User talk:Kseni-kam

Welcome!

A plate of chocolate chip cookies. — **Welcome!**

Hello, Kseni-kam, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Kseni-kam, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Draft:Kk, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Maliner (talk) 06:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kseni-kam,

Please be more careful with page moves, make sure a) that the article should be moved to a different page title, b) that you have spelled it correctly and c) that you are moving the article to the correct namespace. If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ivan Prokhanov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Ivan Prokhanov, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rusty4321 ^{talk contribs} 00:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

You may want to take some time and learn about referencing on Wikipedia. Here are some places to start:

If you need further help, you can ask at the WP:Teahouse

--76.14.122.5 (talk) 04:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Moscow (painting), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cm. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Kseni-kam! Your additions to Draft:Martyrs of Alapayevsk have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:A Birch Grove has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:A Birch Grove. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Kseni-kam (talk) 21:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berlin Childhood around 1900 has been accepted

Berlin Childhood around 1900, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadspike [Talk] 16:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Kseni-kam (talk) 16:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:A Birch Grove has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:A Birch Grove. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 22:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Birch Grove has been accepted

A Birch Grove, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 07:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martyrs of Alapayevsk has been accepted

Martyrs of Alapayevsk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 21:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: All in the past has been accepted

All in the past, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 07:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question about OKA

hey, thanks for your nice translations! I never heard of OKA, but today saw two editors supported by them. If you don't mind to answer, how does it work? Do you choose what to translate by yourself? I can see a very broad range of translated articles, looks impressive. Artem.G (talk) 20:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for your editorial work and this message, too. I am quite new at OKA: I joined the team three months ago. We aim to fill the existing gaps between Wikipedia in different languages, and we have a long and growing list of articles to translate: some are chosen by our team leaders, others are suggested by us freelance translators. The articles to be translated are selected for being well written and highly qualified (with reliable references, bibliography, clear narrative and structure in the source language, etc.) in different languages. Then we pick them up and translate according to our interests and backgrounds. Kseni-kam (talk) 21:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hey, thanks for the answers! looks like a nice project :) Artem.G (talk) 15:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Historiography in the Middle Ages has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Historiography in the Middle Ages. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 19:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Translating across Wikipedias

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 20:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capitalism as Religion (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Capitalism as Religion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Draft:The St. Petersburg workmen's petition to the Tsar (January 22, 1905)

Hello Kseni-kam! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:The St. Petersburg workmen's petition to the Tsar (January 22, 1905), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://valenteshop.ru/en/bolshe-sil-gosudar-nastal-predel-terpeniyu-semeinyi-arhiv-ii-mery-protiv-nishchety/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:The St. Petersburg workmen's petition to the Tsar (January 22, 1905) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:The St. Petersburg workmen's petition to the Tsar (January 22, 1905), in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:The St. Petersburg workmen's petition to the Tsar (January 22, 1905). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:The St. Petersburg workmen's petition to the Tsar (January 22, 1905) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:The St. Petersburg workmen's petition to the Tsar (January 22, 1905) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 12:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I now see that the draft is a copy/translation of the Russian Wikipedia article on this topic and the source that I mentioned was copied from there (it's what we call a Wikipedia mirror). It's okay to copy/translate from other Wikipedias but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. Please do so as soon as you create the page, so that mistakes such as mine are avoided. Best to put it in an edit summary as well as using the {{translated}} template on the article's talk page. Thanks. — Diannaa (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding and for the translation template tip! We also submit them as AfC before they pass to the main space, so it also usually helps to clear up that these are translations. Kseni-kam (talk) 20:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are required to provide attribution under the terms of the licensing. Please don't forget, as new page patrollers might not realize you took the material from another wiki. — Diannaa (talk) 20:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The St. Petersburg workmen's petition to the Tsar (January 22, 1905) has been accepted

