User talk:Cfaso2000

Hi Cfaso2000! I noticed your contributions to Jimeta and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Satnam2408 (talk) 07:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LittlePuppers was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs significant coverage in independent and reliable sources to show that she is notable. Most of the sources right now don't talk about her specifically in detail, or are very routine news. Interviews and articles published by organizations she is involved with are not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emem Usoro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LittlePuppers (talk) 22:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cfaso2000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LittlePuppers (talk) 22:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

" achieving targets[48][49][50][51][52]" is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder. We can only review this properly once we can see the references you have chosen. At present you have created WP:BOMBARD. Less is more.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul Oluikpe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul Oluikpe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Austin Akobundu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 13:43, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Bala M. Bello. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:14, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bala M. Bello. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cfaso2000. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xegma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philip Ikeazor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Xegma(talk) 10:51, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Cfaso2000/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cfaso2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Emem Usoro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cfaso2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paul Oluikpe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cfaso2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bala M. Bello, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cfaso2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Philip Ikeazor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cfaso2000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Emem Usoro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Aminu Maida requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drmies (talk) 15:30, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Annh07. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Igbo people without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Annh07 (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Paul Oluikpe. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Reading Beans 17:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Reading Beans,

Thanks for your feedback and I sincerely appreciate it. However, I do not think your statement "it needs more sources to establish notability" is accurate. I also think your removal of the article from mainspace to draft is unilateral, without allowing discussions on the article and its merit and notability given that other editors just like yourself, have made inputs to the article previously, and thus you should have allowed a more democratic discussion on the article between you and the other previous contributors.

For each of the attributions made, in every segment of the article, there was an independent source with sufficient treatment of the subject in question. Please can you provide a proof of any of the independent sources cited, not being relevant or sufficient? I would love to get your feedback on this.

I invite you to reconsider the decision based on the issues I have raised above. This article and any other one indeed can be improved, but there is notability already established in my honest opinion, and I invite you to provide more feedback where you think this is not so.

I sincerely thank you for taking the time to go through my contribution and look forward to your response.

Regards

Cfaso2000 Cfaso2000 (talk) 17:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftificatiin is unilateral. WP:DRAFTIFY allows it. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out@Timtrent . In any case, the article has been AfD'd . You may kindly take a look and see if any feedback. Most regards. Cfaso2000 (talk) 11:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Muradmomi12 (talk) 08:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philip Ikeazor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Ikeazor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 20:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Oluikpe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Oluikpe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gabriel (……?) 18:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chimele Usuwa Abengowe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chimele Usuwa Abengowe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gabriel (……?) 01:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Ururuka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Ururuka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gabriel (……?) 13:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cfaso2000, I have been here for 7 years now and your behaviour towards my contributions ain't a surprise to me as I expect to see all kinds of behaviour especially in a public community. As a newbie who knows nothing about Wikipedia ANI you reported me base on what I feel you have gone to my talk page to read about which of course is a past between I, safariScribe and Vanderwaalforces and thought of ANI will be the best for you. You needed me blocked so badly but unfortunately it didn't work out for you. Then you had to ping me and other editors on your article AFD about Paul Oluikpe for another review which I intentionally did not respond because the page still hasn't been addressed. Why is it always you?. First of all, it was a misleading template of a new user to your article on your talk page like it was approved. Now its another IP who has been mentioned as a sock two months ago coming to your article to vote keep and going to other article of users who have been blocked such User:TheChineseGroundnut to vote keep on their article AFD. Not only doing that but argue with everyone just like you to other editors who voted deleted on the article. I see what the IP has been doing Special:Contributions/102.164.36.86 but thats by the way. Maybe when reading my talk page you didn't go through the line of those who also came to warn me, ended up being blocked and was tag as a sock of which I was surprise because I never thought they would be. Wikipedia is not a place where if your article gets AFD because of that you choose to fight back. Don't think am like you who protect article they created by themself on AFD because of maybe the effort being put. You can go ahead and start nominating and I bet you wont see me there because I don't push article to mainspace. it's either drafted or on review. On wikipedia, it's just all about peace and doing what is right in good faith. Creating more suspicious behaviour may lead to your account being blocked as I see your contributions look like a newbie. So I will advice you stay calm and understand what Wikipedia is all about before warning people who are here before you all because your article was nominated for an AFD. Those who did are already blocked. Wishing you the best. Gabriel (……?) 16:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I come in good faith my brother. Please calm down. This has nothing to do with you nominating several of my articles for deletion. I do not seek a tit-for-tat. Any article I would nominate for deletion I would take time to research and see if I can improve it and if anything else fails, then in good faith I would nominate it for deletion. Please calm down. I respect your age on Wikipedia and clearly you are older than me here. I have a lot to learn from you. I come in peace. Respect. Cfaso2000 (talk) 16:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cfaso2000,

No editor likes their content creation nominated for deletion discussions. The atmosphere at AFDs can get very heated. I encourage you to work in Draft space and submit your draft to Articles for Creation for review rather than moving articles directly into main space or creating them in main space. It can be difficult to get an article approved by an AFC reviewer but they are spending their time to save you the headaches of having your articles nominated for an AFD. Their mandate is to decline any drafts they believe won't survive an AFD discussion and approve articles they think would make it through an AFD. So, you can hear their opinion on what your article needs, improve it and resubmit without fear of your draft being deleted. It's a slower process but it avoids the possibility of going through multiple AFD discussions which can be stressful. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see from your User talk page that you have submitted articles to AFC in the past so you are familiar with the process. So, I guess I want to encourage you to return to doing this. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Liz this is well noted and thanks for weighing in. Most regards Cfaso2000 (talk) 05:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

... when you have presented logical and policy based arguments, please decide to walk away. No good ever comes of a grudge fight however correct each party believes themselves to be. An example where you ought to have walked away is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ada-George Road. Even if you believe the article has no verified notability (I will not comment on the article itself) the history between you and the other editor (I have not pinged them, but have, elsewhere, given them this same suggestion) suggests that there is a serious disagreement between you both.

