User talk:GreatLakesShips

The article SS Ira H. Owen you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS Ira H. Owen for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:01, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Ira H. Owen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS Ira H. Owen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:21, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Ira H. Owen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ira H. Owen was one of the first steel-hulled lake freighters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Ira H. Owen (2). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS Ira H. Owen), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, how's it going? I am about to write an article about a dredger (the Mallard II) which is currently (not even started) at User:JPxG/Draft24. Would you be able to tell me what you think when I've got it a bit more put together? I don't want to miss out on any important information, but I'm not familiar with writing articles about watercraft. Cheers, jp×g 10:34, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: Sure. I'd be happy to to take a look at it once you are done. Also, I hope you don't mind, but I added a blank ship infobox to the draft. GreatLakesShips (talk) 14:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox and the minor edits have been helpful. I've written about as much as I think I can write about this, although I could probably still find some more to put in by the time GA rolls around... I am not sure that I've been grammatically correct in everything (especially italics, definite articles referring to it, as well as "is it a ship or a boat?"), so if you wanna give it a once-over, go nuts. jp×g 22:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: As soon as I have finished my new article, which I hope to have done by tomorrow, I will do some work on your article. GreatLakesShips (talk) 22:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Samuel Mather wreck.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Merchant, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Merchant was the first iron-hulled merchant ship built on the Great Lakes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Merchant. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS Merchant), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS Cayuga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulwark.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS John Mitchell (1906), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the freighter John Mitchell was the costliest shipwreck on the Great Lakes in 1911? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS John Mitchell (1906). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS John Mitchell (1906)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Cayuga, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the six-year-old steel freighter Cayuga (pictured) was sunk by a wooden freighter twenty years older than her? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Cayuga. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS Cayuga), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Merchant you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Merchant you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS Merchant for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Cayuga you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lectrician2 -- Lectrician2 (talk) 23:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Cayuga you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS Cayuga for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lectrician2 -- Lectrician2 (talk) 01:22, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Cayuga you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS Cayuga for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lectrician2 -- Lectrician2 (talk) 03:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS John Mitchell (1906) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:01, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS John Mitchell (1906) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS John Mitchell (1906) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS Ironsides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gangway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Ironsides you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Merchant you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS Merchant for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS John Mitchell (1906) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS John Mitchell (1906) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Ironsides you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS Ironsides for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Ironsides you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS Ironsides for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 07:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What knowledge do you have of Bethlehem Steel’s Great Lakes Steamship Division? If so why don’t you and I talk about it.--ZorroMothim (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ZorroMothim: Why do you ask? GreatLakesShips (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GreatLakesShips: It’s for the Bethlehem Transportation Company I’ve been working on.--ZorroMothim (talk) 17:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ZorroMothim: I don't know much about the company, other than it owned the Daniel J. Morrell. You could try searching for information on this website, if you haven't already. GreatLakesShips (talk) 17:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ZorroMothim: I'll do some research. GreatLakesShips (talk) 17:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS Lac La Belle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sundries.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Lac La Belle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:21, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Lac La Belle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS Lac La Belle for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Ironsides, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the sister ships Ironsides and Lac La Belle sank under similar circumstances, eleven months apart? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Ironsides/SS Lac La Belle. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS Ironsides), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Lac La Belle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the sister ships Ironsides and Lac La Belle sank under similar circumstances, eleven months apart? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Ironsides/SS Lac La Belle. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS Lac La Belle), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article SS Edward L. Ryerson has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

You'll notice I added "Upper" to "Great Lakes" which is more accurate. I assume the ship never sailed on Lakes Erie or Ontario.

Before you submit the article for FA consideration, there are a few things that need to be fixed, which appear to have been missed during the GA assessment. This sentence - "She is one of only two American-owned straight deck lake freighters, the other one being the 1958-built freighter John Sherwin." - appears in the lede but not in the body of the article. It should be included there with a citation.

A work by Tom Wenstadt is cited throughout the article. This work is self-published, which does not necessarily mean it is unreliable. However, if you can cite the same information with "traditional" sources, I suggest you do so. (See: Wikipedia:Identifying and using self-published works)

One obvious question not covered in the article is the total cost of building the ship. Is that figure available? The ship has been sitting unused for 13 years. The article does not say so, but I assume that other (foreign) sources of cheap steel have devastated the U.S. steel industry and there is no need (or a dramatically reduced need) for iron ore. Perhaps you could expand on this? I assume you found nothing to indicate any future plans for the ship?