The St. Petersburg workmen's petition to the Tsar (January 22, 1905), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 20:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

links on Ivan Prokhanov

hey, i've just stumbled across this article and thought "wow that's a lot of redlinks!" only to hover over them and find out they're all wikilinks to Russian article titles clearly left over from your translation of the Russian article into English, e.g. Пашков, Василий Александрович (религиозный деятель). i've fixed the lead section, but this is a pretty long article and i'd appreciate it if you would clean up these links and check the links in other translations (i haven't checked any of your other articles). translation from other languages is very valuable and i salute you for it, but it's necessary to make sure links and other bits and bobs are functional. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 07:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for your message and help. I'll clean up this article during this week. It was one of the first long articles I worked on, and I took too serious the instruction to save interwiki links and redlinks hehe, now I do it more wisely. Thanks again. Kseni-kam (talk) 16:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kseni-kam You should replace these with Template:Interlanguage link. The red link itself should point to an "English named" page, but it can be followed by the interlanguage link. 7804j (talk) 07:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Kseni-kam (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:By the Pool has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:By the Pool. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 03:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for mentioning these specific errors and articles where you've seen them: I didn't get that I was repeating them, surely because of hurry and wish to do more and faster, sorry for these. I'll work on the articles you mention hoping then they'll be accepted in the main space. Kseni-kam (talk) 03:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! -- Hoary (talk) 07:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Major's marriage proposal has been accepted

Major's marriage proposal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ratnahastin (talk) 04:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yevgeny Beletsky has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yevgeny Beletsky. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 05:48, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Sorcerer Comes to a Peasant Wedding has been accepted

A Sorcerer Comes to a Peasant Wedding, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 01:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Translated page template goes on the Talk page

Kseni-kam, the {{translated page}} template goes on the Talk page of an article, not the article (or Draft) page. I've removed no-wikified {{Translated}} templates from Draft:Gazette readers in Naples and Draft:By the Pool, and I expect there may be more. (It looks like the nowiki tags might be an artifact of Visual Editor, if you are using that, but I'm not an expert on VE.) Also, Draft:Gazette readers in Naples lacks a Talk page; please see the OKA instructions about creating one. Adding 7804j. Mathglot (talk) 07:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Only in the last ones I've worked on, the template mentioned was lef in the wrong place, I'll give it a look. The talk page in "Gazette readers..." is added :) Kseni-kam (talk) 14:02, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eunuchs in the Byzantine Empire has been accepted

Eunuchs in the Byzantine Empire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 11:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Historiography in the Middle Ages has been accepted

Historiography in the Middle Ages, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 12:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vera la Taciturna has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vera la Taciturna. Thanks! Cerebellum (talk) 16:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vera the Silent has been accepted

Vera the Silent, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 17:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:B84C:9C66:EC05:38A. I noticed that you recently removed all content from a page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:B84C:9C66:EC05:38A (talk) 01:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was not on purpose, sorry, thanks. Kseni-kam (talk) 02:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Constantinople history has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Constantinople history. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yevgeny Beletsky has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yevgeny Beletsky. Thanks! Cerebellum (talk) 09:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:By the Pool has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:By the Pool. Thanks! Cerebellum (talk) 16:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constantinople history (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

I'm okay with accepting this as a child article of History of Istanbul, but we need to fix the reference errors. Try using User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors to identify the errors.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Constantinople history and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 13:36, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yevgeny Beletsky (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

Please fix the reference errors then resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yevgeny Beletsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 13:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: By the Pool (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

Please fix the reference errors then resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:By the Pool and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 13:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taking a Snow Town (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

Please fix the reference errors then resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taking a Snow Town and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 13:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taking a Snow Town has been accepted

Taking a Snow Town, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 20:55, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: By the Pool has been accepted

By the Pool, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 20:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constantinople history has been accepted

Constantinople history, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 10:57, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The history of Israeli Intelligence Community (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

Please fix the reference errors then resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The history of Israeli Intelligence Community and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 12:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sverdrup's Fram expedition (1898–1902) has been accepted

Sverdrup's Fram expedition (1898–1902), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 13:30, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Newspaper readers in Naples has been accepted

