User talk:EdwardUK

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For tireless searching of local newspapers to find references for lower league RL transfers Nthep (talk) 19:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Edward. Glad to see you participate in the chem articles. We need people like you, and some skepticism because these articles are often highly imperfect. I am an editor who adds lots of content about industrial routes, but my knowledge is often based on reading, not direct experience. So your question is warranted. Here is a quote from Ullmann's Encyclopedia on Industrial Chemistry "Thermal Cleavage of Acetone. This variation of the ketene process (cleavage of acetone into ketene and methane [59]) has no economic significance for the manufacture of acetic anhydride today." The article emphasizes the thermal dehydration of acetic acid to give ketene, which then adds to AcOH to give the anhydride. --Smokefoot (talk) 01:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was earlier editor that tagged the article, I just spotted that the template used contained a deprecated parameter (missing the "reason="), unfortunately my own knowledge of chemistry is a little more limited EdwardUK (talk) 01:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment. I will address the question. --Smokefoot (talk) 01:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed that using acetylene and Hg is a little strange. My understanding is that Hg and acetylene routes are current only in countries - PRC, Soviet bloc - that tolerate a lot of pollution. They often rely on cheap coal as a hydrocarbon surrogate. But in the bad old days, lots of mercury was often used even in the West to induce reactions of alkynes. Here is a quote from another section of Ullmann's Encyclopedia (doi:10.1002/14356007.a01_031.pub2): "Wet Oxidation Process (Hoechst). The wet oxidation process ... was operated... until the changeover to ethylene.... In this method, iron(III) sulfate is added to reoxidize the mercury metal to the mercury(II) salt..." One of the angles I have taken in writing these basic chemicals articles is to highlight large scale routes that today might seem implausible.--Smokefoot (talk) 01:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As with the "Acetic acid" article an editor called Riventree originally tagged the section with "citation needed" EdwardUK (talk) 01:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EdwardUK

I've neglected the author pages I edit, which is mostly writers from Cooperstown NY and Pittsburgh, PA. Several of the pages I edit have stale refs or edits have left some of them a little choppy. I saw you put on a ref improve on the BPL page back in February. It's going to take me a while but I've just finished my Master's so I have time again.

Peace be the Botendaddy

Hello, I don't know how RS 'Talk Talk' is, but assure you that, as it says on the 'Central' page, In 1989 it was incorporated as a higher education college in its own right and funded directly by government. Central had been offering degrees since 1986, firstly validated by the Council for National Academic Awards and from 1992 by the Open University.

No 'Central' student received any kind of degree until 1986. Were this not the case, why is there no mention of a degree on the Harold Pinter, Laurence Olivier, the three Redgraves etc etc etc pages and no mention of a degree on any other Judi Dench source (one of the most written about modern actresses). Central offered a practical training, not an academic course and only began awarding degrees when it became 'necessary' for Govt funding reasons. The same was true of all major UK drama schools until the 1980s. Pincrete (talk) 23:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it would be expected for it to be mentioned in more sources - there are a couple of other articles (broadway.com) (thestage.co.uk) that state "first class degree" (who may have used talktalk as their source), but other such as Darling Judi (Miller) only go as far as saying she graduated. I had reinserted it as it matched the source given, but based on what you have written and the possible unreliability of the source I think it is probably best to leave it out. EdwardUK (talk) 00:33, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'Graduated' is used on quite a number of Central alumni articles, in the pre-1986 context it simply means 'completed and left'. Previous to 1986, 'Central' awarded diplomas, which had no real value outside of the world of acting. This was true of almost all drama courses - and some other arts courses (eg musical instruments). Most of these drama school courses made the change as it became necessary for a course to be recognised as a degree course in order for students to get grants (and later loans). In the case of 'Central', the entire acting course staff resigned circa 1984 in protest at the change forced on them by the Governors, to what had previously been a wholly practical training, but which became a 'faux academic' course in their opinion. Central had also trained teachers and speech therapists and theatre techs, but they were awarded various forms of certificate. Pincrete (talk) 10:39, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good for you, but why is Zayn Malik still in twins? I have something more to say than this and I am not done talking to you! I think we should start an article for Rybka twins. Make me talk more because I do not feel lowly of myself in front of people whether they are related to me or not. I have never seen a negativity before in my entire life.

I Have Always Been a Twin (talk) 15:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good, was that his evil twin Rodger Malik and not his twin sister on http://www.onedirectionfanfiction.org and http://www.harrystylesfanfiction.com Harriet? Can you still answer my question, "does zayn malik have a twin sister?" --I Have Always Been a Twin (talk) 18:09, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EdwardUK, thank you very much for your all infobox corrections. One question… how are you identifying the errors? Best Regards DynamoDegsy (talk) 22:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For rugby infoboxes there is a list of errors here: Category:Pages using infobox rugby league biography with unknown parameters. When you go to an article you can click edit and then preview and it gives a red message at the top of the article such as: "Warning: Page using Template:Infobox rugby league biography with unknown parameter "nickname" (this message is shown only in preview)." To let you know what the error is. Then I either correct or remove the parameter based on whether it’s a simple typo, incorrect, already covered in the main text, or needs a citation. EdwardUK (talk) 22:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edward,

Thanks for you fixing up Lady Bomanjis page. I write to seek your help in keeping this page alive. Just read my talk page and you will understand whats going on. I have added all factual information about her but i have not been able to convince some guy on wiki to keep her page. I have been given time to fix it up before it is marked for deletion. Please help in keeping this page alive on wiki. It is the least we can do to for someone who gave her life to harrogate and england.

