. Thanks for your good work, -- Infrogmation 01:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Before trying to tweak any rangeblocks or autoblocks, could you please see me in #-clerks - Essjay needs me to pass on some critical info to you. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 06:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

For unblocking me. DavidJJJ 18:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

You said: "Any chance you'd care to comment on this unblock request? This isn't the only person who seems to have been caught up in it."

I lifted the block. The ISP has completely ignored my abuse report. This means we almost certainly will now have to fight yet more Cute 1 4 u (talk · contribs) sockpuppets. Additionally, this block shouldn't have affected anyone who already had an account. I'm sorry for the collateral, however. --Yamla 19:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Your effort is much appreciated, especially since it was not you who imposed the block, but Essjay - who seems to have gone on a break right afterwards ... Textor 21:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your welcome note. Athletes Foot 00:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Too late you see Kelly's mates are just too powerful [6] who will be the next to stand up to her I wonder. Giano 01:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello. Somebody has been messing around with the dates in this article for a long time. As far as I can tell he was born in 1923, and I have set it to that. However, is there a way that I can find somebody to verify this? Thanks Athletes Foot 23:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

What's going on here? I check that page occasionally. Read it: you'll see what I mean. Acalamari 00:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

It's okay, I believe you. I check the Opronc/Opronc-oA pages occasionally to see if anything changed. I don't know about you, but I think it's funny that this User has a list of Users he "doesn't like." It seems that you are one of them; and so, not surprisingly, am I. Acalamari 02:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

What are Google Alerts, and what do you mean by getting "blogged?" I know what a blog is, but I don't know what the term "blogged" means. Acalamari 02:44, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I'll let you get back to your own work. I'll check the Opronc-oA Talk Page more often, just to see what Opronc/Opronc-oA has to say. Acalamari 02:49, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Please look at the page right now if you are online! Bearly541 01:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Did this user say that he wanted to be blocked? Bearly541 02:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Luna, isn't your name Spanish? Bearly541 03:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

who have been blocked? Bearly541 03:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Luna, my access to WP is very limited right now, so I can't deal with this myself. Someone has tampered with Ryan Seacrest, or with one of the images therein, so that it now has Tubgirl in it. This is bad. Deal with it, please? DS 03:25, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for putting pile-on back. It didn't survive its nearly immediate AfD, but it did get a get a goodly amount of attention and perhaps will come back again. Frotz661 08:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Copied from archive: You seem to have deleted cold fusion/tmp on Sept 18, 2006. This temporary page was written by a cold fusion researcher, and, as such, contained valuable information. I wanted to have a second look at it to improve the cold fusion article. Why was it deleted ? Was the deletion discussed and approved somewhere ? Is there anyway to find it again ? It would be sad if we could not find it anymore. Pcarbonn 22:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Any news from this undeletion ? Should I start a deletion review ? Pcarbonn 19:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

OK. Thanks.Pcarbonn 14:09, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

You blocked my ISP address for simply restoring a link named the Lets talk Dusty site repeatedly, that was previously destroyed and removed by ravenfire again and again. I really resent that you took it on yourself to see my actions as vandalism when I was only restoring the links and NOT deleting them. You should have contacted by message first! Do it again and I'll report you to Wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brum2k (talk • contribs) 30 December 2006.

To add to that, the IP address doesn't seem to be a shared one, or isn't shared among very many people, and it's starting to look like you're the same person. Do you have a slightly more robust explanation, perhaps?

