User talk:GregAsche/Archive

Greg, if you are using the monobook skin, you can copy this:

function RcHideUsers()
{
	var li = document.getElementById( 'n-recentchanges' );
	if ( ! li ) return; // sanity check
	li.appendChild( document.createTextNode( ' ' ) );
	var a = document.createElement( 'a' );
	a.href = '/w/index.php?title=Special:Recentchanges&hideliu=1&limit=500';
	a.appendChild( document.createTextNode( 'Hide' ) );
	li.appendChild( a );
}
if ( window.addEventListener ) window.addEventListener( 'load', RcHideUsers, false );
else if ( window.attachEvent ) window.attachEvent( 'onload', RcHideUsers );

into this link: User:GregAsche/monobook.js. It adds a "Hide" link next to the "Recent Changes" link. Func( t, c, e,  ) 02:38, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greg, as I've explained to an admin previously, I have had difficulty adding tags. The Nycbuginvasion is GFDL-license by the owner, and the tag should be complete by now. Other permissions are in process for Keston -- the site owner is in Spain running a marathon, but has replied favorably once already -- and his other images are magazines and album covers. Simons is in review with two depts. at WSJ, and the microchip tags have been granted permission from the chip manufacturer, who has already released these photos for use as part of their press kit. Don't have time more details, but the process of tagging has simply been confusing for me, as I have only been active at WP for three weeks. All halloween photos are GFDL licensed by parade director Jeanne Fleming, except for the two by Williams who granted license yesterday. Regards, please be patient. Klenk paul klenk 02:43, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greg, I will need additional help here. I am asking Imdaking to help as well. What info is missing, and can one of you please assist me in the spirit of community cooperation. I am trying to do my best and would like assistance. Regards. paul klenk 02:50, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the link, but I've already tried to read that page with no luck. It is useless to a newcomer, sad to say. Left various requests for help at pages and admins, but with little effect. What is missing, where, exactly? What you see is what I think I have. I can't tell you what's missing, because I don't know what's missing -- Imdaking has an idea, I think, and I am waiting for a reply.

We are talking past each other. At the moment, what is missing where? What I have is what you see. paul klenk 03:05, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

are you there? paul klenk 03:20, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greg, are you there? paul klenk 03:28, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have questions for you tomorrow. paul klenk 03:43, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greg, indented below are comments I left at Imda's page. Would you kindly see, if you are in a position to do so, that no image removal takes place on at New York's Village Halloween Parade unless specific notice is given me of what required information is necessary? And, help is provided to me to understand these requirements? It does not help to say delete and "no source," as so much info has been provided. I believe a lot of time has been wasted chatting back and forth and furiously removing and reverting, when all that was needed was assistance and cooperation, rather than gratuitous policing without sufficient explanation and replies. I have gone to great lengths to ask for help with images, which no one seems in a position to offer, and to get carte blanche GFDL licensing from the parade corporation (the image owner) and its director, Jeanne Fleming. She has granted parade access (press passes) to various photographers in exchange for being given rights to the photos. paul klenk 11:22, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind -- I'd rather do the changes myself. I'm going back to check all original imags, and if they have 1] name of owner, 2] address of Web site, 3] a description and 4] a tag, I am placing it back. No additional requirements have been requested, and by my record, I've made several attempts to ask what they might be. paul klenk 03:54, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shuffle.jpg, Twopaperfaces.jpg, Nycbuginvasion.jpg, and Fixingdino.jpg all have the four items above. Before I revert, is anything missing? If so please describe exactly what -- again, "source" doesn't tell me much since I added their authors and pages. paul klenk 03:59, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, the only photo on the Halloween page that is tagged as being listed on images for deletion is Fixingdino. Per the tag, I have listed on its talk page all the information about the image, arguing that it not be deleted. I am now reverting the page again to its previous state, as every photo on it has 1] name of owner, 2] address of Web site, 3] a description and 4] a GFDL license tag, and, when known, 5] the photographer. These photos are copyright of the parade, and its director, Jeanne Fleming, has granted carte blanche GFDL licensing for the photos.

