User talk:Found5dollar

Archive 1 - November 2007- December 2011
Archive 2 - January 2011- December 2015

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Dear Found5dollar, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity related articles, especially your recent creation of List of Antarctic churches. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 00:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--Found5dollar (talk) 00:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of List of Antarctic churches at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Rod ^talk 09:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of List of Antarctic churches at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:31, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harrias ^talk 01:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic

You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck. Sunday July 16 New England Wiknic (also on Facebook) 1–5pm - come by any time! Look for us by the Wikipedia / Wikimedia banner! We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

The article Thomas Whiteside (photographer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence for notability. The book does not seem to be even in WorldCat

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 01:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Higgins Armory logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the sculptures themselves may be subject to copyright but the images of them aren't per

This United States Congress image is in the public domain in the US. This may be because it is an official congressional portrait, because it was taken by an official employee of the Congress, or because it has been released into the public domain by a member of Congress. PD Public domain false false

עם ישראל חי (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. The image may be free but it is of something that is not, therefore it can not be on wikipedia. The photo and the object must be free from copyright.Found5dollar (talk) 20:11, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Whiteside (photographer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Whiteside (photographer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 16:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Bailey-Gates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Bailey-Gates until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:58, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYKUpdateBot (talk) 12:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are recipient no. 2395 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ User:Gerda Arendt Thank you for this! I just putz around on wiki these days making articles of stuff I'm interested in. thank you for the recognition that even though I'm just working alone, other people value what I do.--Found5dollar (talk) 17:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monuments and memorials removed during the George Floyd protests, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tennessean and Grayson County Courthouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for helping out with a DYK review. The most important point of the review is to verify that the fact(s) in the hook are mentioned, cited, and verified in the article. As you can see, this may not have been the case. Best, Yoninah (talk) 14:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yoninah, i actually did some heavy sluthing to make sure it was all sourced and verified. i replied to your concerns on the nomination page. --Found5dollar (talk) 15:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For your edits to List of Broadway theaters, an unexpected but highly enjoyable read; well written and well sourced. Keep up the good work! Tom (LT) (talk) 09:31, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! (I knew this was a winner when I promoted it!) Yoninah (talk) 19:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

oh wow! Thank you Yoninah for pointing this out! And thank you for all the work you do in DYK!

Hello! Your submission of List of Dia Art Foundation locations and sites at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

