User talk:Fleetflame

Fleetflame is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #116

Archives

Archive 1

Thank you! A compliment from you is great. Alas, I dont' know how to remove the tags on James Thackara's article. Can you help yet again? Many thanks lumenlittLumenlitt (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've got it now.  ;-] Fleetflame · whack! whack! · 18:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello . The photographer of the file:James_Thackara.jpg would prefer not to have his name listed on wikipedia as the source. Rather he wants "photo given to the author by the photograhper" Can you direct me as to how to get this done? My last question about this was entered on google as an entry which defeats the purpose. Many thanks lumenlittLumenlitt (talk) 15:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this what you mean? If so, you've done it again!  :-] Fleetflame · whack! whack! · 17:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fleetflame, This old issue. Indeed the reference to the photogrpaher has been deleted as per his request. But, it still appears on Google with his name. Moreoever and more importantly, it was never intended to be an entry on google anyway. That is why is was given to attribution sharealike3. The thought behind that was that it would be on the article, but unreferenced. Now, it appoears on google by itself, ahead of the article. Can you help me sort this out? Ideally the picture would not be an entry and the photographers name is absent. Do we have to change the attribution share alike? Thanks and by the way, I suspect you had something to do with getting the article back on the google. Your help is most appreciated LumenlittLumenlitt (talk) 10:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am sorry for asking you questions and then figuring out how to make the change. Indeed so you know of my conrition, this one will remain unsolved by me! On Sunday, the article for James Thackara was appearing on google. Now, even after 25 pages it does not appear. A more focused search, ie google - james thackara wikipedia brings up in the followiong order 1) the entry about the jpg with the photographer's name still appearing as the donor of the photo and 2) the user:Lumenlitt entry to the article on Thackara and 3) my query about the copyright of the photo. Even though these entries and the absence of the article itself may be the effects of readjustments of the google system, it does confound me. Of course, I should add that the Thackara entry does come up when wikipedia is opened on its own without first going to google. Do you think I have made an error? Is there something I should do differently? It has been one of the greatest pleasures of my academic life to have worked on this for wikipedia and to have met such exigent and fair critics, so to have the fruits of that work not appear on google is a great frustration. Thanks in advance Fleetflame for your help. Lumenlitt Lumenlitt (talk) 18:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Lumenlitt, no problem. Sorry about my late response, but I'll answer both questions right here. We can't do anything about Google searches - Google has a bot that crawls the web and indexes pages for searching. Old page revisions on Wikipedia sometimes show up for a few days or even weeks - they'll disappear eventually. The new pages or revisions can sometimes take a little while to show up as well. Like I said, it's all automatic, and we can't do anything about it. Just wait a while.  :-] Fleetflame · whack! whack! · 16:37, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fleet, I just wanted to drop by and leave you a big **THANK YOU!** for all your patience, help and advice today, you are a legend! Zepx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zephfya (talk • contribs) 19:07, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Glad to be of help. Leave me a note here if you ever need anything, or of course you know where to find me in IRC. Fleetflame · whack! whack! · 16:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fleet, I also want to say thanks. Above, your talk page says you're busy in real life, but you managed to answer my call for help within minutes.

