User talk:Esolo5002

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

Hello, I'm BlueboyLINY. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, WLNY-TV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 19:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if this is worth adding, if you are updating the schedule in the future, but MLB Network and the BBC have signed an agreement. https://www.sportspromedia.com/news/mlb-bbc-tv-rights-deal-uk-yankees-red-sox-london-series/

"Coverage will start on 24th September with the third game of a four-match series between rivals the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox, which will be streamed live on the BBC iPlayer service. The game will be produced by the MLB Network and feature commentary geared towards a UK audience, with former Yankees player CC Sabathia, broadcaster Melanie Newman and podcast host Felix White all part of the commentary team."

My understanding is that game was on Yes in the US, but I can tell you the thing was branded as a MLB Network Showcase here https://i.imgur.com/RE3ZMUF.png TIGHazard (talk) 21:59, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RPI2026F1. I noticed that you recently removed content from Major League Baseball on ABC without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RPI2026F1 (talk) 18:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I se that you moved it into a new place. Next time, say so in the edit summary. RPI2026F1 (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I HIGHLY recommend you block 98.111.253.112 before they claim The Daily Show is ending for the umpteenth time. 100.7.44.80 (talk) 00:25, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Astros's combined World Series no-hitter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astros's combined World Series no-hitter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Muboshgu (talk) 16:14, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 16:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 Los Angeles Chargers–Las Vegas Raiders game is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Los Angeles Chargers–Las Vegas Raiders game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hatman31 (talk) 00:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 collapse of Damar Hamlin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 collapse of Damar Hamlin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mackensen (talk) 15:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Esolo5002, can you please engage on the talk pages? I see you are continuing to edit but you are not engaging in good faith discussions anywhere. - Fuzheado | Talk 15:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Esolo5002 - A friendly note, that you didn't need to put "Copied from 2023 collapse of Damar Hamlin, see that page for full attribution" into the edit summary, since you are the author of both edits - Special:Diff/1131751754. - Fuzheado | Talk 16:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, @Esolo5002. Now that 2023 collapse of Damar Hamlin has been closed at AfD as a redirect, you have copy/pasted that text into a new draft Draft:Collapse of Damar Hamlin. You are reproducing the same problems with your original cut/paste move in terms of copyright and attribution. Again. This page actually should be speedy deleted without discussion under criteria: WP:G4 "Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion: This applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion."

However, as a courtesy I wanted to raise it here in case you had a better explanation. Thanks. - Fuzheado | Talk 13:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to harass me I will have to open an arbitration hearing against you. Please note "It excludes pages in userspace and draftspace where the content was converted to a draft for explicit improvement." (How can I make the page ready for a future article if I don't have a draft?)

Also note that was no copyright violations on the initial article. An admin REMOVED your copyright notice. But just for your sake, I have blanked and recreated the draft with a copied notice.

Once again, if you continue to harass me, I will have no choice but to take further action. Esolo5002 (talk) 15:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I got a notification from this Talk page from another editor[1] but the comment was removed. I'm not familiar with the current dispute after the AfD but I hope it is resolved the right way. Good luck! Saucysalsa30 (talk) 02:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interborough Express, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Silikonz💬 17:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Diamond Sports Group instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Need consensus for a split and much of this appears to be copied from the main article without attribution.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bankruptcy of Diamond Sports Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

S0091 can you please let me know what was copied without attribution. Thank you! Esolo5002 (talk) 20:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The removal has happened. Why should we keep an out-of-date title? --Ferien (talk) 21:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We need concensus on what we should move it too. Otherwise we get a string of uncessary moves. Esolo5002 (talk) 21:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I get that, and the name I moved it to wasn't intended to be final. It was just intended to keep the page name up-to-date while we discuss. --Ferien (talk) 21:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An RM discussion can result in the selection of a new title that is different from the one that was proposed. I suggest to revert the closure, since I don't think there is a consensus to keep the current title. This is also not a good opportunity for an {{RMNAC}}. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert if you think that's the best move. In my opinion this is the closest safe option. Discussion can continue. Esolo5002 (talk) 21:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[2] To answer your question: why would they want it? What's the point of expelling a member because of procedural matters, especially when he represents a strongly Republican district that would merely elect another Republican? Aside from pro-Confederate members expelled at the beginning of the Civil War, only three members have ever been expelled — one for treason and two for bribery — so expelling a member merely because of his lawful activities in the House would set an awful precedent. Thus the importance of my clarification: according to the source, Gingrich was calling for him to be expelled from the caucus, not from the House, as can be inferred from the previous wording. As far as the reference to the Democrats: if Republicans held 2/3 or more House seats, they could expel him even with unanimous Democratic opposition, but since that's not the case, some Democrats would need to vote for expulsion. Nyttend (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Diamond Sports Group. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

In my opinion, only one article is needed, which should be about Diamond Sports Group, but with content primarily about the bankruptcy. This content can be merged into the parent article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bankruptcy of Diamond Sports Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:33, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esolo5002! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:33, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recently my candidacy was deleted from the Libertarian 2024 Wikipedia page. Please replace if possible. I am registered with Fe and can be identified through the American Academy of Otolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery.