In the interest of efficiency, cooperation, and the spirit of Wikipedia, please refrain from removing the images from the page until addressing a comment to me specifying exactly what necessary or required information is missing. paul klenk 11:22, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my change, which replaced the original text with:

A home computer is a computer that is at home.

Yuhong 02:40, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my RfA has not quite completed yet, but either way, I'd like to thank you for your vote and your support, regardless of the outcome. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 18:38, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of my RfA, which I have formally withdrawn. The full text of my withdrawal and statement of appreciation is on the RfA page. Best wishes, Leonard G. 03:23, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greg, 165.83.196.82 added all the material that they took out. If you look at the history of the Black Kettle article, you will see that they have been working on it since yesterday. This IP belongs to the National Park Service. I had not had a chance, and was waiting until they were done adding new information, before I went comprehensively through article and did a copy edit, which I would bet it needs. I have also been trying to help this user on their talk page, User_talk:165.83.196.82, to be a better editor. Following the rules may have scared them off. I was not to excited when they removed all of their additions. I figured I would just look at an old version and pick out any good points that I thought needed too, or could be, added. Check it out and tell me what you think? WikiDon 21:48, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, the article was only about 10 sentences long before yesterday. Unfortunately, there is not a lot known about Black Kettle, and a good deal of what has been written is from a POV, bias, white-man's take. Just like I warned IP 165.83.196.82, don't let the article get off track into the battles, the 7th Cav, the Southern Cheyenne tribe, etc., which is easy to do. I wish we could jump in the time machine at interview the man. WikiDon 22:20, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PS I don't know what the heck happened there. !~!

I appreciate your vote in my successful RfA. If you every need anything just ask. I hope I can live up to expectations. - Trevor MacInnis(Talk | Contribs) 12:47, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for reverting the anon AOL vandal's attacks on my talk page. I only wish that the idiot would realise that I never see his work unless I go looking for it, thanks to the efforts of good folks like yourself, because he works in the middle of the night my time! -- Arwel 13:03, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

At 01:38, 18 September 2005 (UTC), you said ‘’this message is regarding the article New Zealand general election, 2005. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism.’’ I was not doing vandalism, I was just adding full break down of results. Then the Wikipedia software told me that the article was to big, so I moved the more detailed results to its own page (New Zealand General Election, 2005, Full Results), and put back the table that was their. 210.54.114.253 01:51, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(I should have logged in User: Brian New Zealand

This is in regards to the rollback of my edit of the Scott Stapp article. I would appreciate not being treated like a complete noob, as I have been using Wikipedia for quite some time, and I have almost 200 edits to my name. I knew what I was doing when I reverted the article. There is a large amount of superfluous biographical material on Scott Stapp in the article. It is obviously removed directly from a book or magazine, probably in violation of copyright. The article's quality suffers because of this. I was attempting to correct the problem by reverting to a previous version without the biographical text.--Alhutch 04:43, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

no problem, apology accepted.

Hello, I thank you for your support to my adminship, and I am sure that we shall be around contributing and building the encyclopedia. I will surely keep the confidence reposed in me. --Bhadani 09:27, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that when some jerk deleted the whole article on Tahoe which I wrote 90% of, you were able to put the page back the way it was. Well some other jerk just deleted about 2/3s more of the page, as i was writing it. I already commented on his talk page, but I was wondering if somehow you could restore it like you did before. Thanks Tobyk777 19:24, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget to substitute templates with section headers (such as {{Welcome2}} and {{Idw}}) when you use them on talk pages: it reduces server load, and prevents accidental blanking of the template. --Phroziac ^(talk) 02:28, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Greg-
I noticed you posted a message on an anonymous vandal's talk page about vandalism of the Second Amendment page. I have found that that only encourages them to vandalize more, since they are getting attention. (Like a little child, which he/she may very well be). I usually just revert and move on. My advice, take it for what it's worth. Thanks for fixing vandalism, a never ending job here. --Rogerd 22:04, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• I am not sure I agree with that. In some cases, realising that they are being watched may scare a vandal off, -- RHaworth 08:07, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I want to thank you very much for your vote on my RFA. Greatly apperciated, I owe you one!

