User talk:Krimuk2.0/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Krimuk2.0. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

Hi, can you review this one?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:06, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey Smaro, take a look at these userboxes created by me:

Code	Result
{{User:Pleasant1623/The Shining}}	THE SHiNiNG "HEEERE'S JOHNNY!"	Usage
{{User:UBX/Kahaani}}	K Hello Krimuk2.0, I am Bob Biswas. Do you have a minute?	Usage

What's your thoughts about it? Reply me in my talk page, and plus congrats on your Rani Mukerji FAC! Thanks, ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 16:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

And what about the Kahaani userbox? ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 11:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, anyway. And as always, keep up the good work! ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 12:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Smarojit, Thank you very much for the quick review and passing of the article to GA. May I request you to leave message of approval of this GA on my talkpage. Incidentally, RedtigerXYZ and myself wrote some articles on films such as Sant Tukaram (film) , Hunterwali etc for the Centenary Celebrations of Hindi Films which were DYKs> Do you think it is worth taking Sant Tukaram (film) to GA upgrade? --Nvvchar. 14:08, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks.--Nvvchar. 16:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

If the personal attacks have continued through Facebook and e-mails, please immediately raise an ANI. This is a serious violation of the policy for civility and NPA. Let them know that e-mail is being violated in this way. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 03:38, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey. I did e-mail an administrator with screenshots of the personal attacks. He has been warned after that, so thankfully he has stopped sending such messages now. But you can see that his behaviour hasn't changed at all. --smarojit ^HD 03:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

What are you up to? Which article are you eyeing next?--Dwaipayan (talk) 23:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Excellent. The problem with Pather Panchali is there is too much material available overall, some of which are online. This is particularly true for theme, and to some extent, for filming. Summarizing so much materials is troublesome.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ranbir Kapoor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imtiaz Ali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

This guy still keeps changing the birthdate and removing all the sources that I recently added. Can you help me out here? BollyJeff | talk 17:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Good day laddie, I've nominated Badajoz for GA if you're interested. We'll try to reduce the red links this week by creating some stubs. I asked Tim to review Bramshill afterwards!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:56, 9 August 2013 (UTC) I'll review Ranbir Kapoor!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 12:03, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

The article looks great, will review it. :) --smarojit ^HD 12:07, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Ranbir Kapoor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 12:06, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Review has started!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 12:42, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

The article Ranbir Kapoor you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ranbir Kapoor for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 13:28, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

	The Good Article Barnstar
	Dude, you're on fire! Congrats for your recent success on Ranbir Kapoor. --Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 10:52, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	For your good work on the Ranbir Kapoor article. :) GleekVampire | talk! 11:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

You deserve it! A certain editor (you know who) was getting on my nerves, so I decided to take a break. GleekVampire | talk!

Btw I need a small favour. Can u copy-edit the Randeep Hooda article? GleekVampire | talk!

Thanks! :) GleekVampire | talk!

Hi. You're invited to participate in a peer review for the Mughal-e-Azam article at Wikipedia:Peer review/Mughal-e-Azam/archive1. I hope that constructive input from several people can better prepare it for FAC. It probably needs several pairs of eyes who don't know much about Indian film to comment on as much as it needs experts to comment..♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Good news! Jab Tak Hai Jaan has just passed the GA review!----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 13:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deepika Padukone, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Helen and Imtiaz Ali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Added your piece of info bro with a bit of refs, clean it up if you will.$oHƎM❊আড্ডা 13:19, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Long due for Ranbir Kapoor. You the man. Plus check OUATIMD and say what you think, gonna list it up for GA after Box Office India updates are complete. $oHƎM❊আড্ডা 13:23, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

আরে এটা আবার কি এমন? তুমি এত সুন্দর কাজ করেছ, এটা তোমার প্রাপ্য ছিল. Please put the opinions Here.$oHƎM❊আড্ডা 13:30, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi smarojit! Yeah, that sounds good to me :) AB01 (talk) 06:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Dammit, thought you wouldn't notice, bahaha. ;) Anyways, it'll be fun collaborating with you. Look forward to it! I'll ask questions if I need help with anything, if that's ok with you AB01 (talk) 06:55, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok, cool :) AB01 (talk) 07:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Yep, I might have to fix some of the sources up later. Do you think Apunkachoice is a reliable source. Deepika was initially meant to do Happy New Year instead of Om Shanti Om, but that was shelved later. Though I'm not sure which source to use. Here are a couple of sources I found.
[1]- this is Farah Khan directly saying that Deepika was going to be in Happy New Year, but it's Q&A with fans. I'm thinking this is the best source
[2]- directly says that this was meant to be Deepika's Bollywood debut
[3]-interview with Deepika, so direct, but it is a blog, sooo..
[4]-website doesn't seem reliable
[5]-here, it says she was "reportedly" offered the film
[6]-doesn't seem reliable
So, what do you think? AB01 (talk) 12:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Alright then. It might actually take me a while to get everything done, but I'll let you know when you can start doing that :) Feel free to edit stuff if you think I'm too slow, haha.AB01 (talk) 12:38, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey just my two cents. PAdukone is fine, however, Ranbir's article needs much more polish for FA. I mean even content wise also both feel a little too premature. This is my two cents based on the assumption that you plan to immediately take them to FAC, if not, please feel free to ignore my suggesntion Smaro. Also, can you give your eyes over the Ranveer Singh article and add your dollar? It is GA but still somehow I feel like its lacking depth. Like a "In the media" section or influences section. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I was thinking of adding a still from Om Shanti Om, cos it seems empty near the top. I've seen some Bollywood Hungama images on commons, so I was wondering if this would be ok in terms of copyright issues: [7]AB01 (talk) 14:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Heyy, do we need a commons account to upload images, or can we upload them with our Wikipedia username? And are we allowed to crop images because some of the images on Bollywood Hungama are watermarked?AB01 (talk) 05:24, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

