User talk:Ealdgyth/Archive 60

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ealdgyth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

We'd like to invite you to participate in a user study closely related to SuggestBot. User:Another Article is seeking to understand more about the workflow and time commitment of contributors to the English Wikipedia. As part of this study you will occasionally be prompted to answer questions about your editing activity, and these questions should never take more than a minute or two to complete. The intended length of the study is two weeks, but your actual time commitment is totally up to you. If you would like to see more details you can read the project proposal at Research:Measuring editor time commitment and workflow (on meta), but if you are feeling bold and would like just like to sign up right now you can add the line importScript("User:Another_Article/workflowstudyclient.js"); to your common.js. Contact User:Another Article if you have any questions about this study!

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
106		Rebadging (talk)						Add sources
128		Morpeth, Northumberland (talk)						Add sources
32		World Matchplay (darts) (talk)						Add sources
52		Construct state (talk)						Add sources
126		Sweyn II of Denmark (talk)						Add sources
273		Eadwig (talk)						Add sources
107		Council of Clermont (talk)						Cleanup
4,722		Jerusalem (talk)						Cleanup
849		Edward Said (talk)						Cleanup
33		Religious image (talk)						Expand
289		Film distribution (talk)						Expand
393		Invasions of the British Isles (talk)						Expand
15		Sibyl de Neufmarché (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
4,571		Somalia (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
433		Horse breeding (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
24		Flavus, brother of Arminius (talk)						Merge
571		Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy (talk)						Merge
27		Flavus (son of Segimerus) (talk)						Merge
196		Fancy mouse (talk)						Wikify
1,779		Viking Age (talk)						Wikify
7		Mærwynn (talk)						Wikify
6		4shbab (talk)						Orphan
4		Abe Mizet II (talk)						Orphan
3		Amrit, Egypt (talk)						Orphan
40		Minerve, Hérault (talk)						Stub
17		Wyszków (talk)						Stub
7		Katharine Keats-Rohan (talk)						Stub
8		Jarrow Hall (talk)						Stub
12		David Bates (historian) (talk)						Stub
9		12 cm felthaubits/m32 (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at Battle of Hastings. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. The Parson's Cat (talk) 20:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

It's a featured article and the edit wasn't backed up by the given sources. I've explained in great detail why the totality of the edit wasn't good. It's also good to note that I wasn't the only one reverting the edit. Ealdgyth - Talk 20:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence talk:Battle of Hastings. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. The Parson's Cat (talk) 22:48, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Since all the messages dealt exclusively with my own behavior and looking for help in expressing my viewpoint ... I don't think I need to worry. Asking for help with my own behavior is an acceptable reason to post about something. Ealdgyth - Talk 00:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Um Parsonscat< you need to go read WP:DTTR. Montanabw^(talk) 02:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Battle of Hastings#Dispute30Sep2016. The Parson's Cat (talk) 07:46, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi V, here's another one of your FAC nominations at TFA, I'm working on the TFA text now. - Dank (push to talk) 19:56, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

We'd like to invite you to participate in a user study closely related to SuggestBot. User:Another Article is seeking to understand more about the workflow and time commitment of contributors to the English Wikipedia. As part of this study you will occasionally be prompted to answer questions about your editing activity, and these questions should never take more than a minute or two to complete. The intended length of the study is two weeks, but your actual time commitment is totally up to you. If you would like to see more details you can read the project proposal at Research:Measuring editor time commitment and workflow (on meta), but if you are feeling bold and would like just like to sign up right now you can add the line importScript("User:Another_Article/workflowstudyclient.js"); to your common.js. Contact User:Another Article if you have any questions about this study!

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
488		Style of the British sovereign (talk)						Add sources
409		Robert Curthose (talk)						Add sources
415		Malcolm III of Scotland (talk)						Add sources
9		Wigbert (talk)						Add sources
533		Kingdom of Northumbria (talk)						Add sources
318		Harold Harefoot (talk)						Add sources
478		Danger Zone (song) (talk)						Cleanup
547		Edgar the Peaceful (talk)						Cleanup
25		History of the English fiscal system (talk)						Cleanup
24		1060s (talk)						Expand
2,701		Antisemitism (talk)						Expand
3,416		Achaemenid Empire (talk)						Expand
426		Rule of Saint Benedict (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
611		English longbow (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
429		Longbow (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
83		Proto-Indo-European homeland (talk)						Merge
572		Proto-Indo-Europeans (talk)						Merge
40		Mongol raids into Palestine (talk)						Merge
21		Designation card (talk)						Wikify
4		H. P. R. Finberg (talk)						Wikify
2,225		Umayyad Caliphate (talk)						Wikify
2		Arturo López Castro (talk)						Orphan
2		Aleksandr Kucheryavenko (talk)						Orphan
3		A. J. T. Johnsingh (talk)						Orphan
10		Jan Smit (physicist) (talk)						Stub
5		Robert Gilbert (bishop) (talk)						Stub
5		Brihthelm (bishop of London) (talk)						Stub
62		Edwin, Earl of Mercia (talk)						Stub
16		John Fordham (bishop) (talk)						Stub
6		Verfeil, Haute-Garonne (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Screen Shot 2016-10-14 at 9.31.01 AM.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I was making some changes and I see you've reverted some so I thought I'd pop here to explain. The verb "to come" is defined as follows: move or travel towards or into a place thought of as near or familiar to the speaker. Using "came to" implies that the author (or reader) is familliar with the place in question. This is an international encyclopedia so it makes more sense to use a different verb. For example, if I said that "Peter came to London in 1921" and "Peter went to London in 1921", the first implies that either I (and sometimes the reader) is familiar with Londong. The second is more neutral and removes any such implication. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 13:26, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

