User talk:Bollardant

Kandara Airport, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 12:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bollardant! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Paul_012 (talk) 19:30, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions. I've noticed that you've been using bare URLs in your referencing. This should be avoided, and citations should include more identifying information to avoid breakage when links go offline. You'll find more information at WP:Bare URLs.

Also, it seems you used some sort of translation tool to generate the Thai name for Bhumibol Dam Airport, which was gibberish. Machine translation tools should never be used this way, as they are wholly unable to identify the correct terms and spellings for proper nouns. If you don't know the language, please leave the native name empty.

Finally, while having Wikipedia articles for obscure airports is nice, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a directory. Topics need to satisfy the WP:notability guidelines to warrant an article. If no in-depth information apart from basic technical facts from directory listings is available, that's usually a sign that the subject might not warrant a Wikipedia article. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will take this in account for my next contributions to Wikipedia. Bollardant (talk) 00:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. Thank you for your recent contributions to Loei Airport. I noticed that you added an image to the article's infobox as a thumbnail. In future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox, as this is against the Manual of Style. When adding an image, supply only the filename to the |image= parameter and the caption to the |caption= parameter instead. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using; please consult the Template page for the infobox being used on that page for proper instructions and documentation. Thanks! - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bollardant. You have new messages at Talk:RAF Kasfareet.
Message added 20:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gavbadger (talk) 20:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sorry, I had forgotten to put a citation about the aircraft. The information was from citation 3 (Middle Eastern Airfield Report Volume 2 on Page 149). Bollardant (talk) 11:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this amazing article Bollardant!! Which was the source about Egyptian Air Force use of aircraft there, including F-100s? Can you link it? Many thanks Buckshot06 (talk) 11:12, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for doing all that digging. But I believe you have misunderstood. The EAF never flew F-100Cs or F-100Ds. What that listing is is a USAF assessment of what USAF aircraft could operate from the airfield in an emergency, I believe!! Buckshot06 (talk) 20:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I did not think about that. That was a good pointer, so I will try to do more digging, thanks! Bollardant (talk) 09:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very impressive work you have done! Big thanks for doing such great research and also adding all of these squadrons. Bollardant (talk) 15:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Sargodha Satellite Fields. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for moving it into the draft, I now have fixed the issue by verifiying every segment with the source I got it off from. Bollardant (talk) 21:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But the article leans on some unreliable sources. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see, I will do more digging focused on books and published sources, hopefully to replace the unreliable sources! Thanks again. Bollardant (talk) 07:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, re Sargodha Satellite Fields, what was the name of Sargodha (Main) when it was used by the Royal Air Force? I can't find any mention of it within the map section of my RAF squadron books, or the name of the airfield in my RAF unit book. Did it have paved runways during WW2? What kind of aircraft operated from there during WW2? Fighters, bombers, or observation planes? Gavbadger (talk) 20:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it was only mentioned a few times that it was apparently used by the RAF, and then abandoned after WW2. The only relevant map I could find while the complex was still active, is a PAF Wartime sectional chart, which shows all four airfields.

[1]https://sameerjoshi73.medium.com/a-knights-tale-da8235ab7272 Bollardant (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aérodrome communal de Rodez-Onet-le-Château and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 06:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bollardant! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 06:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Memer15151 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

One source is about a sporting complex, one doesn’t appear to constitute WP:SIGCOV. The last source doesn’t show where it got any of its information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aérodrome communal de Rodez-Onet-le-Château and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UserMemer (chat) Tribs 14:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Serre-Chevalier Airfield. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mount Lykaion Hippodrome and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk • contribs 02:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bollardant! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Published article hasn’t been reviewed, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 05:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chernobyl Reactors 5 and 6, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LR.127 (talk) 01:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Chernobyl Reactors 5 and 6 at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tesleemah was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Most part of the article is unsourced, kindly remove sections you can't find sources for.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Corsica Airfield Complex and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tesleemah (talk) 06:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Why did you create Lannion Airfield instead of just copying your content into Lannion–Côte de Granit Airport. The airport article is tiny, has no historical information and has plenty of room for expansion.

Gavbadger (talk) 18:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]