User talk:KissL

For discussions before 2007, see here.

The little and great alfold are both considered part of the Euro-Asian steppe as you can see for example in the writings of Grousset and Sinor (BTW the latter is Hungarian by origin). Nik Sage ^{(talk/contrib)} 16:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Figyeljetek erre a Székely Attila nevezetü (román) vandálra, ugyanez a ürge volt/van is a német wikipédián, és ott megprobálta tönkretenni a magyarokkal kapcsolatos cikkeket - hogy honnan tudom hogy ugyanaz e? Hát ez nem nehéz, mivel ugyanazokat a cikkeket kreálta itt mint ott: magyar 'dialektusok', székely 'nyelv'. Aztán meg mindig lekerekítette a magyarok számát, szerinte csak 11-12 millió magyar él a földön, vagy még kevesebb; ez még következik. --Öcsi 14:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, és tud magyarul, de utálja a magyarokat. Hogy miért, azt nem tudom... Öcsi

Can you explain me this: [1] with details? Especially the "other 25%" since they are the non religious ppl. (felekezeteken kívüli) [2]. Not the atheists/agnostics/jews/other. BTW I've just copied those datas from huwiki's hu:Magyarok. I put a question there too. --Vince ^{hey, yo! :-)} 14:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer, I completely agree. Hope you agree with this too. Üdv, --Vince ^{hey, yo! :-)} 12:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! A bit off topic! I am trying to help a Norwegian person to find his roots. His family name is Milett, and I found this word in some Hungarian texts. Maybe you can explain me what this words actually means in a sentence like this: "Eltudom képzelni milett volna még kátyú esetén." Thank you very much! Jakro64 06:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer you gave on my discussion page, even if this one showed up to be a dead end. Jakro64 17:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey... You forgot to link to the new discussion in your talk page messages. "Here" in your message just links to the article "here". :-0 Grandmasterka 09:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. :-) I've already participated in the AFD after you notified me. Thanks. Terence 13:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same complaint (useless link on my user talk page). I'm sure I'll be able to track it down.... - Jmabel | Talk 16:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I forgot to paste the right link in there, sorry about that. The heading of this section links there now, thanks to Grandmasterka. KissL 16:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Border history of Serbia. Khoikhoi 22:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This can be done as a standard rename. Login as KissL, make a request to rename to a throwaway account, and then log in as Kissl to usurp the KissL account. =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kissl, thank you for your message. According to WP:NCGN, the same name as in the title should be used also in the text of articles. The only exception is if a "widely accepted historic English name for a specific historical context" could be identified in a discussion on the talk page of the main article, using the evidence listed by WP:NCGN. Such a name should be consistently used by recently published English sources. Unless we can identify a widely accepted historic English name of Kosice, the same name as in the title should be used even if the official name of Kosice was Kassa in 1899. However, if you believe that Kassa can be proven to be a widely accepted English name of Kosice for certain period, I encourage you to initiate a discussion on the Kosice's talk page. The list of required evidence is listed here. If you have any additional questions, feel free to drop me a line. Cheers. Tankred 12:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I was quite surprised when I saw your name in an edit summary of an IP and I decided rather not to revert that edit because I thought it was you. I hope you'll be better soon. Tankred 17:25, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry magyar friend.I love magyar because turk::magyar.Hungar(Turkish Language:Karışık)macar.:)))--Uannis 16:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you have a look at my last edit in Wikipedia:Hungarian_Wikipedians'_notice_board#Effect_of_the_Naming_Convention_on_Hungarian_settelements_in_neighbouring_countries --KIDB 07:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are interested, there is a proposal to move the Odorheiu Secuiesc page to its native name Székelyudvarhely, similarly to Swedish settlements in Finnland, or German settlements in South Tyrol. For more, see the talk page of the article. Please remember that this is not simply a vote; your comments must include reasons to carry weight. Many Romanian users have already expressed their opinion there --KIDB 06:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Jameswilson 23:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser was already declined in that case, as the checkuser determined that the puppetry was too obvious for it to even be necessary. However, he's contacted me by email as well. I've asked for explanations of some things, if he can provide good ones, I certainly may well reconsider. If he's contacted you at this point as well, the best advice you could give him is to actually get back to me! I'll certainly hear him out, and consider carefully what he has to say. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 11:07, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Szerbusz, én írtam a hosszabb írást a Hungary-Soviet era-ban, amit voltál szíves törölni. Megtudhatnám, hogy miért? Miért profibb ez szűkszavú leírás? Ezt az írást is kitörlöd? Így tudja mindenki szerkeszteni? Úgy demokrácia ez, mint Magyarország. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.66.81.80 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm replying here because your IP is likely to change. I restored the prior version because the Hungary page should contain a summary, and your version was too detailed in my opinion. On the other hand, it was also quite emotive, which is not the preferred style in an encyclopedia (even if the statements are right and the text is well formulated to make a nice essay). You may want to register a username and consult a few introductory pages, such as WP:NPOV (regarding style) or WP:NOT which tells you that Wikipedia (unlike Hungary... :)) neither intends nor claims to be a democracy. Regards, KissL 13:02, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks/köszi, I didn't even notice that. :) KovacsUr 12:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apukám forrást akár mirre lehet találni, de attól függetlenül nem bizonyított állításokra hivatkozol. --Beyond silence 13:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, you may be right...I was just running on instinct myself, assuming that most people who searched for "trianon" would be looking for the world-reshaping treaty, not the building, but if it's a false assumption we can change it back, I'm not especially attached to that redirect. :-) (I don't actually know how to undo redirects, though...is it a job for an admin, or do I just retrace my steps?) K. Lásztocska 13:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi KL, it's KL. ;-)

