User talk:Ceosad

Hello, Ceosad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Finnusertop (talk) 00:29, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ceosad! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of universities in the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List contains only one item. Sole source fails WP:RS thus raising WP:NRV issues. Additionally list title refers to a self proclaimed state which does not enjoy widespread recognition thus potentially raising WP:NPOV concerns. Bottom-line; there is no list here, there are no RS sources and there may be political implications/motives in the title.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:37, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi buddy! Finnusertop (talk|guestbook|contribs) 18:51, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ceosad, thanks for your feedback on the Emilia Vuorisalmi article I wrote. I've added references now, do you think it's OK now? Would you remove your nomination for deletion, or what do you think I should still improve? (WP newbie), thanks for your time — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemanja.rodic (talk • contribs) 07:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nemanja.rodic:! The references are good, but I personally feel that she just is not a notable enough person for a biography article. : ( I think that it would be better to create an article about Hehku instead, if the article gets deleted by vote here. She is known primarily for that TV show, right? (See this policy.) All of the contents on your article could easily fit into a new article about Hehku, so I would like to encourage you to write that article instead, if the current one gets deleted. Doing a biography article successfully is rather hard, due to all those complex policies! Articles about TV shows don't have the same problems.

I hope that I have not discouraged you in any way, and that you enjoy your stay in Wikipedia! : ) Ceosad (talk) 06:05, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ceosad, thanks for the answer and instructions. I won't get discouraged  :) in fact I want to perfect this article because I definitely think notability isn't an issue when someone occupies prime time national television slots. It says 'If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate.' on the (See this policy.) page. Hehku is prime time national television programming and she is one of the 3 hosts of this talk show, meaning they are all household names in Finland and she herself has covered all relevant national periodicals, most recently two weeks ago (Kauneus ja Terveys, publishes nearly 100000 prints in Finland). The notability is there, girls and women in Finland know her very well, the question is if I have referenced it properly. Did I understand it correctly that until you withdraw your nomination for deletion the article will stay nominated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemanja.rodic (talk • contribs) 12:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Nemanja.rodic: The article will stay nominated until a moderator either removes the nomination or deletes the article. I believe the status of the vote and discussion is checked weekly. I could not withdraw my nomination myself, and I am not a moderator. The process is explained here. It looks like there is currently no consensus here, so your article will most likely stay in wikipedia. :) Ceosad (talk) 19:04, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article With the Century, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in his autobiography With the Century, North Korean dictator Kim Il-sung stated that his motto is "The people are my God"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/With the Century. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Thanks for helping the DYK project maintain the main page Victuallers (talk) 19:58, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been primarily involved in this article; I invite you to join in for consensus. --George Ho (talk) 19:44, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ceosad, thanks for creating the interesting article Shang Yue! I've nominated it for DYK, please see nomination page. Cheers, Zanhe (talk) 19:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much @Zanhe, for helping with cleaning up the article and nominating it for DYK! Ceosad (talk) 21:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shang Yue, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that North Korean leader Kim Il-sung credited his Chinese teacher Shang Yue with introducing him to Chinese classics and Russian literature? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shang Yue. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I want to let you know that I closed your deletion nomination for Jangmadang. Since the redirect as it stands is helpful, and since you are not ready yet to publish your draft, I closed the discussion. When you are ready to publish your draft, please go to WP:RMTR. Requests there can be fulfilled by administrators who will delete the blocking page and move your draft to the new title. Feel free to contact me with any concerns. Steel1943 (talk) 00:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To add to what Steel943 said above: Alternatively (when you're ready for the move), you can simply tag the redirect page blocking the move with speedy deletion option WP:G6, {{Db-move}} in this case. After the page is deleted, if the deleting administrator doesn't take care of it, you can move the page there yourself. Finally, you can request speedy deletion of the page where the draft used to reside after the move has taken place, with a WP:U1 tag.

