User talk:Bneu2013/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bneu2013. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I reverted your changes at U.S. Space & Rocket Center because the coordinates were messed up, and because the museum was established in 1965, with financing via a statewide bond referendum in November of that year. It opened March 15, 1970. Your contribution about IMAX made some sense, and I thank you for drawing it to my attention. I'll take a crack at making that part more complete, especially since the IMAX theater has since been replaced by a planetarium. -- ke4roh (talk) 16:37, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

@Ke4roh: - the coordinates issue was a typo; edits were made with my mobile phone. Do you have a citation for the March 15 opening date? This exact date is not listed in the article; only the year. Bneu2013 (talk) 04:13, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

[1] -- ke4roh (talk)

Thanks for including that info. ke4roh (talk) 23:40, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

You are welcome. Bneu2013 (talk) 23:42, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Your addition to Tennessee-Georgia water dispute has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:23, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: my further change was not acceptable? I don't know how much different it should be than the source. I currently have it in my sandbox, and would like for someone more experienced than me to take a look at my changes once I have them complete, and tell me if they are acceptable. Are the quotes in quotations not acceptable? Bneu2013 (talk) 23:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Any content you add to Wikipedia needs to be completely different from the source, re-written in your own words. That includes material in sandboxes and drafts. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: - I'm currently rewriting it right now. Are the quotations not acceptable? Bneu2013 (talk) 23:47, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Don't use quotations unless you absolutely have to. Please use the copyvio detector: see here. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: - I've modified it now to where the vast majority of the similarities are the quotations. I did remove one quotation, but I still feel like the ones I've left work to better illustrate the subject matter. It's still saying that there is a 40.8% chance of a violation, however Bneu2013 (talk) 00:35, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Thank you for uploading File:Olgiati widening side.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

The article Rockvale High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

general notability; no significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ericwg (talk) 22:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Femkemilene -- Femkemilene (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

I've done a broad review of the article. I think it needs quite a bit of updating, condensing and restructuring. I think it is not yet useful for me to go into details before these big points are addressed. I found it quite an interesting read and I hope we can improve this article quite a bit :). Femke Nijsse (talk) 15:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Need more external sources besides that it is announced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Tennessee Star and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Tennessee Star, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:43, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Bneu2013! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:43, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=TVA_Kingston_Fossil_Plant_coal_ash_spill, which is not released under a compatible license. Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International is not a compatible license. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:39, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Diannaa - I'll try to be as civil as I can here, but this is getting old. While I did use a citation from sourcewatch.com, I significantly modified the text to my own words; I didn't simply copy and paste and switch a word or two. I don't know how this bot operates, but I can confirm that I modified the text beyond a copyright violation. Bneu2013 (talk) 17:08, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Your addition was flagged by a bot as a potential copyright issue and was assessed by myself. Here is a link to the bot report. Click on the iThenticate link to view the overlap, which in my opinion is indeed a violation of our copyright policy, so I removed the material. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:52, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

The article Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Femkemilene -- Femkemilene (talk) 20:01, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

The article Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Femkemilene -- Femkemilene (talk) 16:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

I have blocked you for 1 week because CheckUser indicates you have violated our policy on abuse of multiple accounts. You may appeal this block by following the instructions at WP:GAB. Note that future violations of the socking policy will likely lead to an indefinite block. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bneu2013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Blocking administrator has not given a reason why he believes that I have used multiple accounts via checkuser. If it is because I have had previous accounts in the past, this is not the same situation. All of these accounts I lost the passwords to, and have not used in years. An SPI case does not appear to have been opened about me, either. However, I will confess that I do sometimes edit from my place of employment, and there is a person there (whose identity I will not reveal) who sometimes edits Wikipedia himself via the server (no account that I know of) who has vandalized Wikipedia articles before, and I have reverted. He always seems to do it when I am around, presumably to get my attention. I have asked him to stop, yet he refuses. I also often edit via my mobile phone, of whom I share a server with family members. While I do admit that I have edited via shared IP servers that others use to edit Wikipedia, I never have used any other accounts, and have no idea why this blocking administrator believes so, unless it is the situation mentioned above. Regardless of what you all decide, I am agreeing to not create and use any other accounts, and will also no longer edit from the shared server at my place of employment. I will work to the best of my abilities to continue to follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and avoid shared IP servers. Bneu2013 (talk) 08:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Let me just reiterate that any more logged-out vandalism or other disruption related to WP:SOCK will result in an indefinite block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NinjaRobotPirate - Why does Checkuser believe that I have been socking? He has not indicated that. Bneu2013 (talk) 19:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

