User talk:David Blockchain

Hello, I'm SunDawn. Your recent edit to EtherRock appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:28, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message and for pointing out the issue with my recent edit to the EtherRock article. I appreciate your vigilance in maintaining the accuracy of the content. David Blockchain (talk) 13:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Cryptocurrency media. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 00:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man I was checking the same yeah I’m working on it I will build it proper way and then move it back to article space thanks - what’s your name let’s connect tell me more about you? Oh let’s be frens David Blockchain (talk) 13:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, David Blockchain,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Mutahir showkat, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales ^Parley 13:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello user:Joseywales1961,

Thank you for your message and for the guidance on the deletion process. I understand the importance of following Wikipedia’s protocols for article content.

However, I’d like to strongly contest the deletion of the article on Mutahir Showkat. I believe he is indeed notable and meets the criteria for inclusion. Mutahir Showkat has made significant contributions to blockchain, entrepreneurship and photography , and I’m confident that more detailed sources and references can substantiate his notability.

I would like to request a review of this decision, as I believe there might have been some oversight regarding his notability. I’m prepared to provide additional sources and details that highlight his significance and relevance to ensure the article meets Wikipedia’s standards.

Thank you for considering this appeal. I look forward to your guidance on how to proceed with a deletion review or any other steps I need to take.

Best regards,

user:David Blockchain David Blockchain (talk) 13:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SerialNumber54129 13:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification. I appreciate the clarity regarding the administrative ruling and understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia’s policies and standards, especially in sensitive areas like blockchain and cryptocurrencies. I will review the guidance on these sanctions to ensure my contributions remain in line with the expected standards. If I have any questions or need clarification on specific edits, I will definitely reach out for further discussion. Thanks again for the heads-up. David Blockchain (talk) 13:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for violating the policy on the use of multiple accounts. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]