While you are free to reply to this message, which is not intended as a discussion, please also consider it to be a warning to consider your actions, and to return to being a collegial editor.

Please note that, in my opinion, that AfD was not policy based, and should not have been opened, certainly in that manner 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1. Please listen to Timtrent and drop the stick. I’m a Nigerian and I can count a handful of Nigerians who contribute here and I wouldn’t want to lose you. I’ve mentored some seasoned editors here from Nigeria, so, you can reach out to me when in doubt. Best, Reading Beans 07:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans thank you for the words of wisdom. I will take on your offer of mentorship and I am serious. I will knock on your door as and when necessary, and to hold your feet to the fire. Your mentorship has already started with this candid advise of yours. Thank You. Cfaso2000 (talk) 16:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent thank you for stepping in here. I appreciate your feedback and sincerely would take it on board. I am here to contribute to the wealth of knowledge and not to pick fights. You won't see that from me again I promise. As a new member, I felt under siege after an old and established member picked off three articles of mine in quick succession, and seemingly took issue with "my effrontery" to upload articles directly to mainspace without going through the rubrics of an AFC. His concerns are quite legitimate, but pursued and expressed in "unwelcoming" terms. I am here to learn, contribute and collaborate. You have my pledge on this going forward. Thank You. Cfaso2000 (talk) 16:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One important thing is that AFC is not compulsory. It is intended to help people by allowing experienced reviewers to guide less experienced editors. You have an absolute right to create directly in mai space or to move any suitable draft article to main space. For the next short while I think this experience shows you might be unwise to do so, but equally, well, who am I to judge?

I'm glad you will work out how not to get into that situation again. Africa, and Nigeria in particular, needs good quality, collegial, level headed editors 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cfaso2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Cfaso2000/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Iweh Pascal Odinaka(Poco Lee) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19 § Iweh Pascal Odinaka(Poco Lee) until a consensus is reached. GTrang (talk) 05:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Iweh Pascal Odinaka(Poco Lee), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Oluikpe was deleted some few days ago (a day ago?), what is the reason of speedily recreating it at Draft:Paul Oluikpe? Please, refrain from creating the article until a reasonable timeframe. Best, Reading of Beans 05:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, go through this discussion to see why it was deleted. As I advised you earlier, read through the list of unreliable sources sources in Nigeria which you have used in this biography of a living person. Best, Reading of Beans 05:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies I had recreated this. I took some time out to read the notability guidelines (1) GNG (2) People (3) Books (4) Academics and the more I read it the more I was beginning to think that the subjects I write about, especially Paul Oluikpe, meet on a general note, these criteria(especially on Academia and GNG. So in my heart I was convinced to recreate the article. I also read through these guidelines that you may need only a few independent sources, and then support with a generality of other sources, and that this would not be injurious to the article. I now know I may have interpreted these wrongly. I do recognize that you and the rest of the other colleagues who weighed in have been here a long time and have familiarity and practical knowledge of applying these guidelines. So accept my apology. I will drop this article for now until sometime in the future to see if more coverage would emerge. I am delighted to have had a good success rate in the articles I have created here. I would continue to broaden the subjects I write about and also get more familiar with the applicable notability guidelines. Imeela. Cfaso2000 (talk) 13:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Make sense to me. Best, Reading of Beans 06:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Paul Oluikpe. Thanks! Star Mississippi 13:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul Oluikpe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cfaso2000! Your additions to Draft:Bala M. Bello have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 18:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bala M. Bello, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cfaso2000,

Hope you're fine? Please if you are not sure of the categories to use, leave it blank, and another editor will help out. Most of the categories you added to the pages of the deputy governors of CBN isn't good at all. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@SafariScribe I am doing fine. Thanks for the advice and your contributions and improvements to my articles. Most appreciated. Your advice on the categories is also noted. I am learning day by day and thanks to experienced people here like yourself, I am picking up and hopefully I would be up to speed soonest. I appreciate your mentorship. Regards. Cfaso2000 (talk) 06:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emem Usoro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kingsley Obiora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to join the African Legislators in Red from 9 December 2024 to 9 January 2024.

Join African Legislators in Red, an initiative dedicated to creating and editing Wikipedia articles on African legislators to ensure their legacies are preserved and celebrated.

Sign up for this contest by listing your username under the participants section.

The following prizes will be awarded at the end of the contest.

• Overall winner - ₦100,000
• Runner-up - ₦70,000
• Second runner-up - ₦50,000

For more information concerning the contest and how to fully participate, visit the contest page by clicking here.

Together, let’s amplify the voices of African legislators on the global stage!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]