We aren’t allowed to publicly connect IPs to accounts. If someone is logged out socking and CU indicates it, however, we do block. You have edited logged out in a way that is explicitly forbidden by policy. You got caught, and I blocked you for a week. It’s that simple. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:20, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

TonyBallioni I will admit that I have unintentionally edited as an IP before when accidentally logged out, and am working to make sure that never happens again. Is that what you are saying is forbidden? I also have, as mentioned above, edited from shared IP accounts where others edit from, and feel I may have been caught up in a situation there. If someone suspected that I was socking, why did they not open a SPI? After all, I feel that I may have been caught up in something beyond my control. Is this a block that would be impossible to appeal? Bneu2013 (talk) 19:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

No, you did not unintentionally edit logged out. You did so intentionally and deceptively. CheckUsers are not required to file SPIs to block, and if it involves logged out editing, we generally won’t because the privacy policy does not allow us to publicly connect IPs and accounts. Any other CU, such as NRP is able to review my actions and come to their own conclusions on this block. I am more than happy to share my conclusions with any CheckUser who asks, and have already preemptively shared them with NinjaRobotPirate via email. You are free to appeal again, and I’ll gladly discuss this with any CU who may be reviewing. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:39, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

TonyBallioni I am searching for diffs for edits I made accidentally logged out. This is the first one I found. This was simply a mistake, and not intended to be deceptive. I will also point out that that is a static IP, and there are many others very similar to it used by other people. Was my mistake there a violation of any policies? Is it also possible for CU to prove I made the edit? Regardless of the situation, I am agreeing not to sock. I will not log out and make edits, and will continue to work to improve the encyclopedia. I am also in the process of looking for other diffs like the one above. Bneu2013 (talk) 19:55, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

As you intend to keep lying, I will not be further responding to you. Any CU can email me for more information should you post a new unblock request. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:08, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

The administrators have failed to inform me of my situation and answer the questions related to my block that I am uncertain about. It also appears that an agreement to not sock in the future will not be an adequate reason to unblock. Bneu2013 (talk) 02:17, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Bneu2013,

I just wanted to tell you that since your user page was deleted, any redirects from previous accounts of yours turned into broken redirects and have been deleted. But the old accounts' talk pages still redirect to this one so you can always locate your old accounts by clicking on the "What links here" link on this page, in the left-hand side menu. Given this recent block, you might not have any interest in your old accounts but I thought I'd let you know in case you ever want to look back and see your old contributions. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I totally forgot about that. My user page should be back up soon, and I'll redirect the old account user pages back. I don't have any interest in my old accounts, but I think it's best to let users know that I have had other accounts in the past as it has become evident that some consider that sockpuppetry. Bneu2013 (talk) 02:28, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

That was not why you were blocked. You were blocked for abusively editing logged out as confirmed by two CheckUsers. Please stop saying that you were blocked because of your old accounts. You weren't. You were blocked for intentionally and knowingly violating policy, and there is little to no doubt of that. The only reason I am commenting on this now is that even after the block expired you insist on not telling the truth, which means it is likely in my mind the issues will repeat themselves, so I will repeat my warning: if you violate WP:SOCK again in any capacity, the next block will be indefinite. You have nothing to worry about, so long as you follow the policy. Having declared previous accounts is not a violation of the policy, and was not why you were blocked. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:50, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