(Gives you the stupid dog look) Seven minutes? How'm I supposed to know I logged in seven minutes after the dweeb was blocked? Pffft, I can't help bad timing on my part. :P Yes, it has been a while, obviously....death in the family, grieving, and probate chaos tends to do that. But I suppose that's not robust enough for you...*shrugs* So... I have questions for you. You apparently glanced at my article edit dates, but... (1) Have you looked at the subject matter? Does the subject matter match the other dweeb's usual haunts? (2) Since you won't google me, have you looked at the COMMENTS that I've made on articles I watch? That's where most of my blabbering has been. (Since it's been a while, you'll probably need to search the respective article "talk"'s archives.) Otherwise, hey, you can always drop me an email and I'll explain things further that way. Open invitation to land in my inbox. :) There's a link via my user page, I believe, I don't want to direct link my email here since I get more than enough spammage already. SphynxCatVP 01:49, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello Luna, I notice you have been making quite a few large rangeblocks recently and I was just wondering why, since these /16 blocks affect over 65000 IPs each. Sorry to bother you, Prodego ^talk 04:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Nothing to worry about, just that there seemed to be an awful lot (in general, not you) of /16 blocks going on, and I was wondering if I was missing something! ;-) Prodego ^talk 05:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Mikey95, who you blocked, has made an {{unblock}} request on his talk page. Please respond to it.Eli Falk 12:02, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello Luna, I want to propose this 2RR rule, what to you say? --HIZKIAH (User &#149; Talk) 13:25, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I see you blocked this user indef with the reason vandal account. This user has claimed his account was compromised by a household member. Looking through the users contribution history I tend to believe him. All vandalism is at the end of his contributions following general helpfulness.

I reduced the block to 4 days warning the user that he is responsible for his account. I hope I have not stepped on your toes too much with this. If you know something I do not I will gladly rethink this. I will be watching the user's contributions very closely. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 16:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

The SEGA checkuser was moved to complete with only 1 of SEGA's 3 IP addys being blocked. It is nice to see an overdue punishment handed down...but SEGA does just as much damage using the other 2 IP addresses. Should they not have been given the same block duration as the "prime" IP? Just wondering. Thanks, cheers and Happy New Year! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 05:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

That unfortunate autoblock I seemed to have accquired by a changing Ip has lifted now, I can edit again. I'm perfectly fine now. :) Wiki wa wa 12:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I am not sure why it shows that my IP is blocked by YOU ? I am not good in computers, so give me a layman answer please. Happy 2007 ! -- anbarasi

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anbarasi12 (talk • contribs) 1 January 2007.

That is really intriging how I made a valid complaint on your talk forum on you blocking my isp address and you delete that too. Grand to see how you don't want people to see the vandalism you actually carry out. You need reporting —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.28.41.229 (talk) 23:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC).

Luna is grouchy. —Brian Michael Barbera 02:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Dear Luna Santin,

First of all, I want to say, you are the only administrator that has shown any respect to me, and for that, I come to ask that you help me overcome this outstanding prejudice directed toward myself by the many pompous admins that continue to block me and harass me unfairly. While I have made mistakes in the past, I assure you I am committed to only contributing to wikipedia.

I am angry because the last time I was blocked was completely unfair. I was issued a warning because I posted "I love you" on two users talk pages. While they took this as a joke, I took it as my try to make peace with these people that i felt wronged me in the past. I'm sorry if "love" is considered a joke around here. While I tried explaining that I should not be warned for something like this, they decided they did not want to hear the radical idea that they were exerting their overzealous attitude towards me, instead of being responsible admins. As a result, they decided to keep me quiet by blocking me for a week. While on this ban, they decided to accuse me of having a sockpuppet, because this user claimed he was me in an edit. Everybody knows a sockpuppet would not admit he is one in his own edit. Since they foolishly thought this user was a sockpuppet of mine, they extended the block to 1 month, to further keep me quiet. I, obviously finding this as unfair, decided to request an unblock, because an accusation that has no actual evidence is no reason to extend the block. Since this was a way of me speaking out, they rejected and even protected my page, which is why you may not be able to respond on my page until the user decides to unprotect it.

I hope you can get back to me, and really help me out. I feel mistreated, and, as a person that cannot stand unjust people and a person that fights for what is right, I want to fight this, so that this whole mishap is solved. If you can help in any way, that would be appreciated. I know that I might even get blocked again for writing this letter, since it involves me speaking out against the almighty admins, even though what I am speaking out against, is wrong.

Thank you, Sportsguru9999 08:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)