User talk:Eroica

Do you have a verifiable reference for the edit you made to Ireland's Eye where you added the Church of the Three Sons of Nessan information? I have never seen this anywhere. ww2censor (talk) 15:27, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• My source is: Roland McHugh, Annotations to Finnegans Wake (third edition, 2006, The John Hopkins University Press) ISBN 0-8018-8382-2. On page 26 McHugh glosses Joyce's phrase "school nessans" (Finnegans Wake 026.34) with the words: "Church of the 3 Sons of Nessan, Ireland's Eye". According to the Ordnance Survey of Ireland's Discovery Series (Map 50), the Irish name of Ireland's Eye is Inis Mac Neasáin, which translates as "The Island of the Sons of Nessan". If you Google "sons of Nessan" you may find other references. Eroica (talk) 13:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can I trouble you to add a reference to the history of the telescope, telescope, and optical telescope articles in regard to Robert Grosseteste? I am trying to add his name to those articles. I didn't evne know about him and I want to add a little on him, but I have no reference. Thanks for yout time. InternetHero (talk) 04:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Saxotromba, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 08:07, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I was just looking at Category:French novels and noticed that your sandbox appeared there because you have a few categories at the end of the article you're working on—I commented them out for now to prevent that, and you can just uncomment them whenever you copy the article you're working on to the main article space. Thought I'd let you know. Mr. Absurd (talk) 00:36, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Saxtuba, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady 02:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

What would be the best example of bass trumpet playing in the Ring? Please let me know which recording you're listening to, I have Solti for Rheingold and Walkure. Willi Gers07 (talk) 17:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will listen to the Ride again with Solti and hopefully I'll catch the bass trumpet. I don't have a complete Siegfried, but I do have the funeral music excerpted in a couple of different performances. Willi Gers07 (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eroica, your work on the above is incredible! May I ask where you got such good maps? Fergananim (talk) 06:53, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just to let you know, this article has been nominated for deletion. If you wish to contest this, please see WP:PROD and WP:Notability (people). Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Andrew Jackson, Sr.. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Jackson, Sr.. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very good work, Eroica. Why don't you try to get this up for FA status? Its well worth it. Fergananim (talk) 18:59, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I saw that you created the Spectral flux density article -- thanks -- but can you add a definition of -relative- spectral flux density to it, please? I've seen this phrase but haven't found anything online that defines it or provides a symbol for it. Thanks, 212.84.121.213 (talk) 16:29, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That looks great. The only thing I think I don't understand from it is "a fraction of some arbitrarily chosen reference value". Is there a table of these reference values from which one is picked (why arbitrarily?) or does this work some other way? Thanks. 212.84.121.179 (talk) 11:41, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"a fraction of some arbitrarily chosen reference value" simply means that the scale on the y-axis just consists of pure numbers without any units. For example, you might place tick-marks every centimetre on the y-axis, and label them 0, 1, 2, 3, .... This simply means that if the relative spectral flux density is 2 at one wavelength and 4 at another wavelength, then the absolute value of the spectral flux density at the second wavelength is twice what it is at the first wavelength. You're not told what those absolute values are in SI units (presumably because it's not relevant to the discussion). Relative spectral flux densities are used when we are only interested in comparing things, rather than measuring them. (Eroica (talk) 20:15, 15 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I think I understand, although it sounds a bit vague to me. I imagine that's probably because I would now need to study the topic. Thanks for responding to my request and adding to the article. 212.84.121.179 (talk) 10:00, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting the error - I've corrected and confirmed it was 39 not 40. Lugnuts (talk) 17:55, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have been looking into the affairs of the Ui Imair and I spotted this edit or yours from nearly 3 years ago. Although there is a reference to John O'Donovan I can't find anything that backs up the suggestion that "Gothfraid (i.e. Ímar's father) was added by a copyist in the 17th century". Can you help me out? Ben MacDui 12:22, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ben, the relevant text is The Fragmentary Annals of Ireland, page 198 (footnote m) and 199, which John O'Donovan translated from a manuscript prepared in 1643 by Dubhaltach Mac Firbisigh. The entry in question was translated by O'Donovan as: "The King of the Lochlanns died of an ugly, sudden disease. sic enim Deo placuit." The identification of the King as Gothfraid was added by Mac Firbisigh (or his copyist) and was not translated by O'Donovan. The same entry is discussed by Ó Corráin in The Vikings in Ireland and Scotland in the Ninth Century] (pages 36-37), where he refers to it as "much-emended". See also Early Scandinavian Dublin, footnote 103, for other references. Eroica (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks - these comments are very helpful. The controversy over whether Gofraidh or Ivar is being referred to in the FAI is clear. O' Corrain refers to this although he concludes on p. 37: "This much-emended entry appears to be the death notice of Gøðrøðr, king of the Vikings in Scotland."