TonyBallioni - That's not what I was saying. I was referring to the fact that other users have claimed that my previous accounts were used to sock. I have received this accusation on multiple occasions. I understand that I improperly edited anonymously in the past and screwed up there, so I got what I deserved. I plan to include a section about this on my future userpage, which I am currently drafting. My future user page will be controversial, but I am not referring to all users. I did something stupid, and have learned from my mistakes, and won't do it again. I'll also take even more precaution in the future to ensure that I don't accidentally edit while logged out. I'm not disputing the fact that I was blocked for improperly editing while logged out, yet i don't know exactly what specific event led you to conclude that I was doing so. I realize that you are not allowed to reveal that information to me. Also, this seems a bit like it was intended to harass me, and something that probably shouldn't have been said. Bneu2013 (talk) 03:18, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for agreeing to follow the policy in the future :) It is appreciated. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:23, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Could you give me an explanation of your edit to Bruce Mansfield? I'm rather confused as the plant was originally scheduled to be shut down in June 2021, but now, the shut down is expected to be in November 2019. FunksBrother (talk) 01:26, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

FunksBrother - When I said "moved back," I meant the closure date had been moved back in time (earlier) than the original date. I realize now that you must have interpreted the change as meaning the plant was originally scheduled to close in 2019, then moved to 2021, then back to 2019, and I apologize for the misunderstanding. Bneu2013 (talk) 04:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Bneu2013 Ahh. Thank you for clarifying. I wanted to make sure and we're now on the same page. I didn't want to revert and violate WP:OWNERSHIP. FunksBrother (talk) 04:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walker Valley High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Still doesn't satisfy WP:EVENT IMO. Being found by an ex-NFL player adds little in the way of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Disappearance of Joe Keller and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Disappearance of Joe Keller, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 05:46, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Bneu2013! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Clarityfiend (talk) 05:46, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Tennessee Star, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Bneu2013. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "IMPROVE Act".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Hey, I'm writing just to note that I'm making some changes to the articles around WALI (currently WALI and WRHA (AM)) to bring them back in line with guidelines.

The WALI call sign belongs to the 1280 AM facility in Dayton, even if the station is promoting itself as a Cleveland station now because of the translator; in general, we maintain one article per station license. As such, I've opened a requested move at Talk:WRHA (AM) that would have as its goal placing the correct article in its position. Relevant content from the current WALI page, like the station logo, has been moved there.

You're invited to participate in the requested move discussion. Raymie (t • c) 05:08, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Bneu2013. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Tennessee Star".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 19:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Loudoun, Tennesse. Since you had some involvement with the Loudoun, Tennesse redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ComplexRational (talk) 17:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tullahoma (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tullahoma (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Disappearance of Joe Keller, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gallatin, Tennessee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bypass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polk County, Tennessee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Powerhouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

The file File:Candy's creek cherokee historical marker 1959.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Copper Basin (Tennessee) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 17:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 Knoxville stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Knoxville stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BilCat (talk) 09:08, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

The file File:Copper-basin-satellite-1984 - cropped.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

The article Copper Basin (Tennessee) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Copper Basin (Tennessee) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 23:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Category:Media in Cleveland, Tennessee. Since you had some involvement with the Category:Media in Cleveland, Tennessee redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm not seeing any evidence the subject meets WP:NBIO. He died in an accident while hiking and his body was found years later. How does that make him notable?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Disappearance of Joe Keller and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Disappearance of Joe Keller, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 12:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Bneu2013! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 12:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ocoee Scenic Byway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copper Basin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Hey, congratulations on your new Good Article. It was a pleasure working with you. ♠Vami_IV†♠ 01:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! Bneu2013 (talk) 20:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello. I added the PROD tag on File:Blue springs encampments marker.jpg. If left uncontested for more than seven days, then the image will be deleted around that time. The image would eventually be discussed at WP:FFD if you would like to contest the deletion. --George Ho (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Do you have a subscription? If so, you should be able to make clippings of the newspaper articles you're citing. Take https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/112055511/ for instance.