Many Thanks

Hello Edward. I have added some information to the Aldermaston Pottery page. It seems like there isn't one main person who created the page out of a special interest. So I'm just contacting you to see if you have time to help load up a couple of images. Sorry, every time I try it takes hours and I don't succeed. I've obviously got abilities in other areas!

You'll see my entry on the page so far.

There are copies of the lists of studio assistants at Aldermaston Pottery, with an example of their potter's mark. I found a couple at a web site called 20th Century Forum. If you look there, scroll down, maybe on the 2nd page, and there are a couple of examples of the lists. https://www.20thcenturyforum.com/t3346-aldermaston-pottery

I saved them as pictures on my computer but can't get any further. I wonder if you could help? Regards Solatully Australia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Solatully (talk • contribs) 05:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the image of Sam Daghles? Shipsview (talk) 17:23, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

there was no image, only text - which doesn't belong in the "image=" parameter, but in others such as "coach_start=" and "cteam1=" - see Template:Infobox basketball biography - EdwardUK (talk) 20:51, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies Shipsview (talk) 16:28, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edward ---- Can you tell me what is your reason for reducing the size of the image of Sue Draheim in the article Sue Draheim? Thank you. --Akhooha (talk) 18:43, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The picture used full image syntax rather than just the file name as suggested in the infobox documentation – see template:Infobox musical artist. A forced fixed size (px) is generally only needed to enlarge small images and it overrides users preference settings for image display. To me the default size seemed adequate here – however i’ve now added the upright parameter which scales the image back to the previous size. EdwardUK (talk) 20:51, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for restoring it to its original size. I'm just curious, though, since now everything looks the same as before you made any changes, what purpose was served in changing the "syntax" of the image? Thanks for your reply. --Akhooha (talk) 20:58, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t remember quite where i’ve read the more detailed version of it, but one reason is given in Wikipedia:autosizing images is that having a fixed image size can cause problems for certain users and devices. EdwardUK (talk) 21:14, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm --- OK -- thanks for your quick reply.--Akhooha (talk) 21:28, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've edited the page about the William H. McCreery House. I own that house and my wife and I operate a wedding and event venue on the property. The legal business name is simply "The McCreery House" which is what I attempted to use in the main content as well as a link to the business website. Why was that changed? Can we not link to tour business site?

BTW - I've never updated a wiki page before and I'm only interested in this one because it appears in Google searches for our business and was showing incorrect information and a terrible picture which does not encourage people to visit our website. I'm mainly interested in directing traffic there, but I would think accurate information in Wikipedia is also important?

Cmarsh80501 (talk) 17:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article is primarily about the building rather than the business that operates there, but I can see why you would like to improve it. I changed the article because articles usually start with the full name in bold, which in this article is the registered name of historic building. The website link is still there at the bottom of the article, but I have now also added it to the infobox, and added: "also known as The McCreery House" to the first line.

To encourage people to want to find out more (and visit the website) the article would benefit from being longer - firstly adding sections on the architecture and history of the building – there is lots of info given in the nrhp listing (reference 3) which could be useful, and then add a section about its current use. The WikiProject National Register of Historic Places WP:NRHP has links to good articles on similar buildings and a guide that may help. EdwardUK (talk) 18:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Hi ! Thank you for your support and help with edits of image bu Elliott Broidy page. If you dont mind could you say me how exactly i should added the picture, what was my mistake? Regards Annmorgan24 (talk) 16:42, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The formatting would have been fine if used somewhere else in the article, but in the infobox it only needed the filename without the square brackets or the use of thumb. there are lots of useful guides for editing on the Help:Contents page. EdwardUK (talk) 16:58, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’m new to Wikipedia and I couldn’t figure out how to convince the infobox of the N-localizer page to display the enclosed image on center. You did it, so thanks, or should I say “Ta” instead? Lunqvist (talk) 02:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for fixing Solrad 1. My issue with other photos is that, because they are large or long, they make an infobox unwieldy, which is why I've sometimes used thumbnails. Do you have a recommendation on how to address this issue? Thank you! --Neopeius (talk) 17:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Most infoboxes have parameters such as image_size= or upright= that can be used to adjust the display size. Template:Infobox spaceflight uses image_size= which defaults to 220px wide if not set, but can be changed if needed – for tall images it is also possible to set the height rather than width by putting an x before the number – for example x250px - EdwardUK (talk) 17:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to edit my inline refs over next few days. Can you check it in a week please. Kalani Pe'a Allanbcool (talk) 08:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for tidying up the logo attributes in the image parameter for the organization infobox on Phoenix Lodge. Rjrh (talk) 17:37, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly haven't seen the match. BTW, where is the source that Chelsea were "better" in the first half of 1994 FA Cup Final? See what is says in Summary section. D Gums (talk) 20:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - regarding this diff, and several other ones you made recently to some articles I've written recently - can you give me a link to instructions on using ref templates like that? I'll probably be using that Historic Environment Scotland portal again in future articles, so if you can show me how to reference it more efficiently next time it will save other people having to clear up after me. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 09:02, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That link is to an out of date news article, this revision is current and accurate info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.43.93.211 (talk) 19:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All material on Wikipedia articles must be attributable to a reliable published source, so if the information regarding Oliver's Mount has changed then a citation needs to be provided to support the changes otherwise it appears to be "original research" which is prohibited on Wikipedia and is usually reverted or removed. EdwardUK (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no citation to quote as it has not been reported elsewhere, but this is fact and was posted by Olivers Mount Racing Ltd, the account for the company that own the rights to operate the circuit, and so should be regarded as such unless anyone has evidence to the contrary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.43.93.211 (talk) 08:22, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If there are no sources that directly report the information, then you have to rely on available published sources and reword the article based on what they say – I’ve added a citation that gives the original company name as reported at the time and another citation which shows that it has since been renamed. EdwardUK (talk) 11:03, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edward, so that suggests that Wiki can only ever report the situation as it has been reported elsewhere, but what about when the information is accurate but simply has not been reported elsewhere? Surely it should be able to stand if no-one disputes the information stated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.43.93.211 (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If there is no source for the information then it shouldn't be on Wikipedia. This is one of the core policies as covered here: Wikipedia:No original research. EdwardUK (talk) 18:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the guidance, will await a quotable external source before editing this piece again — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.43.93.211 (talk) 07:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - you've been good enough in the past to go through a few articles I wrote and replace my 'cite web' reference templates with the 'Historic Environment Scotland' template. Since then I've been trying to avoid making other people tidy up after me by using that template myself when writing articles - I wonder, though, whether I'm doing it wrong.