—valereee (talk) 00:03, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dia Art Foundation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dream House.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see you plan to tackle this project. I've been working through several Presidential biographies during these viral times. They tend to be long and weighty so make great time wasters. I left a Carter quote for you at Talk:Resolute desk, maybe you can use it. If I find anything else I'll leave notes. GA-RT-22 (talk) 18:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA-RT-22, that quote is perfect! I'm going to add it to the Wilson desk article. Thanks!--Found5dollar (talk) 19:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theodore Roosevelt desk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Secret Service.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Johnson desk at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! With 12,002 views, your Johnson desk hook is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of December. All the more impressive since it was not a lead/photo hook and appeared in a 12-hour queue. Accordingly, it has been included at DYKSTATS December. Keep up the good work! Cbl62 (talk) 19:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 12,002 views (1,000.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2020 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 09:38, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Found5dollar. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Broadway theaters – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 8, 2021. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:36, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want it on the day of the Tony Awards, we can make than happen. Well, kind of. TFLs run on Mondays and Fridays; presuming they schedule the Tonys on a Sunday, the list would actually first appear on Sunday night here in the U.S., so it would be a good fit. I'll go ahead and schedule something else for this date the next time I pick a list for TFL. Cheers. Giants2008 (Talk) 17:19, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've gone ahead and postponed the Main Page appearance. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:43, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Giants2008: thank you!--Found5dollar (talk) 00:04, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Giants2008:, they just announced the Tony Awards for September 26th. I just submitted List of Broadway theaters for the 27th at WP:TFLS--Found5dollar (talk) 20:38, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the list is now set to run on the 27th. The blurb is here. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Resolute desk, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Prince Albert and New London.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just watched The Equalizer, a 2014 movie starring Denzel Washington, and was amused to see that the bad guy had a replica Resolute desk in his office. GA-RT-22 (talk) 05:40, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GA-RT-22: oh neat! ill have to watch it!--Found5dollar (talk) 18:28, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And now I just watched all three and a half hours of Nixon (film) and was pleased to see that they used the correct Wilson desk in the movie's Oval Office. I'm impressed at the authenticity, as they could have saved time and money by just using any old desk and not many people would have noticed. GA-RT-22 (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GA-RT-22:. that's so awesome. I thought about watching that movie a few times, but the length scares me off! happy to hear they are authentic with the desk!--Found5dollar (talk) 22:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The 2020 totals are now complete, and your hook for the "hum" of Times Square (Neuhaus) ranked as the No. 15 hook of the year with 1,793 DYK views per hour. A list of the 25 most viewed hooks of the year can be viewed at "Top hooks of 2020". Congratulations on your hook's remarkable showing, and keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 10:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cbl62: Woah! thats crazy. thanks for letting me know! --Found5dollar (talk) 17:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and nothing personal at the Resolute page, I've enjoyed your extensive edits but just noticed you'd removed the long-term image. Wanted to come by to mention your username picks up an old trauma of mine, when I was about seven years old suddenly five dollar bills flew at me on the wind along a busy sidewalk. A fortune! Then a woman ran up, kissed me on the head for collecting "her" money, grabbed it and ran off. So actually thank you for your name, which allowed me to process a money/then no money incident. Appreciated. Randy Kryn (talk) 21:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 20,350 views (1,695.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Annoying you're certainly being. But, I've no interest in wasting time with you on the matter. One's not gonna fight over needing a source to show that the sky in blue. GoodDay (talk) 19:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! With 20,350 total views (and 1,696 views per hour), your hook on the Theodore Roosevelt desk is the one of most viewed DYK hooks this month. Accordingly, it has been placed in the list at DYKSTATS January. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 19:12, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Resolute desk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chenille.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:51, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Resolute desk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The News Herald.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Resolute desk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spyglass.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of tallest buildings in New York City § RfC about list inclusion criteria. 119.59.121.172 (talk) 03:08, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thorough GA review for Suffolk Downs station! I'm not sure I have the expertise to review the White House desk articles, but feel welcome to ping me should you bring any articles closer to my wheelhouse up for review. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:04, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:13, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wilson desk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 17:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wilson desk you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wilson desk for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 14:21, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you back "at your desk" so to speak. GA-RT-22 (talk) 20:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA-RT-22 haha! Thank you! Summer is starting and I have some more free time so I'm hopping back in a bit.