User talk:Fluteflute

Main   Talk   Userboxes

Archives

1

Hello, I hope I am communicating with the right person, I'm a bit new to this. The deletion of this file is due, I am sure, to my inexperience. Contrary to you thinking I copied it from the Casting callpro website, in fact I copied it from the subject's own website at http://ginabeck.co.uk/CV.pdf with the agreement of her agent. I must say the conditions surrounding uploading images and copyright seem to be a complete minefield and I am struggling to know how to proceed. Can you provide any help? Thanks. Ralphshelton14(talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ralphshelton14 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Greenewlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good photo, but it looks much too small to be a double contrabass flute. See [1] and you'll see what I'm talking about. Badagnani (talk) 09:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We've got articles on all the sizes. I think he's calling a contrabass flute (one octave lower than the bass) an "octobass." But we can only be sure if we write him, ask how many octaves below the regular concert flute it is, and who made his instrument. Do you want to do it? Otherwise maybe we could ask Maria Ramey to use her photo, which shows how massive the real double contrabass flute is. Badagnani (talk) 09:18, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll email her now. Badagnani (talk) 09:21, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great that you're interested and have expertise. I think this is one we didn't know about. I just listened and it sounds fantastic. I think "a tessiture la rapproche du violoncelle : elle s’étend sur trois octaves et demie (partant du la grave situé une tierce au-dessous du do de la corde basse du violoncelle)" means that its lowest note is an A a third below the low C of the cello. I've never heard of a flute that went down to low A (don't they usually go down to low C or G?), so that's weird. That would put it between the contrabass flute and double contra-alto flute.

Can you somehow get photos of the rare smaller ones like the treble flute and flute d'amour?

I'm excited because Matthias Ziegler is coming to perform in Cleveland this winter. Badagnani (talk) 09:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a double contra-alto flute.[2] Badagnani (talk) 09:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We already have articles on the flute, concert flute, and all the various sizes. I think it's good to have all of them, as they can only grow. Each instrument has its own identity, as do, for example, the different saxophones, clarinets, or violin-family instruments. Badagnani (talk) 09:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that exists already. Badagnani (talk) 09:57, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, it looks great, but we already had Western_concert_flute#Members_of_the_concert_flute_family. Excellent getting the treble flute photo; how did you do that? I got three from Maria Ramey, of the contrabass, double contra-alto, and double contrabass. Badagnani (talk) 18:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have one more to upload. Did you know about the instant WP-to-Commons tool? Badagnani (talk) 18:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Geography Barnstar
		For getting WikiProject Hampshire off to a flying start and in particular for your sterling work on the Woolston, Hampshire article. waggers (talk) 22:31, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Ashbey  Ӝ  14:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have from Commons:File:Red Eagle.jpg removed category Commons:Category:Isle of Wight Ferries and only Commons:Category:IMO 9117337 is left. I created the IMO categories for reference and grouping pictures of ships with get diffrent names, owners, lines etc. By giving a ship only an IMO-number, you can't find her by owner, line, operator, country etc. IMO numbers in itself give only information to specialists. Will you please revert ? --Stunteltje (talk) 00:00, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elizabeth II's Signature.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Signature of Elizabeth II.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Signature of Elizabeth II.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:03, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Thanks for uploading File:11thdoctor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:23, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting editors' help There is currently an oppened collaboration which aims in improving articles related to typefaces and font categorization. If you´re interested in this subject, please visit the collaboration page, add your self and see how you can help.

I hope you can contribute in this section. Happy editings! - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 21:39, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Giveawayoftheday.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:35, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LOGO1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Ubuntu (operating system), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Synaptic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Fluteflute, many thanks for your support, it is greatly appreciated.

Coolsvilleowner (talk) 18:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:St johns oxford crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:48, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:St johns oxford crest.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bencherlite^Talk 21:16, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tauntons logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rcsmg2.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Serverfault.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:St johns oxford crest.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:52, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Southampton Music Services has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability criteria, which is required for an article like this to be included in the encyclopaedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WaggersTALK 10:37, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fsyo logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Southampton-Wind-Band.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you're right in reverting my revert. I was admittedly quick to hit the rollback, I'll try to pay more attention to the context in the future. Also removed notice from User talk:129.67.168.163. Thanks and cheers — MusikAnimal ^talk 14:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, sorry I didn't get around to writing on your talk page. -- Fluteflute ^{Talk Contributions} 05:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to St John's College, Oxford may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• St John's used to be the home of two dining societies, the [[King Charles Club] and the Archery Club. Tony Blair has been pictured at a gathering of the latter

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Divisions of the University of Oxford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Radcliffe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Fluteflute, Sorry to bug you with this: can I please ask you for help with an issue with the "Wadham College, Oxford" wikipedia page? Given that you also made a few edits for that entry I thought you may care to know that the entry for Wadham College is being sabotaged by a user (131.111.185.25, who may be the same as 131.111.194.10, I'm not sure). The user has changed that wiki entry back to how it was before the major revision I had made in December 2013. I'm a total newbie to Wikipedia, but I put a lot of effort in trying to improve the horrible page that has now been put back by that user. Is there anything one can do? Lots of other wikipedia users had since improved the changes I had made (e.g. more neutral language, etc.), so I don't think the version we had on June 24 was lacking neutrality. The revisions of 25 June 2014 by‎ 131.111.185.25 and on 28 June 2014 by‎ 131.111.194.10 are reverting the entry back to how it was before December 2013. Is there anything one can do? That user is doing a great disservice to the Wikipedia community who have worked hard to improve that page. Thanks for any help you may have time for! Rp31 (talk) 22:35, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm a bit busy right at this moment, but I will try to have a look in the next day or two. Welcome to Wikipedia though! -- Fluteflute ^{Talk Contributions} 12:20, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Hampshire! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 2,690 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in Hampshire.

• Browse the new WikiProject page
• Become a member today! – members have access to an opt-in notification system

Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 20:42, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Doctor Who – Battles in Time issues has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The magazine is notable and has an article. But the individual issues, even as a list, seem to lack all notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 11:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Doctor Who – Battles in Time issues is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Doctor Who – Battles in Time issues until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 07:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fluteflute! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:List of Honour Schools of the University of Oxford requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 21:04, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giveaway of the Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giveaway of the Day until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 20:02, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cpslogo3.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]