User talk:Joelr31

---

Archives
July 2005 — March 2006 March 2006 — May 2006 May 2006 – July 2006 July 2006 – August 2006 August 2006 – September 2006 September 2006 – November 2006 December 2006 – June 2007 June 2007 – January 2008 January 2008 – February 2009

Featured article removal candidates view edit
Bart Simpson	Review now
Emmy Noether	Review now
The Notorious B.I.G.	Review now
Isaac Brock	Review now
Mariah Carey	Review now
Concerto delle donne	Review now

---

I wasn't sure if you were aware or not, but the nominator of the above FAR has withdrawn it. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will be taking a look at FAR today. Joelito (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk 22:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Care to explain this since the only person who thought it should go to FARC was the nom and even he admitted the refs were fixed and everyone else thought issues were not FARC worthy, minor, etc? — Rlevse • Talk • 02:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator him/herself did not strike his/her other (even though minor) concerns. In any case, two weeks in FARC should not hurt the article if it is indeed up to FA standards. Joelito (talk) 03:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minor concerns do not warrant losing FA status. What really irks me is the nom didn't even bring this up on the talk page first. I don't mind improvements to the article but the way the nom went about it and the obvious weak rationale (except for refs, which was fixed and stricken) left a lot to be desired. It's possible the nom isn't even watching the FAR now. — Rlevse • Talk • 03:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nom has asked the FAR be withdrawn. See FAR page. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look later today. Joelito (talk) 12:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The FAR page says that an article normally stays in the discussion phase 2-3 weeks, but I see some articles that stagnate there with no improvements for close to a month now. Shouldn't these be move to the FARC phase sooner? I'm asking this because there are more articles that should be nominated for FAR, but the FAR page recommends that an editor open only one FAR at a time. Xasodfuih (talk) 17:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is entirely my fault. I have been slow to move articles from FAR to FARC. Please let me know which article you feel should me moved to FARC. Joelito (talk) 04:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chemical warfare. Xasodfuih (talk) 00:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Puerto Rico Newsletter Year III - Issue 1 - Fall & Winter 2008-09
"Yo exigí que se tocara La Borinqueña." - José Torres to Rafael Bracero, discussing the preparations for his championship fight against Willie Pastrano.
From the editor Hello, Joelr31. This is the sixth issue of WikiProject Puerto Rico's newsletter. The newsletter is intended to help all members to keep up with the latest news relating to the project. Continuing our new format, this issue will discuss the news, achievements and other incidences relevant to our project between fall and winter. - Caribbean~H.Q. 22:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Flags and records Greetings, during the past months, there has been a lot of activity and active discussion surrounding articles within our scope. Of particular interest is one that took place in Flag of Puerto Rico, in which several project members exposed their points of view regarding the tones of our flag. Ultimately, research brought forth a severe loophole in the regulation employed by the Senate of Puerto Rico. Our flag doesn't have official tones! Attempting to prevent future conflicts, I presented a proposal in the project's talk page. The subsequent discussion served as an perfect example of consensus. Thanks to everyone for your participation. In other news, our friend Tony the Marine added another impressive achievement to his brilliant resume. On December 8, 2008, his DYK hook for Ivan Castro (soldier) broke the previous all-time record for more views, receiving 71,300 visits. Tony has also been actively cooperating with this Newsletter, the inclusion of a new "Did you Know?" section, was entirely his idea. - Caribbean~H.Q. 22:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]	Users who helped with this newsletter Caribbean H.Q. (talk · contribs) Marine 69-71 (talk · contribs) Other areas where you can help Voluntaries are needed to improve Puerto Rico. Please help Marcos maintain Portal:Puerto Rico. An image for you!
Project News On January 3, 2009, Cerejota presented a draft interested in establishing a solid style guide for the project. The current revision can be seen here, further suggestions can be placed in the project's talk page. Puerto Rican Campaign, Jewish immigration to Puerto Rico, Currencies of Puerto Rico and Sixto Escobar are now of good article quality. Facts from Isabel Gonzalez, Jewish immigration to Puerto Rico, Chinese immigration to Puerto Rico, Ivan Castro (soldier), Currencies of Puerto Rico, Orlando Antigua and Jaime Fonalledas were featured in the "Did you know..." section of the main page. List of Puerto Rican boxing world champions is currently a featured list candidate Luis Muñoz Rivera and Flag of Puerto Rico, articles within our scope, are currently good article nominees.
Puerto Rican Highlight On November 1, Jonathan González won the flyweight division's gold medal at the International Boxing Association's Youth World Championships. (Primera Hora) González joins John John Molina, Aníbal Santiago Acevedo, Carlos Febres and Daniel Alicea as gold medalists in this competition. Did you Know? That the Elfin-woods Warbler, an endemic bird of Puerto Rico first observed in 1968, is the last New World warbler species to be discovered?