Those are all the issues I found. Best of luck with the FA when you get to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:58, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've been responding to a very thorough FAR of this article. A question arose on sourcing the coordinates of the sunken ships, which I noticed that you added. Could you tell me where you got those from? Any answer is cool. For example, if you derived them from the Brown map I think I could just note that and keep them. Thanks. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 23:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: I seem to remember getting the co-ordinates for the Hydrus and Argus off Wrecksite. I believe the others came from the rest of the articles in this section.

This might be useful.GreatLakesShips (talk) 23:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! North8000 (talk) 12:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Bronze Maple Leaf Award
		This maple leaf is awarded to GreatLakesShips for writing the good article 115 (barge) during the fifth year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 15:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article PS Keystone State, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the paddle steamer Keystone State was rumored to be carrying gold when she sank? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/PS Keystone State. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, PS Keystone State), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Ritchie333 (talk) 00:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For your material, which I used in Hog_Island_(Wisconsin)#Shipwreck.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 05:39, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Epiphyllumlover: The article looks very good. GreatLakesShips (talk) 13:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Manasoo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the freighter Manasoo is believed to have been sunk by cows? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Manasoo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS Manasoo), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 5,721 views (476.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 02:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status". Gog the Mild (talk) 23:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. GreatLakesShips (talk) 21:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, GreatLakesShips! The article you nominated, SS Choctaw, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to keep the July 11 TFAR text, it should be here: {{Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/SS Choctaw}} Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on SS Choctaw. — Bilorv (talk) 20:12, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are these days I'm working on, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Benson_Ford_(1924_ship), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:MV_Stewart_J._Court, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Henry_Ford_II_(1924_ship) Courtesy of yours truly. ZorroMothim 16:40, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ZorroMothim: What would you like help with? GreatLakesShips (talk) 16:46, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Writing out these drafts. Courtesy of yours truly. ZorroMothim 23:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GLS. I think the inconsistency in tonnage figures here results from confusing gross register tonnage with builder's old measurement (burthen or burden), and I don't think that a divers' guide is the best source for that. Best wishes, Kablammo (talk) 23:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GreatLakesShips, I wanted to discuss this edit, in which you undid a previous good faith edit I had made. There was no edit summary, so I'm not sure the reason for the revert. Could we discuss? Thanks! CaptainAngus (talk) 02:06, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CaptainAngus: I have been unable to find any evidence to suggest that the Gunilda had any female crew members, and most sailors on the Great Lakes at the time were men. Also, "manned by a crew of 20" reads better than "carrying a crew of 20". "Manned" is a widely used and understood phrase, and removing it from Wikipedia is utterly ludicrous. GreatLakesShips (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GreatLakesShips: The change brings the article in-line with MOS:GNL. We could certainly find a different way of stating it, if you'd prefer. How about "Crewed by a complement of 20"? This wording preserves the original intent and is actually more logically correct, as a steam yacht does not require men to crew it, either gender would suffice.

{{re|CaptainAngus}] When it comes to the word "manned", MOS:GNL only explicitly states it should be avoided when referring to space programs. Furthermore, the big discussion that happened last August ended with no clear consensus. GreatLakesShips (talk) 23:03, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GreatLakesShips: I would disagree with the interpretation that MOS:GNL only applies to space programs. Would you object to the following phrasing: "Crewed by a complement of 20"? This wording preserves the original intent and brings the article in-line with MOS:GNL. I would again state that there is nothing that special about sailing a yacht that requires a particular gender; the emphasis of the phrase is on the size of the crew for this particular boat, which is captured by the proposed edit. CaptainAngus (talk) 02:07, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CaptainAngus: This change brings nothing to the article, and given how the debate on the usage of "manned" ended without a consensus, I believe MOS:VAR applies here. GreatLakesShips (talk) 21:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GreatLakesShips: I will defer to your preference here, but humor me as I make one more pitch. Our discussion has helped me understand your personal perspective, but I still think the use of the word 'manned' is potentially misleading. If you pick any random visitor that might come across this page, they are not all going to have the same historical context you're citing. The original phrasing does not tell the full story that a crew of any gender is able to sail. I get the value in the recommendations of MOS:VAR, but I personally think this is more than just a question of writing style; the statement is logically incorrect. Appreciate the discussion. CaptainAngus (talk) 02:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 16 February 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 2022, or to make more comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/February 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February flowers