--Found5dollar (talk) 21:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Resolute desk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 21:20, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Resolute desk you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Resolute desk for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 02:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Resolute desk you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Resolute desk for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Usernameunique -- Usernameunique (talk) 22:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Theodore Roosevelt desk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:21, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Theodore Roosevelt desk you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Theodore Roosevelt desk for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:21, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Resolute desk at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BuySomeApples (talk) 19:57, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Theodore Roosevelt desk you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Theodore Roosevelt desk for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:41, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just wanted to congratulate you on getting the Theodore Roosevelt desk article to Good Article status, and I'm glad I could help with it. HenryCrun15 (talk) 06:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 23,426 views (1,952.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 21:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hoover desk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 12:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hoover desk you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hoover desk for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hoover desk you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hoover desk for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 13,029 views (1,085.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 02:26, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you removed the picture of harry Truman's vice president bust it has been mive than 70 years since the sculpter has passed and therefore it's in fair use Journey896 (talk) 18:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have an interest in the fate of the C&O desk... Mr. Patton, of the George H.W. Bush Library, said that unfortunately it's not likely that any information about the C&O desk's current location will be added to their website, since they don't actually have it in their collection or do individual item listings. I did manage to talk to Lydia Tederick, the White House Curator, who confirmed that the desk is in the White House's collection. She said that it's currently in storage, but that "it's a beautiful piece" and it might well be used again for something in future administrations. They also don't put information like that online anywhere. So it looks like the citation we have is the best we're going to get! —Ganesha811 (talk) 17:35, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ganesha811: why thank you! Hope you have a wonderful holiday season as well!Found5dollar (talk) 16:01, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article C&O desk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 08:43, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty busy this week but I'll try to make some time for the C&O desk article. I love fixing these petty little things and I get the impression you're more of a big-picture type. GA-RT-22 (talk) 13:51, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GA-RT-22 Oh thank you! you are completely right hahah. I love the research part, and hate the grammar and formatting. I'm popping into the review now. Found5dollar (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I don't know if you watchlist Presidential call button, but while working on the C&O article I came across an 1881 reference to a call button on James Garfield's desk! Presumably diet Coke had not yet been invented. GA-RT-22 (talk) 22:17, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GA-RT-22 Woah! what a find.--Found5dollar (talk) 22:24, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article C&O desk you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:C&O desk and Talk:C&O desk/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 19:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article C&O desk you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:C&O desk for comments about the article, and Talk:C&O desk/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 07:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dia Bridgehampton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Chamberlain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Found5dollar (talk) 13:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
14		Fred Sandback (talk)	Add sources
37		Address to the nation (talk)	Add sources
23		New York City Fire Museum (talk)	Add sources
9		Sean Kelly Gallery (talk)	Add sources
19		Greene St. Recording (talk)	Add sources
54		HI-SEAS (talk)	Add sources
127		Uncrewed spacecraft (talk)	Cleanup
8		Space Island Group (talk)	Cleanup
330		James Turrell (talk)	Cleanup
107		Roden Crater (talk)	Expand
107		403(b) (talk)	Expand
14		Airbus Defence and Space Spaceplane (talk)	Expand
69		Writing in space (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
17		Astronautical hygiene (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
24		Mimmo Paladino (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
362		Richard Garriott (talk)	Merge
102		Anastatia Mayers (talk)	Merge
36		Keisha Schahaff (talk)	Merge
194		Donald Judd (talk)	Wikify
485		Doug Aitken (talk)	Wikify
18		Jorge Pardo (artist) (talk)	Wikify
10		Social Pool (talk)	Orphan
2		The Hill of James Magee (talk)	Orphan
4		Bilderstreit (talk)	Orphan
29		Mercer Street (Manhattan) (talk)	Stub
8		Double Portrait of Jakob Meyer zum Hasen and Dorothea Kannengießer (talk)	Stub
34		Chambers Street (Manhattan) (talk)	Stub
4		Elizabeth du Gué Trapier (talk)	Stub
11		OK Harris Gallery (talk)	Stub
6		Team Gallery (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dia Bridgehampton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Chamberlain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dia Bridgehampton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 15:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dia Bridgehampton you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dia Bridgehampton and Talk:Dia Bridgehampton/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 16:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Found5dollar, just a reminder about this GAN. If there is no response in the next few days, I'll close this as unsuccessful. Z1720 (talk) 15:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dia Bridgehampton you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dia Bridgehampton for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 15:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Found5dollar. Thank you for your work on Beacon Point. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you added extremely long decimal coordinates to the 155 Mercer Street article, which I shortened to 4 digits. Google Maps has taken to providing 16-digit coordinates in what is believed to be a copyright trap scheme. That level of precision is in the 1/100th of a micrometer range. WP:OPCOORD calls for always rounding or truncating coordinates (tldr: use DD°MM'SS" or D.dddd° for everything). Otherwise, great article. Abductive (reasoning) 04:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dia Bridgehampton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 08:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dia Bridgehampton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 21:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dia Bridgehampton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dia Bridgehampton for comments about the article, and Talk:Dia Bridgehampton/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 02:24, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]