I also took a look at the online version of the FAI translated by O'Donovan. You are unquestionably correct that he translates Ég righ Lochlainne .i. Gothfraid do tedmaimm grána opond. Sic quod placuit Deo. as "The King of the Lochlanns died of an ugly, sudden disease." What he doesn't seem to say is why - at least on pages 197-9 as far as I can see.

Re the early Scandinavian Dublin footnotes, I have found a copy of the Cogad and again you are quite right - he identifies this fragment as referring to Ivar - but similarly I can't find a stated reason. (There may well be one - I have not read it all!)

There is thus clear evidence of varying interpretations. What I can't find is a clear reference to this apparent copyists error and yet I can find O' Corrain discussing the literal translation with confidence, and the 1977 Celt translation of FA409 that "The Norwegian king, i.e. Gothfraid, died of a sudden hideous disease. Thus it pleased God."

In other words, so far the only evidence I have that Gofraidh "was probably added by Duald MacFirbis or his anonymous secretary, who made the only extant copy of these annals in the 17th century" is the wording "much-emended". Is this something that was discovered (or at least discussed) after 1998? Any further details would be much appreciated. Ben MacDui 11:23, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Wow! I feel stupid telling you about CELT now. Sorry about that, Ben. Have you been planning on adding a lot to the Uí Ímair article itself? If so, there's an important paper by Bart Jaski I haven't read yet, where he makes the case that the Uí Ímair/Vikings/Norse were overall the most responsible for the destruction of the ancient Kingship of Tara.[1] In one way or another they managed to smash up an awful lot they came in contact with, but this would be one of if not the biggest in Ireland or Britain, long-term historical impact considered, and if we in effect join the pro-Uí Néill camp, thus regarding Bóruma only the unlikely beneficiary of Uí Ímair efforts to compete for the High Kingship themselves. I believe Woolf argues Amlaíb Cuarán was all about just that, but I can't remember in which paper, volume, or monograph/book.

Maybe I should be posting this elsewhere, on your or the Uí Ímair talk page, but here Eroica gets to see it too. In any case, I apologize to both of you for the off-topic intrusion Nora lives (talk) 07:45, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Ave Imperator, morituri te salutant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulysses (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serpent (instrument), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bellini (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nicknack009's comments have convinced me that the article should remain at Lebor Gabála Érenn so I'm going to withdraw the request, just wanted to make sure you aren't desiring the move before I close it formally. From your comment it seemed that you were just 'not objecting' to the move rather than actually desiring it to move. -- Jamie ^u_t 10:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. I was merely expressing my indifference. Eroica (talk) 20:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As my first edit summary said, I don't see where the source backs the content of the edit. You reverted me with no explanation, so I've again removed it as OR. I may well be wrong but I'd appreciate an explanation on the article's talk page. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 16:46, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eroica. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 20:40, 4 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dougweller (talk) 20:40, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your copyedit. I did rush a bit on this one to create the article before someone else did: no-one expected him to win so I had nothing prepared. Tigerboy1966  21:52, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Une double famille, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferragus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have been on Wikipedia a while, so I'm not quite sure why you added a non-RS citation from a fringe wiki to the article Sardanapalus, from the site Hyksos.org. The site describes itself thusly:

"Hyksos.org is a site for aspiring students with interests in researching alternative religion and history as presented by historical records and archaeological discoveries, and not so much by today's deceptive conventional educational curriculum, which sets its own aggrandized agenda which actively seeks to suppress and ignores actual legitimate historical, evidence." [sic; emphasis added]

The site appears to be little more than a hodgepodge of fringe conspiracy theories and original research, with clear biases and little to no currency outside of that wiki. To be perfectly honest (and blunt), it's probably the most extreme case I've yet to see in a history article. It's also a wiki, which is not appropriate to cite on Wikipedia, regardless. I'd recommend that you read the polices WP:RS, WP:FRINGE, WP:PSEUDOSCIENCE and WP:VERIFIABILITY, which should make clear that this source doesn't meet even the most basic requirements for use as a citation on Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't a forum for WP:THETRUTH. While an essay, it applies here. I've of course removed the fringe claim and reference; if you'd like to try to argue that it's an acceptable source, do so in the appropriate forum. But I daresay it wouldn't result in much except a boomerang. I rarely leave such comments, as the edit summary is usually sufficient. But since you're a long time editor, I thought I'd give you the courtesy of a head's up, so that hopefully you'll avoid adding such links in the future. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 08:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eroica. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eroica. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eroica. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eroica. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages into Jakob Heierli. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When translating a foreign-language Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've translated content, disclosing the translation and linking to the translated page, e.g., Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the page you placed the translation. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have translated material before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 22:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Machine translation from German, contains errors. Please do not do machine translation unless you're fluent in both languages and carefully check for errors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buidhe (talk • contribs) 22:15, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jakob Heierli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Joe (talk) 14:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polflucht, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deformation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Wursteisen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Wursteisen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 12:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Parsifal has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 03:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]