@Steel1943: Wouldn't this alternate method be the way to go in this case? WP:RM/TR is used for potentially controversial moves, which I don't believe to be the case in this situation, unless this has been previously deleted or has history I'm unaware of. Regards,—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 13:20, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Godsy: Either method works. (In theory, WP:RMTR is supposed to be used for uncontroversial moves; controversial ones there are usually opposed before they get to be moved. I don't see this one being controversial.) Steel1943 (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Steel1943: You're correct, the introduction sentence on the WP:RMTR mislead me.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 13:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Steel1943 and Godsy: Thank you for the information! The page moves etc. have always been very confusing for me... Ceosad (talk) 20:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Freedom of speech Barnstar
		On behalf of WikiProject Freedom of speech, The Freedom of speech Barnstar is awarded to Ceosad, for contributions related to expanding and improving the quality of articles on Wikipedia relevant to freedom of speech and censorship -- including Balloon campaigns in Korea. From the participants at WikiProject Freedom of speech, thank you, — Cirt (talk) 06:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Cirt! Ceosad (talk) 09:08, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're most welcome, — Cirt (talk) 15:37, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ceosad, There is a WikiProject about Freedom of speech, called WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do: List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: List of participants. Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject. Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}. Join in discussion at project talkpage. Notify other editors you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject. Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, -- — Cirt (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC).[reply]

The links you're including in the further reading of that article do not seem directly relevant to the person. Also, Hindawi Publishing is a really dodgy outfit and should not be used in Wikipedia essentially ever. jps (talk) 22:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@I9Q79oL78KiL0QTFHgyc:Yes, those links were indeed not directly relevant on this person, but they were directly relevant on the single event he is known for! As it is stated in WP:SINGLEEVENT, the general rule on these cases is to cover the event primarily. As you know, the article for primo-vascular system was deleted a few months ago. This is why I think it should be reasonable to cover his research in wider detail, that is not typical on biography articles for people who have much more varied achievements. Regarding the Hindawi Publishing, I agree but external links or further reading sections don't need to use only reliable sources. WP:ELMAYBE Ceosad (talk) 23:12, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should stick to biographical sources. These could be in fringe journals if you like (there are a few that are cited in the article right now), but we don't want the article to become a coatrack for a deleted page. If this guy is notable for his invention of this pseudoscientific concept, then by all means we should discuss the concept, but going into further detail past his involvement is inappropriate. From what I saw of the sources that were included, they were more interested in discussing the new ideas associated with his initial proposal rather than the Kim himself or his initial idea itself. jps (talk) 23:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@I9Q79oL78KiL0QTFHgyc: Yeah, it sounds reasonable to draw a line where his involvement ends. These fringe journals pretty much have to be used as sources, as this person has been quietly purged from the North Korean history, although it is probably debatable what parts of these fringe journals can be considered reliable even for biographical use. It might be best to try finding Korean or Chinese language sources to support some of the claims. Ceosad (talk) 00:10, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if he was purged for political reasons or because of some sort of external criticism? Of course, North Korea is so opaque we may never know. I strongly suspect that there are Korean and Chinese sources that mention him in greater detail, but I have only been able to find a few that have been translated from that time. jps (talk) 00:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@I9Q79oL78KiL0QTFHgyc: It looks like South Korean online newspapers and magazines do talk about him in detail. I found this and this. There are some Korean acupuncture journals out there too. I might collect some of the better Korean/Chinese sources on the article's talk page in the future. (About his purge: In 1967 there was some kind of political Kapsan faction incident, and in the late 1960s all kinds of unofficial publishing was banned. His disappearance might be related to those things.) Ceosad (talk) 00:56, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would nice to find sources that were not as credulous as the ones we currently have. In the interest of WP:NPOV, it would be a real shame if all we could find were acupuncturists gushing about his ideas. jps (talk) 01:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@I9Q79oL78KiL0QTFHgyc: That is true. None of the English sources contain meaningful criticism of his theories. I also wonder if it is possible to dig up something about the fact that he was a defector from the South to the North. It might not be enough to take care of the WP:SINGLEEVENT, but it is a start. Ceosad (talk) 01:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I read that it was at least in part due to the North Korean government offering a tremendous amount of resources for scientist to work there. When your lab is devoted to studying acupuncture, a topic that maligned as pseudoscientific by mainstream science, it makes a lot of sense that you might find the resources offered by North Korea to be extremely attractive compared