User talk:Chemical Engineer

You have been invited to join the WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort focused on improving Wikipedia's coverage of Engineering. If you'd like to join, just add your name to the member list. Thanks for reading!

Would you please add some image in Chemical engineering. I've added an image from another article. As you are professional engineer please try to expand the article. Thank you. Tanvir che (talk) 17:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because chemical engineering covers such a vast range and is actually an abstract (we design processes, other people make the objects which operate the processes) I have some difficulty in thinking what would be suitable. For personal reasons, I do not wish to make use of images from my professional work. Chemical Engineer (talk) 18:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do any of your sources explain just why the hospital was named after St James? (Was it a local church? Which of the umpteen Saints? etc!). Just wondered if you might know as you've just added to the article. Cheers, PamD (talk) 16:03, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet. I have only had a quick delve in the library while shopping. I plan to do some more Leeds local history this Summer. Chemical Engineer (talk) 16:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And as you will see, I have now found who the two Jimmies were and added this to the article. Chemical Engineer (talk) 19:41, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added refs to the relevant articles, showing that Adamiecki was indeed the originator of an idea. It just goes to underline that if you don't publish in English (or at least German or French), you might as well not bother... (see also Michał Kalecki for another example).--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Przepraszam,

I believe you are confusing priority with cause. The Michał Kalecki page is also special pleading rather than NPOV. What tends to happen is that at a certain stage in culture, different people have similar ideas because they are looking at the same problem. Do your reference books specifically state how Henry Gantt got to hear of Adamiecki's unpublished work and then stole it? If so, it is legitimate to say the Gantt chart is a modified Harmonogram. If they just assert it or note it was around earlier, then it is a slander on Gantt. I was about to write (based on the Marsh article which I have) what the harmonogram was and how it was superior, but I don't think I'll bother now. (And why does the Polish Wikipedia not have a decent article on the harmonogram?)Chemical Engineer (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can read the linked book excerpts yourself (I have provided Google Book links to specific pages) and decide whether they support this formulation (as I believe they do). I have used English sources, I could look for some Polish ones that may go into the details (and I have not bothered with Google Scholar yet, but I can, if you want me to). Why is Polish Wiki worse? Well, it has fewer editors to work on it. PS. I have c/e the articles; it is indeed not correct to imply any form of plagiarism with the refs at hand. What they do support is that Adamiecki invented the idea but did not popularize it in the West. It is not clear whether Gantt knew of Adamiecki's work or not (it would be interesting to go to his publications and look whether he mentions Adamiecki anywhere), but he popularized it and it is attributed to him.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't agree. They indicate independent invention on the pages you cite. Only the first reference (is the author by any chance of Polish origin?) in any way asserts they are the same, but does not give a reason on the page you cite. I stand by my statement that (for the purposes of an encylopedia entry) the most which can be confidently said is that the Harmonogram is similar to the Gantt chart.Chemical Engineer (talk) 21:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to rewrite the sections, we will see if it is better. Also, if you do create the article on harmonogram, we can see if it is a better invention than the Gantt chart or not.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Arthur B. Metzner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 23:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined the speedy deletion - Notability of the academic was asserted. Nice job. Toddst1 (talk) 23:06, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

oh sorry about that. i assumed the photo had been removed for valid reasons, i should have looked into it properly. xxx Jessi1989 (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing this image. Your nuisance edits are tantamount to vandalism. Please consider before doing so that placing the photograph on the right hand side, in general text would upset the page layout. If you prefer it in the box of images at the bottom then please move it there, rather then remove it altogeter. Surely if this was the case, then the chuch in the history section should also be relocated to the religion section. Mtaylor848 (talk) 17:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have placed a picture of Street Lane as the main image of a section marked "History". It has no particular relevance and provides no added value to the section. I appreciate your enthusiasm for North Leeds, but think you are being impolite to call my edits nuisance and vandalism.

