User talk:Izady

Welcome!

Hello, Izady, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Baristarim 04:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

""Odd! The map is my own. Read the copyright underneath it. What other kinds of permission do you require beyond that of the author himself? M. Izady?"

You can state you are the author of the work specifically, there are certain steps to doing so. You may want to try to upload it again and I'll help you answer whatever questions you have about stating the copyright. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 02:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Ismailiyya. The problem is I don't remember which map was it! When I remember, I will post it again and will ask you for your help. M. IzadyIzady (talk) 15:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know you have replies at your comment on the help desk here. I hope that helped you- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 07:49, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MidEastReligionCore.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

""This map is mine, copyrighted to me, as written on the bottom of the map. I give Wikipedia the permission to use it. So stop baggering this poor fellow."

Like I stated above, you may want to try to upload it again and I'll help make sure it knows you are the copyright holder. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 02:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bilal ibn al-Harith. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Notmyrealname (talk) 17:24, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"I see. So, the correction to your blatant errors by a former Harvard professor is considered "vandalism" but your pithless pseudo-information is not! Congratulations to Wikipedia for its standards! M. Izady"

I am sorry this happened: what you did was not vandalism, many editors do not know what vandalism really means. As for your edit, while "deity" may be more correct, it is generally translated in English as "god" for whatever reason, perhaps to parallel the original Arabic more closely since Allah is translated as the proper noun "God". --♥pashtun ismailiyya 02:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Deity" is gender and species neutral. God or god is male and is human or humanoid. The correct term is, therefore, "deity" not "god"-- as in "I confess that there is no deity but God; I confess that Muhammad is God's messenger" (i.e., the correct translation of the Islamic confessional for conversion). The Arabic term "Ilaah" (Semitic, "El") should be always translated into English as "deity". M. IzadyIzady (talk) 07:08, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This may not be the right place to report this, but I have spent nearly an hour trying to find the 'right place' to contact a Wiki editor. Someone has used my IP to post an inflamatory "correction" to an article on the Iraqi Mass Graves. I am the author of many books and articles on the plight of the Kurds and the Shiites, and would be the last person to justify their murder and torment--as the "correction" to the article has done. As a result, you have slated ME as a "vandal." That is a double jeopardy. Please remove those "correction" and my IP as the source. It is insulting and defamatory, never mind inaccurate. (Izady (talk) 23:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Izady)[reply]

What is your IP? You may wish to e-mail me. John Reaves 23:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've offered some suggestions above, and I'll love to be of any service. In addition, the best way to make sure your edits aren't reverted is to cite a valid source, even if that valid source is your own published work. Once something is visibly cited, there can be very little debate about it. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 02:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you P. Ismailiyya. The following should be a helpful additional source.

I. Bruk, Narodny predny Asii, Moscow, 1960; I. Bruk and V.S. Apenchenko, Atlas Narodov Mira, Moscow, 1964. M. IzadyIzady (talk) 07:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - I noticed when reverting an image vandalism by a random IP that you added the sentence "His mother, TKTM (vocalization uncertain) was a native of the port of Murcia in Andalucia (southeastern Spain), presumably a Muslim." This contradicts the existing material a sentence later and needs a citation... his mother's name was Najma according to common understanding. I'm sure you have a cite, though, so just dig it on up and we'll figure out how to word the resulting sentence to include both sets of information. Ogress _smash! 07:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In all the biographies one finds at the Shrine Library in Mashhad, the Imam's mother's true name is recorded as "TKTM of Murcia", and add to it, "alias Najma." The name must have been proto-Spanish, since none of the sources recording it knows for certain how to vocalize it. M. IzadyIzady (talk) 07:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I restored parts of your deleted edits. Please copyedit it according to WP:MOS. Alefbe (talk) 16:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It is fine. At a point in the future, I will try and copy verbatim all the British statistics for the Ahsa oasis (village and town level) into the Wiki pages. Hopefully that will provide the specific information needed for this volatile and sensitive district that is already entering into mainstream news from the Middle East and the Gulf. IzadyIzady (talk) 23:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Alefbe Alefbe. Someone keeps deleting my editing of the page on Imam Malik ibn Anas. I keep writing a logically accurate and conciliatory addition to the entry, and he/she keeps removing it and placing a prejudicial, baseless piece in its stead! Can you do something about it? The following is what I keep adding to his/her, but he immediately replaces it by an anti-Shia fabrication.