Thanks Charles Ballay, MD CB70072 (talk) 16:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, check out www.Ballay2024.com CB70072 (talk) 16:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In a 24 hour period you made 2 reverts on the infobox, and 1 revert was restoring the RFKJR gallery to the body. I know you were implementing consensus, especially when adding the RFKJR gallery, but we want to be careful on articles designated “contentious”. Just a friendly reminder. Prcc27 (talk) 18:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Prcc27 (talk) 17:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

“You have been told to not do this and you did it anyway.” Yes, I went ahead with my BOLD edit because the only argument against my edit was that there is an active RfC; nobody refuted my points. The onus for inclusion has not been met, and keeping RFKJR in the infobox seems like stonewalling at this point. Prcc27 (talk) 15:14, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Esolo5002, I noticed that you have worked on several articles related to TV sports. I'd appreciate you looking at my request to update Jane Skinner's article, formerly a Fox News anchor and recent co-producer of "Earnin' It: The NFL's Forward Progress" for Peacock. I would like her page to more accurately reflect her career path. Would you mind implementing these changes? Thanks! Sadielousd (talk) 00:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you did this, did you read my edit summary? Did you see that there are required accessibility features that you removed? Why is that a good thing? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:26, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your subsequent edit. I really appreciate it. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:21, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just letting you know as per your request that I've reverted your edit on Template:2024VTDem and added back all write-ins that recieved more than 100 votes, with the rest being included in an "other write-ins" category. I've expanded on my reasoning a little bit on Talk:2024 Vermont Democratic presidential primary, but given Vermont does publish write-ins, I think it's worth including some particularly strong write-in performances in the results table. I'm not exactly sure where the line should lie, but I think something like Rashida Tlaib's 1.1% performance, which was stronger than a number of candidates on the ballot, is worth including. Feel free to put your thoughts on that talk page! LivelyRatification (talk) 06:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Academy Awards broadcasters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Academy Awards broadcasters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpacedFarmer (talk) 07:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Esolo, You recently opened an Afd for Antisemitism in Columbia University. The Afd was closed with a very clear consensus to keep. Nevertheless, after which you deleted the article. You also wrote "Bold redirect, which was suggested in the AFD. Most of this content is already there". I don't want to be rude, but I don't think that's true, as the result of the Afd was clearly keep and there is no mention of redirect.

As I wrote to you before, let's talk about these on the articles talk page. Eladkarmel (talk) 11:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion on this issue is requested

You have been tagged to this conversation because you may have previously participated in similar discussions and there has been a notable development. Please consider sharing your views.
𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓔𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻 06:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esolo5002. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bankruptcy of Diamond Sports Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you may know, you unexpectedly deleted the UFL championship logo from the template at 2024 UFL championship game. Please explain why. Thank you. 72727277edit (talk) 22:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See my edit summary. Esolo5002 (talk) 22:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, the copyright information on the image you added is incorrect. You are most certainly not the actual copyright owner of that image. Esolo5002 (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ballot access in the 2024 United States presidential election

There's a list of Ballot Deadlines there. The line between 'Minor Party' and 'Independent' is super super fuzzy as often candidates are both in different states with the smaller third parties or the coalition candidates. But these specific states have both deadlines passed AND No Write Ins allowed which I'm pretty sure means they are 100% no doubts about it off the maps if they aren't picked up yet. Color them Black or Dark Grey or something

2604:3D09:1F80:CA00:14FE:B2CC:3ED7:E4A9 (talk) 23:20, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esolo5002. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "History of the NFL on CBS".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esolo5002. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "America's Game of the Week".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esolo5002,

Please do not move articles to a different page title when they are being discussed at an AFD deletion discussion. We have an editing tool, XFDcloser, which closers use to relist discussions and close them. While XFDcloser is invaluable at doing those two things, it does not understand when an article is at a different page title than it was when it was nominated for an AFD and discussion closures become more complicated. So, if you could just hold off on moving an article until the AFD is closed, it would be greatly appreciated. I realize that this means not acting immediately when you see problems with article page titles like spelling and punctuation, but it would be very helpful if you could make a mental note of a change that you can make after the discussion is closed. It's only important to get the page title right if an article is Kept, if consensus is to Delete it, then it doesn't really matter what the page title is when it was nominated. Thank you for your help. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks for letting me know. Esolo5002 (talk) 02:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esolo5002. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2023–24 sports related U.S. television changes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esolo5002. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Speakership of Mike Johnson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:09, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esolo5002. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prime Monday Night Hockey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Escolo5002 -- not sure if you saw but I came across Draft:2023–24 House of Representatives legislative coalition which was a great draft you started and have made some significant additions. I hope you don't mind my butting in. I think the draft is good enough now that we can publish it and continue to improve it where it will get more attention. Let me know if you disagree or if you agree that we can move it out of drafts now. Cheers! Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 02:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I actually meant to leave a message thanking you for improving it. I think it’s ready to move out of the drafts. Hopefully other Wikipedians will agree! Esolo5002 (talk) 03:22, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great to hear, I'll go ahead and do that shortly -- if you have a chance to run through the language at some point, another set of eyes to copyedit would be great. I also think it would benefit from a infobox if you have any ideas for an appropriate template to use. Cheers! Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 21:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your edits removing content from, and replacing with redirects, various of the 2024–25 NCAA football bowl games (such as 2024 Alamo Bowl) have been or will be reverted. I'd be happy to discuss the overall creation of bowl game articles in the Talk area of WP:COLLEGEFOOTBALL if you feel such articles should not be created until teams have been announced (as suggested in edit comments) for this, or future, bowl seasons. Dmoore5556 (talk) 13:39, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Esolo5002. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Prime Monday Night Hockey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esolo5002. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of NFL International Series results".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]