I was thinking of adding these pictures for OSO [8] and LAK [9]. What do you think? AB01 (talk) 07:43, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

I guess not. I was just thinking we should add some images for her 2 big films in that period. Anyways, I think I'm pretty much done editing. You can do your thing now. :) AB01 (talk) 10:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Wow, you're doing so well with the article. You're such a good writer (and researcher)! :D AB01 (talk) 07:27, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Checking out the Career section now. you've done a good job. Is there anything I can do to help with the rest? AB01 (talk) 08:10, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Oh, and congrats on RK's GA :) AB01 (talk) 08:10, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

I'll try my best, although it's pretty hard to find stuff on charities. Those were the only 2 points I could find, but I'll try again anyway :) Would auctioning off clothes worn in her films count (eg. the Dum Maaro Dum skirt, and Chennai Express clothes)? AB01 (talk) 17:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

All I can find for charity is auctioning of clothes from movies (Chennai Express and the Dum Maaro Dum skirt), and prize money received from shows like 10 Ka Dum given to charity. But I'm not sure if that's worth putting in a Wiki article :/ AB01 (talk) 09:14, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

$oHƎM❊আড্ডা 09:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, can you review this for GA? It seems to be a sound, comprehensive account of one of the most sought after lost films. Let me know when you've started on Padakone. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks. If there's one actress I could get up to GA it would either be Claudia Cardinale or Audrey Hepburn. I'm thinking of working on The Great Ziegfeld for GA, it's a brilliant film and I can think of no other film which better reflects "Golden Hollywood". Luise Rainer's performance in it is one of the most deserving Oscars!! It would be good actually to get every Academy Award-winning film up to GA at some point.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:09, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Watch this, just click the arrow down the bottom, don't download anything it should just play. One of the best films of all time in my opinion (easily in my top 5 best films ever), certainly the finest soundtrack of any film. 28:14 is one of my favourite moments in cinematic history, the rising above representing the development of the old west and the music. The music with the wind and her finding them dead at 47:28 is so moving. I'd love to get a film like Roman Holiday up to GA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:29, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Yeah Roman Holiday is one of my favourites, just a charming film, she's so cute in it! Peck is one of my favourite actors anyway, although some of his war films could be a bit boring. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

It is. Guns of Navarone and Man in the Grey Flannel Suit are also very good. I've begun watching every Academy Award winner since 1927, I've reached 1947 currently, I'm watching Gentleman's Agreement later which won in 1947. I thought the 1946 winner Best Years of Our Lives was really boring and overrated (and I usually agree with Roger Ebert on most movies). It got better towards the end but I found it exceedingly dull and I think a big part of the reaosn why it won 7 Academy Awards was because it was about soldiers returning home from World War II, a theme which was very relevant to the time. Funnily enough is was directed by the same director as Roman Holiday, go figure LOL!! I has a 97% rating on Rotten Tomatoes which seems bizarre to me. I didn't think Citizen Kane was that brilliant either.. I thought Hitchcock's Rebecca of the same year which one the Oscar was a much superior picture.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps under WP:FFEXCEPTIONS and existing policy you might agree to the benefit of a redirect to the now existing section at Anurag Basu#Films. ? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:34, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey bud... I would just like to start off by congratulating you for Rani Mukerji! I know that I was supposed to help you with it but I've been very busy lately. Thank you for taking it to the end! :) I'm also interested in taking Kajol to FA but more importantly taking Saif Ali Khan to GA and then eventually to FA. As you can see I began working on the article earlier this year but shifted focus. I was wondering if you would be willing to collaborate with me. Let me know what other projects you have planned. Would love working with you! :) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 02:41, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

School and work have been keeping me busy unfortunately! :( I would love to eventually see Kapoor's article reach FA status but his career is just beginning! ;) Let me know if you need help with Padukone and I will try my best to help you out. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 03:13, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

There's no stopping you! Congrats again! :) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 22:10, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry bud! I had temporarily deactivated that feature when I knew I wasn't going to be active on WP. I've enabled that feature again. Feel free to send me an e-mail if you like! :) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 05:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits on Kapoor's article bud! I do intend on nominating the article to feature as "Today's featured article", but don't you think that Chopra's article being recently featured will prove to be a deterrent? BTW, I've tweaked the lead a bit and have created a summarized copy in my sandbox. Let me know what you think! :) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 16:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

What do you think of the lead? The other version I had in mind was: "She achieved further success by featuring as the female lead in the 2009 dramedy 3 Idiots, the 2010 comedy Golmaal 3, the 2011 romantic drama Bodyguard and the 2011 science fiction Ra.One—all of which are among the highest-grossing Bollywood films of all time—and has earned critical acclaim for the role of a fading film star in the 2012 drama Heroine." -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 05:46, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

There are not enough points to support the nomination Smaro! The fact that PC's article was recently featured earlier this month already removes 2 points. I was thinking that I might save the nomination for next year or maybe for October 16 - her wedding anniversary. What do you say? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 03:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)