I had looked over and over again at the final footnote, but didn't think the problem would be in the previous one. In my sandbox, for my new article, I had the same problem, which I've fixed. Enjoy yourself up in Maine, I have lots of family there. NinetyNineFennelSeeds (talk) 02:48, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On November 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Turkey Day Classic, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:52, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I goof this.. you know what the intention is..even if my novice execution of it fails!Zephfya (talk) 23:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Helping Hand Barnstar
		For copious amounts of patient helping with this newbie! Zephfya (talk) 23:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The irc help chat has totally given up the ghost my end! I can't get back into it!Zephfya (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Zephfya, it works fine for me. If Freenode's client (http://webchat.freenode.net/) ever doesn't work, you can always try the Toolserver client (http://toolserver.org/~bjelleklang/pjirc/). Fleetflame · whack! whack! · 19:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fleetflame. You have new messages at ShadowRangerRIT's talk page.
Message added 20:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 20:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My user talk page is not light blue. How come? Also, how do I change the font color? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moplord359 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. 39933 was the one. (I don't know how to memo on IRC :P).  fetchcomms☛ 23:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On December 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sékouba Konaté, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas, Fleetflame! May you be blessed with a full plate and a joyous spirit!
I hope that this Christmas season is one of celebration and rest for you and your family.  fetchcomms☛ 18:36, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Thanks for being an excellent helper on IRC.  fetchcomms☛ 18:57, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. hopefully I have left my plea in the right area. Msmayer (talk) 04:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Memoserv is not cooperating, so I have to unfortunately bring it here. Ignore the WQA (if you saw) which was sorted out on IRC, and I'll be back when I'm done writing. Hold down the fort as usual, or I will have to feed you some castor oil 'n clues.  fetchcomms☛ 04:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is that allowed or not? Just wanted verification from an "admin"--Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 15:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See this - I think that's what you're looking for. Cheers! Fleetflame · whack! whack! · 15:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isabell121 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Fair enough. Yes, I reverted the mass-removal without closer inspection of each tag. My bad. --Geniac (talk) 01:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you tweaked {{Ear}} back in June last year and, now that the original creator of that template has semi-retired, I was wondering whether I could enlist your help creating a similar template for responses on the Requests for feedback page. As you will see if you peruse that page, I am one of, if not the only, regular "feedbacker" there and it does get a little tedious bashing out the same response -- most seem to be versions of "non-notable person/company/band please read [the appropriate guideline]"; "you need to cite some references from reliable sources", "probably meets the notability guidelines but the tone is too spammy/unencyclopedic, please read WP:SPAM/WP:TONE" - I think you get the idea. What would be a huge help, and speed things along, would be a switched template like {{Ear}} that does all the hard work with a few shorthand switches. I am afraid my template skills do not stretch anywhere far enough to be able to attempt this, so, if you have time, would you be prepared to create one? Will watch this page for your reply. Thanks in advance. – ukexpat (talk) 21:59, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear Mendaliv is semi-retired. Certainly, I'll toss some syntax together and see what we come up with.  ;-] Fleetflame · whack! whack! · 02:34, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I threw the {{Ear}} syntax into a subpage at User:Ukexpat/Feedb so feel free to start there if it helps. Thanks again. – ukexpat (talk) 02:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've started offline, ukexpat. I'll need some info exactly what you're looking for, but I should be fine for a while just putting everything together. Also, {{feed}} was deleted earlier today, so I'm hoping we can use that eventually. Fleetflame · whack! whack! · 02:54, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent - let me know when you need more input from me. If it's easier to discuss by e-mail or phone, my account is e-mail enabled. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 03:05, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've got the basic framework down I believe, ukexpat, and I'm putting in some basic notability responses. What issues exactly do you want this template to cover? So far I'm just putting in the same responses I'd give someone asking the question, but if there's anything specific you want it to say, let me know. When I get it sort of pieced together I'll put it on here so you can tweak it to perfection.  :-] Fleetflame · whack! whack! · 16:19, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow fast work! If you take a look at WP:FEED you will see the kind of responses that I and other patrollers routinely use. For now though it may be best to take a look at what you have done and keep tweaking it before we roll it out. I think if it covers the basic bios, bands, companies/orgs, and web notability responses, that would be a great start and may be things like "total spam", "more sources". Make sense? Thanks again for help. – ukexpat (talk) 16:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ooooo exciting! Let me play with it in my sandbox and maybe test it on a few live examples. Thanks again for the help. – ukexpat (talk) 18:53, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great stuff! I may play around with the text of some of the messages, but the essence of it is spot on. I guess it would be possible to shorten the first switch even more to just "bio", "corp" etc. I'll take a crack at adding a couple of my own too. I can't tell you how much I appreciate your help with this - it should speed things up greatly. I am also going to work on revamping the advice for WP:RFF responders to incorporate use of the the template. Thanks again.  – ukexpat (talk) 19:02, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice and suggestion but i think you forgotten to fallow the edits of Evox. I agree on discussion but he user evox always want things on his and then he want to discusses later so why can't i. One more thing that hear the objection or support doesn't count on numbers but a neutral discussions and referencing. So hear i am ready to discuss any matter but not your way or evox way. --Sandeep (talk) 10:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Articles for Creation barnstar
		You have made some great contribs to the team. Thanks for your help. -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 02:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also would like to give you the honour of this companion ribbon. -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 02:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On March 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rocco Ortenzio, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—Ed (talk • majestic titan) 00:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help at IRC with B2C Jewels. I might need your help again. I will repair that article from a neutral view point and get back to you.Ganesh J. Acharya (talk) 02:10, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...To avoid fouling up, since I'm new at creating accounts: I'm handling a request by a user who chose xxxxx42 as username; another similar username exists, though (it's xxxxx51).
I'd give it a go, but I just wanted to be sure... Sorry if I bothered you. ^______^ Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 00:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's plenty different - my personal rule of thumb is that if I couldn't tell who left a message by the signature, they're too close. By that rule, ___42 and ___51 are fine. Cheers! Fleetflame · whack! whack! · 00:44, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! That's what I thought too, but you know... Better safe than sorry... Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 00:52, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:25, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fleet, Congrats on the reviewer status! :) Can i please beg your knowledge and assistance with getting the Flamel series pages part protected? We've been getting a spate of edits that are adding incorrect information eg, the necromancer is josh, added I keep reverting them at the author's request but they just happen all over again, can you please help me implement the part protection request? Many thanks, Z. Zephfya (talk) 15:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect T:ear. Since you had some involvement with the T:ear redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 07:45, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fleetflame! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 16:16, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fleetflame! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 03:30, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Since your account has been inactive for some time, it has been removed from Wikipedia:Editor assistance/list. There is an explanation at Wikipedia talk:Editor assistance/list#Problem with inactive accounts on the list. You are, of course, welcome to re-add yourself to the list if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fleetflame/ritter looks good to go. Can it be moved to mainspace? John Vandenberg ^(chat) 08:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	New England Wikimedia General Meeting
	The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future! Potential topics: What is a Wikimedia chapter and should we work towards one? Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?) Planning for upcoming coordinated events (Wikipedia Love Libraries, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiknic, etc.) Outreach to universities (WikiProject Academical Village) and cultural institutions (GLAM) Wikimania DC is this summer. Your ideas!
	Sunday, April 22 1:30 PM – 4:30 PM	Conference Room C06, Johnson Building, Boston Public Library—Central Library 700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