^{Journalist C.}/ ^{Holla @ me!}

The {{playwright-stub}} is deprecated and in the process of being removed. In the future, please use {{writer-stub}} (or one of the subtypes based on region or nationality). If the author is primarily known for writing for the theatre then also using the {{theat-stub}} is recommended. Caerwine 09:33, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it is a copyvio does not make Corban College a candidate for speedy deletion. Please use the proper copyvio process. -- RHaworth 08:05, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friend,

Thank you for redirecting my article on Social Technology . I will try and extend this in the next few days. I am trying to add a section every day.

I feel like Alice in Wonderland. Please correct any errors that I make.

Best regards, Nirupma Kapoor neeray 18:17, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for posting at the top of your page, but this is just a brief "I'll try" on the Law project. I'm in my second year of law school so quite a bit busy. BenWilson 16:22, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My note: I moved this down to the bottom to make space. -Greg Asche (talk) 02:04, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support on my RfA. At this point it doesn't look so good, but that's okay. If I don't achieve sysophood, I will be alright. I'll just keep up the good work and maybe try again later. People are allowed their opinions and I respect that. Thanks. --Lord Voldemort ^{(Dark Mark)} 15:55, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, we haven't spoken in the past (AFAIK), but I noticed you do alot of hard work (saw your reverting some vandalism during my RC patrol), and I was wondering if you would be interested in adminship? I'd love to nominate you. Let me know :). -Greg Asche (talk) 01:35, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Sure! I'd appreciate that! Owen× ☎ 01:40, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not only am I too lazy to read all the stuff that admins are supposed to know, I'm even too lazy to start my own thread. Seeing this one already in place, I decided to use it to decline your kind offer. Seriously, I appreciate your asking, and I've thought about it from time to time, but for the moment I think I'll keep contributing without having the title. JamesMLane 23:01, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for expanding the {{stub}} on Binding (sewing) to {{lang-stub}}. I was trying to find a textile-related stub and was at a loss :-). I didn't think to head down the lang path! Thanks, again! >: Roby Wayne ^{Talk • Hist} 03:44, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support and your kind comment on my RfA! Robert 15:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Greg. I'm contacting you since you are listed at Category:Wikipedians in Minnesota. I'm going to be at a conference in Minneapolis and am plannnig a Wikipedia meetup for October 8. If you are near Minneapolis at that time, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Minneapolis. Angela. 20:34, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to thank you for your vote of support in my request for adminship! -- Gyrofrog (talk) 04:58, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Molotov (talk) 19:19, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I had to stop to let you know that you do excellent work on this site, and I;ll nominate you for admin. Molotov (talk) 02:20, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greg, thank you for nominating and supporting my RfA. Your timing was excellent! I'll do my best to live up to your standards. Owen× ☎ 21:25, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greg, I got a bit stumped with the Hamelin issue. Some smart Germans have their stake in Hamelin, so I stopped in the disambig, as I couldnt work out what to do with the western australian variety. The joy of being a newbie. (My contribs list may say one thing, but I still dont understand others)vcxlor 15:08, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Thanks for the notice you placed here. --HappyCamper 22:00, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I normally see you alot in RC patrol and when I saw your user page and i was in shock you were not a admin. Want me to nominate you? --JAranda | watz sup 02:30, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• OK Im going to place the admin nomination in my sandbox and going to nominate you in early November if that ok with u. Thanks for your response --JAranda | watz sup 02:43, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Nomvember 8th is the date. Placed it in my sandbox. Thanks for your responce --JAranda | watz sup 02:47, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• I talked to Redwolf24 about nomitating you and another user and he said that you could get nomintaed now and unless something very bad happens which I clearly doubt you will have no problem with it.And also even though you were very active since early Augest u actually got your account in April so you dont have to worry about it. Could I nominate you right now . --JAranda | watz sup 00:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Done Here it is Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GregAsche --JAranda | watz sup 02:15, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! freestylefrappe 02:52, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I find it funny that you count how many times your page is vandalised. However, my "lol" hardly counts as 16 1/2. That was not my intention, sorry.  :-P

