User talk:Europrobe

Hello there Daniel, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or drop me a line. Cheers! --maveric149

Hi, welcome to the pedia. Ericd 11:14 Apr 18, 2003 (UTC)

Hi, since you're interested in military subjects, you might like to take a look at at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military if you haven't seen it already, as a way to organize multiple articles about military organizations. For instance, each branch of the Swedish armed forces deserves its own article, and similarly for units within each branch (as a non-Swedish reader, www.mil.se is pretty hard for me to understand :-) ). Stan 22:14 Apr 18, 2003 (UTC)

Det var inte jag som bytte namn på den, men jag fullföljde händelsevis namnbytet genom att ändra alla referenser till den. Jag vet att den används även på land men: 1) den heter örlogsflagga och även om "örlog" ursprungligen var synonymt med krig förknippas det främst med sjöstridskrafter; 2) det nya filnamnet är mer enhetligt och i linje med andra motsvarande flaggor och 3) det är bara ett filnamn - det viktiga är att flaggan får rätt beskrivning på sin artikelsida.

Kanske får ett namnbyte till göras, men i så fall inte tillbaka till Swedish-War-Flag.svg, utan kanske till Military_Flag_of_Sweden.svg eller Flag_of_Sweden_(military).svg, beroende på vad som bäst stämmer med namngivningsriktlinjerna.

Magnus Holmgren 07:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:OPEC-reserves.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Iorsh (talk) 08:48, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daniel. Thanks for contributing to Solid-state drive‎#Microsoft Windows and exFAT. I think there was some misunderstanding about the terms so I have reverted your last edit and given a detailed response to your helpful comments on the Talk page. Hope that's OK. Richardguk (talk) 04:53, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Europrobe, I came across the nomination you created in 2010 and noticed that it wasn't transcluded per due process onto the FPC page, hence received no feedback, so listed it now. Cheers, --ELEKHH^T 02:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Yeah, I wondered why nothing seemed to happen with that nomination. Oh well, the pic is still as good, I would say. europrobe (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Europrobe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Hello, Europrobe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Missingno.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SnorlaxMonster 13:53, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]