Generally, when I insert a ref, I use the 'cite' tool above the editing window, and select one of the standard templates from the drop-down list - web, news, book or journal. This is fairly easy and convenient, but since you changed my first few article, whenever I now cite a Historic Environment Scotland template, I find myself going back to an old article, finding the template you added, copy/pasting it into my new article, and manually changing the code with the right details. Essentially, it's significantly more of a hassle than just citing it as a standard web reference.

I'm sure I'm missing something here - is there a smart/easy way for me to insert a template like that without going through a whole load of hassle? A script I have to install or something? Any tips would be much appreciated. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 18:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I not aware of any tools or scripts for making it easier to use the template, also I haven't seen anything similar for use with the NHLE template (which the Historic Environment Scotland template is based on) – my method for using such templates is to cut and paste from a text document I've created which has blank copies of the non-standard cite templates I use most often. EdwardUK (talk) 22:39, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - I guess I could do something similar. Just for my understanding then, what's the rationale for using the template instead of a standard web ref? It's only slightly more of a ballache than inserting a regular ref, so I'm happy to do it if it's of any actual benefit, but I'm not clear on how it helps. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 18:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed on your userpage that you actually created the template - I'd probably have phrased the above comments slightly differently if I'd realised that! Apologies if I've come across as moaning about it, I'm not meaning to have a go, just trying to better understand the reasoning behind it. GirthSummit _(blether) 18:06, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are a couple of reasons of using the template – dead link management and uniform appearance.

The main benefit of the template is that if the website for the database changes then we only have to update the template rather than all of the pages on which it is used. In the past the databases for listed buildings across the UK have changed websites a few times, but the reference numbers for each listing stay constant. For Scotland it was "data.historic-scotland.gov.uk" before becoming "portal.historicenvironment.scot". These changes caused the standard citations to become dead links thus creating a lot of work to archive/replace each of them, whereas with the template it would have been possible to update all these pages with just a couple of edits as was done with the England template in March 2015. Currently the Scotland template is used on only about 1500 pages, but for the England template the figure is about 14000.

The template also produces a consistent look to these citations regardless of editor as most people will probably only use 3 or 4 main parameters (typically num, desc, and access-date) unlike with cite web where individual editors often use different combinations of author, work, website or publisher. EdwardUK (talk) 14:58, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah - OK, I'm sold - the idea of manually changing 1,500 (let along 14,000!) pages if their website changes is... unappealing. That makes perfect sense, I'll do as you suggest and start a 'notes' page with this template on there. Thanks for explaining (and for creating the template!) GirthSummit _(blether) 21:48, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent edit on the above article. You were more justified in doing that than you may have realised. I created the article and knew about that complaint at the time, but omitted it from the article for a reason. It is true that his relatives made such a complaint, but whether he was guilty or not is beside the point. The accusations became official just when a BBC team was researching for a documentary on Bunting's conservation work, and in response the team promptly withdrew plans for the programme. I understand that the withdrawal was not only about possible public exposure of vulnerable people who may have suffered, but also about rumoured suggestions of heavy bribery and/or political pressure from certain major chemical company interests whose reputation might have benefited from such revelations. I would think that this matter would fall under WP biography guidelines, so I would suggest that this kind of material is kept out of the article so long as there are living relatives who could be hurt by it. Keep up the good work. Storye book (talk) 20:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon is planned for March 2020, a contest/editathon to eliminate as many stubs as possible from all 134 counties. Amazon vouchers/book prizes are planned for most articles destubbed from England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland and Northern Ireland and whoever destubs articles from the most counties out of the 134. Sign up on page if interested in participating, hope this will prove to be good fun and productive, we have over 44,000 stubs!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my edit in the pontefract page. Ljy1 (talk) 11:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information added to Wikipedia needs to have a citation to show where the information is from - as described here: Wikipedia:VerifiabilityEdwardUK (talk) 12:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr Edward, the reason I removed the deletion placed on this page by the first Editor was because she claimed that the page violates some of Wikipedia's guidelines under WP:NACTOR and it doesn't. Duke Elvis is a public and notable figure in the Nigerian movie industry and he has made a lot of contributions to the industry. He has played major movie roles in quite a number of movies and a very popular Nigerian TV series known as The Johnsons. He has a very large fanbase both online and offline in and outside Nigeria. It is obvious that the first person that placed the deletion didn't go through the page and make her research about Duke Elvis on the web through the citations and links I put on the page because barely after I created the page, she nominated it for deletion and it's for possible for a person to make a proper research about a person in less that 5mins. I can assure you that Duke Elvis is a notable figure, please I'm new on Wikipedia and don't really know how to go about this deletion process so please could you lend a helping hand cause I don't want my effort to go down the drain. Thank you. VictorHB (talk) 21:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir for your kind words and advice, I'll find a way to get to the deletion page to contribute to the discussion so my work go down the drain. Please also help add a discussion on the topic so the page won't be deleted because based on Wikipedia standards, Duke Elvis is a notable figure. Thank you so much. VictorHB (talk) 22:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir, please I've tried adding a discussion on the deletion page but I couldn't, I even followed what you said but still couldn't. I don't know my way around, i only came to edit I never knew it would come to this. Please I'm even willing to give you my wiki login details so you can help me add a discussion on the Deletion page...I already have what I want to say but don't know how to put it. Please help me out, I don't want that page to be deleted, it took my time, effort, lots of tutorials before I could create it. VictorHB (talk) 22:27, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting me on the referee article, a little unfamiliar with European Football terms so that was appreciated. Mutantcow (talk) 12:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disrupting editing. I am editing in Wikipedia because that is true in timeline of Carlito Marquez. Dont delete his birthdate in his article page. Or else you will be block in Editing. And the page Carlito Marquez has citations and sources. Thank You. Baby Aline Vargas Alfonso (talk) 08:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article has sources – but not one of them mentions the birth date and therefore none of them can be used to verify this information – Verifiability is a core policy of Wikipedia – see WP:VERIFY – If you had read the numerous clean up messages on the page rather than constantly removing them, without dealing with the issues stated, then you would be aware of this. The unsourced information will continue to be removed by myself or other editors unless it has citations which can be used to verify it. EdwardUK (talk) 09:07, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EdwardUK, I saw you changing singer into solo_singer in the article Al Capps, which is not really what he did. Than I looked what you changed furthermore and I wonder on what basis you change articles? Gracinha Leporace wasn't a solo singer according to the introduction of the article: "Gracinha Leporace (born Maria da Graça Leporace) is a Brazilian singer who worked extensively with her husband Sérgio Mendes and his band." You changed in Izzy Stradlin "backgroud=rhythm_guitar" into "background=solo_singer", but that is not the only thing he does. In Rob Twizz you changed rapper into solo_singer, but he is a rapper (as a matter of fact rappers exist that can only sing falsely). Can you please stop altering things massively and undo anything you changed without knowing what it is about? Ymnes (talk) 14:42, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

