User talk:Chris25689

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Chris25689! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! BilCat (talk) 03:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Belated thank you BilCat!

-Chris25689 (talk) 06:34, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edits on the Space Shuttle page regarding the Lego models of the Space Shuttle. In particular, it looks like there were two issues with the changes you made. First, you replaced a fully fleshed out reference with just a bare URL reference. Per WP:CITEWEB, references should have more information than just a link to the page. Second, the article stated that there was a Lego model of the Space Shuttle, while your changes stated that there were multiple Lego models. The reference you provided still only pointed to a single Lego model, so there needs to be a source pointing to multiple Lego models before that can be in the article. Let me know if you have any questions! It looks like you're relatively new to Wikipedia (at least editing with this username) so welcome! Balon Greyjoy (talk) 09:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay! I would've added more URLs on Lego sets like set numbers 1682 (Legoland) 3367 (City, which I actually have), 6339 (System), 7470 (STS-31 Discovery), 10213 (Adventure), 10231 (Expedition, another set I have), 31066 (Explorer, the reverted URL), and 60080 (Spaceport, the URL I replaced it with); but unfortunately, there aren't any yet and I could only find articles from https://brickipedia.fandom.com (a Fandom website dedicated to Lego sets0 and other shops like Amazon and EBay. Can you help me?

Yes, I'm relatively new to Wikipedia.

-Chris25689 (talk) 06:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately Brickpedia, Ebay, and Amazon are not categorized as a WP:RELIABLE SOURCE, so we cannot use them in an article. Not sure about finding other sources. While I commend your efforts in finding more information, I'm not too concerned about its inclusion in the page (personal opinion only; I'm just one person on the internet) as I don't think the change from one Lego set to multiple Lego sets changes much about the overall information about the Space Shuttle (would be a different case if the page is about Space Shuttle Lego sets). On a side note, it looks like you are manually entering in your signature to posts. You can auto-sign it with your info and date/time by adding (don't include the quotes) "~~~~" at the end of your post. There's even a button to the right of where it says "Sign your posts on talk pages" that you can press to auto insert that. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 07:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chris25689, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Oratio Imperata have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:42, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa, thanks for giving me clarifications on edits. This is a benefit when Wikipedia is edited by many Wikipedians. I was just bumped out by the fact that there are many Oratio Imperata prayers used by Catholics like me in different conflicts, but none haven't been featured yet, especially the first one I put (the one against COVID-19).

-Chris25689 (talk) 14:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Chris25689 (talk) 14:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not for posting your own personal profile (WP:COI).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Chris25689/sandbox/User:Chris25689 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Chris25689/sandbox/User:Chris25689, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris25689! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not submit the sandbox unless it contans a fully-fledged draft which is ready for review. Your userpage exists for you to tell the the community a little about yourself.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Chris25689/sandbox/User:Chris25689 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Chris25689/sandbox/User:Chris25689, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 04:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leo the Lion (MGM), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MGM Grand. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris25689. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Chris25689/sandbox/User:Chris25689, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris25689. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/User:Chris25689".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads more like a fan page and doesn't have critical reception and analysis of significance for the event.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Huling El Bimbo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at [[:Smosh]]. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Unlike Anthony Padilla, Hecox does not seem to have any notability outside of Smosh as a organization.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ian Hecox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#NEWS and Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Huling El Bimbo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:31, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the rejection, Paul Vaurie! I actually want it to be deleted because of the aforementioned reasons. Could it be deleted even before the next 6 months?

-Chris25689 (talk) 10:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris25689. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Huling El Bimbo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chris25689. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Huling El Bimbo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the deletion, but how do you delete drafts even before 6 months?

Chris25689 (talk) 12:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Hecox, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Chris25689:! I would like to thank you for starting a Wikipedia draft on Draft:St. Joseph Shrine (Cubao, Quezon City), I added some information and sources that could help in drafting this page. You may take a look at the changes. You may reply to my message if you may have some clarifications. I am happy to help. Maraming salamat po.

Hello again, @Chris25689:! I recently saw your conversation with Ca in her Talk page. Regarding the draft's rejection. Yup, it is really hard to find some independent or reliable sources aside from the Facebook page. I would like to let you know that I am happy to know that you are somehow related to the subject because I am also related to the shrine. Also, although I created my user account long time ago, I am still not familiar with the process of Wikipedia Article creation unlike you. I appreciate your effort. Keep it up. God bless you.

Thank you so much, @LPH3RD:! As of now though, I'm not dedicating that much time to edit the draft, yet it's very cool to know that you're also related to the shrine!

Hello, Chris25689. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reunions of the Eraserheads, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]