User talk:GustavoCza

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

It is duly noted that your stated reasoning for reverting edit for the second time at Chris Martin includes a pointed personal attack. Please see WP:No personal attacks 842U (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe "second-most attended tour" is a lead-notable achievement of the article, considering majority of the article/commentary discussing the tour introduces the tour as the one that grossed the largest sum of all time, and not as "the second most attended tour" ever. If you find it notable, then that is your personal opinion. Clearly, it is not the most crowning achievement of the Eras Tour in all the sources cited, considering it holds a string of numerous records and most of them wane in front of the 2B USD sum. The lead is already bit large, and therefore cannot afford to have facts that is not the most notable about the tour. Regards. ℛonherry☘ 08:59, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not including the attendance is misleading, but sure, suit yourself. I'm too tired to fight over this. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 18:30, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not misconstrue what I had stated. Attendance is already included in the infobox and covered in the Boxscore section. I only stated that the "second most-attended" tour is not a notable point for the lead, as the tour holds bigger records. The press has extensively mentioned the points about (i) hitting 1 and 2 billion dollar milestones and (ii) the highest-grossing tour of all time. "Second-most attended" is not one of those. As an editor, you are supposed to use the sources to guide your edits - to decide where and how to include data, and to determine the order of notability of information when writing the lead. ℛonherry☘ 17:06, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

People will think it's the most attended because it was the highest-grossing. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 19:45, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is a crazy proposition. That's like saying "ABC is the best selling album" means people will think it is also the most streamed album. They are completely different wordings... ℛonherry☘ 21:48, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just realised that you literally ignored all the points I've made in my response about how important it is to copyedit/concise the lead and your only reply was "People will think it's the most attended because it was the highest-grossing". It looks like that is the only thing you care about, and not the quality of the article, because you're a hardcore Coldplay fan, and it's seriously necessary for you to make sure everybody knows that about your favorite band. This is not right. ℛonherry☘ 21:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A quality article is first and foremost accurate my friend. And you seem to be a hardcore swiftie based on your editing history, so I don't see why bringing that up. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 21:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GustavoCza. I would appreciate it if you could be more careful when using the certification table template, specifically, maintaining the correct footnotes. The footnotes at the bottom should match the ones used in the table. I just had to correct three articles after edits you made (Special:Diff/1263794401, Special:Diff/1263794908, Special:Diff/1263795460). Happy editing. Muhandes (talk) 18:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the new certifications, those footnotes were already there before. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 18:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you misunderstand, so I'll give an example. As you can see, this is the table before your edits, and the bottom matches the table. On the other hand, this is the page after your edit. As you can see, they don't match. Your edit changed the table, but did not change the bottom.
All I ask is that when you make an edit, check afterwards that the table still matches the footnotes. Otherwise, someone else needs to clean up after you and fix the table. Muhandes (talk) 18:58, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you removed "Israel" unilateraly from Elyanna's page without any reasoning. To my knowledge, this kind of omission- leaving out the state after the city has never been applied to any contemporary person on wikipedia. Standard guidelines call for including both city and country, and Nazareth is internationally recognized as part of Israel. Could you clarify the reasoning behind this edit? This edit goes against established Wikipedia guidelines; see: Template:Infobox writer, birth_place QuestForInsight (talk) 11:22, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]