Newspaper readers in Naples, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 13:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yevgeny Beletsky has been accepted

Yevgeny Beletsky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 10:52, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The history of Israeli Intelligence Community (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The history of Israeli Intelligence Community and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of the Israeli Intelligence Community has been accepted

History of the Israeli Intelligence Community, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 11:21, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kapustnica (Nikolai Fechin) has been accepted

Kapustnica (Nikolai Fechin), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cathedral of Christ the Saviour (Samara) has been accepted

Cathedral of Christ the Saviour (Samara), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Boyaryna Morozova (painting) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Boyaryna Morozova (painting). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:14, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boyaryna Morozova (painting) has been accepted

Boyaryna Morozova (painting), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:14, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Horsewoman, Bryullov

Hello, Kseni-kam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Horsewoman, Bryullov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Theory of attempted suicide by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky has been accepted

Theory of attempted suicide by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1553 succession crisis in England has been accepted

1553 succession crisis in England, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LR.127 (talk) 09:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikita Pustosvyat. Debate about faith has been accepted

Nikita Pustosvyat. Debate about faith, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LR.127 (talk) 03:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The First Snow (painting) (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft is written in the tone of an essay or personal reflection. It may contain original research, and there is excessive detail. Try shortening it up so it is written more in the summary style of an encyclopedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The First Snow (painting) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Netherzone (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haymaking (Arkady Plastov) has been accepted

Haymaking (Arkady Plastov), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 10:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about the organization you represent

Hey there,

I've been accepting a lot of translated articles from the French Wikipedia page, and thus, I have seen OKA around a lot. However, I have a question about the ethics, and especially what you believe your role as a contributor is. If you wouldn't mind, this is my big question:

As I mentioned, I have seen a lot of translated articles, which are very high ranking. Thank you for being one of those contributors, it's much appreciated. As the organizations website stated,
"...articles in topics such as Science, technology, engineering, and Finance are lacking compared to topics such as History, Geography, and Humanities. Content from non-anglophone countries is underrepresented. Hundreds of thousands of high-quality articles are not translated."
Do you think these translations are helpful for researchers, from a translator prospective?

OnlyNano^talk 01:35, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

That's a very interesting question.

Based on my 5 or 6 months experience of working on these translations with OKA with Russian as the source language, I'd say that there is a part of articles (like half maybe) that can be helpful for researches, because of their approach (mostly in humanities) and the way their authors work with bibliography in this kind of articles (for example, I worked on some articles on Walter Benjamin's work and found them very complete and deep, or had some very complete and deep articles on historiography topics). I'd say that this "group" of articles can be very helpful for young researchers as an example of how to organize their ideas, to give keys to bibliographical work, to write in a clear way... And on the other hand, I'd define another group of articles that may not be so helpful for researchers, but very interesting and stimulating for erudite and curious Wiki's users/readers (like articles on outstanding people, famous paintings, monuments, etc.)

I hope my answer will be helpful in your observations and research. Kseni-kam (talk) 04:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harvest Time (Croppers) has been accepted

Harvest Time (Croppers), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OnlyNano^talk 01:38, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Harvest Time (Croppers)

Hello, Kseni-kam,

Thank you for creating Harvest Time (Croppers).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Great page, thanks for your contributions!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|OnlyNano}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

OnlyNano^talk 01:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I'll review it as soon as possible and make the necessary adjustments. Kseni-kam (talk) 17:07, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dmitry Schultz has been accepted

Dmitry Schultz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OnlyNano^talk 01:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The First Snow (painting) (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The tone was slightly cleaned up although it needs a lot more work. It still does not address the WP:OR or excessive detail issue raised by previous reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The First Snow (painting) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 02:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatiana Davydova has been accepted

Tatiana Davydova, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 19:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please don't make edits with false edits summaries as you did in Rodina (magazine) and other pages. --Altenmann >talk 19:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. My fault. Kseni-kam (talk) 19:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tatiana Davydova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Death in Byzantine Empire has been accepted

