User talk:Discopleasant

Talkpage archive

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Talk page:

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Forums, NYP, DailyWire, all cannot be used to source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whatever (channel) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 22:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Discopleasant! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 22:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll see to it. Can I resubmit the article again for review once I make the changes? (Discopleasant (talk) 22:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC))[reply]

@Discopleasant yep! Make sure you prove notability under WP:NORG. Qcne (talk) 22:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also recommend a bit of a re-write, as "Since the channel's transition into a podcast it began gaining fast recognition and many clips from its episodes..." isn't very encyclopedic. You need to write neutrally. Qcne (talk) 22:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks. (Discopleasant (talk) 22:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC))[reply]

One question, how many times an I allowed to submit the draft for review? (Discopleasant (talk) 17:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC))[reply]

There isn't a limit on how many times you can re-submit, but after each decline reviewers like to see substantial improvements that have met all the suggestions they've made. If your draft is rejected it means it won't be considered further and you can't re-submit. Happy for you to ping me here and I will have another look at the draft before you submit for review, to do a sort of pre-review. Qcne (talk) 21:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! (Discopleasant (talk) 21:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Btw does someone’s linkedin account count as a reliable source? Probably not but still willing to know. (Discopleasant (talk) 01:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC))[reply]

@Discopleasant depends what you are sourcing - you can use primary sources in a limited way to cite straightforward facts - such as a LinkedIn post stating someone had a new job could be used to cite their employment, but we would prefer secondary sources. Qcne (talk) 07:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. It’s to cite the creator’s current occupation and the info that shows he’s the creator of the channel. (Discopleasant (talk) 17:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Could be okay, check WP:LINKEDIN Qcne (talk) 19:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently I couldn’t link the guy’s linkedin to the official site, but his IG does, so… guess I’m using his IG. (Discopleasant (talk) 01:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC))[reply]

That could work, just use it sparingly! Qcne (talk) 08:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've closed it as it doesn't belong there but I expect the editor will take this to WP:SPI. Doug Weller talk 09:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. And btw, I’m not the sockpuppet the other user is accusing me of being. How accurate are these sockpuppet investigations? (Discopleasant (talk) 15:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Doug I hope everything's alright. Is there a way an admin can confirm that Im not the sockpuppet Barjimoa is accusing me of being, considering he’s already staking my edits and I just wanna get this done with. (Discopleasant (talk) 08:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC))[reply]