please see the documentation for Template:Infobox musical artist - the background parameter only supports seven [sic] categories, and classes any vocalist as a solo_singer whether they rap, sing as an individual, or as part of a duo or group. EdwardUK (talk) 14:49, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A singer in a band, a session singer and a rapper are nót solo singers. Do it good or leave it empty, but don't place disinformation there please. Can't you see that Wikipedia is being made unreliable because of your actions? Ymnes (talk) 14:54, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Baby Aline Vargas Alfonso asked you here above as well to stop your disrupting editing. You cannot simply place untrue messages when you are out of choices. Please undo all your mistakes! Ymnes (talk) 14:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

have you read the documentation – particularly this section Template:Infobox musical artist#background – and also the archives of the infobox talk page – with regards to the previous comments on my talk page you may want to check the edit history of the related article where you would see that my edits were not the ones which were disruptive. EdwardUK (talk) 15:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did, but if your edits aren't true, than they simply are disruptive.

What is mentioned at {{infobox musical artist}}, is that your have "six" choices:

• solo_singer
• non_vocal_instrumentalist
• non_performing_personnel
• group_or_band
• classical_ensemble
• temporary

I mentioned one case where "group_or_band" is concerned here above. But, there aren't six choices only, but there is in fact a seventh one as well: the choice to leave background empty. Now you have put data in the background field that is untrue. That surely is a problem, and you should correct all of them. It is hurting the quality of Wikipedia, when you place disinformation in cases where you are out of choices. Ymnes (talk) 15:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not happy with the part of the documentation which states the field is mandatory then you can raise this concern on the talk page for the infobox and suggest alternative options. If you want to change any of the articles you are not happy with – go ahead, but I am ok with them using the options listed. EdwardUK (talk) 15:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If rules lead to disinformation, than they should be altered. If this is not the kind of work you're capable of doing, than you should stop with it right away. Because this is your problem, not mine. Ymnes (talk) 15:38, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that we hold differing opinions on the matter - my edits were consistent with what is given in the documentation – had they not been then the coding of the infobox would have tracked them as containing parameter issues. I could propose modifications to the template, and I have not started with doing anything contradictory to the documentation because, as you point out, I am not capable of altering it myself, as is the case with any template such as this which is edit protected, nor have a made any changes to the documentation which would themselves be contradictory to the coding of the template. It is probable that many readers of the articles would be unaware of the significance of the color-coding resulting from the background parameter, and for those who notice it I am sceptical that they would be misinformed by it as it does not display any text on the article page as this is only visible in edit mode, so the only people to read the text would be editors who could be anticipated to be capable of referring to the relevant pages to clarify what is meant by the parameter, that it is a general color-coding system rather than an uniquely customisable description, whereas for more precise descriptive details there are other parameters available. EdwardUK (talk) 16:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I must fairly admit, that I wasn't aware that the content of this parameter is only changing the color of the banner, for which case my wording of disruptive editing has been too strong for what you did. I apologize for that. Although there is still disinformation at stake, because it confuses people that see that; look alone me. This is not my main Wiki (nl.wikipedia is) so I still would like to ask you to initiate an extra category with the name "other". I ask you because you are very involved with doing this task. Wikipedia is in anyway an encyclopaedia, and we should always strive to provide true information only. Ymnes (talk) 17:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I sometimes forget that other editors don’t see things the same way and have different experiences of how they view things on here. As noted – the template is protected, and anyway a notable change should not be made without discussion and consensus, but I will raise the issue on the talk page, where I suggest you may also want to comment EdwardUK (talk) 18:20, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EdwardUK - thank you for your helpful suggestion for Pennyfield Lock. I probably will not use it for Pennyfield Lock because I have a bad habit of writing too much, but I will use it for two other locks that I am working on. One of them, Swains Lock, will probably be ready in a month or so, and that source has added a missing piece of information—the name of the lock before Swain arrived in 1907. Cheers! TwoScars (talk) 14:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At [[1]] I belive you suggested the possibility of a mode= parameter for Template:Soccerway. Are you able to explain this a little further or point me at an example template where this has been used. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have mostly seen it used in Template:National Heritage List for England and its Scottish and Welsh equivalents, but unfortunately it is not a few simple lines of code that can just be copied across – it looks to come from the invoked Template:Cite web which uses the Module:Citation/CS1. I’m not good enough with coding to understand how this works or be sure how best to add it – but in theory it could be possible to rework the Soccerway template as a wrapper template. It may be worth seeking advice about this at Wikiproject Templates WP:WPT. EdwardUK (talk) 12:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yorkshire Electricity Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yorkshire Electricity Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 17:47, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am Wondering if You saw (Episode Bully) recently becuz (Most events are Vague in my Opinion)?(2603:3006:500:7D00:43C:5195:7084:9FD9 (talk) 19:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

