User talk:C.recalde

Having you work reverted may seem a little harsh but it was the correct decision. Have you considered working up the subject as a draft, then when it is complete it can form an article, and you can link it to this sub-section using a {{further}} template as has been done in the sub-section below. --ClemRutter (talk) 21:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sustainable development, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Integration, Boundary and Humanity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:C.recalde/sandbox8 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.academia.edu/35941134/Chapter_2_Learning_to_transform_the_world_key_competencies_in_ESD. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Person who formerly started with "216" (talk) 17:39, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230514, which is not released under a compatible license. CC BY-NC-SA is not a compatible license.Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note for @Diannaa:, @Person who formerly started with "216": and others who are doing copyright violation monitoring, the text C.Recalde is using is published by UNESCO under CC BY-SA 3.0, please check the bottom of the pages for the Sources section which links to the CC BY-SA source. The reason you are getting false positives for copyright violations is because other websites are reusing UNESCO content (often without attribution) so it looks like copyright is being broken. Is there anything we could do that would make your job easier to spot false positives in which every copyright violation software you are using?

Thanks

John Cummings (talk) 16:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The particular page in my note above is https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230514, and it is not released under a CC BY-SA 3.0. It's marked as being CC BY-NC-SA, or at least it was on the day I checked it. Today the page won't load. The links you provided as sources for this content aren't working either, which makes it a lot harder to assess whether or not the licenses you've offered are actually correct. The links to the licenses don't work either.

However, the same content appears in http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/FIELD/Cairo/images/RethinkingEducation.pdf, which is compatibly licensed, which means I am comfortable restoring the material. Note that both of these urls differ from the one you provided as a source for this content. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:UNESCO King Hamad Bin Isa Al-Khalifa Prize for the Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Education, from its old location at User:C.recalde/sandbox11. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 18:58, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:UNESCO King Hamad Bin Isa Al-Khalifa Prize for the Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Education. Thanks! Zeromonk (talk) 18:32, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Education for Sustainable Development in Brazil, is not quite complete in terms of writing and development. The 29 consecutive footnotes at the end of the article are nonsensical and appear to be an attempt at cite-bombing. Most of those sources are legitimate in themselves but information from each should be written up selectively with footnotes placed in their legitimate positions in the text.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's style guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Monitoring Education for Sustainable Development.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article, "Monitoring Education for Sustainable Development".

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Education for sustainable development in Brazil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Education for sustainable development in Brazil, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 22:54, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, C.recalde! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 22:54, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Education for sustainable development in Brazil, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, C.recalde. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Education for sustainable development in Brazil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:09, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello C.recalde. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:C.recalde. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=C.recalde|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Cordless Larry (talk) 23:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cordless Larry. Thanks for your message. I have updated my user page as requested, adding more information about the project I collaborate on. Best C.recalde (talk) 14:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Continuing UNESCO COI issues. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]