User talk:Jemlim0108

Hello, Jemlim0108!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Hajoon0102 💬 14:08, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm InterstateFive. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 02:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of mobile phones with a high refresh rate display, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 30. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Vivo X70, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 06:52, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Oppo Find X5, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 10:16, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Vivo X80, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 10:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Oppo Find X3 into Draft:Oppo Find X5. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 11:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jemlim0108, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 21:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, I can't join ur group. Jemlim0108 (talk) 09:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check out the civility policy and don't speak like this to people. If you call an editor "dumb" again, or tell them to quit Wikipedia or similar, you may be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 10:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]

I asked you to stop moving Draft:Oppo Find X5 to Oppo Find X5 and you clearly couldn't help yourself. I also note that you're making uncivil comments to other editors, and I think you should apologize to these folks. You're blocked until you decide you're ready to contribute in a constructive manner. -FASTILY 22:39, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is there anything wrong with the find x5 article draft? pls explain Jemlim0108 (talk) 09:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

also, i am sorry for what i done. i did not see your reply of 'dont move the draft to article', so it seemed like i 'clearly cant help myself' Jemlim0108 (talk) 09:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jemlim0108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I may had been making uncivil comments and like Fastily said, I was blocked for page move warring after warnings in the past, but I have learnt my mistake and will not make uncivil comments again. And by the way, I still moved the draft to the article even after Fastily's warning because I did not read his/her warning on his/her talk page. I am sorry to anyone who I posted uncivil comments to.Jemlim0108 (talk) 09:39, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block evasion was a really stupid idea and made things worse. You'll need to address that in any future unblock request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That was an even stupider idea. Talk page access removed. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:32, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by 'it's closed? Jemlim0108 (talk) 13:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closed is the opposite of open. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:49, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is open. Admins, please feel free to add to it if I missed anything. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Admins w/o tools, please feel free to comment here --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: This user was blocked with an expiration time of indefinite and can't edit own talk page. --Hajoon0102 💬 11:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's why the unblock request is at UTRS. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. --Hajoon0102 💬 14:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vivo X80 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage, just mentions and spec pages, to meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]