1. Load the full page with the desired source article.
2. There's a toolbar at the top of the page that contains an icon that looks like a pair of scissors. Click that. That will bring up a selection box and and a dialog box.
3. Expand the selection to encompass the full article.
4. Type a description of the article; I use the article's headline.
5. Click the "Clip" button.
6. A new box appears with "Article has been clipped!". Click the "Embed" button, bringing up two presentations of the URL for the clipping. Click the "Copy" button for the lower presentation of the bare URL. This will copy the URL to the clipboard, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/51197267/east-west-interstate-finish-set-here-by/ .
7. Paste this URL into the citation on Wikipedia and save the edit.
8. Don't forget to include the page number and |via=Newspapers.com so that readers have the full citation and know where you obtained your copy. I try to make sure I use the page number as presented on the original page itself; sometimes Newspapers.com numbers them consecutively for the entire issue irrespective of section numbering or lettering.

If an article is continued to a second page, I make a clipping of both sections of the article. I put the URL of the clipping for the start of the article in |url= and then link the second page number with the clipping for the continuation, like in Special routes of U.S. Route 31#cite note-6. That way readers can see the entirety of the source article. Imzadi 1979 → 00:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Imzadi1979 - I do have a subscription, however, I hadn't thought of the need to make clippings of citations. I'll admit that I am also kind of new to Newspapers.com. But thanks for letting me know. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:40, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Clippings are visible to non-subscribers, but the full pages are not. It just helps our readers to access our sources. Imzadi 1979 → 00:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Imzadi1979 - I'll do that in the future, and work on clipping sources that I have already used. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Ken Ham. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 00:53, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

StAnselm I'm sorry, but I don't know what the issue is here. This subject as well as his organization is well known to promote climate change denial, pretty sure it is referenced. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:55, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

"Pretty sure" isn't good enough for a BLP. In fact, it wasn't cited in the article. (Of course, as the category discussion indicates, you shouldn't have created the categories in the first place.) StAnselm (talk) 00:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

StAnselm - I'm going to add information in the article about his views on the subject, with citations. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:58, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Just saw you adding Ken Ham to an Australian Category. Can you add anything to Talk:Ken Ham/Archive 5#Nationality? HiLo48 (talk) 01:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

HiLo48 - I just removed that category, as I realized that I probably acted too hastily. I will look at the discussion. Bneu2013 (talk) 01:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Femkemilene -- Femkemilene (talk) 15:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

The article Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Femke Nijsse (talk) 10:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Rick tyler.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Whpq the file came from the Southern Poverty Law Center's website, who claim it came from his Facebook page. That seems to indicate that it is free, as I strongly doubt he would consent to letting them use it. It is also used by multiple media outlets. I must admit I am not the most experienced when it comes to uploading files like this. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:04, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Being publicly available is not the same thing as being licensed as CC-0. Most everything published is copyrighted by default. Unless there is an explicit statement of a free license, then it isn't under a free license. -- Whpq (talk) 00:10, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

I'll look into the issue. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:20, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Just wanted to say thanks for the help on a recent edit I made. I've been on Wiki for quite a while and have made many edits. But I still don't know much about how to do more than that. I looked over your page and have to say it made me feel a little better to learn that even someone like you has had to deal with jerk editors. Not going to mention any names, but I've run into some doozies. Thanks for the way you edit on here. People like YOU make this a better place. Oh yeah: feel free to delete this if it doesn't fit.BillVol (talk) 23:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

BillVol Thank you very much! There's nothing wrong with this at all. I'm glad that I've been of help and inspiration to you. Keep up the good work! Bneu2013 (talk) 01:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Bneu2013,