Addbot (talk) 20:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I should be able to keep up with them. I'm unlikely to go on a long wikibreak anytime soon, so should be able to keep up to progress with it. D.M.N. (talk) 08:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Yes, I agree with closing the review. Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 22:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure about this? Is there any way I can convince you to change your mind? Raul654 (talk) 21:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also wish you would reconsider, Joelito; you are such an effective delegate there, often stepping in to the most difficult decisions. Perhaps having YellowMonkey as a backup will make the work more enjoyable for you? Also, many that are currently on the page have declarations from YellowMonkey, meaning that he shouldn't be the one to close them. You are a real asset at FAR, and losing you would be sad; is there anything that will make this easier for you? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will stay for a while longer but I desire to edit articles again. At the moment 95% of my time in Wikipedia is spent reading FARs. I appreciate both Raul's and your requests but I think it is time for me to step down and let new people take care of FAR. Joelito (talk) 15:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The timing of Marskell's return is still uncertain; would you be able to hang in there a while longer? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:59, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot guarantee anything since there is no return date for Tim. Time will tell. Joelito (talk) 23:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't think I should close the ones where I already advocated a position in the second half, although I think in quite a few of them, the articles were quite abandoned, so you don't have to think about too much. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 02:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Epa, Joelito, ¿qué tal? I don't know if you saw Raul's note on my talk page, but YellowMonkey may have quit, and Raul put out a query about appointing another FAR delegate. It looks like YM isn't currently closing FARs, so I was hoping to trouble you to do the next run through ? Espero que sigas bien alli ... saludos, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Estupendo; me contenta mucho :) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that while soccer is not at the level of basketball, baseball and volleyball, its popularity has been increasing dramatically:

• The Islanders are moving up and developing a very strong fan base-they sold out at Juan Ramón Loubriel Soccer Stadium in their game against Mexico's Cruz Azul with tickets selling for twenty bucks, much more than most other tickets.

• Soccer is increasingly being taught in private and some public schools

• Soccer leagues are developing in many communities---Fraigcomar and others

It probably already is the fourth most popular sport in PR. Pr4ever (talk) 00:39, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I could make a similar argument for wrestling but I would not compare it with baseball, basketball and boxing. Joelito (talk) 01:33, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. MeegsC | Talk 15:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 06:08, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joel. Can you move this down please? I normally don't have a problem with moving my own noms down as long as I don't close them but in this case I think there would be a riot...the author has said that he feels that citations aren't needed anyway so I don't think extra time is needed (it's been on FAR about 4 weeks without any action) YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 00:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amazona vittata range.PNG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Amazona vittata range.PNG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Amazona vittata range.PNG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:01, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Established editors association will be a kind of union of who have made substantial and enduring (and reliably sourced) contributions to the encyclopedia for a period of time (say, two years or more). The proposed articles of association are here - suggestions welcome.