That was a goatse troll, not just a typical blanker. His image was just quickly speedied. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 01:57, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't do it for every RfA. I do try to do it for every RfA for a user with <2000 edits, and do it sometimes for nominees with more. I'm trying to encourage people to use edit summaries, and I think it's slowly working :) The data for you; use of edit summaries is 90% overall, first 500 edits at 69% and last 500 at 97.8%. Doing great! I generate the data in an MS-Excel spreadsheet. It's automated for me after I copy the data. I just click a button. But, it's not a script tool I can put online. I think Kate's tool could be modified to include the capability though. --Durin 05:07, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not to second guess your judgement, but I noticed you blocked User:66.26.83.157 for 48 hours for vandalism. Both of his edits go George W. Bush seemed like a newbie test rather than malicious vandalism to me, and he even reverted his own test at Enemy of God. He has been warned on his talk page, and I think your 48 hour block was a bit overboard for a simple newbie test. The newbies of today are the worthwhile contributors of tomorrow, and I think we are scaring them off by taking such a harsh line on blocking. Again, this is just my opinion, you're the admin and if you feel differently then that is your decision. -Greg Asche (talk) 21:06, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

While I am always one who tries to assume good WP:FAITH whenever possible, the last two edits by this IP address were a dead giveaway that the edits were malintended, and not mere tests. [2] [3] "He was arrested for driving under the influence|being a lsalsd" was not something I interpreted as a mistake. As you may be aware, the George W. Bush is the most vandalised article on Wikipedia, with approximately 90% of all the edits towards that article being vandalism-related. Also note that each and every section (not just the header) of the George W. Bush article contains the following text: "Anyone who vandalizes the page may be blocked for 24 hours or more without further warning." There is simply no excuse for the actions of this particular editor. Hall Monitor 21:16, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support on my RfA, and for your very kind words. Both are sincerely appreciated. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 14:46, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

for the barnstar! Fg2 03:53, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your support - my bid (as you probably know) went swimmingly. I couldn't have asked for a better one. Thank you very much and I just hope I don't mess up! The fact that I don't know you makes your support just that little bt more special! --Celestianpower ^hablamé 12:42, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Egh, I usually do, but I forgot that time. By the way, is it standard to respond in someone else's talk or your own? Also, the page (Dale W. Meyerrose) seems to have been reverted... raylu 00:47, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am on the prowl for good admin candidates, and I don't think they get much better than you! If you want to become an admin they I would be happy to nominate you, or if you nominated yourself you would certainly receive my support. let me know, thanks Martin 22:36, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That would have been really embarassing if I had already voted on your rfa as well!, oh well, good luck! Martin 22:53, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help with the vandal. I really appreciate it. For your efforts, I award you this Psi. Use it in good mental health or to combat wiki-stress! See you around and thanks again. -- Psy guy ^(talk) 23:14, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism at my user page! Cheers, Sango123 (talk) 01:50, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You might be a liitle strict with this user, explain that "This notice is needed so other users will not repeatly cite you for your potental vandalism and know that the matter has already been delt with." This is just my view, but freezeing someones talk page makes it hard for other users to raise this users warning messages if 66.214.251.126 continues trolling.

Prodego 02:29, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You are LIGHTNING FAST reverting vandalism! Well done! KHM03 23:47, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the vote and comment, I'm sorry that you get a "bad vibe" from me, I've never done anything to deserve it, but if its what you feel its what you feel. Thanks for what you said anyway, I guess I'll try to avoid giving off the bad vibe, maybe I'll stop trying to have a personality on wikipedia, or anything, because I guess I'm just a weird person to people. Private Butcher 18:36, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed you fixed that bit of vandalism on my user page last night. Thanks much for that. It's the first time for me and I feel as if I've finally arrived! :D –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 15:44, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support :)!Voice of All ^{@|Esperanza|E M} 22:27, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article is part of an article from Black Belt Magazine March 1965 to which he has rights to reproduce. The webite does not.