frozen

Thank you today for the article "about the Great Lakes freighter"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article PS Lotta Bernard you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 12:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article PS Lotta Bernard you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:PS Lotta Bernard for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 03:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article PS Keystone State you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 19:21, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article PS Keystone State you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:PS Keystone State for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 19:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Manasoo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 07:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article PS Lotta Bernard, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the paddle steamer Lotta Bernard was described as "altogether unfit for the traffic she was employed in" after she sank? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/PS Lotta Bernard. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, PS Lotta Bernard), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GreatLakesShips. I just finished copy editing SS Cayuga. Terrific article. Most of my edits were smaller, style and grammar stuff. One big edit - I took a lot of content out of the lead section in accordance with WP:MOS/Lead Section. The editor who awarded the article a well-earned GA status pointed out that the lead needed to be more concise; I agreed with him. Nothing was lost; all content remains in the body of the article. Nice work!I enjoyed reading and editing it. I also added the article to the disambiguation page. Cleveland Todd (talk) 19:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I did not realize you were British. I changed some of the spellings in the article to the US version. I can change them back if you wish. Sorry. Cleveland Todd (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cleveland Todd: No worries. Thanks for working on the article. GreatLakesShips (talk) 14:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like your choice of pic. for your user page. Very evocative – and good that it's B&W.
Interesting that a Brit would take on this topic. Best. – Sca (talk) 13:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PS: You might be interested in this exchange. – Sca (talk) 13:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Edward L. Ryerson in the Manitowoc River.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Edward L. Ryerson launch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Manasoo you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS Manasoo for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 20:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Chester A. Congdon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 17:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Chester A. Congdon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS Chester A. Congdon for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 21:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Chester A. Congdon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS Chester A. Congdon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 23:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Emperor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Emperor you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SS Emperor for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 16:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Emperor you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS Emperor for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 20:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Chester A. Congdon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the freighter Chester A. Congdon became the largest financial loss to date on the Great Lakes when she wrecked in 1918? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Chester A. Congdon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS Chester A. Congdon), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 20:41, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 5,567 views (463.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Emperor, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the freighter Emperor is the most visited shipwreck in Isle Royale National Park? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Emperor. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS Emperor), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- I saw your ping, here, for Dudley, but it won't have worked. Pings don't work unless you add the ping in the same edit that you sign. The easiest way to make this one work would probably be to completely remove the comment, then readd it in the next edit. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, GreatLakesShips! The article you nominated, SS Edward L. Ryerson, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! Nice work! North8000 (talk) 00:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thanks for your help. GreatLakesShips 🤘 (talk - contribs) 04:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! You might wish to add {{User crown}} to your userpage. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on SS Edward L. Ryerson. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GreatLakesShips, do you have any response to the new reviewer's source query? It might get this review moving again. Thanks for taking a look. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:28, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GreatLakesShips, I noticed that you said you'd get back to this review (and also Talk:PS Keystone State/GA1) after you returned from vacation last month, which appears to have been about two weeks ago—you've made well over 100 edits since your return. Please give these your response a priority if you wish the reviews to continue. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you would still like SS Edward L. Ryerson to run as a TFA in August, then it is time to nominate it at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:02, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 28 August 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 28, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:38, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August songs

Thank you today for another Great Lakes freighter! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect SS Rochester and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 5#SS Rochester until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Davidships (talk) 11:54, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Sorry for the reversion of the edits on the S.S. John V. Moran DYK nomination page. I was just looking at it and did not know I even undid anything. I am still new to Wikipedia, so I clicked on it because I was looking at the DYK nomination process, specifically Yoninah's contributions, and I guess I accidentally hit something that reverted it. Again, so sorry about that, I did not mean to do anything. RGreen (BYU) (talk) 19:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RGreen (BYU): Don't worry about it. It just caught me a bit off guard. GreatLakesShips 🤘 (talk - contribs) 19:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of SS Sir William Siemens at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Muboshgu (talk) 19:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your revision of my edit on the Barge 129 page - I had erroneously thought that the Choctaw, Andaste, and Yuma were all included in the usual count of 44 whalebacks, but turns out although they're monitors, the final design wasn't directly from Alexander McDougall. Cheers! TORNELLcello (talk) 03:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like Half-Life has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article PS Keystone State you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:PS Keystone State for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 23:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians who like Assassination Classroom indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Bronze Maple Leaf Award
		This maple leaf is awarded to GreatLakesShips for creating new articles on ships during the sixth year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 21:40, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of SS Sir William Siemens at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:42, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, My name is Ross Richardson, from Lake Ann, Michigan. I just read your article about the Jarvis Lord shipwreck and I want to thank you for putting it together. I have a few other shipwreck discoveries and plan to announce a new discovery in January. If there's ever anything I can do to help you, please let me know.