If you wish to be elected, please notify me here. If you know of someone else who may be eligible, please nominate them here

Discussion is here.Peter Damian (talk) 19:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A pile that I nominated: Aramaic language, Peterborough Chronicle, Krag-Jorgensen YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 08:40, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will get to this later today. Joelito (talk) 14:16, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia talk:Featured article review#Changes to instructions SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:44, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I would like to conduct an interview regarding the Featured Article Review process over the next week or two. Are you available / are you interested? --Cryptic C62 · Talk 15:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2009 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Newsletter delivery by –xeno ^talk 02:20, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joelr31. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at WT:FAR regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_review#Inappropriate_comments_at_Featured_article_review_by_Disinfoboxman. Thank you. --Cirt (talk) 18:56, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joel - you've been away for quite a while now. Since then, Yellowmonkey has been handling FAR more-or-less by himself. He asked for another delegate, and I've appointed Dana Boomer. I also removed you and Marskell, but if you want the job back, please let me know. Raul654 (talk) 21:39, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 23:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:WPPR. Since you had some involvement with the Template:WPPR redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Feedback (talk) 07:08, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on October 22, 2010. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 22, 2010. If you think that it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director, Raul654 (talk · contribs). If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 19:27, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PRCollab has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 06:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Centro del Sur has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion HERE. Thank you, Mercy11 (talk) 23:35, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{help me-helped}} on this page with {{help me}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Hi

You deleted this wikipedia page. I am not sure why you did. Please can you explain? also you have left my email showing in public. Please can you delete this as this has privacy and data protection law requirements. You have left this showing saying (redirected to <email address redacted>).

Please can you address these issues. thank you Jbrito (talk) " class="ext-discussiontools-init-timestamplink">09:48, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@Joelr31 - not sure why he posted this here

@JBrito - the talk page was deleted because its title contained your email address, and you want all mention of your email address removed; the more you keep posting it in messages like this, the more it will get picked up by spambots. Now your account has been renamed and the redirects from the old one which contained your email address have been deleted, your email address is no longer on view anywhere in Wikipedia, unless you post it again. JohnCD (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Joelr31,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 23:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Arecibo flag.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:24, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 02:08, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roberto Clemente, an article that you may be interested in, has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Zepppep (talk) 23:12, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution! I made some changes to reflect the need of going over caciques, Conquistadores, and United States rule. Please check out Governor of Puerto Rico when you have a chance. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 18:00, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated History of Puerto Rico for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --Philpill691 (talk) 18:28, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Isabela flag.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mayaguez skyline.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Mayaguez skyline.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:38, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joel, on April 14 you offered to write something in the "Cost of Living" section of the Puerto Rico article. I know you have contributed a great deal to the article, so it would be great (as the #1 editor) if you could help out one more time (!) I'll wait a few days...if nothing happens, I'll take a stab at it myself. The NPOV tag has been up there a long time, and I'd like to resolve the matter and remove it. Thanks! Sarason (talk) 07:02, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joelr31! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:14, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:29, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joelr31. This in an invitation to participate in the 1st. Art+Feminism Wikipedia edit-a-thon in Puerto Rico. The event will take place from March 27th to April 8th in The contemporary Art Museum in San Juan. If you would like to attend and give technical support as an experience wikipedian, please, feel free to reach me at my talk page or contact the organizers: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/primer-wiki-ton-en-el-mac-mujeres-arte-y-activismo-tickets-32364939405?aff=es2 --Yhhue91 (talk) 22:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles that you have been involved in editing—Monotypic taxon and Monospecificity—have been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Nessie (talk) 15:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated List of birds of Puerto Rico for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Giants2008 (Talk) 02:20, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Isabela flag.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Isabela seal.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		Faithful friends who are dear to us
		... gather near to us once more. May your heart be light and your troubles out of sight, now and in the New Year. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I Am Half-Sick of Shadows, Said the Lady of Shalott		Happy holidays
		Dear Joelito, For you and all your loved ones, "Let there be mercy". Wishing you health, peace and happiness this holiday season and in the coming year. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Fauna of Puerto Rico for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 03:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPPR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 08:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Juana Diaz seal.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:CoA_Municipio_de_Juana_Díaz.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]