I think I managed to do a quick-and-dirty solution for the Trianon redirect mess--I just redirected "Trianon" to Trianon (disambiguation) which is pretty much how it was before. I think that will work fine, but feel free to change anything you see fit. Cheers! K. Lásztocska 13:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kissl, thanks for fixing all my embarrassing mistakes on that article (including the title). I should really try to be a little less sloppy when starting a new article. - TheMightyQuill

Hi. Since you have contributed to 12 points of the Hungarian Revolutionaries of 1848, I wonder whether you can also look at March laws. It is a fairly new article, but it concerns a topic of great historical importance - at least for Hungary and other countries formerly belonging to the Kingdom of Hungary. I hope someone will be able to expand it. Tankred 14:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry. The previous IP wasnt on the same netmask so I overlooked it. I'll be more careful next time :) — Shinhan < talk > 08:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That subjective statement in Gyurcsány you protect from deletion, that objective statement what I write to Hungary you delete? How do you think it? Stop your destructive actions! --Beyond silence 19:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You recently participated in a requested move discussion at Talk:Greater Fatra and might be interested a similar situation at Talk:Slovak Ore Mountains and Talk:Lesser Fatra. These articles were previously moved to their Slovak names but I have reverted the moves and posted them at WP:RM to allow for discussion. —  AjaxSmack  05:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying that. It's appreciated. Jc3schmi

Hi. I am not sure, but you are an admin, right? (I think you are, but you did not wrote that on your user page, so I am not sure). Anyway, can you please worn User:Rjecina not to call me "fundamentalist" and not to lie about things that I said: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABorders_before_and_after_Yugoslavia&diff=146127770&oldid=145876340 I respect you as NPOV user and I would really appreciate that you worn him to stop with this because these false accusations are really not pleasant. PANONIAN 14:54, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention that he use word "fundamentalists" for other users as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ANikola_Tesla%2FNationality_and_ethnicity&diff=146129581&oldid=146118836 PANONIAN 15:12, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to see something interesting you must to look article Borders before and after Yugoslavia, PANONIAN map of Serbia in 1918 and our discussion about this map. Discussion is on discussion page of article for which I have given you link. In last week I am fighting with PANONIAN that this fantasy map in which even Pecs and Timisoara are Serbian territory be deleted on wiki. ---Rjecina 19:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have time go please on commons for voting about deleting of Serbia1918 map. Link is [3] ---Rjecina 18:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tudom, bunkóság volt, de képtelen voltam megállni. olyan lettem, mint ők. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.66.14.66 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have stoped to be civil with PANONIAN after 14 June 2007 when he has attacked User talk:Kingstone93-cro with croato-serbian words: Koji ti je kurac?. I think that translation will be something similar to "What the fuck is with you?". If he has not recieved blocking because of that then ..... Will be OK for future that I write comment about PANONIAN in style: "I think that he is Serbian fundamentalist" ? --- Rjecina 17:12, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I said that to him, but only after user Kingstone93-cro said that I am "chetnik" and "war criminal", which are very big insults. In another words, my answer to him was just REACTION to his behaviour, but it is he who did not had right to call me with such names and you too have no right because I did not called you "ustaša" or something like that (no matter that most Serbs would agree that it is justified to use description "ustaša" in your case). PANONIAN 22:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me link (on my discussion page or Kissl will kill us both) where he has say that you are chetnik and war criminal. --- Rjecina 22:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APANONIAN&diff=138230079&oldid=138226125 I wonder what you would answer to him after reading that shit. PANONIAN 22:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