This is what I add in the page on his views on the Shia:

Views on Shi'ites

Along with Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam Malik was a student of the Shiite 6th imam, Ja'far al-Sadiq who is the law giver of the Shiites. As such, Maliki and Hanafi schools of jurisprudence are quite close to the Shia system in their general approach to Islamic jurisprudence. In fact, like the Shia, Imam Malik asks this followers to do the prayers with both hands dangling down on the side instead of joing on the chest (as all other Sunnis do), and like the Shia, keep their eyes straight on "facing the Qibla" instead of looking down, as do all other Sunnis (see the article Maliki on this point). Therefore, derogatory pronouncements ascribed to Imam Malik abusive of the Shiites, are obviously of later fabrication to divide Muslims from one another at the altar of nifaq (disunity). One of these fabrications is a passage ascribed to the great Imam Malik, that purports when the latter "was asked about them and he replied, "Do not speak to them nor narrate from them, for surely they are liars." [Minhaaj as-Sunnah, 1/37]^[1] One wonders how would Malik have remained a student of Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq, the founder of the Shiite jurisprudence, if he considered the Shiites "liars"? It is a sad fact that today the hypocrets in their attemtp to divide Muslim masses, have set out on demonizing the Shia, to the point of fabricating hateful sayings for the Islamic grandees such as Imam Malik or Imam Abu Hanifa.

Dear Izady, you can't add your own ideas , theories and research about a subject to Wikipedia pages, doing so is a violation of WP:OR. --Kurdo777 (talk) 05:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kurdo, isn't the "discussion section" for discussing one's idea? What do you suggest it is then? And what is wrong with my "own idea"? Whose idea should it be? I am an established scholar, author and policy advisor. Do you rather see i quote some obscure writer in Bengal or Oklahoma than my own research? IzadyIzady (talk) 02:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that Mr. Izady. But wikipedia is not the medium to publish your thoughts and research even if you are an scholar. As a matter of fact, there are many editors here who are scholars in real life. I would recommend that you publish your work in a peer-reviewed journal, and have another editor cite it in those wikipedia pages, in order to avoid WP:COI. Even then, other editors may argue that your ideas violate WP:Fringe, specially on Geber ‎ where most of the cited academic works refer to his place of Birth as Tus, Khorasan. --Kurdo777 (talk) 08:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Kurdo, now I understand your issue: an Iranian nationalist wanting to grab the heritage of others for his own people. You adding of "an" to the word "scholar" gives you away. It is not Escholar but Scholar. Only Iranians make such a grammatical mistake!! Wow. It is so funny how one's own true stripes come through when ***pretending*** to have the good of the public at heart, while just really promoting one's own agenda. Geber/ Jabir ibn Hayyan WAS from Tartus, Syria, not Tus, Iran. "Most of the cited academic works" you mention must be Iranian in their composition and, obviously, to your own liking. How about checking, say, Encyclopaedia Iranica or Britannica, or Americana, or Islamica? See if any of those list Geber/Jabir as a Persian from Tus? And you are presumably one of those "editor scholars" you brazenly note? It is unbelievable how folks like you end up being the "impartial" arbiters and editors of Wiki? Let me see if other other editors agree with your brazen nationalist views. IzadyIzady (talk) 22:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, let's not attack each other. I will take this to the talk page. --Afghana ^[talk] 06:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. And thank you Afghana for your intervention to prevent misguided nationalism dictating the content of this medium. izadyIzady (talk) 21:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your article contributions, such as the edit you made to Turkmenistan. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 16:41, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Green Giant. So civil and polite! My complements. ~~izady

Dear Green Giant, I just wrote an article on the Shaqaqi tribe of Kurds. I would like to upload a map for it (of my own making and copyright). How do I do that? Also, in the past, I have written articles such as this one, that have been quickly removed by someone, before I ever got the chance to expand it, add footnotes, and the like. Who is allowed to remove an entire article? ~~izady

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Malik ibn Anas, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Supertouch (talk) 18:52, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your logic--or rather, the lack thereof, would be amusing, if it was not so misguided and transparently bigoted. What exactly is "original" (viz, unsupported proposal) in my correction to the article? I simply use the arguments presented in this SAME article--Malik was a student of the Shias 6th Imam (the law giver of the Shias)--to dispel the bigoted argument that Imam Malik was an anti-Shia like Osama Bin Laden is today? Just because the bigot who wrote the original paragraph can produce a dubious passage to support his bigoted views, it does not make it correct. One could produce material from Hitler's Mein Kampf (yes, it is well-known and it is published) to "prove" Jews are evil. Would Wiki allows that in its pages?

