User talk:L0rents

Dear Sir: I saw your comments in the discussion for the hydrogen molecular ion. I have responded to your points and added material. I hope this addresses your points. Have you seen the Chem. Phys. paper of Scott et al.? The 3D case of H2_+ is indeed licked for the clamped nuclear case. This problem can be done entirely with a Computer algebra program. Is everything clear now?

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Exomol, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.exomol.com/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:08, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KISS (algorithm) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KISS (algorithm) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 03:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Please note that you shouldn't create articles without substantial secondary source coverage, such as Kalyna (cipher). This goes against the the notability guideline. Articles that don't satisfy the notability guideline may be proposed for deletion. -- intgr [talk] 16:43, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]