His comment is that you support chetnicko-serbian politcs and not that you are Chetnik. You know that I agree with that comment ? (In future I will stop writing about that on this page) --- Rjecina 21:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is racistic insult to say to Serb that he is "Chetnik". If you agree with that you are nothing bur racist. PANONIAN 04:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Our wiki revert war is started with article History of Serbia. On talk page of this article he is writing how Yugoslavia and not Serbia has attacked Bosnia and Croatia. On talk page of article Federal Republic of Yugoslavia he is saying that Yugoslavia has not attacked Bosnia but Bosnian Serbs. I now want to speak about demographic question. PANONIAN like to write demography data how Serbs has been majority in Vojvodina, Slavonia, Hungary but if I do not make mistakes not even UK is having clear census data before XIX century so this is for me clear propaganda. There is no need to say that users from Croatia and Hungary do not agree with this numbers:))--- Rjecina 15:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I gave you answers to all these questions on relevant talk pages, so it would not harm you to read them... PANONIAN

If the image is not protected by any copyright, then it's not fair use, and should be retagged, to prove this claim you would need a source from where the image comes from saying they have released it under the GFDL/public domain/etc. Otherwise, to use it on this template, you will need to start a thread on the talk of the exemptions page and gather consensus that fair use isn't applicable here. — Moe ε 14:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A template you created, Template:Komárom-Esztergom, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 02:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm...Sorry to bug you but...could you help me translate this comment made by someone I know:

uram isten...tenyleg mar...te fura gyerek, meny es piskald valaki masd

Sorry if it turns out to be a rude comment...I just want to know what it means. Thanks, nat^tang 18:15, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It's scornful rather than rude. (And badly misspelled.) An approximate translation is "Oh my god... really now... you strange kid, go pick at someone else". KissL 15:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

haha...thanks...and he always says that he spells hungarian perfectly and that he's always right...i guess not...:P... nat^tang 16:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"I am always right" is just a less trivial analogue of "The Cretans are always liars" – you don't really need the proof to know it's wrong. :) KissL 10:18, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello mi a baj ezzel? miert akarja kitorolni? Unitarian villages in Transylvania segitenel technikailag rendbehozni?