As to similarities between Maliki and Shia rituals, I use another article in Wiki which I cross reference (Maliki), to arrive at a proposal that Imam Malik would have wanted peace and harmony among Muslims not hatred and bigotry. But of course, this bothers your prejudicial, anti-Shia feelings. Shame on you and on Wiki for allowing this to become a platform for hatred and religious bigotry. Your touch is surely a "Supertouch" in narrowmindedness and prejudice~~izady

A tag has been placed on Hamoun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dwayne was here! ♫ 18:24, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Dwayne. It has been placed by someone under the Anglicized title of "Hamuns". The terminal s is English plural, and misleading. It would be much better to restore it to what I had it under: Hamun.

Also, I have asked for the help of the editors to rid Wikipedia from its increasingly anti-Shia tone. Every time I edit and tone down the religious bigotry that I find in the texts, it is immediately restored to its original anti-Shia text. Most recently, I corrected the article on Imam Malik to reflect his urbane and non-prejudicial nature vis a vis the Shias. Immediately it was restored to its bigoted form by one your self-styled, hatemonguering editors. Read his laughable excuse for doing so.

Are you THE IZADY, the scholar or just someone with the same name? --84.59.186.208 (talk) 00:44, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

someone, probably you, made an assertion here:

Wikipedia_talk:Copyright_problems#My_maps_are_stolen_and_posted_here_on_Wiki

that there is "stolen" data somewhere in Wikipedia.

I am just another editor with no special rights or anything, but I would like to help resolve this if you have not done so already. Can you please amplify your assertion? If you can point to specific problems, we can work together to fix them.

I think I understand why you are upset, but we need to be very precise. First, you used the term "stolen" and the phrase "I hold Wikpedia responsible." These can be construed as legal terms, but not precise legal terms. Unfortunately, things rapidly get messy when lawyers get involved, and you should really try to avoid this unless you feel that you have no choice. If any editor thinks that you (or anyone) is threatening a legal action against Wikipedia, then we are forced by policy to turn the matter over to the Wikimedia foundation's attorney and block the editor who made the threat. This is not the best way to resolve the matter quickly. Instead, I would prefer to assist you an any way I can to identify and resolve the problem to which you refer.

From my (very brief and non-professional) review of your work, It appears that you have spent a lot of time collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and explaining data about the religion and culture of a particular area. The results are impressive. As a citizen of the world, I thank you.

Now to specifics.

First: "stolen." Your work is protected by Copyright. Copyright protects the creative content of your work. It does not protect the data itself, nor does it protect any non-creative aspects of the presentation of that data. The fact that you worked very hard to create your maps ("sweat of the brow") is not considered creative. I'm just a layman, so if this is unclear you should consult a lawyer who specializes in copyright law.

Next: lack of references. If you have found material in Wikipedia that uses the facts reported in your work but that does not reference any source, you may challenge it and have it removed. (I can help if you do not know how to do this.)

Next: Plagiarism. If you have found material that used your work without violating copyright law, but that does not attribute your work, then the article (or image) can be modified to attribute your work. You can make the change yourself or I can help you with this.

Finally, If you so desire, and if you feel that the maps we are using are inferior to your maps, you can place your maps on Wikimedia commons under a CC-BY-SA license and replace the maps we are using with your maps, together with with all the approprite attributions to your original works.

Please feel free to reply here, or on my talk page, or at the original talk page. Thanks. -Arch dude (talk) 02:13, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Izady. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

I have tried uselessly to find a way to contact any authority in Wikipedia to report yet another plagiarizing of my work and its posting here on wikipedia. This time it is a map, copied and amended with bias by someone (most likely, an ethnic Azeri), before posting it here. This is the link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safavid_conversion_of_Iran_to_Shia_Islam

The original is found here.

http://gulf2000.columbia.edu/images/maps/Iran_Languages_lg.png

I am not sure if anyone reads this postings, but if one does, please contact me via my Yahoo email. You have it, as you send me the annual donation/contribution alerts. Izady

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Izady. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]