The above is a sock of a banned user. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 23:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prove it becuz I’m just an Inocent stranger on Celular data Wifi walking on Streets?(2600:387:6:80F:0:0:0:77 (talk) 00:08, 18 November 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

You're a banned user. Here's the previous reversion of your garbage.[2] ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 03:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You seem to have been left off an original ping list for this one. Your involvement in place articles could suggest you might interested in this topic. Thanks. See:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_England/Parishes_RfC Acabashi (talk) 14:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, EdwardUK. I'm just posting to let you know that Grade I listed buildings in Rhondda Cynon Taf – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for May 7. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 20:32, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great to see this on the front page. Many congratulations. KJP1 (talk) 12:31, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EdwardUK, I see that you have removed the thumbnails of the buses in the article and have added Wiki links to similar chassis types. This will give readers the (wrong) impression that the vehicles featured in the Wiki links are actually in the museum. Can we restore the actual vehicle images please? Also, you have moved a general picture of the double deck buses into the collections area. These vehicles are not all in the collection, it is a view of vehicles that may typically be present on a museum open day so would be more appropriate at the top. The layout I used is what I would want to see it I was looking at an article on any other bus museum. Can we put it back please? 24 Barnsley Road (talk) 01:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The links to other articles were intended to give additional information on the manufacturer and type of chassis, rather than link to specific individual vehicles. The thumbnails were removed as Wikipedia is not an image repository. They appeared to be quite similar and had no captions to explain their relevance causing them to add little to the reader's understanding of the subject. On other articles on bus museums, for example London Bus Museum and Isle of Wight Bus & Coach Museum, only a few images are used in the article to represent the collection, the rest being accessible through the commons link at the end of the article. The image of double deck buses is not well suited to top due to its size - the lead or infobox image should be no larger than upright=1.35 (equivalent to 300px). However, if it does not represent the collection then the section on Events which mentions open days seems a more suitable place for this image. EdwardUK (talk) 02:56, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edward, I see that you have made two images into thumbnails. This seems to have had the effect of moving the images from the relevant sections (Events and Site History) and squashing them into the right hand side in the wrong sections. Is there a way of moving the thumbnails back to the left hand side in the correct sections please? Thank you 24 Barnsley Road (talk) 00:55, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added {{clear}} which stops images from being pushed down out of their sections by starting new sections below any images/maps/tables, it would be possible to add |left to the images, but most images should be on the right side of the page, which is the default and is more readable/accessible according to the manual of style: (MOS:IMAGES). EdwardUK (talk) 01:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Edward 24 Barnsley Road (talk) 17:13, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Holly Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EdwardUK, thanks so much for fixing up my Mount Holly Park article so it could be approved! DfosterRGB (talk) 15:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Hello EUK. I present you this award for your work cleaning up the infoboxes in film articles. In the same way that nature abhors a vacuum some editors feel the need to fill out empty fields. Since those have been deactivated any info they put there wont be seen :-) Your efforts are much appreciated MarnetteD|Talk 20:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear EdwardUK

We apologise for removing content without explaining why, if you can advise us on how to avoid that in the future it would be greatly appreciated.

We noticed that you undid a change to the Le Phonographique Wiki page. There is a claim by Mark M that he was a DJ. The source for this is an interview with John Robb; wherein Mark talks about his involvement with the club; as a former owner of the club, and after talking to other owners we can catagorically state that this is not the case and therefore would appreciate it if this claim is removed.

