User talk:CapLiber

Profile	Talk	Sandbox	Contributions	Ruswiki [ru]

WHAT ARE YOU DOING??? Dobrom (talk) 15:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries to explain the changes you make to pages to let other editors know what you are doing. There is a box for such summaries just above the buttons for saving changes. Also, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies on common naming practices, neutral point of view, and gaining consensus for edits. You are making numerous controversial edits without discussing what you are doing. Much of that work is likely to be reverted, and if you continue without discussion, you risk being blocked from editing. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 17:08, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Laszlo Panaflex:. Two years later and the user still doesn't use edit summaries 80% of the time, or look for consensus in edits. I suggest, if this continues, taking it to ANI. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 00:18, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ukrainian heraldry stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Dawynn (talk) 18:11, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SW epVIII logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As a courtesy to other editors, I would like you to consider two suggestions:

• Please read WP:ES carefully, and make sure you always make an edit summary when you are editing articles.

• Please read WP:MINOR carefully, and make sure to click the "Minor" button only when the edit is truly minor.

In both cases, it would make it much easier for other editors to understand what you are doing, and why. --T*U (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Pirates of the Caribbean (film series), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 07:55, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Navalny in Yaroslavl.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:49, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CapLiber! Thank you for your contributions.

If you would be interested in joining a group of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, please take a look at the Military history WikiProject—we would be delighted to have you! If you like what you see, please sign your name here, and a project coordinator will soon be along with a formal welcome. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:09, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Star Wars timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] had me perplexed: What was that supposed to mean? A joke? My editing in that article then was somewhat clumsy — due to the fact that i was using a desktop with no functional ″copy/paste″ capacity. No reason for disruptive teasing, or whatever that was meant to be, I suppose.Axxxion (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CapLiber. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thirty Years' War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Lützen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CapLiber. I noticed that on your user page, a user named Dobrom left a rather rude message to you. It was inappropriate for the user to leave their message on your user page (if anywhere, it should have been here on your user talk page). Their edit summary was doubly inappropriate, and if I had seen it today, I would have strongly considered blocking the user for harassment. All of which is to say: please feel free to remove that text from your user page if you want. Mz7 (talk) 19:40, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Russia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ladoga

Star Wars (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Finn

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to slow your roll when it comes to editing these articles. You have made hundreds of unexplained edits to these articles (the lack of an edit summary is an issue in and of itself.) without attempts for discussion on the talk pages of the articles. The style edits are also a problem. Please seek consensus(WP:CONENSUS) for them first. A few other editors are also changing the style so It's nothing but a never-ending saga of people trying to change the style of the tables, etc. Also, stop adding "Untitled Boba Fett film." There have been no official announcements of this film by Lucasfilm yet. Any addition of this is considered WP:OR and I will remove it immediately and issue a warning. Start taking to the talk page if you want to totally revamp these articles. I will message other users who do this when I see the edits. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 00:21, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I never added the information about the Boba Fett film. It was other users who did that. User:CapLiber (talk); 09:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Star Wars and List of Star Wars films and television series. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - R9tgokunks ⭕ 00:21, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Hebrew Bible, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 14:32, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, you reversed a move made by consensus after discussion within the last two months at Talk:Hebrew Bible. Largoplazo (talk) 17:28, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Timeline of the Ukrainian crisis, CapLiber!

Wikipedia editor Edaham just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've reviewed this article and for the time being, as it's unsourced and lacks context, I've changed it to a redirect. I suggest adding this info (if verifiable) as a section in the parent article first, where more editors will be able to give it attention. If it becomes a large enough section, you may want to start a discussion at the talk page of the parent article regarding a fork. This is particularly important as the information may possibly be controversial and we should avoid small forks which allow the isolated addition of information which may be contended in other articles. Edaham (talk) 04:51, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Edaham's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Soviet Union (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Georgian, Latvian, Armenian, Ukrainian, Belarusian, Azerbaijani, Turkmen, Tajik, Kazakh, Uzbek, Lithuanian, Moldovan, Estonian and Kyrgyz

Star Wars (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Finn and Rey

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Read over WP:Sandwich. Consider this a final warning--Moxy (talk) 11:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Star Wars canon galaxy map.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Star Wars opening crawl logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 22:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited J. J. Abrams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amanda Foreman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. All the names and the openings of the Star Wars movie related articles have been arrived at after years of discussion on the talk pages and agreed upon by the community. You made some changes, they were reverted, now please take them to the talk page and don't edit war against consensus. Canterbury Tail talk 17:39, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Canterbury Tail talk 17:51, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I actually write edit summaries most of the times. User:CapLiber (talk) 18:19 UTC, 10/11/2018

Your contributions log suggests otherwise. Only 7 times in the last 100 mainspace edits. Canterbury Tail talk 19:25, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

RGloucester — ☎ 14:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Yeltsin on August Coup, 1991.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please don't put that Putin was President of Russia since 1999 as you did here [2]

This is a WP:BLP.

