User talk:KjjjKjjj

Hello, KjjjKjjj, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 02:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S.J.K (C) Serdang Baru 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:S.J.K (C) Serdang Baru 2. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:S.J.K (C) Serdang Baru 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:41, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SMK Sulaiman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Still no evidence of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SMK Sulaiman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SJK (C) Jalan Davidson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think you should revise the rules around notability, and especially the general notability guideline WP:GNG which applies to most subjects. You've been submitting drafts on schools without any evidence that they are notable, and this is wasting your time as well as the reviewers'. The vast majority of schools in the world are not simply notable by Wikipedia standards. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for being late ! the reason I wrote SMK Sulaiman is because it is a Sekolah Kluster Kecemerlangan school. This achievement is the highest a school can ever receive by the MOE. This achievement is usually why these schools are popular in Malaysia. The reason I use blogs as references is because the official website of the school shut down so I can't find any of its history besides the blogs. Also, the news for the school is mostly from students achieving good grades from exams. (e.g.) I wish you all the best in reviewing Wikipedia articles. Best Wishes, KjjjKjjj KjjjKjjj (talk) 07:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

Most of the sources are just the school's website. This makes it hard to write an neutral article. You should find other independent, affiliated sources and summarize what those say, and avoid non-independent sources if possible. Thanks,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SJK (C) Jalan Davidson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

♠ Ca ^{talk to me!} 06:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NSCHOOL, requires significant coverage about the school in multiple independent secondary sources. The school's website is a primary source and therefore not independent or reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SJK (C) Jalan Davidson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:07, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. Thank you for your work on Sierra Leone at the 2020 Summer Paralympics. Broc, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice page. In the future, please make sure to add references for the results, even if they are already present in other Wikipedia pages, and to add categories.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 14:57, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Broc: Thanks for your suggestion ! I will try and improve my wikipedia edits ! ~~~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 03:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. Thank you for your work on Channa marulioides. Moriwen, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice page! Thanks for the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 14:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Moriwen: Thanks for examining my page ! ~~~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 02:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to East-Town Football Park Stadium. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 15:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the reason. KjjjKjjj (talk) 02:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Teluk Bahang River. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChineseGroundnut was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not sufficiently notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:All Night Radio (song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

@T.C.G. [talk] 10:59, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All Night Radio (song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mach61 12:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj,

Thank you for creating Gymnocypris pengquensis.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating, please categorise.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nothing's New (Rio Romeo song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KjjjKjjj. Thank you for your work on Sewellia albisuera. Another editor, Aviram7, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Great Work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 03:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviram7:Thanks!

~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 12:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the creation of Ado related articles such as for "Kura Kura" and "All Night Radio". It is very much appreciated! My tip to you as I also was in a similar situation when I first started making Japanese related song and album articles is to also look into Japanese references when creating articles, such as from Billboard Japan, Natalie, Barks, Oricon, etc. Certain Japanese songs and/or albums typically receive very little to no coverage in English sources. Without enough sources, some of your newly created articles may be deemed not notable. In the meantime, I will attempt to expand upon some of these articles as there are quite a bit of Japanese sources on them. As for the personnel section, I suggest using a source such as Tidal which lists all credited persons who contributed towards the creation of the recording. Great work so far though! I look forward to seeing more of your contributions. -Verso- (talk) 03:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will take your tip for future articles.

~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 11:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:End of Academic Session Exam (Malaysia) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:07, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Flying Bird and Cicada (song). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  // Timothy :: talk  15:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KjjjKjjj. Thank you for your work on Sewellia diardi. Another editor, Aviram7, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviram7:Thanks!

~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 14:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect "Undead" (Yoasobi song) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 5 § "Undead" (Yoasobi song) until a consensus is reached. PepeBonus (talk) 04:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KjjjKjjj! Your additions to Otaku Vampire’s Love Bite have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 09:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! didn't know that is also copyrighted too.

~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 10:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tokyo (Leat'eq song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Kentuckian |💬   14:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Harsur. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and This article is not ready yet for publishing on article namespace and need to add more information.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KjjjKjjj. Thank you for your work on Sambal, Mandi. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start!, many of your articles are Orphan, you may link them, including this one. cheers!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 12:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! will try to link the articles.