Kind regards

Richard Cordwell

Le Phonographique (talk) 18:58, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Le Phonographique: – I suggest that you raise this issue on the talk page for the article so that other editors will understand the reasons for the change. Then either edit the article using "see talk page" as the edit summary, or place an edit request on the talk page. As you have a connection with the venue you may find the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines helpful EdwardUK (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

copied here from my sandbox to preserve - "this" = Version 1 of "Wars of the Roses family tree" (from my sandbox at the time)

@EdwardUK I'm going to copy this to my sandbox to work on it. —GoldRingChip 12:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Let's work on it collaboratively at Template:Wars of the Roses family tree/sandbox. —GoldRingChip 12:49, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EdwardUK, I'm currently taking Cullen House through FAC, and an issue has come up with Template:Historic Environment Scotland. If you take a look in the refs of that article, ref numbers 5, 31, 32 and 33 all use the template. It appears to be showing a double space between the name of the designation, and the bit where it says "(Category A listed building)". Would you be able to check whether it's something that I'm doing wrong, or if it's an issue with the template itself and, if possible, remove the extra space? (For reference, the issue was raised in this part of the review.) Cheers Girth Summit _(blether) 14:39, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: I think I’ve found the problem, an extra space in the template that has now been removed. Happy to see other editors using the template and good work with the article - I look forward to seeing it on the main page. EdwardUK (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the speedy fix, much appreciated! And yes, I use it loads - almost every article I've written has that template in it somewhere, so thanks for making it! Girth Summit _(blether) 16:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding these. I didn’t know we had a template corresponding to the Cadw one. Did you create it? I shall certainly use it going forward. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 06:17, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KJP1: – I adapted it from the Cadw template, it is basically a copy with a few things changed or removed, so it is the creator of that (who also created the NHLE template) who did all of the hard work. Having almost identical parameters should make it simple to use if you are already familiar with Cadw and other similar templates. EdwardUK (talk) 07:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it looks very good, although why RCAHMW and Cadw use different identifier numbers is beyond me. But a note of warning; I created quite a lot of Welsh building articles using the old reference style, before I thought to ask DavidCane to create one modelled on his Historic England template. So there are a fair number that need updating! Thanks again. KJP1 (talk) 11:10, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just discovered the CADW template, thank you so much! No Swan So Fine (talk) 16:48, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating Template:Coflein, and for editing numerous articles to use it. I would like to request the creation of Template:Dictionary of Welsh Biography (or Template:Cite DWB), to cite the Dictionary of Welsh Biography, also known as Welsh Biography Online. This is a widely-used source in Welsh biographical and historical articles.[3][4] The template might be based on Template:Cite ODNB. Regards, Verbcatcher (talk) 04:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Verbcatcher: I have had a go at creating the template, but it is slightly different from the others that I have previously worked on. It is based on a mix of Coflein, Cite ODND and Cite Australian Dictionary of Biography, and uses Cite encyclopedia so it took a bit of guesswork and there may be some errors that will need to be fixed. Also some of the existing citations for have ids that appear to have changed since it used wbo.llgc.org.uk so these will need to be repaired when adding the template. EdwardUK (talk) 09:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I wasn't expecting such quick work. Would you welcome help with rolling this out to articles – do you have a tool to automate this? Should we wait until any bugs have made themselves known? Verbcatcher (talk) 13:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Verbcatcher: Help with adding the template would be great. Ideally it will need to be added quite a few times, by different editors and using different combinations of parameters, to fully identify any bugs. I will mention it on the Wales wikiproject as some of the members may find it useful and have suggestions for improvements. One of the ways of monitoring and checking for problems will be the "monthly parameter report" of the template data but this won't be available for a couple of weeks. It is probably best to replace existing citations first before adding new ones - I have added "This external link template is underused... check here" to the documentation which can be used to find existing citations.

I have no tools for adding the template beyond simple copy and paste, when replacing existing citations it is usually fairly easy to edit the text and rename/remove the parameters, and when adding new citations I find it easiest to copy/paste the "commonly used" blank version and then fill it in from the website. (also if I plan to add it several times I copy the blank to a text document, add ref tags, the access-date and mode/fewer-links if needed, then use this to paste part filled versions into articles) EdwardUK (talk) 18:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd just like to add my thanks for creating this. The DWB is an invaluable source, and I am sure I shall find the template useful. DuncanHill (talk) 05:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added this to several articles and have not found any problems. My observations include:

The first letter of the id code specifies the language of the article: 's' for English (Saesneg) or 'c' for Welsh (Cymraeg). It appears that all the articles are available in both English and Welsh, with the Welsh articles at bywgraffiadur.cymru, for example:

• https://biography.wales/article/s12-YATE-NIG-1944
• https://bywgraffiadur.cymru/article/c12-YATE-NIG-1944

Perhaps the article identifier should be defined as the characters that follow the 's'.

It might be helpful to describe more of the available parameters on the documentation page, for example for DWB articles with multiple authors:

• {{Cite DWB |id=s-PRYS-GOG-1500 |title=PRYSE family, of Gogerddan, Cardiganshire |first1=Sir William |last1=Llewelyn Davies |authorlink1=William Llewelyn Davies |first2=David |last2=Jenkins |authorlink2=David Jenkins (librarian) |year=1959}}

which displays as:

• Llewelyn Davies, Sir William; Jenkins, David (1959). "PRYSE family, of Gogerddan, Cardiganshire". Dictionary of Welsh Biography. National Library of Wales.

I have also used the |quote= syntax, which works as expected.