Message delivered by Dominic at 08:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.[reply]

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!

Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:19, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 10:09, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NE Meetup #4: January 18 at MIT Building 5

Dear Fellow Wikimedian, You have been invited to the New England Wikimedians 2014 kick-off party and Wikipedia Day Celebration at Building Five on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March - You are invited!

New England Wikimedians is excited to announce a series of Wikipedia edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of Wikiwomen's History Month from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click here). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of Boston, Northampton, South Hadley, and Cambridge. Further information on dates and locations can be found on our user group page. Questions? Contact Girona7 (talk)

NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square

Dear Fellow Wikimedian, New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter. We hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) and Maia Weinstock (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You're invited to the Peabody Essex Museum Edit-a-thon Spring 2014

On May 3rd, the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachusetts will be hosting a Native American and Chinese Art edit-a-thon from 9:00-5:00 pm. You are more than welcome to attend, as there will be free food and drink, and an outing afterwards. If you are interested, please sign up here, as we would love to see you there!

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Ed Rodley's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England

As you may have already heard, the Wikipedia community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a worldwide series of tributes, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows: May 21st at Northeastern University's Snell Library, in the Digital Scholarship Commons on the second floor May 22nd at Brown University's Rockefeller Library, in the Digital Scholarship Lab June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA), where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Wikipedia for the first time. If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

	Hello fellow WikiProject Maine members!
I'm trying to breathe a little new life into WP:WP ME and as such I have posted a few questions on the project's talk page that I would like to get some feedback from all of the project's members on! There are apparently a lot of inactive members on our participants list (and even a user that has been blocked for years). What do we as a project want to do about inactive or blocked users? I have some ideas on the issue, but would love feedback from others. Remove blocked users that appear to be no longer interested in participating in developing Wikipedia. Users with zero activity at all in three years are unlikely to come back. I suggest that we remove them from the mailing list and deactivate any categorizing feature of a userbox on their page. When doing this, we must make sure to leave a note on their talk page explaining that since they have been off-wiki for three years that they have been removed from the list as a purely technical measure and they are more than welcome to add themselves back to the list if they choose to start editing again. Users with zero activity on wiki for 18 months may come back, despite it being unlikely. I would suggest that we mark those users as inactive on our mailing list, and stop sending them messages like this one to prevent their user talk page from filling up with irrelevant notices. Users with zero activity on wiki for at least six months should be marked as inactive in the mailing list template, but should still receive mailings. I'm also trying to gauge some interest in there being a Great American Wikinic in Maine! If you are interested, possible locations might include Portland, Augusta, and or Bangor, please make a note in the appropriate section on our talk page! We should create a template to use for mass mailings from this wikiproject so all we need to do is enter our message and signature and the general format of the box and image and title and stuff will stay familiar. What is your opinion on this idea? Do you have any preferences to what that may look like (because I think this looks horrible compared to some I've seen from other projects)?
This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) at 17:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC). To remove yourself from this list, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Maine/members, remove the WikiProject's userbox/category from your user page (rarely used for mass mailings), or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.[reply]

	Hello fellow WikiProject Maine members!
I'm trying to breathe a little new life into WP:WP ME and as such I have posted a few questions on the project's talk page that I would like to get some feedback from all of the project's members on! There are apparently a lot of inactive members on our participants list (and even a user that has been blocked for years). What do we as a project want to do about inactive or blocked users? I have some ideas on the issue, but would love feedback from others. Remove blocked users that appear to be no longer interested in participating in developing Wikipedia. Users with zero activity at all in three years are unlikely to come back. I suggest that we remove them from the mailing list and deactivate any categorizing feature of a userbox on their page. When doing this, we must make sure to leave a note on their talk page explaining that since they have been off-wiki for three years that they have been removed from the list as a purely technical measure and they are more than welcome to add themselves back to the list if they choose to start editing again. Users with zero activity on wiki for 18 months may come back, despite it being unlikely. I would suggest that we mark those users as inactive on our mailing list, and stop sending them messages like this one to prevent their user talk page from filling up with irrelevant notices. Users with zero activity on wiki for at least six months should be marked as inactive in the mailing list template, but should still receive mailings. I'm also trying to gauge some interest in there being a Great American Wikinic in Maine! If you are interested, possible locations might include Portland, Augusta, and or Bangor, please make a note in the appropriate section on our talk page! We should create a template to use for mass mailings from this wikiproject so all we need to do is enter our message and signature and the general format of the box and image and title and stuff will stay familiar. What is your opinion on this idea? Do you have any preferences to what that may look like (because I think this looks horrible compared to some I've seen from other projects)?
This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) at 17:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC). To remove yourself from this list, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Maine/members, remove the WikiProject's userbox/category from your user page (rarely used for mass mailings), or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.[reply]

You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic

You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck. Sunday July 16 New England Wiknic (also on Facebook) 1–5pm - come by any time! Look for us by the Wikipedia / Wikimedia banner! We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)