to the US-based grants that were not liable to look too kindly on his "breakthrough". jps (talk) 01:30, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@I9Q79oL78KiL0QTFHgyc: It is possible, that the resources for research were an incentive, but the defections during the 1950s to North Korea were almost universally because of ideological reasons. The exact timing and reasons of his defection would be very important details to find. I am somewhat unsure how the acupuncture was perceived in the 1950s-1960s, or at an earlier date under Japanese rule. However, the North Koreans have a tradition of supporting research for some very scary alternative medicines, such as "health injections". I guess the Chinese like to buy them. Ceosad (talk) 02:13, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, my friend. I was hoping someone would rescue the articles and add more information. All the best to you. H.dryad (talk) 13:08, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see all references included with article. At least four different albums by The Miracles refer to this album's existence...(including two of them by Official Miracles biographer Stu Hackel) in Motown Records' liner notes in those albums. Many Thanks, Willgee (talk) 05:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have the scan from The Miracles' 35th Anniversary Box Set liner notes , verifying that the album "The Miracles Sing Modern" was an actual unreleased Tamla album with the catalog number T234 . I took the scan of it with my cellphone, but I've never sent a scan to Wikipedia before. Do you happen to know how ? Any help you give would be appreciated. Thanks. Willgee (talk) 19:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Willgee: I am not sure if the scan can be uploaded to Wikipedia, due to copyright/fair use concerns. How about uploading the picture to some outside hosting site like Filesmelt, and then giving us the url? We just need to see the scan to validate the source. By the way, you should also use the "|quote=" parameter and Cite AV media notes template to add that same information to the article too. I hope this helped. Ceosad (talk) 22:39, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks !! I'll do it tonight . Willgee (talk) 06:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes for 2016! I am responding here to your comments rather than risk violating Talk page guidelines. Personally I think the quest to get a photo of Kim donated to Wikipedia is likely to be fruitless. But I'm happy to be proved wrong. The best chance is that Russia releases a photo if he goes there. The RfC is now formally closed, and I certainly don't want to continue the debate for year after year. Though that is probably inevitable, as there is nothing to stop random passers-by venting their spleen. I certainly don't intend to use the efforts of people to obtain free photos to undermine their position against fair use photos.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jack Upland: I would not really mind at all in the case that anybody would try to "undermine" fair use as a result of the newest efforts. Actually that was one of my motivations to do something, so that the discussions could get slightly more fresh. Also, it would (hopefully) be slightly easier and quicker to end the continuous arguments rather than starting them from the beginning every single time to reach the same conclusion. In the endless discussions it has been stated innumerable times that AP and the others remained uncontacted, but nobody had done anything substantial recently to move that part of the discussion forward, until I and Tonystewart14 started our quests. My hope is that the people who tend to come and randomly complain, or otherwise start the inevitable discussion, on the talk page could be better deterred and discouraged by simply telling them that "we have already tried it" instead of listening the blame of not contacting the photographers and arguments coming from misunderstandings of fair use policies and guidelines. This might be wishful thinking though. The arguing on the talk page had gotten really annoying this year, but I do not have ill will or blame towards you or anybody else. The other leaders' article talks are sometimes bad, but Kim Jong Un talk is just plainly ridiculous. You are almost certainly correct about Russia, and my hopes were on that solution too, but Kim Jong Un has been more isolationist than his father... Frankly, my time would probably be better spent on complaining about the biased WP:NCKO guideline, as the nature of the photographers' work make success unlikely. We shall see what happens next year. Best Wishes and Happy New Year 2016! - Ceosad (talk) 10:32, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pyongyang Maternity Hospital, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pyongyang Maternity Hospital is equipped with video call booths for visiting fathers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pyongyang Maternity Hospital. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Authoritarian socialism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asante. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ceosad,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of gay male teen novels for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 01:36, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited GCC homosexuality test, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Homosexuality test. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for starting this article. I hope you don't mind, but I added the article to Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride 2016/Results, which tracks new and improved LGBT-related content as part of an ongoing Wiki Loves Pride campaign. If you create or improve other LGBT articles between now and the end of June, feel free to update this page with your contributions. Thanks again! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Ceosad (talk) 18:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		Medical Content Creator Barnstar