Thanks for reverting that userpage vandalism; I guess that anon isn't too happy with me :). --Spangineer^es (háblame) 03:26, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anon. would be much happier if the page on Elizabeth Morgan reflected fact. It contains inaccuracies and considerable amounts of bias. She was not sent to prison for two years; she was sent to the District of Columbia jail for 22 months. She and Foretich met at Fairfax Hospital in Virginia. He was still married at the time and had lied to her about being divorced. Your page includes several citations that support Foretich's viewpoint and few if any supporting Elizabeth. This makes it slanted and incorrect. If you want to be seen as an authoritative source you need to correct these.

Just a quick word of thanks for your vote. If you have any concerns over my actions please let me know. CambridgeBayWeather 23:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting Supertroll vandalising my user page last night and the barnstar and also congrats on your adminship knew I made a good choice --JAranda | watz sup 00:39, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for you know what. ;) --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 01:52, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey greg. I noticed you changed your vote. Can I just get some thoughts on your reasoning so I can help myself become better? What particularly unsettles you? Thank you, a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 21:13, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I really haven't made any anti-Indian editing, you can check that if you want. As for pro-Islamic, I work a lot on Islamic articles, but I mostly revert vandalism and discuss minor edits. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 21:21, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pleased to inform you that you are now an administrator. Please consider reading all the material on the administrators' reading list before testing out your new privileges. Though everything you do, excluding image deletions and page history merges, is reversible, you should nevertheless be very careful with your sysop capabilities. For instructions, please see the administrators' how-to guide. Good luck! — Dan | Talk 02:17, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! Good to see you with the mop. Owen× ☎ 02:49, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to congratulate you. Congratulations! --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 03:43, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cngrats also Dlyons493 Talk 03:55, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, and thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! --JoanneB 07:56, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryville Middle School appears in danger of being trumped by a conspicuous and concerted effort on the part of deletionists. Please review the nomination and vote at your convenience.--Nicodemus75 05:34, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• I was not adding racist comments to the article, that was user:Nivik77, I've been try to revert vandalism. --Fallout boy 03:05, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your support on my RfA, I really appreciate it. Congratulations on your success as well. Let's go whack some vandals! the wub "?!" 12:47, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA. I never thought I would get so much support! Thanks to your help, my nomination was the 10th most supported RfA in Wikipedia history. Now, please keep an eye out on me while I learn the new tools (and thanks for the script!), ok? Thanks again! Titoxd^(?!?) 17:17, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're an admin, so i have a question, if you know the answer. Can users be deleted on Wikipedia? A few months ago i placed a "test" warning on 24.84.36.230's user page, and i set myself to watch them. Yet, when i went back today to check if they had vandalized again, they had no contributions? Is this my mistake, or can people's accounts be deleted? Thanks! --Quadraxis 01:58, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Ah, thanks very much! --Quadraxis 02:01, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, i forgot, the article that person vandalized was pretty insignificant, so that makes sense. Thanks again! --Quadraxis 02:02, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I need a sysop and I see that you are probably near your computer now. Can you put this AfD out of its misery for me. cheers Youngamerican 02:50, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism at my user space. I don't know why this dude started picking on me, but hey, let the vandals waste their time. Thanks again! :) Titoxd^(?!?) 20:26, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Will some one please f**** help me add a photo to an article. Couldnt the creator of this site make it a lot easier, why does it ahve to be in all this gay code and shit

ya thats fu*** great, but how the fu** do i put the photo in the article i want. explain that one

Just a reminder: If you haven't already done so, you have until November 1st (00:00 UTC) to vote in the Counter Vandalism Unit Elections! FireFox 18:55, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could you, perchance, use your newfound superpowers to undo my ill-thought out move of Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation pages with links to Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation pages with links/archive 01 - I was trying to keep the original history in the archived version. Didn't work out. Cheers!  BD2412 ^talk 03:04, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks - there ought to be an "archive" function!  BD2412 ^talk 03:15, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nah, I've already put two much work into balancing two archive pages. Next time, tho! ;-)  BD2412 ^talk 03:30, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you are interested in law. Well quite some time aga I started an article called "fair comment". I must confess it was a way for me to get the fact out that "fair comment" is actually a legal term. This is now an established fact. However the article itself did not fare so well in the process. I was accused of mischaracterising the actual meaning of "fair comment" and the article was ... "modified"... While this in itself is not such a bad thing I have checked the newest version of the article and found some logical errors. In a long post I pointed out that I did not mischaracterised the meaning of "fair comment" and that there are logical inconsistancies in the last paragraph of the newest version...