The building of St John's Church was an important part of the history of the area, and illustrates the adjacent text. Churches are facts in history, and I support the Wikipedia NPOV.Chemical Engineer (talk) 17:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I would agree with you that the church is a historical building, surely it has to be linked in for a reason. If you prefer the picture elsewhere there is a gallery at the bottom. Considering Street Lane is Roundhay's main street, and besides the park and mansion, the shops on it are probably its best known buildings, a photograph of them is surely required to enhance the article. Ideally the photograph would be put on the right under the info box, but this would disorientate the layout (as is a problem with many pages). The picture could be moved to the top and placed on the left, alternatively it could be put in the info box and the park picture tied in with the park section. Mtaylor848 (talk) 18:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The picture of the church of St John is adjacent to text about its construction and effect on the area, which was considerable. Your picture of Street Lane you have put adjacent to text about the Doomsday book. Which is more appropriate?Chemical Engineer (talk)

Thanks for uploading File:HowToBeAnAlien.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Chemical Engineer (talk) 22:27, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chemical Engineer.

As requested, I've had a go at expanding the article but it's mostly from memory as I've recently moved and haven't unpacked my copy yet. Regards, Ian Dunster (talk) 11:07, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion regarding splitting of the Leeds article. As you were involved in the previous merge discussion you might be interested in this. Quantpole (talk) 22:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your work. On Foyers, a question. Is Aleister Crowley's old hiomestead within the Village limits now? In his time it lay two miles outside of the Village, but I don't know if it has expanded. Thanks, Aleister Wilson (talk) 23:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding this further reading link - any chance you have access to the article and could incorporate the text into our bio? Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 21:43, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have not got time at the moment but put it there in case anyone else has access and the time. Otherwise I will get round to it eventually. Chemical Engineer (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chemical Engineer! The Old Malvernians/alumnae section that you contributed to in Malvern College finally got so long that it had to be split off into a separate list page. In doing so, it's been found that for many of those noble people there is no actual proof that they ever went to the school. However, they probably did, and the entries were made in good faith. Nevertheless, the rules require everything in the encyclopedia to be verifiably sourced. It would be great therefore, if you could take a look at the list and help out if you can with providing some references. The people all have their own Wiki articles, but it is no guarantee that the mentions of Malvern College (if any) are correctly cited. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in your edit here you say that EMT are to apply again for planning permission for the ticket barriers, but the reference you quoted does not mention this. Do you have a sufficient reference? Regards, Schumi555 21:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected the link. Chemical Engineer (talk) 23:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. Schumi555 10:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of Mensans, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. 71.166.152.95 (talk) 17:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who you are, but Jack Cohen is said to be a Mensan in his article, as with others in the list. I see no reason to duplicate the reference.Chemical Engineer (talk) 18:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is Verifiability ... just because someone "is said to be a Mensan in their article" is insufficient ... you need to quote a Reliable source for this kind of thing every place that it is mentioned because of Biographies of living persons ... see here and here for some history of this article (my comments from 2007). As for who I am, follow the prominent links on my User and Talk pages to User:The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome ... now you know more about me than I know about you, as if that means anything here. — 71.166.152.95 (talk) 20:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. We have a lot in common. Age for one. Chemical Engineer (talk) 17:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thanks for tidying up my recent edits to the Arthur Dehon Little article. The Servos article on the history of Chemical Engineering at MIT 1900-1939 was interesting and pertinent to Little, so that's why I added it. A good read. Bests. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc (talk) 20:41, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 19:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The misguided editor who moved the article to a "correct" title did the same for a Dublin hospital St James's Hospital. I'd like to WP:AGF, but that requires that we assume a stubborn refusal to recognise that all previous editors to the articles were getting it right! I've stuck a note into the article text of each of them, to try to dissuade similar moves in future. Sorry about the duplicated ref - thanks for tidying it up. PamD (talk) 21:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Herbert McLeod, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Herbert McLeod invented the McLeod gauge? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Not one of the most surprising DYKs.Chemical Engineer (talk) 20:52, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not asking you, but I was amazed that the article is that short and no image of the McLeod gauge. My boss showed me one and he said: This is a McLeod gauge!! And you know we have two of them! Making fun of the "There can be only one," catch phrase of Highlander (film).--Stone (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There was an article about the gauge with a picture, so I thought it worthwhile having one about the inventor. As there is a separate article, I did not think it worth having the picture here as well. What would be nice would be a picture of Herbert.Chemical Engineer (talk) 22:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Lord Mayor of Leeds , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. LNWWatcher (talk) 15:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, with regard to this deletion, you might be misunderstanding the extent of the {{alumni}} template. This is not just a question of notability but also whether these people really are verifiable as alumni. The blue linked articles may or may not be for the right person intended, their associated citations and article titles may change over time and so currently or in the future they might have no references that confirm whether they are an alumnus. See the guidance of WP:NLIST and the essay at User:Fæ/Alumni. Unless there is a clear rationale as to why this article might be an exception I propose the template is re-added with its original date. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 13:45, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bingham1a.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 05:31, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! For reasons I don't really understand, I seem to have gone off on a tangent and involved myself with ATSE and FTSE. If you feel you can add some value to these pages, and would enjoy doing so, please "go for it"! I'm about to ramp down my interaction and go back to my "normal" domain. However, should you so wish, and you feel you'd like assistance, please don't hesitate to solicit my help. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help - it is appreciated. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 06:53, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for ‘reducing’ my opinion statements.