Death in Byzantine Empire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 20:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Hüfner has been accepted

George Hüfner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OnlyNano^talk 02:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve George Hüfner

Hello, Kseni-kam,

Thank you for creating George Hüfner.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for this translation, I appreciate it!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|OnlyNano}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

OnlyNano^talk 02:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Zemstvo Dines (painting) has been accepted

The Zemstvo Dines (painting), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OnlyNano^talk 12:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Zemstvo Dines (painting)

Hello, Kseni-kam,

Thank you for creating The Zemstvo Dines (painting).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for this translation :)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|OnlyNano}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

OnlyNano^talk 12:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ~~~~ Kseni-kam (talk) 17:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this a piece of irony, please keep in mind that this is a boilerplate message by "page curators", pretty annoying, I must say, for their triviality and taking lots of vertical space on the page. For the latter reason I am usually deleting these. --Altenmann >talk 17:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now my real thanks. While I was fixing some minor, but sometimes weird mistranslations from Russian and other minor things, I learned A LOT about Russian art :-) Never particularly cared before; cum grano salis: please add the Russian titles, like here. It is not that people will learn Russian, but it is helpful for search if someone would like to read more in the internets. Also, since it seems that you are translating from ru-wiki, please add interwikilinks to the articles you create. --Altenmann >talk 18:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I wasn't sure if it was a boilerplate, so I was serious about the answer :D Thanks for your tips, I'll keep them in mind from now on. And how great that we can learn new things and find something interesting while working on these texts! Kseni-kam (talk) 19:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't mind, I would like to suggest you a more complicated advice. As I noticed, in ru-wiki the lead sections are rather chaotic. In en-wiki it is recommended that the first 1-2 sentences must provide a concise definition of the subject, while the rest must be a summary of the article. For example, I run into your another translation: Haymaking. Does it really important for the subject that it was painted in some obscure village and the models were painter's buddies?... And do I really want first thing to know the names of art critics who enjoyed the painting? I chopped and rearranged the lede a bit, without much thinking, leaving a more thorough job for art experts. Of course, the translation itself is a large work, and I would not insist on an extra burden... --Altenmann >talk 00:18, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a nice advice, I really appreciate it and will try to put it into practice next time I work with this kind of articles about paintings. Kseni-kam (talk) 02:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Первый снег 1946.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Первый снег 1946.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eya Fechin (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I regret to inform you that Find A Grave cannot be used in Wikipedia articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eya Fechin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mika Morozov has been accepted

Mika Morozov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sir MemeGod  16:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:750px-Дочь Советской Киргизии.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:750px-Дочь Советской Киргизии.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Banks in Lviv has been accepted

Banks in Lviv, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 15:42, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olga Shore has been accepted

Olga Shore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thilsebatti (talk) 06:50, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yefremov's School has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yefremov's School. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 21:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vasily the Barefoot has been accepted

Vasily the Barefoot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Recon rabbit 17:33, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kseni-kam, would it be okay if I were to nominate a fact from this translated article to "Did You Know" on the main page? Recon rabbit 13:40, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Yes, thank you! Kseni-kam (talk) 15:56, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daughter of Soviet Kirgizia has been accepted

Daughter of Soviet Kirgizia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

UserMemer (chat) Tribs 20:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eya Fechin

Not much seems to have been published in English about Ия Николаевна Фешина, but what has been published calls her Eya Fechin. So the title of Draft:Eya Fechin seems appropriate. What puzzles me is that the draft refers to her as both "Eya" and "ia" (never as "ia" or "Iya"). Is "ia" some sort of mistake (perhaps of machine translation or similar) for "Eya"? If so, please correct it to "Eya" (you can easily find each example by searching for "dubious"); if not, please explain, perhaps in an "Efn" note. (And then of course remove the "dubious" warning flags.) Once that's done, I'll happily promote the draft to full article status. (I've already edited it.)