I have however not edited the article since I started the original version and following the politicaly charged climate i do not intend to do so in the future.

Would you therefore please review my observations and conclusions?

For the sake of the article especially the logical errors are important, you can find my views about them under the following headline on the article talkpage:

1.6 "Following this sentance by sentance analysis I make these observations" and there observation number 3.

Most of the post is just to show that I did not mischaracterised the meaning of "fair comment".

Thank you in advance --Zirkon 12:05, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support! If you should ever have any concerns about my actions as an administrator, please be sure to tell me! Kirill Lokshin 13:23, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

re: Admin intervention against vandalism

You said you didn't see anything in the past day that was vandalism, I offer you some glasses ;) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft&diff=26847893&oldid=26803491 Paul Cyr 06:44, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, in case you didn't notice it in your watchlist, I replied on my talk page. But I think I fixed the problem. Make sure you hit shift-refresh, and I dont think it works in IE, although I could probably get it too if I weren't lazy :) Let me know. «»Who?¿?^meta 22:42, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[[4]] seems to be a school shared IP, and their last contribution was a revert of their own vandalism, so why block them for a month instead of giving them the benefit of the doubt? School users are our future contributors, even if they vandalize sometimes now. :-) --Unforgettableid | Talk to me 05:33, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, that anon editor who you scolded for blanking the Marren and Brian Marren articles? He was right. They were worthless garbage; very ornate hoaxes. I'm in the middle of cleaning up all the damage. DS 02:02, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You banned this user temporarily User_talk:210.55.249.78 yesterday. Vandalism resumed today. See contribs to Gisborne article. --jnothman ^talk 05:05, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Since it was unprotected thepage has been blanked 5 times in an hour. Brandt has askedon his wikipedia watch site "Who will rid me of this meddlesome article?" [5].

As a result, he and his freinds are vandalising it systematically. What to do? Please respont on talk page

jucifer 22:49, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Greg, I just thought I'd drop you a note after browsing your userpage. If you add a colon immediately after the first set of double brackets for a category, it acts as a link to that category page and does not place the page into the category. For example, [[:Category:Stubs]] results in Category:Stubs. These may be piped as normal, such as Stubs. Cheers, BanyanTree 01:16, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick revert on my page. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 02:33, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Right now you just placed plenty of blocks on AOL ips and I need them unblocked cause I cant edit. Could u unblock them please. 205.188.116.72 is a example Thanks --JAranda | watz sup 02:35, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious, Aranda, but if the AOL IP blocks are affecting you, how come you're able to edit this page? Are the blocks just affecting specific pages, where the IP stays the same? Thanks. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 02:38, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Someone using AOL and apparently IPs very similar to yours just went on a spree of user / user talk page vandalism. They used a different IP each time, and I blocked them all for 15 minutes. If there is a specific one that affects you, I will unblock it. :) (copy pasting from Aranda's talk page so we can follow this.) -Greg Asche (talk) 02:37, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(oops, I copied and pasted my comment to Aranda56's talk page as well) :-) Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 02:40, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yep an AOL Ip Just attacked me saying that i like COMMUNIST PENIS thanks for the revert --JAranda | watz sup 02:48, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I need all those AOL Ip numbers unblocked as OwenX re blocked them for 48 hours, and a few other admins are ignoring me and I cant do important edits. Thanks --JAranda | watz sup 04:26, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to thank you for catching that vandalism to my user talk page. Damn AOL! :)--Sean|Black 02:56, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my time page. Please accept my personal award, the Psi. I bestow it to polite, courteous, and helpful users. It is to be used in good mental health or to fight wiki-stress. Take care. -- Psy guy ^(talk) 03:50, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a pov tag to avoid revert wars, and it got removed. Do whatever you might find apropriate. Thanks. +MATIA ☎ 14:50, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Greg, Thanks a ton for your constructive comments and for voting at my RFA. I am now a wikipedia administrator. I hope I can keep your trust and hopefully, we should interact more in the future. Thanks again. --Pamri ^{• Talk • Reply} 16:25, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support on my RfA. I will use my new abilities with the common interest in mind. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.

