User talk:Dorrough618

Hello, Dorrough618, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to 2020 AFF Championship knockout stage seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 09:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dorrough618! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Kostas Frantzeskos

added a link pointing to Ray McKinnon

Saturation diving

added a link pointing to Equilibrium

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dorrough618, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page 2020–21 South African Premier Division did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Greenman (talk) 09:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you recently removed content from Princess Shova Shahi of Nepal without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 10:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Adakiko (talk) 10:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 AFF Championship Group B, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nguyễn Văn Toàn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add a picture of this animal in it's page? The old one is outdated not allowed to use elsewhere. It'd be a great help if u can. Thank u Ishan87 (talk) 13:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Country data VShojo has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:04, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Country data VShojo. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jane Shore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taper.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Nehme1499. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2021 FIFA Arab Cup knockout stage have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 12:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ibrahim Hazzazi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Ittihad Club.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ayman Alkurd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 02:06, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sweden national football team. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 09:13, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at India, you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Geoffrey Kizito. GiantSnowman 08:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GiantSnowman 17:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dorrough618 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I just want to edit again. Dorrough618 (talk) 08:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 08:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Geoffrey Kizito. GiantSnowman 16:41, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Andressinha. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. BigDom (talk) 09:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Per WP:NOTBROKEN [[Centre-back]] and [[right-back]] are to be preferred over [[Defender (association football)|centre-back]] and [[Defender (association football)|right-back]]. Also, going forward please be sure to use an Help:Edit summary to make it easier for other editors to understand your changes. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 07:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Then why don't you look at your spelling first? "Centre-back" is spelled with a dash!" Please stay WP:CIVIL. Like you I prefer the spelling with the hyphen but both spellings are valid. Thanks for improving the wording at Mark De Man. Robby.is.on (talk) 08:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. Dorrough618 (talk) 10:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTBROKEN also applies to linking "striker": [[striker (association football)|striker]] is preferable over [[forward (association football)|striker]]. I've fixed this at Michael Chopra. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2010 Gwangju Sangmu FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim Bum-soo (footballer).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:44, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thanks for improving Ronaldo (Brazilian footballer). Please be aware of MOS:OVERLINK which says to not link "names of subjects with which most readers will be at least somewhat familiar", for example countries like the United States. I have removed the link at Ronaldo (Brazilian footballer). Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 08:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In your change you added Zimbabwe; I don't know your reasoning, but short description is simply a navigation aid for mobile devices, therefore it's not necessary to add a 1980s name change, IMO. Incidentally, I see you made minor changes to Isle of Man (probaby I wrote it) - in 1980 I met a young lady in IoM who'd left her home country, not wanting to stay on under the then-new regime, and was travelling the world. A couple of months earlier I briefly worked for a man who had two nephew/niece wards, whose farmer parents had been butchered (machetes - the kids told me). They escaped as they were at boarding school. Thanks for the memories! rgds,--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 12:41, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bro... Dorrough618 (talk) 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm StartOkayStop. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dahomey without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. StartOkayStop (talk) 04:38, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. You see, there existed two states called "Dahomey", one was a kingdom and the other was a republic. Both of them are now part of modern Benin. People often confuse these two Dahomeys and think that only the kingdom or the republic was the true Dahomey. So, I decided to make the "Dahomey" page a disambiguation page, saying that it may refer to either the kingdom or the republic, to avoid future confusions. Dorrough618 (talk) 04:52, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Michel Dussuyer. GiantSnowman 09:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arteaga (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jorge Arteaga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm FunIsOptional. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pau FC without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fun Is Optional (talk) 06:07, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do anything wrong, mate. I just removed these sections because they have nothing to do with the club at all.

Dorrough618 (talk) 06:10, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Sections don't look 100% relevant but instead of removing them, please create a discussion on the talk page to gather consensus on removing them. Thanks! Fun Is Optional (talk) 06:14, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pau FC, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Fun Is Optional (talk) 06:11, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FunIsOptional: Content removal is legitimate if it is policy-based. Dorrough618 should have explained in their edit summary the first time they removed the content. "BECAUSE IT HAS NO RELATION TO THE CLUB" is a proper explanation but all caps are not great for a WP:CIVIL exchange between editors. FunIsOptional, you twice reverted with the edit summary "section blanking". That would be suitable for obvious vandalism but at least the second time, when Dorrough618 gave an explanation, a policy-based explanation would have been appropriate.

I have re-removed the content per WP:UNDUE. Large parts are at best tangentially related. We should look into reinstating parts that are relevant. Robby.is.on (talk) 08:40, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Sweden women's national football team, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 07:40, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User:Apex Predator Gura, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue to harass other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Creating other user's userpages with "User:Dorrough618/Hololive Production" to call them a simp is harassment, and creating pages without their expressed consent violates their freedom of speech. DO NOT DO IT AGAIN. Zinnober9 (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Zinnober9 I dont think what @Dorrough618said was harassment, maybe only the fool part but I dont mind looking like one so its fine. I also do not mind if they create page on my profile, they have permission to do so as of this post (=^ ◡ ^=) thank you! Apex Predator Gura (talk) 16:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Oozora Subaru requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G3, created by another user in attempt to harrass this user

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zinnober9 (talk) 05:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Um... Excuse me, but what happened in here? Why are you tagging me on this user's page talk? Oozora Subaru (talk) 15:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Ency234 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G3, created by another user in attempt to harrass this user

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zinnober9 (talk) 05:11, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:00, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dorrough618,

What were you thinking, creating User pages for other editors against their wishes? I can not think of a valid reason for you to create these pages. This is vandalism and another editor saw it as harassment. Once your block is over, please refrain from taking things personally and going after other editors like this. You really need to act in a more mature manner than calling other editors "simps". If you want to use this userbox on your own page, go ahead but don't place it on other editor's pages. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:04, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Why did you make this change? It doesn't seem true because most of the sources online including FIFA Technical Study draw Moroccan defensive lineup for this match as 2-4-5-3 (RB-CB-CB-LB). The footage of the game proves that the players were placed on the field this way and not the way you specified. What source did you rely on? Algorus (talk) 18:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Country data Hololive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. V27t (talk) 19:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m professional football player in Cambodia. Actually I need your help to make my Wikipedia page. I will give you my sample of my sandbox. I hope you see it, thank you for your contribute.

rim soheng

Rim Soheng​ (born 8 May 2004), is a Cambodian football player currently playing as a centerback for Angkor tiger football club in the Cambodian League, and the Cambodia national team.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.gofootballtogo.com/team/cambodia-u16/24105/ https://globalsportsarchive.com/people/ Rim soheng (talk) 15:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dorrough618

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SunDawn, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Thanouthong Kietnalonglop, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]