User talk:Irisoptical

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tambov, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that due to WP:RUSUKR, editors who are not extended confirmed are unable to make edits about Russia–Ukraine war, broadly construed. They can still leave constructive comments on the talk page or make edit requests. Thanks. Mellk (talk) 00:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh i didnt know sorry; i just wanted to get the sourced information I found out there Irisoptical (talk) 00:47, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, you can still make edit requests. See WP:ER. Mellk (talk) 00:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Helldivers 2, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

201st Fighter Squadron

added a link pointing to Philippines campaign

43rd Infantry Division (United States)

added a link pointing to Philippines campaign

58th Air Division

added a link pointing to Pacific Theater

6th Infantry Division (United States)

added a link pointing to Philippines campaign

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:UT Austin Vietnam War Protest 1970.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

201st Fighter Squadron

added a link pointing to Philippines campaign

43rd Infantry Division (United States)

added a link pointing to Philippines campaign

4th Carrier Division (Imperial Japanese Navy)

added a link pointing to Philippines campaign

No. 11 Squadron PAF

added a link pointing to Operation Sentinel

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 4th Carrier Division (Imperial Japanese Navy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philippines campaign.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from University of Texas at Austin into History of the University of Texas at Austin. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

5th Dragoon Regiment (France)

added links pointing to Siege of Namur and Flanders Campaign

16th Mechanised Division (Poland)

added a link pointing to Greater Poland Uprising

1st Battalion (Ontario Regiment), CEF

added a link pointing to Battle of Amiens

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 02:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 16th Mechanised Division (Poland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greater Poland Uprising.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Palace Mosque, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Irisoptical. I noticed that you didn't provide the source information for the photo. Is this your own shot? 0x0a (talk) 15:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss on the talk page your deletion from 2024 United States presidential debates. The information is well sourced and even has two whole sections dedicated to it, and so is notable enough to be in the lead. Please note that the article is desginated a contentious topic, so please don't edit war. — Czello ^(music) 07:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please do not add extra references without adding text, as you did at Jingle Jangle Jingle. This is considered refbombing. Also, does your username refer to an organisation called Iris Optical? If so, you should change it, as such usernames are not allowed per our policy on organisation names as usernames. Graham87 (talk) 11:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh it is just two words from a random name generator lol

is that okay with you? Irisoptical (talk) 03:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]