There are thousands of citations of the dictionary, and it may not be feasible to convert them all. I have made a modest start, and have worked on a few articles with a reasonable high profile with a view to giving the new template more exposure to editors. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did think of automatically including the 's' until I spotted some articles cite pages that started with 'arc_s' (used for archived versions). The template should work with the parameters from Cite encyclopedia, I initially listed only the most basic ones, but descriptions for any of the other parameters can be added if this would be helpful. I would estimate there is the potential for around 10,000 copies of the template as many of the biographies could be cited several times (for example on the articles for the person and their birth year and death year articles). There is no time limit for this so after the initial push to raise awareness (maybe 400+ translusions?) other editors will start to add it as part of their general editing. EdwardUK (talk) 19:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your continuing work modifying citations to use the template. I have added a list of 'notable' DWB contributors to the Dictionary of Welsh Biography article. I assembled the list from the use of the template's author-link parameter, as reported in the monthly parameter usage report. I intend to update the list using a future report. Regards, Verbcatcher (talk) 22:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Verbcatcher: Having a list of authors is a great idea, there are over 500 authors on the website, I have no idea how many have wiki articles, but probably more than 50, and once that many have an author-link the list will disappear from the monthly report. I will add a note about it to the template documentation.EdwardUK (talk) 18:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help. I wanted to add something in timeline Welsh history and I kinda fucked up and I tried fixing it but it made it worse. Kolwing (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Edward,

I notice you reverted my change to Stanley Hollis’s page re where he is buried from Linthorpe Cemetery back to Acklam Cemetery. If you hit the coordinates in Stanley’s Page it takes you to Linthorpe Cemetery not Acklam. My Mam is 84 and a very well educated lady and she maintains that Linthorpe is correct!

I have always had an interest in SH and this has been magnified recently by my first Grandchild being named Stanley, which I absolutely love. Anyway just some feedback for you!! maborouk 05:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maborouk (talk • contribs)

There are several sources that give the location as Acklam Cemetery (Morgan, find a grave, vconline) rather than Linthorpe. It looks like the error was with the coords, probably because both are located on Acklam Rd. But if you have other sources that give Linthorpe as being correct then you could raise the issue on the articles talk page EdwardUK (talk) 12:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I re-reverted your recent reversion to Jake Thackray without realising the page had been edited since I last read it (yesterday or the day before). The last section of Talk:Jake Thackray explains my reasoning. Happy to continue the conversation there.

Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 18:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Rugby League Barnstar
		You have been awarded this barnstar in recognition of your contributions to the work of WikiProject Rugby League. Paticurlarly for your creation and work on the Wheelchair Rugby League World Cup and 2021 Physical Disability Rugby League World Cup this past month. Such a groundbreaking year for the sport so it is great to have amazing editors who are recording its coverage. A constant reminder of how great the people of our sport are. Awarded by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 08:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you recently added a bunch of results to the England Wheelchair Rugby League team page. I want to know if to your know is that's all their non world cup fixture or if their are any more? Mn1548 (talk) 00:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are more but I have not had time to add them. The Wales rugby website has all the results from the 2013 world cup (the same citation used for the 2017 results) and they look to be correct apart from their score in the final 44–40 which does not agree with other the match reports. On the talk page for the article, I have added a link to the European Rugby League website, they have several more of their matches – world cup, euros, and a few friendlies against France. Unfortunately, the coverage of the 2008 world cup is very limited, so I am yet to find any scores apart from the final. EdwardUK (talk) 10:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you Edward — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cruzdelaman (talk • contribs) 08:22, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Morning Edward, hope you are keeping well. I'm wanting to use the Cadw Scheduled monument template for the churchyard cross at St Peter's Church, Dixton. But I'm messing up with the uid, i.e. <ref>{{Cadw|uid='''???'''|class=SM|num=MM308|desc=St. Peter's Churchyard Cross, Dixton|access-date=10 January 2023}}</ref>. Can you remind me what it is/where I find it. The Cadw SM listing is here. Many thanks. KJP1 (talk) 09:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edward - no worries. Found the answer on the very helpful page, Template:National Historic Assets of Wales. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 10:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Morning Edward - I'm back with another query. Now that the Cadw/ICOMOS Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest in Wales has statutory effect, a few of us have being doing some category creation for historic Welsh gardens. You can see where we've got to here, Category:Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest in Wales. I then tried to do this, User:KJP1/sandbox 5 Monmouthshire gardens, with the aim of ending up with list articles by principal area similar to this, Grade I listed buildings in Rhondda Cynon Taf, which will be familiar to you! Where I think I've gone wrong is I used an English/Historic England template as a basis, and the reference number links don't work.

So, my questions. Do we need a new template that could link to the Cadw data or could your RCT Grade I list be adapted to work for historic gardens? We'd certainly need a Designation, I/II*/II, column and a bit of thought about what others would be best. Would this be something you could help with, or do you know where I could ask? I don't know anything about setting up templates, so I've no idea how big an ask it is. If you were able to do the template, I'd be very willing to do the grunt work of populating it, from my failed first effort. People could then use the Monmouthshire one as the basis for the others. Very grateful for any advice. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 06:06, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@KJP1: To get the reference number to link correctly the {{NHAW}} template can be used (use the parameters: class=HPG, short=yes, num= and uid=). The designation entries also needs a sort key to stop them from sorting as I/II/II*. A template can be created, but is not yet needed. The list can be worked on as a wikitable and then changed to use a template later. To get something consistent with other articles my suggestion would be to create something like the wikitable for the Monmouthshire listed buildings, but replace the "Cadw listed building header" with a custom version that adds a designation column such as:

{| class="RM_table wikitable sortable plainlinks" style="width:100%; font-size:100%; margin-top:0.5em;"
|-
! scope="col" | Name
! scope="col" | Location, Geo{{nbhyph}}coordinates,<br />{{abbr|Grid ref.|Grid references}}<ref group="note" name="EH listed building header note 2">Sometimes known as OSGB36, the grid reference is based on <code><nowiki>the [[British national grid reference system]] used by the [[Ordnance Survey]].</ref>
! scope="col" | Date Listed
! scope="col" | Function and Notes
! scope="col" | Designation
! scope="col" | Reference Number
! scope="col" class="unsortable" | Image