Incidentally, I infer from the article Nikolai Fechin (as well as from "Фешин(а)") that in an English-language context, the "ch" of "Fechin" would probably have been pronounced as /ʃ/ rather than as /tʃ/. How about "Eya"? In order that the draft can be promoted to an article, it's not necessary to explain all this, but an explanation would be welcome all the same. -- Hoary (talk) 22:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. "Eyas"/"ias" are fixed

What's for "ch" and "sh"...I found it strange, too, and if I had to choose and there were no information about Nicolai Fechin with this "ch" variation, I would leave it as "sh", because it's really pronounced as sh/ /ʃ/ as you mention.

As for surname and "Fechin" or "Fechina" it's something strange that in existence sources it's "Eya Fechin" (without "a")...In Russian surnames with "ev", "ov" and "in" endings, we put "a" in female cases, so that's why I decided to leave it this way, but if you feel we'd better follow the existence sources for this aspect, it'd would be fair and logical, too. Kseni-kam (talk) 16:14, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that "Eya Fechin" is how she's referred to in English (and how she spelled her name when using the Roman alphabet), and that's a good enough reason to call her that in the article. There's no particular reason why Russians need to observe the spelling idiosyncrasies of English, rather than those of French: Consider "Balanchine" and others. If I remember right, V. V. Nabokov strongly objected to "Anna Karenina" when discussing the character in English; he insisted on "Anna Karenin". (I am a little puzzled by father and daughter's choice of "Fechin": Why neither "Feshin" [to suit English expectations] nor "Fechine" [to suit French expectations], but instead something halfway?) ¶ I'm a little busy right now, but within 24 hours I'll promote this draft to full article status. -- Hoary (talk) 09:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Portrait of Varya Adoratskaya has been accepted

Portrait of Varya Adoratskaya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 08:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Welcoming the Icon has been accepted

Welcoming the Icon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Royiswariii (talk) 11:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eya Fechin has been accepted

Eya Fechin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 11:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Machine translation

It does seem to me that the (most worthwhile and interesting) material you're posting as translations from ru:Wikipedia are, or are derived from, machine translations. If this is so, then which machine translation system are you using? -- Hoary (talk) 22:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's true. I mainly use DeepL for translation and also DeepL, chatgpt and languagetool for proofreading. The parts with colloquial or literary quotations I do manually, if there isn't an "official" translation in a reliable source in the case of the second ones. Please let me know if you see any repetitive, awkward phrases or details. Kseni-kam (talk) 04:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your candor. No, I haven't seen that kind of problem. That is, aside from details. I'm now looking at the article Armenians in Byzantine Empire, which was accepted by some other editor and which is completely new to me. The title sounds very unidiomatic; I'd have titled it either Armenians in Byzantium or Armenians in the Byzantine empire. "(610-641)" etc should use en dashes rather than hyphens, thus "(610–641)". I'll put aside the references in Russian, but among those in English I notice "Stratos, A. (1980). Byzantium in the Seventh Century. Amsterdam: Cambridge University Press. p. 203. ISBN 90-256-0852-3". It's immediately odd because, whereas Oxford University Press books have been published in New York, Lagos, etc, I've never encountered a Cambridge UP book that wasn't published in Cambridge (England). And why just page 203? OCLC 174983406 explains. The book was published not by Cambridge UP but by a Dutch company, and it has 203 pages. The standard way of writing "Has 203 pages" is "203 pp", but this information is quite unnecessary. And Yale UP books are published in New Haven -- only two "E"s! -- Hoary (talk) 00:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aleksey Sofronov has been accepted

Aleksey Sofronov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Royiswariii (talk) 14:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Armenians in Byzantine Empire has been accepted

Armenians in Byzantine Empire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 18:48, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ekaterina Khomyakova has been accepted

Ekaterina Khomyakova, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 06:55, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Etude of the life of the Russian Tsars (Chess playing) has been accepted

Etude of the life of the Russian Tsars (Chess playing), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Etude of the life of the Russian Tsars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexei Tolstoy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]