Thanks again, Ross Richardson www.michiganmysteries.com 24.247.184.170 (talk) 13:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is going to keep me up at night. I've been following your work for some time. In 2014, you found the wreck of the A.D. Patchin as well as several other wrecks, some of them unidentified. Had you ruled out the propeller Oriental which ran aground on Skillagalee Reef in 1859? GreatLakesShips 🤘 (talk - contribs) 15:14, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Sir William Siemens, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when launched in 1896, the freighter Sir William Siemens (pictured) and her sister ships were the largest vessels on the Great Lakes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Sir William Siemens. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SS Sir William Siemens), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Manasoo you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:SS Manasoo for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 11:41, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello-- I thought this new item would interest you. In my experience, links from this source do not go dead. I do not plan on writing an article about it.

Best wishes, Kablammo (talk) 21:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kablammo: Thanks. I read about that a few days ago. I think I'll eventually get around to writing about it, but right now I'm snowed under with school stuff. GreatLakesShips 🤘 (talk - contribs) 10:24, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitext	userbox	where used
{{User:UBX/Diesel locomotives}}	This user likes diesel locomotives.	linked pages
{{User:UBX/Electric locomotives}}	This user likes electric locomotives.	linked pages
{{User:UBX/Gas turbine locomotives}}	This user likes Gas turbine locomotives.	linked pages
{{User:UBX/Steam locomotives}}	This user likes steam locomotives.	linked pages

I believe you originally made the steam locomotive one, which I've updated and move to User:UBX for hosting.

You will see it listed at Wikipedia:Userboxes/Rail transport#Locomotive types, along with userboxes by another editor I updated.

I've also moved the other steam locomotive userbox into User:Tbf69/userboxes/LNER Class A4 4468 Mallard in my own userspace. Sorry 👌. - Tbf69 🛈 🗩 22:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- I took a look and would be happy to review it again, but I wanted to check a couple of things with you first. I see you managed to find replacements for steamboatstories.ca, which is great. I also see that all the newspaper stories cited to MHGL are now cited to the papers themselves, which is also good to see. However there are still many citations to this page, which is one of the sites we'd like to replace. Can anything be done about that? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Christie: This one wasn't flagged in the original review. This is a site I've used very widely, and it has always been accepted, even in an FA nomination.

OK, I'll take another look. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just looked at the PS Keystone State review and I see you went to some trouble there to change all the references to that site to references to the original newspapers that it was showing. The site was questioned there by Ealdgyth, and after I agreed with her you started going through and changing them all; that's how we got that article through GA. For the Manasoo, I see you did the same thing. The difference is that here you are also citing a page written by that site, not just copied from elsewhere -- that wasn't the case with the Keystone State. So I had a look at the source of that page; it comes from the Scanner, the journal of the Toronto Marine Historical Society. That issue was edited by Jay Bascom, who appears not have any academic qualifications, so I went looking for other reliable sources that cite him, as evidence that he is regarded as reliable. I found him described in Ships and Shipwrecks: Stories from the Great Lakes by Richard Gebhart as "Jay's standing in the realm of Great Lakes maritime historians is unsurpassed on either side of the U.S.-Canada border". I think that's good enough, certainly for GA. I'll pick up the review in a moment -- it might take me a day or two to complete it. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SS Manasoo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 16:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article SS Manasoo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SS Manasoo for comments about the article, and Talk:SS Manasoo/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 15:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect P. Smit Jr. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § P. Smit Jr. until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:21, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. SS Howard S. Gerkin and SS Howard S. Gerken are redirects without a mention in the target article. Can you assist please? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. GreatLakesShips 🤘 (talk - contribs) 17:45, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent - thank you. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]