[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

User talk:Jerzy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

All New: 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Orphaned: 500 1001 1501 - - (Generated (using "subst:") from 06:07, 3 May 2009 (UTC) revision of user-Jerzy-talk generating template User:Jerzy/Fresh Talk Page, based on 3 January 2009 revision of User talk:Jerzy plus dynamic transclusion of User:Jerzy/Past Archive Phases, minor typo fixes, and a new link.)
<small>{{Attempting_wikibreak|[[User:Jerzy|Jerzy]]| in late June|I}}</small>
Now Back
--Jerzyt 09:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rough Overview of this Page

  1. Welcome to the Page for "Talking" to Jerzy (Talk-Page Front-Matter)
    1. About Communicating Here
    2. Note to Non-Native Speakers of English
    3. Links to my Discussion (User-talk page) Archives
    4. Detailed Table of Contents of whole page
  2. Messages to Jerzy and Dialogues with Him

Messages to Jerzy and Dialogues with Him

[edit]

Template:American politicians Robert Smith has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
—Preceding undated comment added 16:39, 22 October 2009.

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Jerzy. You have new messages at Auntof6's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New Page Patrol survey

[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Jerzy! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Notice of redirect discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Not real talk: an extra sandbox

[edit]

rUbBER roOM

A page you started (Empress of Japan (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Empress of Japan (disambiguation), Jerzy!

Wikipedia editor Devopam just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please participate in the AfD discussion should you contest the action.

To reply, leave a comment on Devopam's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Notice

The article Matthew 18 process has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability; sole reliable source is NYtimes article, was unable to find additional sources using the term that could be incorporated

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 02:30, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Gang of Four (Pakistan) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Radioactive (talk) 06:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Bob Martin (singer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO and falls under WP:ONEEVENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bob Martin (singer) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Martin (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Martin (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sims2aholic8 (talk) 07:48, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Has (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Has (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Has (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Rebecca Campbell-Howe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet our notability guidelines. A WP:BEFORE search finds none of the significant coverage in independent reliable sources needed to satisfy the GNG, and no relevant SNG (e.g. WP:NPROF) appears to be met.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"C. dif" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect C. dif and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 14#C. dif until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Husker du? (TV program) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable, nothing in a BEFORE. Tagged since 2018

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:04, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tl-ovw

[edit]

Template:Tl-ovw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tl-ovw2

[edit]

Template:Tl-ovw2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tl1-1

[edit]

Template:Tl1-1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:04, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tl1-2

[edit]

Template:Tl1-2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:04, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tl2-1

[edit]

Template:Tl2-1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IK Sirius (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 18:45, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Politicians of African nations has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Politicians of African nations has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 08:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Contrecoup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unneccesary disambiguation page, only 1 link has its own page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michael H (talk) 13:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Names by culture has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Names by culture has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Critics has been nominated for splitting

[edit]

Category:Critics has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Superconducting steel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. The article discusses a misprint in New York Times.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 09:45, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Scorsezi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24 § Scorsezi until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie (talkcontribs) 13:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Scorsesi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24 § Scorsesi until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie (talkcontribs) 13:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sports teams named Trojans for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sports teams named Trojans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports teams named Trojans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 13:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Roman-succ

[edit]

Template:Roman-succ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of 3D animation software for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of 3D animation software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 3D animation software until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Greatder (talk) 07:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article War of the Roses (Pennsylvania) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]