User talk:Dijxtra

Archives
July 2005 – December 2005 January 2006 – April 2006 May 2006 – August 2006 September 2006 – June 2007

Thank you for uploading Image:Miso_Kovac.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Videmus Omnia 14:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in the currently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. —Nightstallion 15:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bregovic Redzic Bebek 2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bregovic Islamovic 2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bregovic Islamovic 2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ➪HiDrNick! 05:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bok!

Molio bih te da podržiš moj zahtjev za preimenovanje Republic of Ragusa u Republic of Dubrovnik na en.wiki kao i na ostalim koje nisu talijanske.

Anto

Thanks for uploading Image:Gornji_grad_medvescak_map.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 16:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gornja_dubrava_map.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 16:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You initially posted the page Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect. There is a discussion at its talk page that you may want to participate in. -- Jreferee t/c 22:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 01:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sinjska alka was deleted as a broken redirect under WP:CSD#R1. It pointed to Alka. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, (hope I'm doing this right) I noticed you re-referenced the dates of the Third Wave experiment as 1969. I went to Cubberley during all this, and the Third Wave experiment was in April, 1967. I wasn't in Jones class myself, but I was a photojournalist at the time. I've posted the references to my website www.cubberleycatamount.com with scans from the original articles from the original student paper at Cubberley. I tried to reference these in the wiki article, but I'm not sure if I've got them referenced correctly or not - maybe you can help me fix it up properly, assuming it looks OK to you. There have been a number of articles after this time which have gotten the timeframe wrong, but these dates are confirmed both in the Catamount and in "Hassling", by Sylvia Berry Williams. Jones had left Cubberley (fired and/or resigned - he was supposedly offered another job in the district, but declined it) by June of 1969. Jones did a "United Student Movement" simulation/experiment in December 1967, and an Apartheid "experiment" in 1968 (using the color of hair or eyes or something like that as the discriminator). I hope this is how I'm supposed to communicate one-on-one... if not, sorry(!) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meadowvistan1984 (talk • contribs) 05:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! Thank you for pointing this out, I fixed the error and will take some time to expand the article with references you provided. Thank you very much for this input, and welcome to Wikipedia! --Dijxtra 13:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HDZ also has 67 - it signed a coalition contract with the minority representative from the Mreza romskih udruga. --PaxEquilibrium 09:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the only problem is that minority representative is not 100% sure to enter the parilament :-) See here: [1]. --Dijxtra 09:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, didn't see that. ;) --PaxEquilibrium 11:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found out you excluded Granić and several others from the Mayors of Zagreb category. I also don't think they should be considered real mayors, but I put them in the category because they were in the List of mayors of Zagreb. Could you delete them from that article to avoid additional confusion or set up a seperate list for mayor nominees who failed to become mayors? Thanks. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 20:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed them from the list and pointed to the Zagreb Crisis article which mentions all of those candidates for mayor. --Dijxtra 20:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks Admiral Norton ^(talk) 21:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These articles have to go somewhere, so I put them in their own category - Category:Zagreb Crisis mayors. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 22:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the category to Category:Zagreb Crisis mayor nominees, this would be more precise. --Dijxtra (talk) 22:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...and all the best in the new one!!! --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 00:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Donja dubrava map.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Donji grad map.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baci pogled ovdje. Članci su katastrofa, najradije bih sve predložio za brisanje.

Btw. postoje karte zagrebačkih gradskih četvrti na commonsima, tako da ove na en ne trebaju više. Pozdrav --Suradnik13 (talk) 13:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O, bogek, bogek, ovaj momak se baš raspisao o obavještajnim agencijama... pogledat ću da li se da išta učiniti oko tih članaka pa ću popričati sa tim momkom...

E, a šta se tiče gradskih četvrti, to upravo sređujem pa ću pobrisat ove slike koje sam pokrao sa zagreb.hr :-) --Dijxtra (talk) 12:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dovoljno je pogledat naslov članka Obavestajna Bezbednostna Sluzba, a o sadržaju da i ne govorim. Maltene nam službe ne proganjaju srbe i muslimane, te hrvatsku emigraciju. Pozabavio bih se time ovdje, ali trenutno nemam vremena. Napisao sam članak na hr:wiki, vjerojatno ce ti pomoc. Hvala ti. Pozdrav --Suradnik13 (talk) 12:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Je, vidim da je stanje katastrofalno. Probat ću to uredit danas do neke normalne mjere... Hvala što si mi svrnuo pažnju na to ;-) --Dijxtra (talk) 12:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see you are back indeed! Asterion^talk 21:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

