User talk:Emperorubby

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc., and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.akwaibomstatemn.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=34&Itemid=57. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:56, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc., please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.akwaibomstatemn.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=34&Itemid=57. As a copyright violation, Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc. appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc. has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc. and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc. with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc..

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 11:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc.. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:57, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc., please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://akisan.org/about-us/ and http://akisan.org/documents/akwa-ibom-state-association-usa-inc-history.pdf. As a copyright violation, Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc. appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc. has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc. and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc. with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc..

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 04:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In response to your question at Talk:Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc., the problem is that we can't host content if it seems to be a copyright infringement of another source. If you are the copyright holder, or have permission to release the text to be used on Wikipedia, you need to send an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org from an email address associated with the source website (http://akisan.org/about-us/) explicitly stating that you release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. You should take care to read the terms of the license; it is irrevocable and allows anyone to use the text freely as long as they attribute the source. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information. – Toon 18:25, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Koman Coulibaly, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Truthsort (talk) 18:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the article discussion for reasons I deleted the post. Emperorubby (talk) 18:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I ask that you please stop blanking this section, and instead discuss it on the relevant talk page. Thank you.Dashren2001 (talk) 18:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the article discussion for reasons I deleted the post. Emperorubby (talk) 18:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have, and I have responded. In the future, please do not simply blank entire sections of an article without discussing it with others first. That is vandalism. If the information is well-sourced, it should only be deleted after a consensus is reached.Dashren2001 (talk) 18:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And if there is a difference in opinion, it should be respected. I did not blank the entire section. The first paragraph which is encyclopedia-worthy is still there. If you have nothing better to add as a section content, then you might as well remove the entire section. Do more research on this guy and put credible information in his article if you really want to write about him. Emperorubby (talk) 18:47, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've also responded on the talk page. Let's discuss this there. --AW (talk) 18:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Emperorubby (talk) 18:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Koman Coulibaly. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jusdafax 18:50, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24h for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emperorubby (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's foolish for an editor to be blocked for opposing an entry that appears to lack credibility. A discussion has been opened on the article for editors to agree on the proper phrasing of the section and I need to be able to participate in that discussion. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Declined. You were edit-warring, and the block was well-deserved. You can participate in the discussion after your block expires.

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Enigma^msg 19:16, 18 June 2010 (UTC)}}[reply]

Cheap but fine. Be back tomorrow then. Emperorubby (talk) 19:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong about the lack of worldwide outrage. Look at the articles and where there are from. There are articles from America, England, France, Germany, Zimbabwe and many more which talk about how Coulibaly made a bad call. If that is not worldwide, I am not sure what is. Further, check out this article [ http://g.sports.yahoo.com/soccer/world-cup/news/source-u-s-slovenia-ref-gets-poor-rating--fbintl_ro-referee061910.html ] which cites a FIFA source saying that Coulibaly received a poor rating.

Also, your point of him being a ref for 10 years is not very relevant because this is his first match in the world cup and by far his biggest match. Discussing his previous experience as a ref in this page would be similiar to discussing the high school career of a professional athlete. It can be mentioned, but the World cup match needs to be emphasized. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.12.134.172 (talk) 07:29, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that there has been sufficient worldwide coverage of this event. Slovenia appears to be the only country agreeing with the decision of Mr. Coulibaly. No other call in the 2010 World Cup has received the level of attention that Mr. Coulibaly's call has received. The entry is fine and in my opinion could be further elaborated to contain more information about the mistake. Dfourni (talk) 07:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Akwa Ibom State Association of Nigeria, USA Inc., without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.