~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 14:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Baddies! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK and a search in three languages failed to find anything meaningful.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Link20XX (talk) 03:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Ladkui. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 03:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed that, when you were recording your article word counts you should count the words of the whole article, not just the words you copy edited. And some of the articles you copyedited, like TMEM61, doesn't look complete and so you shouldn't remove the copy editing tag from them and mark them as done. GoldRomean (talk) 18:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 2024 Réunion Open. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Brunei at the 2022 Asian Para Games. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Sungai Temau railway station. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 2024 Saipan International (badminton). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Austrian Open is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Austrian Open until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

zoglophie^•talk• 08:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KjjjKjjj. Thank you for your work on K. N. Unnikrishnan. Another editor, Aviram7, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice Work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ᗩvírαm7 • [@píng mє] 03:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 03:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to add full results of badminton tournaments to the German Wikipedia, for instance for de:Austrian Open 2024 (all is prepared for further additions). Especially for the tournaments of German speaking nations everything is welcome. For other countries, please do not start too early with an article (earliest in the week of the tournament). Florentyna (talk) 17:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Channa aristonei has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 20:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Stoney Mountain Boys. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Tennent Mountain. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Georgi Tasin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KjjjKjjj. Thank you for your work on Paragalaxias julianus. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn:Thanks!

~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 14:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj,

Thank you for creating Emmelichthys papillatus.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for creating this article on English Wikipedia, and expanding human knowledge. Please add categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces: I'll try to fix any problems with the article, thanks for letting me know!

~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 06:39, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj,

Thank you for creating Tylochromis aristoma.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for creating this article on English Wikipedia, and expanding human knowledge. Please improve categorisation.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for participating in the May backlog-reduction drive, but your word counts are inaccurate; please see the instructions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives. All the best, Miniapolis 15:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Miniapolis: I did install the script but it didn't work when I tried it. Is there any explaination for it?

~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 16:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure there is, but without more detail I don't know what it is. According to Wikipedia:Prosesize, it doesn't work with the MinervaNeue skin (I use Vector 2010). Do you see a "Page size" link under "Tools" on the left side of the page? Did you install it from your Preferences page by checking the box in Gadgets → Browsing? Make sure that box is still checked; you have to save any changes you make for them to take effect. Good luck and all the best, Miniapolis 17:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Miniapolis: Sorry for responding late! I use Vector 2022 and I did check the box for it and it still doesn't work.

~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 03:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you see the "Page size" link under Tools (which may be on the right side of the page)? If not, it's not installed; after you check the box, you have to click "Save" at the bottom of the page. If the link is there, you may want to ask at WT:Prosesize. There may be a conflict between Prosesize and Wikipedia:MiniEdit if you use that tool. Miniapolis 17:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Miniapolis: I will definitely ask at the talk page.

~~ KjjjKjjj (talk) 23:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 09:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Parentheses in taxonomic authority citations have meaning and are not just a matter of style. Parentheses indicate that a species was originally described in a different genus than the one in which it is now placed. Please don't just put all authorities inside of parentheses. Follow Fishbase; if the authority is in parentheses there, put it in parentheses on Wikipedia. If the authority is not in parentheses in Fishbase, do not put it in parentheses. Plantdrew (talk) 16:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KjjjKjjj. Thank you for your work on Sebastianpillai Vijeyaraj. Another editor, Kentuckian, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article! I deeply appreciate your efforts to expand the sum of human knowledge. Keep up the good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kentuckian}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 Kentuckian |💬   17:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kentuckian: Sorry for my late reply! Thanks! KjjjKjjj (talk) 02:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Rusanda Gamage. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 18:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Channa torsaensis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Channa torsaensis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Fujii-dera (Yoshinogawa). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GrabUp - Talk 08:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fujii-dera (Yoshinogawa), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waqar💬 07:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Clean Air Act of 1971. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:54, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Chamod Battage. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and with only a link to a sports database, this article does not meet WP:SPORTBASIC.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Garuka Sanketh. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and with only a link to a sports database entries, this article does not meet WP:SPORTBASIC.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Penawar Stadium. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Stadium Kuala Selangor. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Ranesh Silva. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and with only a link to a sports database, this article does not meet WP:SPORTBASIC.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:07, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Yuri Koththigoda. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and with only a link to a sports database, this article does not meet WP:SPORTBASIC.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:16, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Rathnaraja Thanuradan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and with only a link to a sports database, this article does not meet WP:SPORTBASIC.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:18, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the secondary sources you added does not satisfy the notability guidelines of Wikipedia. The articles cited only added the school as a mention and not the main subject. I will request a deletion of the article by tomorrow if no reliable source is cited, from there you can explain to the admins why the Wikipedia page should remain. N niyaz (talk) 14:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SMK Seri Kembangan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMK Seri Kembangan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

N niyaz (talk) 10:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Danna-sama to no Love-Love Love Song has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The song doesn't satisfy any of the WP:NSINGLE, the song barely even has reliable news coverage other than the references in the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dokibird is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dokibird until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ArcticSeeress (talk) 08:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, KjjjKjjj! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

• Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
• Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
• Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
• New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sierra Leone at the 2020 Summer Paralympics you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sierra Leone at the 2020 Summer Paralympics for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fritzmann2002 -- Fritzmann2002 (talk) 01:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KjjjKjjj: I just wanted to make sure you saw this, because I just noticed that you also nominated another article for GA which has similar issues to this one. Your edits to Togo at the 2020 Summer Paralympics are definitely improving the article, but it also does not meet the Good Article Criteria. I recommend you follow the advice I left at Talk:Sierra Leone at the 2020 Summer Paralympics, which also has some other olympics articles that did pass GAN. For now, I would suggest you remove the nomination for the Sierra Leone article, and hold off on nominating GAs until you have familiarized yourself with the criteria a little bit more. There is a large backlog at GAN, and it is hard for reviewers to keep up with the large influx of nominations there. Fritzmann (message me) 15:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Togo at the 2020 Summer Paralympics you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Togo at the 2020 Summer Paralympics for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fritzmann2002 -- Fritzmann2002 (talk) 21:42, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've noticed you are replacing "a" with "an" where it is not needed, such as in this edit where you changed "a Malaysian" to "an Malaysian" — "a Malaysian" is grammatically correct. "an" is only used if the following word begins with a vowel sound, such as "an Israeli" or "an American". Malaysia does not begin with a vowel sound, so the correct wording would be "a Malaysian". Swinub (talk) 22:17, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I unfortunately remove your good article nomination for Frieren as you are only the 46th in terms of authorship for the page (Courtesy link) as the instruction for nomination is Nominators must have contributed significantly to the article and be familiar with its subject and cited sources. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 09:15, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Miminity: Good article instructions states that If you are not a significant contributor to the article, secure the consent of the significant contributors before nominating. I have consent from the user Xexerss who is the 1st in terms of authorship. KjjjKjjj (talk) 09:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please add I note then and revert my edit, thanks Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 09:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

add co-nomination with User:Xexerss with the | note = on the nomination Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 09:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:S.J.K (C) Serdang Baru 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lionel Elika Fatupaito is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lionel Elika Fatupaito until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Black Kite (talk) 14:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SMK Sulaiman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for a month, and we've already seen some momentous improvement in the quality of many articles about underrepresented subjects! So far, our top-scoring participants are:

• Magentic Manifestations (submissions) – 338 points, mainly from nine good articles. He's a contender for the "most submissions for a single country" specialty award, with nine submissions for India.
• Arconning (submissions) – 305 points, including from six seasonally-appropriate Olympics-related good articles.
• Generalissima (submissions) – 290 points, the bulk from her featured article about Greenlandic interpreter Qalaherriaq and two China-related good articles.
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) – 245 points, mostly from the achievement of bringing Genghis Khan to featured status.
• Thebiguglyalien (submissions) – 144 points from three good articles, including two about Kiribati elections, and four reviews of good article nominees.

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier! The coordinators would like to extend a special thanks to Thebiguglyalien (submissions) for his commitment to keeping these review pages up to date.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Star
		This barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copy edits totaling over 100,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 02:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 1st Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copyediting 96 articles during the GOCE July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 02:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Words, 1st Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copyediting 102,051 total words during the GOCE July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 02:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 3rd Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copyediting 3 long articles during the GOCE July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 02:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Old Articles, 1st Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copyediting 15 old articles during the GOCE July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 02:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Longest Article, 2nd Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copyediting one of the five longest articles – 9,912 words – during the GOCE July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 02:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Relaxed Scene. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:East-Town Football Park Stadium, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Teluk Bahang River, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SJK (C) Jalan Davidson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The (modern) Guild of Copy Editors Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copy edits totaling over 20,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE August 2024 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 13:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for two months, and we've seen tremendous improvement in the encyclopedic coverage of several underrepresented areas from a wide range of editors! The coordinators would like to highlght some of the newer faces who have been making notable contributions in the contest, including but by no means limited to:

• Arconning (submissions) – 386 points, with several good articles primarily relating to the Olympics
• Vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 141 points, who created multiple articles about abortion rights and laws in African countries
• TheNuggeteer (submissions) – 126 points, who has contributed to several articles associated with the Phillippines
• Jaguarnik (submissions) – 125 points, with several good article reviews and an appearance in the In the news section of the Main Page
• Averageuntitleduser (submissions) – 119 points, and has written about several Haitian topics and historical figures.

