User talk:Festerhauer

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to WeChat, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am editing on a phone so the Limited functionality there made it look like I was blanking the content on purpose. But I can assure you this is farthest from the truth. Festerhauer (talk) 09:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm EDG 543. I noticed that you recently removed content from Maplewashing without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, EDG 543 (talk) 01:49, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Telsho (talk) 03:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Festerhauer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited was Richard Heydarian, which appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! CuteMeow (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your warm and welcoming message. But I shall have to correct you and say that I am not Richard Heydarian. I have had this account for not an insiginificant amount of time now and I would have created an autiobiographical page long ago as I know many editors do were I actually him. i just read his works and noticed that he did not have a page despite his relatively high news making profile so that is why I created his page. I know that Wikipedia has rules on conflicts of interests (Wikipedia:Conflict of interest) so I did my utmost to make sure this new page complies strictly with the guideliness. i can create another page about antoher person to prove i am not him if you like. And If there is anything i had overlooked or you have any other things you want to say to me, kindly let me know! Festerhauer (talk) 09:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When reinstating contentious content, please ensure that it complies with our WP:BLP policies. The reinstated material did not have the proper citation to verify against. Morbidthoughts (talk) 10:50, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christine Fang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Fang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Waskerton per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waskerton. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ST47 (talk) 00:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Collin Koh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

With an h-index of 10, and no works heavily cited, does not meet WP:NPROF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:56, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]