Dmitry Medvedev was president of Russia from 2008 to 2012 as you can see here: List of Presidents of Russia

Thank you. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 18:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You've been asked before to please provide edit summaries, but I notice that you're still not providing them. This leaves other editors in a hard position as they don't know what the intent of your edits were, and as a result many could look like vandalism. I must ask that you provide edit summaries for your edits. Canterbury Tail talk 12:29, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CapLiber. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That works... thanks Blueboar (talk) 14:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Polyamorph (talk) 20:11, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Notimelivelong. I noticed that you recently removed content from Belavezha Accords without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.Notimelivelong (talk) 16:55, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Episode IX announcement logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:55, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CapLiber. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Russian Civil War infobox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:53, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to U.S. Bank Tower (Los Angeles), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 10:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Despite repeated requests, you continually fail to include an edit summary with nearly every edit you make. Editors are strongly advised to use edit summaries, and persistent failure or refusal to do so could be considered disruptive editing. Please follow this practice. RolandR (talk) 11:27, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Russian Revolution; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RolandR (talk) 10:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Battle of Poltava (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pierre-Denis Martin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out the positions of the boxes and that anti soviet white neutral are in the second box.But if that is the case i think the allied and lefists postions should be switched so that its whites, pro-whites and anti-soviet neutral whites JoshRamirez29 (talk) 04:36, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to reach consensus before adding controversial "sides" to the infobox. Many would object to seeing this as a left-wing unrest, and the way you have it presented makes it look like BLM and Antifa are allies. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 20:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I see that you have created a disambiguation page, Russian Constitution of 1918. Please can you help to fix the resulting mis-directed wikilinks, by editing the pages to link to the correct article? Thanks, Certes (talk) 01:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PlayStation 5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CapLiber: Я заметил вашу активность на иностранной вики (статьи, связанные с Российской республикой, Комучем, РФДР и другие) и предлагаю вам обсудить эту тему. Напишите вашу точку зрения и ваши аргументы, а я напишу свои. Вместе придём к консенсусу. Doomer1558 (talk) 14:57, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CapLiber I have big complaints about your edits on the history of Russia. You are using facts that do not have reliable sources. I ask you to be more responsible in this matter. I also criticize your editing style: you edit an article many times, although it can be done in one try. You may be trying to make it difficult to undo your edits this way. Doomer1557 (talk) 14:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте. Мне кажется, мы сошлись в том, что, по крайней мере, Галицко-Волынское княжество и Гетьманщина должны быть в инфобоксе?--Dƶoxar (talk) 10:25, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm OK with that, but I also see the point in what KIENGIR and others are talking about. (CapLiber) (talk) 11:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! - {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 19:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

День добрый. Обратите, пожалуйста, внимание, подобная правка сильно расходится с ВЕС, поскольку ставит на один уровень претензии Украины (поддержанные большинством государств - членов ООН на уровне решений органов этой организации) и претензии Японии, таковой поддержки не получившей (о чём я уже говорил, когда отменял ранее эту же вашу правку). Можете также в ООНовский pocketbook статистики посмотреть: они исключают из России Крым (который не признают частью РФ), но не Южные Курилы, т.к. дают в качестве площади страны докрымскую (17 098 246 км²), но не "безюжнокурильскую" (не вычитают из этой площади ещё и Южные Курилы). Карта, опять же, показывает ЮК российскими. Итого: не надо возвращать карту, помечающие ЮК светло-зелёными. Этот цвет — он либо для неконтролируемого либо для международно непризнанного. Южные Курилы на российской карте не подпадают ни туда ни туда. С уважением, --Seryo93 (talk) 12:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. I will be looking at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 AUGUST 2021!

Thanks so much,

Sarabnas (talk) 19:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gulag montage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sanctions against Russia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 7#Russia Sanctions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 00:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Uebermarginal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 15:43, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Timeline of the Ukrainian crisis and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 23#Timeline of the Ukrainian crisis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gliwrit (talk) 21:18, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cambial — foliar❧ 20:03, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Censuses in Ukraine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volhynian Voivodeship.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Talk:Russo-Ukrainian War. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. That move request is POV or disruptive editing, either or both. I really don't want to template an established user, but ... Lemonaka (talk) 12:11, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Lemonaka (talk) 12:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Israel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in being blocked from editing—especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jeppiz (talk) 20:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CapLiber. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Uebermarginal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 06:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 12:33, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mother Ukraine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally editors must be logged-in have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. nableezy - 04:13, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Trade War with China has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7 § Trade War with China until a consensus is reached. Silcox (talk) 06:42, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Palestinian territories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm Manyareasexpert. Your recent edit(s) to the page Russian occupation of Zaporizhzhia Oblast appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See Talk:Russian occupation of Zaporizhzhia Oblast#unrecognized federal subject of Russia ManyAreasExpert (talk) 12:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Russian occupation of Kherson Oblast. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. See Talk:Russian occupation of Zaporizhzhia Oblast#unrecognized federal subject of Russia . ManyAreasExpert (talk) 12:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ManyAreasExpert (talk) 12:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:African American Antifa flag.png.

This file is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the file description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 19:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]