Name	Location, Geo‑coordinates, Grid ref.[note 1]	Date Listed	Function and Notes	Designation	Reference Number	Image
Abergavenny Castle	Abergavenny 51°49′13″N 3°01′09″W / 51.820302°N 3.019071°W / 51.820302; -3.019071 (Abergavenny Castle) SO 29856 14011	1 February 2022[1]	Park: The grounds of the medieval castle ruins were landscaped c. 1800 with walks created within the curtain walls. In the later nineteenth century further landscaping took place, a formal garden was laid out, and the castle grounds became a public park.[1]	Grade II	PGW(Gt)9(MON)

This should give the table above which is similar to the RCT I list (I also had a go at Grade II* for RCT and Merthyr, but never finished). You may which to separate out the "type" from the notes column but as almost all entries are park or garden this doesn't seem particularly useful. You could also consider separating the location and grid ref columns but placing them next to each other. I found fewer columns worked better as the notes appeared very narrow on smaller display screens. This can be experimented with to work out what works best before creating a template that may be difficult to change once in use. And it may be that minor variations in different lists are preferred, like leaving out the designation column if only one grade is listed - in which case a template my need a show=yes/no option which is harder to code. Once a layout is tested the template can be written to match it. EdwardUK (talk) 22:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Evening Ed, The only thing about the latest change is it seems to have made the images very small. It could be looking at it on the iPad, but I don’t have the same issue with Monmouthshire Grade I’s, for example. Any ideas? KJP1 (talk) 17:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It may just be due to device settings as they all appear correct on my laptop. None of the changes should have had any impact on the images which are all set to a default size, and the coding for the parks template is the same as the listed buildings template which has not been altered. EdwardUK (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - it'll be me. If I have a chance tomorrow, I'll look at flipping the data over. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 18:08, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Registered historic parks and gardens in Caerphilly County Borough is a lovely page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Good work! Nizil (talk) 08:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Registered historic parks and gardens in Carmarthenshire is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:24, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Registered historic parks and gardens in Ceredigion is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EdwardUK. Thank you for your work on Registered historic parks and gardens in Gwynedd. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice job on the article. Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EdwardUK. Thank you for your work on Register of Landscapes of Historic Interest in Wales. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 03:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Second that! An excellent list and a great contribution to Welsh coverage. KJP1 (talk) 05:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right, see User_talk:Mattythewhite#User:HazemGM for a bit more info between a couple of users participating there. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 19:35, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Conway (artist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 00:52, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ann Jago is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Jago until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dazzling4 (talk) 16:20, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please tell me why I keep getting removed as Kyle’s partner I know you didn’t do it this time but someone keeps removing me. I am doing an article on Sunday with a paper I hope that finally sorts this out. My documents are a Police Report saying we shared the same address. His death certificate shows I am/was his de facto. I put the reference in which you saw. I don’t know how Wiki works properly but people just can’t remove me. What do you suggest I do please? Mel666A (talk) 09:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mel666A It was most likely removed by the other editor because they could not find any mention of it in the "cult hero" article, and the problem with the "Births, Death and Marriages" citation is that, as the source document is not online, it is difficult for other editors to verify what it contains. For more about this see Wikipedia:Verifiability. If the information is also mentioned in another website or newspaper report then this would be a better source to use, or if none can be found it may be best to wait until the paper publishes its article which can then be used as a citation. This page: Wikipedia:Citing sources, will be useful for how to a citation, but it could also be worth looking at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest as it may be better to place and edit request on the article talk page. EdwardUK (talk) 16:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EdwardUK. Thank you for your work on 2022 York City Knights season. Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Well done on a comprehensive and well-referenced start to the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 14:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2012 Huddersfield Giants season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kyle Wood.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EdwardUK!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your update here, Cadw/ICOMOS Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest in Wales which has led me to do this, Welsh National and Universal Mining Disaster Memorial Garden. Rather like the maintenance of this, Forth Bridge we have set ourselves a never-ending task! KJP1 (talk) 09:15, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good work with the article – a quick check of the Cadw list showed something was missing – it looks like the lists of scheduled monuments could also do with an update, but sorting these might take a bit longer. EdwardUK (talk) 13:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Interested in having a chat with fellow Wikipedians? There's a meetup in Leeds on Saturday 4th May 2024, at the Tiled Hall Café at Leeds Central Library.

Full details here.

You're receiving this one-off message as you're either a member of WikiProject Yorkshire, you've expressed an interest in a previous Leeds meetup years ago, or (for about 4 of you), we've met :)

I plan to organise more in future, so if you'd like to be notified next time, please say so over on the meetup page.

Please also invite any Wikimedia people you know (or have had wiki dealings with) – spread the word! Hope to see you there.

Jonathan Deamer (talk)

20:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for you edit on RLI season 2022. You archived the only links.

Did you just see if IA had these pages archived or is there a way to get IA to archive them for you. Its just that i find there coverage doesnt cover everythign i want.

Eleutherius (talk) 10:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fortunately, these pages had already been archived, otherwise I could have tried adding them using the "save page now" option (on the main page of web.archive.org, or on the "web" tab of archive.org). EdwardUK (talk) 16:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 196 – August 2024

The August 2024 issue of the Project Newsletter is now available.

11:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 197 – September 2024

The September 2024 issue of the Project Newsletter is now available.

21:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your edit of the lead section. You've saved me a lot of time!John Desmond (talk) 10:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 198 – October 2024

The October 2024 issue of the Project Newsletter is now available.

11:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)