100 hala es köszönet--Vargatamas 19:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Helló. Nem érdkel, hogy kinek van igaza, hogy valóban " Under his office, Hungary suffered a high-profile athletic doping scandal during the 2004 Summer Olympics in Athens." vagy sem. A lényeg: HÜLYESÉGEKEN vitatkoztok, mind a ketten, miközben a LÉNYEG kimarad: semmit sem ADTOK HOZZÁ a cikkhez. Egy ***** soron vitatkoztok. Normális ez? Én írtam a hülye cikk kb. 90%-át, és ti egyetlen hülye mondaton vitatkoztok! Mintha az számítana! Inkább írjatok valami olyat, ami HOZZÁAD a cikkhez! Hogy kikkel találkozott, miket mondott nekik, mik a nézetei az abortuszról, a vallásról, idézeteket tőle, ami jól mutatja, hogy milyen ember, stb! Nem pedig egyetlen ***** mondaton vitatkozni! Szégyen! Nézd meg ezt: [4] Ez azt mutatja, hogy ki mennyiszer edit-elte a feri cikkét. User:Beyond silence és User:Kissl tehát TI utánatok én vagyok az első, és Ti azért vagytok az első kettő, mert CSAK azt csináltátok, hogy ezt a ***** mondatot kitöröltétek és újraírtátok. Ez szerintetek normális? Hihetetlen. Nektek csak egymás ***** fontos?? --Msoos 10:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I noticed I made the mistake in some articles, and corrected them. I thought I'd gotten them all. Thanks for cleaning up after me! :) - Mtmelendez ^{(Talk|UB|Home)} 10:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! -- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  16:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you look at Kiev Expedition (1018) and comment on talk perhaps - there is a revert war going on about whether to include or attribute a fact about Moses' emasculation. I also noted that the Ukrainian source that is used as the reference seems to be written by a poetress - hardly a reliable source (and the website that is being added now doesn't seem very reliable, neither). While this could be discussed in the Saint's own article, I think the info is not properly verified and reliable to be used in related articles.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  16:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you revert multiple vandalism at once? Squash Racket (talk) 12:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. Squash Racket (talk) 12:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you a very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! --R O ^{A M A T A A} | msg  18:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These nationalities had no autonomy (see talk page debate), but the text suggests the Kingdom was some kind of a federal state. That is not just original research, but also not true. "In contrast", "in the nationalities' point of view", "a common state", "not identical to modern Hungary"... Will you ever find reference for such an ambiguous wording? Squash Racket (talk) 18:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, KissL, for protecting integrity of Kingdom of Hungary. When I have slightly more time, I will find references for that section. I hope the final solution will be acceptable to everyone. All the best. Tankred (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think everybody had more than enough time to find references for that part. Right now it is ambiguous and original research. Squash Racket (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The point is that there should be discussion on the talk page. Also time spent on this should be better spent on expanding the article with relevant historical information. Hobartimus (talk)

A tag has been placed on Template:Heves requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Baranya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello i was wondering if you would be able to help me. I am currently helping edit International reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence article. I have found this refernce on Hungary's status with Kosovo that i may need for the article. However it is Hungarian and i wanted to know if you could please translate it into English for me as i want to know what it says.

It isn't too long, but if you would translate it for me i would be very grateful. "original reference" I have copied it below for you.

"A FigyelőNet információi szerint a kormány és az ellenzék megállapodott arról, hazánk mikor ismerje el Koszovó függetlenségét. A kabinet valószínűleg március 19-én jelenti be a döntést.

A kormány és az ellenzék képviselői kedden tárgyaltak Koszovó elismerésének lehetséges dátumáról. Göncz Kinga külügyminiszter még korábban úgy nyilatkozott, Magyarország elismeri az egykori szerb tartományt önálló államként, ám nem elsőként, hanem a vajdasági magyarok számára legalkalmasabb időpontban. Később ezt úgy módosította, hogy március 15-e előtt semmiképpen.

A keddi megbeszélésen a Fidesz felhívta a kormány figyelmét, hogy nincs tovább mire várni, a világ száz országa – ezen belül az EU 16 tagállama – már elismerte az új államot. Lapunk információi szerint az a megegyezés született, hogy a kormány március 19-én dönt a kérdésről.

Lapunk megkeresésére Budai Bernadett kormányszóvivő nem tudta megerősíteni az információt, hozzátette: még nincs döntés az ügyben."

Thank you

Ian Ijanderson977 (talk) 13:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note, Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/Hungarian_Revolution_of_1956/archive1 Fifelfoo (talk) 14:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am reviving a discussion on the naming usage of Sea of Japan and East Sea. See Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Korean)/Disputed names. (Chunbum Park (talk) 06:22, 27 March 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Template:Megye has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:41, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Eastern name order has been nominated for merging with Template:Western name order. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Father Goose (talk) 19:28, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Panonian was banned from the English Wiki, and has been banned 2 times at the Serbian Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.169.28.113 (talk) 12:41, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]