I do not see or know of any such distinction in American English - see dictionary.com nor does that definition appear in the Random House dictionary. Nor does this distinction appear in the Oxford English Dictionary edition which I own. And since both of the articles on which I reverted were copy-edited by British residents ... I'm pretty sure if they had concerns about this usage, they would have changed it. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

If is often not explicitly pointed out in dictionaries but the examples usually make it clear. Nevertheless I have managed to find this OED definition (which includes examples) and it states as the primary definition (and not a more esoteric usage) "Move or travel towards or into a place thought of as near or familiar to the speaker" which is the context being used in the article. I can see that you've done a lot of editing (fantastic stuff too) on many similar articles so I'll leave it with you. It is a teeny point in any case. Just something that niggles me :-) but I'll get over it. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
27,656		Ronald Reagan (talk)						Add sources
106		Narrative art (talk)						Add sources
16		Clement Mary Hofbauer (talk)						Add sources
9,552		Roman Empire (talk)						Add sources
3,176		Rodney King (talk)						Add sources
303		Features of the Marvel Universe (talk)						Add sources
5		2015 US Open – Women's Singles Qualifying (talk)						Cleanup
103		Statistics education (talk)						Cleanup
6,531		Iraq War (talk)						Cleanup
8		Charentais horse (talk)						Expand
47,623		United States (talk)						Expand
4,451		Houston (talk)						Expand
412		Cheltenham Town F.C. (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
764		Cannabis strains (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
52		Modernism in the Catholic Church (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
240		Alonzo Harris (talk)						Merge
40		Thetes (talk)						Merge
1,670		Progressive rock (talk)						Merge
50		Iraq Stock Exchange (talk)						Wikify
6		Post Mart (talk)						Wikify
481		Shaanxi (talk)						Wikify
6		Collationes in Hexaemeron (talk)						Orphan
4		Craticula (talk)						Orphan
4		Stilus (talk)						Orphan
42		Ronald Blair (talk)						Stub
14		Christopher Gravett (talk)						Stub
2		Lina Sjöberg (talk)						Stub
23		Roger de Breteuil, 2nd Earl of Hereford (talk)						Stub
5		Villefranque, Hautes-Pyrénées (talk)						Stub
8		Oenothera caespitosa (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:49, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

The final round of the 2016 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2016 WikiCup top three finalists:

• First Place - Cas Liber (submissions)
• Second Place - MPJ-DK (submissions)
• Third Place - Adam Cuerden (submissions)

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

• Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a three-way tie with themselves for two FAs in each of R2, R3, and R5).
• Good Article – MPJ-DK had 14 GAs promoted in R3.
• Featured List – Calvin999 (submissions) produced 2 FLs in R2
• Featured Pictures – Adam Cuerden restored 18 images to FP status in R4.
• Featured Portal – SSTflyer (submissions) produced the only FPO of the Cup in R2.
• Featured Topic – Cyclonebiskit (submissions) and Calvin were each responsible for one FT in R3 and R2, respectively.
• Good Topic – MPJ-DK created a GT with 9 GAs in R5.
• Did You Know – MPJ-DK put 53 DYKs on the main page in R4.
• In The News – Dharmadhyaksha (submissions) and Muboshgu (submissions), each with 5 ITN, both in R4.
• Good Article Review – MPJ-DK completed 61 GARs in R2.

Over the course of the 2016 WikiCup the following content was added to Wikipedia (only reporting on fixed value categories): 17 Featured Articles, 183 Good Articles, 8 Featured Lists, 87 Featured Pictures, 40 In The News, and 321 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2017 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup Greetings, all! We would like to announce the start of the 4th GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Thus far, there have been three GA Cups, which were successful in reaching our goals of significantly reducing the traditionally long queue at GAN, so we're doing it again. Currently, there are over 400 nominations listed. We hope that we can again make an impact this time. The 4th GA Cup will begin on November 1, 2016. Four rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on February 28, 2017), but this may change based on participant numbers. We may take a break in December for the holidays, depending on the results of a poll of our participants taken shortly after the competition begins. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same, as will the scoring. Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on November 14, 2016. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now! If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges. Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. We apologize for the delay in sending out this message until after the competition has started. Thank you to Krishna Chaitanya Velaga for aiding in getting this message out. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)