1. Would you consider re-inserting the word ‘rare’. Two of the surnames in question were ‘Sacret’ and ‘Honeybone’. I suggest that both these names are unquestionably rare; and that their selection by Rudkin must have been deliberate, thereby justifying the use of the word ‘rare’. What do you think?

2. "Coe (OE c1972-1979) has said that he has set out to geographically identify Birmingham as a specific place, something which he claims is never done in English literature for places other than London". This comes from a published interview with Coe some time ago; regrettably I can no long locate it. Flying Stag (talk) 19:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CE, I just reviewed your DYK nomination. There are some issues that need to be addressed before it could be passed. Thank you, --Al Ameer son (talk) 23:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lesley Yellowlees, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Lesley Yellowlees is the first female president of the Royal Society of Chemistry and is the subject of two portraits in the National Portrait Gallery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lesley Yellowlees. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 00:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to and co-operation with the BGS articles - especially images. I was hoping to get down there this coming weekend to take some photographs when there is nobody around but, of course, am not sure if I will make it or the weather will be helpful and photogenic. As mentioned on my user page, I'm not well-placed for referencing at present but hope to be able to access my books again soon; in the meantime, do please continue to chip in anything that is better than I can find online. Having "been bold" and separated these articles, I'm keen they should both work! Misha An interested observer of this and that 23:33, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see what the problem was either; the new photographs are certainly an improvement. Thanks for your trouble.Misha An interested observer of this and that 14:12, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chemical Engineer, Apologies for reverting you a few days ago - Not sure why there was no edit summary but basically I hadn't realised you were the photographer of the 2 you were replacing and unfortunately many photographers here tend to replace images with theirs and their images usully aren't an an improvement over the previous ones but anyway had I known you were the photographer I wouldn't of reverted but anyway just wanted to apologise for that,
Happy editing :), –Davey2010^Talk 22:06, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies accepted. I agree with your general observation on replacing images.Chemical Engineer (talk)

Hello! Your submission of Tuzex at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:05, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:04, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Public Space Protection Order—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WPCW (talk • contribs) 12:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Tuzex at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:31, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:04, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– Ianblair23 (talk) 01:18, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Hull and East Riding Museum at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:14, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:03, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kindness in adding the Genuine Yorkshire Rose label to my talk page - BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:54, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was very well deserved. Chemical Engineer (talk) 11:01, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:17, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
	Hi Chemical Engineer, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia,    –Davey2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 19:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Chemical Engineer, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 05:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

The Images of England web site is to be decommissioned this month by Historic England. The text of the site entries has been available on the corresponding National Heritage List entry since that web site was created. The images are being transferred ahead of the decommissioning. As a result of this a BOT has changed all {{IoE}} templates to {{NHLE}} templates and translated the reference number according to a list provided by Historic England.

It would be good if members could check these, when they come across them, as I have spotted one with an incorrect translation. Some articles already had {{NHLE}} templates in them so the references may need to be combined. Other changes that may need to be performed are removal of template or text referring to the site as needing registration, changing the text "Images of England" or "IoE" to something more appropriate or may be even removing it if it is part of the description..

WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project

The August 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.

Month	Dates	Article(s)
		B class choice	Start class choice
112	1 Apr 2019 ~ 30 Apr 2019	Ilkley Roman Fort	VolkerRail
113	1 May 2019 ~ 31 May 2019	James Milner	Walkington
114	1 Jun 2019 ~ 30 Jun 2019	North Yorkshire Moors Railway	X+Y
115	1 Jul 2019 ~ 31 Jul 2019	Death of David Oluwale	Yorkshire Wildlife Park
116	1 Aug 2019 ~ 31 Aug 2019	Amy Johnson	Zetland Hotel

Please nominate future articles for improvement at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire.

Please bear in mind...