Johann Wolfgang [ T ...C ] 03:22, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. I just want to know how that Anon IP figured out the dark secret I've been hiding all these years... ROFL!--Isotope23 14:29, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you eliminate the copy-vio notice? Did I do something wrong? 128.146.26.116 22:15, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for supporting my rather contentious request for adminship, but now that I've been promoted, I'd like to do a little dance here *DANCES*. If you have any specific issues/problems with me, please feel free to state them on my talk page so that I can work to prevent them in the future, and thanks once again!  ALKIVAR™ 07:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm leaving this message on the page of all the users mentioned by Brandt on this new page of his wikipeida-watch site. As you can see from the link, he's put together a list of the Wikipedia users that he sees as his enemies, and is trying to collect as much personal information as he can about each of them. Just thought I should let you know. Canderson7 12:33, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FireFox 18:19, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to leave a quick note thanking you for supporting me on my successful RfA. — Phil Welch 21:58, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am not vandalizing. I am removing irrelevant information. Thank you. 24.129.32.5 03:07, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding -- I think someone has decided to turn the school's page into an engineering department hall of fame! 24.129.32.5 03:18, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little confused about the copyright process but i think i have resolved the problem. I have placed a GNU Free Documentation Liscense at the bottom of http://www.anthonychristian.co.uk/about.html . Is that everything i need to do? Mike Hannon

Copied from Talk:Epirus#Protected:
Since a couple anons keep removing the NPOV tag, I've protected this article. -Greg Asche (talk) 18:37, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern, but could you please revert the article to its pre-vandalised version? The current version is full of the anonymous user's untruths and nationalist propaganda.--Theathenae 13:02, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

... and have time to check User:MDFN - conts (at the moment quite small), I'd be grateful. Alf ^melmac 00:44, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RoyBoy's taken care of it, no worries. Alf ^melmac 00:46, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An anon IP made a disambig page at Jack Whittaker, since there is a Canadian MP with the name in addition to the lottery winner. They, however, did a cut and paste move to Jack Whittaker (Virginian) for the lottery guy. This was an incorrect way to move the article, obviously, and is innaccurate, considering he is from West Virginia. I worked with the article and moved it in a proper manner to Jack Whittaker (lottery winner) and corrected the disambig. I believe the Jack Whittaker (Virginian) article meets the requirements for speedy, since it is a duplicate of an article in an accurate namespace, has no edit history, and is not linked to. Thanks for your help. Youngamerican 03:43, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Nevermind. Another admin got it. Cheers. Youngamerican 03:48, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry to always bug you when I need a sysop in a hurry. I usually check the recent contribs until I see a name that I know to be an admin. Then I bug them (well, usually you) to do the mopping. Anyways, thanks and keep up the good work. Youngamerican 03:57, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back from my trip. If you still consider me worthy, I'd appreciate a nomination. :-) --Nlu 03:18, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Nlu 23:18, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for supporting my RfA. It recently closed with final tally of 51/1/2. I sincerely appreciate it and I hope I can live up to your expectations. I will try my best to be a good administrator. If you ever need anything, just let me know. Thanks! -- Psy guy (talk) 05:32, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I blocked the user you removed from the list as you were removing it. He had already been blocked once, and warned, his last warning was done 5 hours after his last spamming link so I blocked him for 24 hours since I believe he probably just went offline and will return. If you don't agree, then you can unblock him since I wasn't sure. The user is 68.198.139.128. -- PRueda29 ^Ptalk29 01:54, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Since I'm new at adminship, I wanted to make sure it was ok. This is my first block (other than an impostor of me), but since it's only for 24 hours then it won't hurt him. Also, I didn't put the block warning because right after I blocked him I noticed you had removed his name without block, but I will do that now. Thanks again for your congratulations! -- PRueda29 ^Ptalk29 02:01, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you please help me move a page. Could you please move Pontic-language to Pontic language. I'm afraid I messed up the redirects there, I was trying something. Rex^(talk) 00:00, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Titoxd^(?!?) 00:04, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]