D, could you please check out the Serb propaganda article, Wikipedia:Coatrack and Wikipedia:Content forking and tell me sincerely what you think? Cheers. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 23:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahahaha, I just can't believe they really took time to write all that. Now I see why Duja took the hike :-D Sorry, no way am I touching that can of worms. I just don't have the time and enthusiasm to fight with all that brain damage on Wikipedia. If you see somebody breaking 3RR or doing some obvious vandalism, just drop me a note and I'll nail the guy, but I just don't wish to fight hordes of lunatic ultranationalists anymore. Sorry. --Dijxtra (talk) 23:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I just wanted to hear your opinion, to make sure mine isn't wrong. ;) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 12:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to say hello and to remind you all that Big Brother is watching :-)... Yep, I'm profoundly disgusted with much of WP, especially our corner, and I'm not sure if I'll be ever trully back. I saw the article before, as well as its AfD, which it managed to survive, which didn't raise my enthusiasm about the state of affairs whatsoever... My current favorites include Serbia#World War II and the Serbian genocide, blatant misquote of reputable historian Wilkes at Bosniaks#Overview, and I just saw the Obavestajna Bezbednostna Sluzba linked above, which I couldn't resist to purge. I dare not search for further facts.
PS, Pax, I assume you want ['ʥuraːʥ]?
Ostajte mi zdravi, mladi & lijepi, & nezarazeni cinizmom. Duja► 12:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hoh! Hello Duja! :-) Nice to see that you are among us, at least passively ;-) I hope you'll join us some day again and then we can jointly ignore 90% of Balkans related excrement sometimes referred to as "articles". --Dijxtra (talk) 16:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know that Duja is skilled in this, but since he's out, what is your experience in IPA?

I need it for Djuradj II article. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 14:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for disappointing you again, but I don't have a clue about IPA. But, Fran could help you out, he's a linguist and has some basic knowledge of Bosnian. --Dijxtra (talk) 18:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks.

Na, you'll never be able to disappoint me, nor probably anyone. ;) All the best. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 21:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:10 dinara.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Basic logic gates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Can you help me with this discussion? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Franjo_Tu%C4%91man#Discussion

--Anto (talk) 16:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I came across some Zagreb city district articles and I noticed some items in neighborhood lists unknown to me, e.g. "Stjepan Radić" and "August Cesarec" in Gornji Grad - Medveščak. I grew up in that city district but I'm still unfamiliar with both of these names. Could you please tell me what do these names represent and why are they surrounded by quotes? Admiral Norton ^(talk) 14:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I figured it out (mjesne zajednice). Admiral Norton ^(talk) 18:35, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:20000 dinara.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

• Image:Ante Marković.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tifa Sarajevo 2005.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? mattbr 15:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bregovic Redzic Bebek 2005.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I'd like you to give your opinion here about the request move:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vladimir_Gotovac#Requested_move --Anto (talk) 16:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you related to the Škorić (Nikola also ?? - I don't remember), who was in the Linguistics Department, School of Philosophy, U of Z, in the 60s? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.29.169.227 (talk) 21:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a persian learner?[as a second language] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahrzad hbk (talk • contribs) 07:40, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please support my proposal here! --Admiral Norton ^(talk) 18:34, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Kralj Tomislav.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image with an unknown source or an unknown copyright status which has been tagged as such for more than 7 days, and it still lacks the necessary information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:File:Kralj Tomislav.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. hmwithτ 16:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated List of largest empires, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest empires (4th nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. 3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 13:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Map of Banovina of Croatia.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tifa 02.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:48, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dijxtra! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Sejo Sexon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Petra Kronberger - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:16, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of largest empires, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest empires until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:16, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Island-town requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Colonies Chris (talk) 09:47, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 23:15, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kad bi bio bijelo dugme (front).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hrvåtski. Since you had some involvement with the Hrvåtski redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 05:39, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SockmasterProven has been nominated for merging with Template:Uw-sockblock. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. B dash (talk) 05:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Carlsberg Croatia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 22:14, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Carlsberg Croatia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this company is notable (fails WP:NCOMPANY/GNG).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:51, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Panonska pivovara.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pan (beer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this product passes WP:GNG. BEFORE does not show anything but mentions in passing/press releases.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:21, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pan pivo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 10:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Socksuspectnotice has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:28, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]