Only one month remains until the end of the contest, so it's time to make your remaining nominations! Please consider answering some review requests, particularly the older entries, as a way of helping out your fellow participants and moving up the leaderboard. Good luck!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Love Call (Shiyui song). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources should be reliable and independent. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for what you describe as "minor copyediting" on articles like Dubai Mall, but the {{copyedit}} templates should only be removed from the tops of these articles when they no longer need any further copyediting at all. If you're just taking a quick look and making a few changes, that's certainly very helpful, but the template should stay in place. Belbury (talk) 15:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see, you're trying to win a competition at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/September 2024 by removing more copyediting templates than other people.

Please only remove copyedit templates when an article definitely no longer needs copyediting. Belbury (talk) 15:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury: At first, I think that the article Dubai Mall, no longer needs copyediting. But after taking up your point, I noticed that there are many more errors. Thanks for the heads up! KjjjKjjj (talk) 03:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mr. @KjjjKjjj... Can you rewriting and copy editing article pages Frontline Pilipinas, Eat Bulaga!, ASAP (TV program), Magandang Buhay, It's Showtime (Philippine TV program), Goin' Bulilit, RCTI, NTV7, Channel 8 (Singaporean TV channel), GMA Network, Ogie Alcasid and Jay R, please....??? Because these articles may be need to fixing grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. Thanks, mabuhay and maraming salamat, po..... 2001:448A:1020:3F01:112C:511D:68E2:1BFA (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IP User, your request is possible, but it might take a few weeks minimum. I can get started right away for both Goin' Bulilit and Ogie Alcasid. Please do note that I won't be 100% correct on copyediting.

Best Regards,

KjjjKjjj (talk) 13:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sir @KjjjKjjj and sir @SheriffIsInTown.... Do you know that several programs from ABS-CBN such as Magandang Buhay and It's Showtime are finally and officially comeback to the original frequencies because it also air on ALLTV...??? And there is the reliable sources for this:

https://trendrod.wordpress.com/2024/06/17/its-showtime-begins-airing-on-alltv/

https://trendrod.wordpress.com/2024/05/01/magandang-buhay-resumes-production-simulcasts-on-alltv-starting-may-13/

Thanks..... 2001:448A:1020:3F01:112C:511D:68E2:1BFA (talk) 10:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IP User, no, I have not heard that since I don't watch shows from the Philippines. If you want to ask someone for help. Please ask someone at WikiProject Philippines for help.

Best Regards,

KjjjKjjj (talk) 13:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KjjjKjjj,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Instant Death (Yuki Kakizaki song) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the album, song or discography is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article of their own.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

jlwoodwa (talk) 02:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Teluk Bahang River".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dokibird is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dokibird (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sparkl^talk 04:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "SJK (C) Jalan Davidson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Star
		This barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copy edits totaling over 100,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 05:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 2nd Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copyediting 72 articles during the GOCE September 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 05:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Words, 2nd Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copyediting 92,315 total words during the GOCE September 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 05:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 5th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copyediting 2 long articles during the GOCE September 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 05:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Old Articles, 2nd Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copyediting 28 old articles during the GOCE September 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 05:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has come to a close! After a thrilling finish to the event with a slew of submissions on the final day, we have our winners. With 608 points, Thebiguglyalien (submissions) comes in third with his series of Kiribati and Botswanan submissions; BeanieFan11 (submissions) flies into second place at the last second with 771 points after a string of good articles about sportspersons; and after leading for much of contest's three months, Generalissima (submissions) finishes with a whopping 798 points to take home the Gold Belt Buckle. Congratulations to our winners!

In addition to his spot in the top three, BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins the special awards for submitting under the most countries (44 countries) and for writing the most articles about women (15 Did you know? nominations)! Magentic Manifestations (submissions), after making 16 submissions under the Indian flag—15 of them good articles—receives the awards for most submissions for a single country and most featured or good articles promoted. For their submission of one FAC review, five FLC reviews, and 20 GAN reviews, Simongraham (submissions) wins for most article reviews.

The results of the contest have far exceeded any expectations the coordinators had for it at the beginning: among the submissions to the event were 3 FAs, 10 FLs, 88 GAs, dozens of article reviews of every kind, and more Did you know? submissions than we can count! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harsur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ladkui, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Flying Bird and Cicada (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:11, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2024 Réunion Open, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2024 Saipan International (badminton), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to KjjjKjjj for copy edits totaling between 1 and 1,999 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE October 2024 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 22:30, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tennent Mountain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Georgi Tasin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brunei at the 2022 Asian Para Games, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Slay!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Flying Bird and Cicada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:22, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Harsur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2024 Austrian Open, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KjjjKjjj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rusanda Gamage, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]