		Great job on improving the Hidradenitis suppurativa article. The encyclopedia is better because of you. Many Thanks for what you do. Barbara (WVS) (talk) 21:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks! Ceosad (talk) 00:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fort Alexander (Hawaii), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Earthwork. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Liwa Fatemiyoun page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ceosad, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:13, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Ceosad (talk) 00:34, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Yarsanism —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MiguelMadeira (talk) 23:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--MiguelMadeira (talk) 23:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Giyorgis of Segla at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 09:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found the page move in the history. Sorry. The article is good to go. SL93 (talk) 09:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing! Ceosad (talk) 12:56, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ceosad, I noticed your draft on Muslim porn stars and the caption of the image Arab woman exposing her breasts, 1890s. Portrayals of hijabs have since become more commonplace in sexually explicit depictions. In fact, the description on the file itself reads: Femme Arabe avec le yachmak, in English: Arabian women with the Yachmak. Just wanted to inform you, it might be useful for the article. Lotje (talk) 04:35, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Lotje! I had not noticed that. I have been planning to finish the article, and I will change the caption to include yashmak. Ceosad (talk) 23:52, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I had no idea that I had edited so much... - Ceosad (talk) 23:34, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Cross-posted to 2 other editors who edited the file talk page) Hi, I'm a little unclear on the exact procedure that's going on here and what to do next. An editor tagged the article for deletion, and there was a bit of back-and-forth, with an editor saying (in an edit summary) "You must leave the di template in place until decided upon by an admin" (emphasis added).

This sounds like a speedy-delete situation where one person decides the issue and that doesn't seem right to me. I want a full-dress discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion or wherever and let's get consensus to delete the image, if it is going to be deleted. If it was a contested-speedy-delete another editor could just remove the deletion tag (one did, but it was reverted). Not sure of the procedure here so I don't want to jump in myself, but could whomever is responsible and knowledgeable move this over to where it goes? Wikipedia:Files for discussion I guess, or of not there let's have WP:MFD or whatever applies. Herostratus (talk) 15:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects throughout the month of June as part of the fourth annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign. Feel free to add new and expanded content on the project's Results page. Happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! I should join in this year's project too! Ceosad (talk) 21:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Trump on social media is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump on social media until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rævhuld (talk) 04:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rævhuld: Oh, really? Please read WP:BEFORE, as was pointed out by the user who speedily closed the AfD. Why not try to nominate Barack Obama on social media for deletion? That one is clearly less notable than Donald Trump on social media. On that matter, see WP:SPINOFF. Do you disagree with that guideline? Ceosad (talk) 18:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have deprodded Mr. Radio (song), as it as previously been to AFD and per policy it's permanently ineligible for prod. Please open another AFD discussion if you still wish to pursue deletion. Cheers, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:39, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I had misunderstood the policy. (The previous AfD had been closed for procedural reasons.) I will open a new AfD for the page. Thanks for notifying me. Ceosad (talk) 17:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hi Ceosad, I'm working on translating Bottega Veneta from English into Korean and was wondering if you have time to help me out. I found your username on wikiproject:Korean and saw that you're fluent in both English and Korean. I have a paid COI regarding Bottega Veneta, but my main concern here is ensuring that the information available in English is available and up to date in Korean as well. I have a translated version of the article on Sandbox. Would you mind reviewing it for accuracy as well as its compliance with Wikipedia guidelines? Thanks!--Chefmikesf (talk) 00:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am sorry, Chefmikesf, but I am not fluent in Korean language. You can find someone who can help you from here, here or here. Ceosad (talk) 12:01, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your work on the article Coinage of the Kingdom of Pontus. Donald Trung 03:04, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! Thanks, Donald Trung! - Ceosad (talk) 16:25, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ceosad, I proposed an unmerge Talk:Bitcoin_Gold#Propose_unmerge_with_Bitcoin_Gold_Double_Spend_Attack. Could you take a look at the comments, and let me know what you think? Xinbenlv (talk) 19:19, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ceosad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Basalota Mika’el".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi (talk) 16:00, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ceosad. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Muslim porn stars, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ceosad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muslim porn stars".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Twitter account of Donald Trump and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 22#Donald Trump and Twitter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Imperator Rome logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]