The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

• Monitoring is essential
  Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

• Moves
  Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.

|} |}

01:43, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

	Merry Christmas Chemical Engineer
	Hi Chemical Engineer, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year,    –Davey2010talk 00:35, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:07, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry Christmas Chemical Engineer
	Hi Chemical Engineer, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,    –Davey2010Talk 19:42, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 157 - May 2021 April issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Welcome to the one hundred and fifty seventh WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter. Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,840 last month to 16,854 on 29 April 2021). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 202 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 80 while WP:GM has 70 out of a total number of 4,654 articles. Currently we have sixty three Yorkshire featured articles: Henry Moore • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • History of Sheffield • York City F.C. • Joseph Priestley • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • Valley Parade • William Wilberforce • History of Bradford City A.F.C. • Last of the Summer Wine • Ealdred (archbishop of York) • Paulinus of York • Wilfrid • HMS Endeavour • Cosmo Gordon Lang • Thomas of Bayeux • Cottingley Fairies • Wilfred Rhodes • Guy Fawkes • Yorkshire captaincy affair of 1927 • Roy Kilner • George Macaulay • Frederick Delius • Battle of Towton • Halifax Gibbet • Gerard (archbishop of York) • George Hirst • Geoffrey (archbishop of York) • Len Hutton • Hedley Verity • Abe Waddington • Æthelwold ætheling • Preparing for a Fancy Dress Ball • The Combat: Woman Pleading for the Vanquished • The Wrestlers (Etty) • Bootham Crescent • History of York City F.C. (1908–1980) • William Etty • History of York City F.C. (1980–present) • William Sterndale Bennett • Candaules, King of Lydia, Shews his Wife by Stealth to Gyges, One of his Ministers, as She Goes to Bed • The World Before the Flood • Musidora: The Bather 'At the Doubtful Breeze Alarmed' • North Eastern Railway War Memorial • York City War Memorial • Northern England • Albert Pierrepoint • RSPB Dearne Valley Old Moor • Keldholme Priory election dispute • 2018 World Snooker Championship • 2019 World Snooker Championship • Capture of Wakefield • 2017 World Snooker Championship • 2017 EFL Championship play-off Final • 1985 World Snooker Championship • Cardiff City F.C. 2–1 Leeds United F.C. • 1986 World Snooker Championship • 1988 Football League Second Division play-off Final • 2020 World Snooker Championship • 1984 World Snooker Championship • 1925 FA Cup Final • 2006 Football League Championship play-off Final • Acamptonectes There are also seventeen featured lists: York City F.C. Clubman of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • List of York City F.C. seasons • List of Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. records and statistics • List of Leeds United F.C. seasons • List of Scarborough F.C. seasons • List of awards and nominations received by Arctic Monkeys • List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland • List of Hull City A.F.C. seasons • List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England • Sheffield United F.C. league record by opponent • York City F.C. league record by opponent • List of York City F.C. players (25–99 appearances) • List of York City F.C. players (1–24 appearances) • Bootham Crescent • Kate Rusby discography Thank you and well done to all those who contributed. Article Activity 2011 Football League One play-off Final was nominated for GA on 22nd March 1989 World Snooker Championship was promoted to GA on 24th March Systime Computers was promoted to GA on 27th March 2011 Football League One play-off Final was promoted to GA on 1st April 2010 Football League Two play-off Final was promoted to GA on 1st April 2004 Football League Third Division play-off Final was nominated for GA on 5th April 1987 World Snooker Championship nominated for FA on 10th April Terri Harper was nominated for GA on 21st April 1993 Football League Third Division play-off Final was nominated for GA on 23rd April '2004 Football League Third Division play-off Final appeared in DYK on 27th April 1997 Football League First Division play-off Final was nominated for FA on 27th April Member News There are 89 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! The membership has dropped since the April newsletter: 1 member was removed from the project as a banned editor. SHISHIR DUA (talk · contribs) Thanks A very big Thank you to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. To members who have added suggestions to the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal. To the football and rugby editors who have done stirling work in keeping abreast of the top clubs. To all the WikiProject Yorkshire editors who have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist.  Great! Yorkshire articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 2 1 15 60 78 FL 1 16 17 GA 2 7 36 175 220 B 9 66 136 356 567 C 5 144 293 1,495 1,937 Start 1 240 1,254 8,668 1 10,164 Stub 20 355 5,656 3 6,034 List 4 12 932 948 Category 3,879 3,879 Disambig 21 21 File 22 22 Portal 95 95 Project 225 225 Redirect 2 193 1,353 1,548 Template 104 516 620 NA 5 2 7 Other 12 12 Assessed 19 482 2,104 17,660 6,128 1 26,394 Unassessed 1 1 Total 19 482 2,104 17,661 6,128 1 26,395 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 96,895 Ω = 5.10 Assessment Assess and review As of 27 April 2021, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner. (Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however) Aims After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008. Specific aims for the project are:- To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below) To recruit more active editors (See Member News) To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive (See this month's feature below) To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members and apropos of the above a 2010 New Year article improvement drive/collaboration is being organised. Priority Articles The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows - Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • Northern England • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project The May 2021 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page. Month Dates Article(s) B class choice Start class choice 132 1 Dec 2020 ~ 31 Dec 2020 Rother Valley (UK Parliament constituency) Ranmoor 133 1 Jan 2021 ~ 31 Jan 2021 Scarborough, North Yorkshire Salem Chapel, Leeds 134 1 Feb 2021 ~ 28 Feb 2021 Trolleybuses in Doncaster The Avenues, Kingston upon Hull 135 1 Mar 2021 ~ 31 Mar 2021 Dave Ulliott Unilever Leeds 136 1 Apr 2021 ~ 30 Apr 2021 Wheldrake Velocity Tower 137 1 May 2021 ~ 31 May 2021 1st Hull Heavy Battery, Royal Garrison Artillery Wakefield Castle Please nominate future articles for improvement at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire. Please bear in mind... The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis. Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.  Thanks Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below... Written by Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

