User talk:JohnnyCoal

Welcome!

Hello, JohnnyCoal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 17:52, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Molly 👍 JohnnyCoal (talk) 17:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JohnnyCoal. Your well-sourced contributions are appreciated, but please avoid bare URLs as they lead to link rot. See Citing sources and Referencing for beginners for step-by-step instructions. I'm happy to assist if you have questions. Muhandes (talk) 13:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muhandes ! Thank you so much, and, I'm deeply sorry! I will fix my current contributions where bare links have been used, and will make sure to not use bare links ever again in the future. JohnnyCoal (talk) 13:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Robby.is.on (talk) 23:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and updated both the infobox and the table. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 23:26, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robby! Thank you for your precious advice. I understand, and thank you for the heads up and the advice. Appreciate! Will make sure to follow your schema when editing footballers stats. JohnnyCoal (talk) 09:06, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Great! :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 18:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johnny, I've appreciated your edits to the CryptoPunks article and believe you would like to see it improved as I do. You may have noticed there's another editor who continues to delete entire sections without discussion. I've tried to work it out on Talk to no avail, so I've taken it to the dispute noticeboard and if you have the time I think your comments there could be useful. [1] Seanbonner (talk) 19:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Sean! Thanks for your kind words. Definitely, and I will follow your advice. I also tried to request a page protection but I was told the level of vandalism is not as high as the standard wants, in order for it to get semi-protected or protected. JohnnyCoal (talk) 08:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there hope you're doing well. We've been trying to make some edits to the XCOPY page, at the request of the artist, and they seem to be getting deleted. Would you mind letting them stand, or helping us understand why they’re being deleted? We’re hoping to work together to sort this out so we can revise the page and make it more accurate/updated. Thanks, hope to hear from you soon. Jessekaltman (talk) 14:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! The edits on XCOPY are being reverted for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to poorly sourced content, basic copyediting, non-neutral point of view, use of primary sources and others. You are free to contribute to the article by following the three core Wikipedia content policies. If you wish to discuss this furthermore, you can add your rationale to the related article talk page. JohnnyCoal (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, SuperRare, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 14:23, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Praxidicae,

Thank you; I know, that's why I submit the under construction template on said page. I'll improve the article soon. 17:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC) JohnnyCoal (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lord Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rare Pepe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This needs a stronger reference than thesource.com/bitcoinmagazine.com and the project's own website. I was unable to find any such sources myself. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The only in-depth coverage appears to be non-independent (supplied text and and interview).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SuperRare and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 09:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnnyCoal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 09:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnnyCoal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SuperRare, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnnyCoal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "SuperRare".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]