11:50, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 158 - June 2021 May issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Welcome to the one hundred and fifty eighth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter. Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,840 last month to 16,901 on 26 May 2021). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 204 is ahead of WP:GM who have 88. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 81 while WP:GM has 70 out of a total number of 4,664 articles. Currently we have sixty four Yorkshire featured articles: Henry Moore • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • History of Sheffield • York City F.C. • Joseph Priestley • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • Valley Parade • William Wilberforce • History of Bradford City A.F.C. • Last of the Summer Wine • Ealdred (archbishop of York) • Paulinus of York • Wilfrid • HMS Endeavour • Cosmo Gordon Lang • Thomas of Bayeux • Cottingley Fairies • Wilfred Rhodes • Guy Fawkes • Yorkshire captaincy affair of 1927 • Roy Kilner • George Macaulay • Frederick Delius • Battle of Towton • Halifax Gibbet • Gerard (archbishop of York) • George Hirst • Geoffrey (archbishop of York) • Len Hutton • Hedley Verity • Abe Waddington • Æthelwold ætheling • Preparing for a Fancy Dress Ball • The Combat: Woman Pleading for the Vanquished • The Wrestlers (Etty) • Bootham Crescent • History of York City F.C. (1908–1980) • William Etty • History of York City F.C. (1980–present) • William Sterndale Bennett • Candaules, King of Lydia, Shews his Wife by Stealth to Gyges, One of his Ministers, as She Goes to Bed • The World Before the Flood • Musidora: The Bather 'At the Doubtful Breeze Alarmed' • North Eastern Railway War Memorial • York City War Memorial • Northern England • Albert Pierrepoint • RSPB Dearne Valley Old Moor • Keldholme Priory election dispute • 2018 World Snooker Championship • 2019 World Snooker Championship • Capture of Wakefield • 2017 World Snooker Championship • 2017 EFL Championship play-off Final • 1985 World Snooker Championship • Cardiff City F.C. 2–1 Leeds United F.C. • 1986 World Snooker Championship • 1988 Football League Second Division play-off Final • 2020 World Snooker Championship • 1984 World Snooker Championship • 1925 FA Cup Final • 2006 Football League Championship play-off Final • Acamptonectes • 1997 Football League First Division play-off Final There are also seventeen featured lists: York City F.C. Clubman of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • List of York City F.C. seasons • List of Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. records and statistics • List of Leeds United F.C. seasons • List of Scarborough F.C. seasons • List of awards and nominations received by Arctic Monkeys • List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland • List of Hull City A.F.C. seasons • List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England • Sheffield United F.C. league record by opponent • York City F.C. league record by opponent • List of York City F.C. players (25–99 appearances) • List of York City F.C. players (1–24 appearances) • Bootham Crescent • Kate Rusby discography Thank you and well done to all those who contributed. Article Activity Arn Gill (North Yorkshire) appeared in DYK on 7th May 2004 Football League Third Division play-off Final was promoted to GA on 7th May 1980 World Snooker Championship was nominated for GA on 8th May 1993 Football League Third Division play-off Final was promoted to GA on 8th May 1980 World Snooker Championship was promoted to GA on 10th May 1993 Football League Third Division play-off Final appeared in DYK on 14th May 1997 Football League First Division play-off Final was promoted to FA on 14th May Member News There are 89 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! The membership is unchanged since the May newsletter: Thanks A very big Thank you to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. To members who have added suggestions to the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal. To the football and rugby editors who have done stirling work in keeping abreast of the top clubs. To all the WikiProject Yorkshire editors who have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist.  Great! Yorkshire articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 2 1 15 60 78 FL 1 16 17 GA 2 7 36 175 220 B 9 66 136 356 567 C 5 144 293 1,495 1,937 Start 1 240 1,254 8,668 1 10,164 Stub 20 355 5,656 3 6,034 List 4 12 932 948 Category 3,879 3,879 Disambig 21 21 File 22 22 Portal 95 95 Project 225 225 Redirect 2 193 1,353 1,548 Template 104 516 620 NA 5 2 7 Other 12 12 Assessed 19 482 2,104 17,660 6,128 1 26,394 Unassessed 1 1 Total 19 482 2,104 17,661 6,128 1 26,395 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 96,895 Ω = 5.10 Assessment Assess and review As of 26 May 2021, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner. (Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however) Aims After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008. Specific aims for the project are:- To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below) To recruit more active editors (See Member News) To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive (See this month's feature below) To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members and apropos of the above a 2010 New Year article improvement drive/collaboration is being organised. Priority Articles The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows - Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • Northern England • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project The June 2021 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page. Month Dates Article(s) B class choice Start class choice 133 1 Jan 2021 ~ 31 Jan 2021 Scarborough, North Yorkshire Salem Chapel, Leeds 134 1 Feb 2021 ~ 28 Feb 2021 Trolleybuses in Doncaster The Avenues, Kingston upon Hull 135 1 Mar 2021 ~ 31 Mar 2021 Dave Ulliott Unilever Leeds 136 1 Apr 2021 ~ 30 Apr 2021 Wheldrake Velocity Tower 137 1 May 2021 ~ 31 May 2021 1st Hull Heavy Battery, Royal Garrison Artillery Wakefield Castle 138 1 Jun 2021 ~ 30 Jun 2021 Armley asbestos disaster Yorkshire pudding Please nominate future articles for improvement at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire. Please bear in mind... The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis. Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.  Thanks Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below... Written by Keith D • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!

16:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Girth Summit _(blether) 18:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I don't want to come across as an aggressive or heavy-handed deletionist here (and since I see you are a fellow Wikiproject Yorkshire member, I don't want you to come over to York and biff me on the nose), but there's no easy way to say this: the creation of that article wasn't OK. You're autopatrolled, which means that the community trusts you to create articles that don't need to be reviewed by New Page Patrol. The article mentioned above has no supporting independent, secondary sources, just an entry on an exhaustive database of registered UK charities, and the charity's own website. That's not on for someone with your advanced permissions: please be more careful. Anything you create needs to be have enough independent, secondary and reliable sources to demonstrate notability. Cheers Girth Summit _(blether) 18:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No offence taken. I made a start but was a bit disappointed I could not find more. I am no kind of expert on Wikipedia's rules, just someone who tries to help out. Chemical Engineer (talk) 22:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Institution of Chemical Engineers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Steel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vulcanization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vulcan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parkinson's Law Book.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KletzBiography.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 10:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seacroft Scroll thumb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Interested in having a chat with fellow Wikipedians? There's a meetup in Leeds on Saturday 4th May 2024, at the Tiled Hall Café at Leeds Central Library.

Full details here.

You're receiving this one-off message as you're either a member of WikiProject Yorkshire, you've expressed an interest in a previous Leeds meetup years ago, or (for about 4 of you), we've met :)

I plan to organise more in future, so if you'd like to be notified next time, please say so over on the meetup page.

Please also invite any Wikimedia people you know (or have had wiki dealings with) – spread the word! Hope to see you there.

Jonathan Deamer (talk)

20:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)