Thank you for creating List of private schools in Nashville, Tennessee.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please complete the page and add multiple reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 02:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Rick tyler.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:04, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Rick tyler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello,

I am in the works of creating an article regarding one of the newest National Scenic Byways in the NBS system, the East Tennessee Crossing Byway. The byway is on an unsigned concurrency along US-25E/TN-32 and on US-25 from Newport to the North Carolina state line. I have started a draft of the article on my sandbox, and I was curious if you could assist me in the Major Intersections section and possibly create a map of the byway in order to make the article look more professional and appealing. I also have added a file of the shield/logo of the byway on Commons, and I'm unsure by how to add it to the article.

Thanks in advance, --AppalachianCentrist (talk) 01:23, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

AppalachianCentrist - Yes, I can help, even though I must admit that the "major intersections" sections are probably the area within road articles where I have the least experience. But I can still work on that, and I think I've got the right software to create a map. For the shield, I'm not sure at the moment how to get it to automatically appear in the infobox, or if it won't automatically appear under its current state. I'll look into this one too. However, you might have to resort to manually inserting it under the "marker image" parameter. Examples of where this is done include Pellissippi Parkway and APD-40. I'll have to do a little research on this one, but I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Bneu2013 (talk) 02:10, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Hello, Bneu2013

Thank you for creating Williamson Herald.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article, but note that other editors have called for better sources, and more than just a simple announcement of the newspaper's existence.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

––DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 23:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Alive 971.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

United Daughters of the Confederacy Monument (Cleveland, Tennessee), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 840 (Tennessee) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 17:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

The article Interstate 840 (Tennessee) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Interstate 840 (Tennessee) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 16:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

The article Interstate 840 (Tennessee) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 840 (Tennessee) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Memphis tank truck disaster, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Mcminn-central.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

The Tennessee Star, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 440 (Tennessee) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 (talk) 22:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

The article Interstate 440 (Tennessee) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 440 (Tennessee) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 (talk) 18:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Tim Kelly (Tennessee politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback. Thanks again, and happy editing!

DanCherek (talk) 14:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello,

I am currently looking into using Newspapers.com as source for expanding Tennessee related articles, particularly those pertaining to Grainger County and Morristown-Hamblen County. I do not have access to a Newspapers.com account to make clippings to use sources.

I ask if you could make a clipping of https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/596005587 for me from the Knoxville News Sentinel pertaining to Grainger County being selected for the Rural Development program.

Thanks, --AppalachianCentrist (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

@AppalachianCentrist: - [2]. Page number is F-3; note this is defferent than what is listed on Newspapers.com. If you need any more clippings, please let me know. Thanks! Bneu2013 (talk) 00:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Here is another newspapers.com link regarding a cancelled economic development project involving a hiking trail system on Clinch Mountain in East Tennessee.

https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/595408997/

Thanks, --AppalachianCentrist (talk) 18:48, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

@AppalachianCentrist: - [3]. Page is 8A. Bneu2013 (talk) 19:14, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello again, this is my last request for the day. I am currently drafting a new article regarding proposed and stalled state park project in Hawkins County near Rogersville in East Tennessee. The attached links are for articles discussing the proposed park and the opposition and hardships it faced from the 50s to the late 1970s. I haven't been able to find any article post 1978 regarding the park project.

https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/587636052/

https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/592754050/

https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/587415828/

https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/68698706/

https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/592507845/

Thanks for all your help today,

--AppalachianCentrist (talk) 20:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

@AppalachianCentrist: -

• 5-12-57 - page 1-D

• 10-27-76 - page 1, 8

• 3-31-57 - page 8A; also illustration from same page.

• 3-10-76 - page 1D

• 5-13-73 - page 8-A

If you cite the Kingsport Times-News article that is split between two pages, you can link the second page in the |page= parameter. Thanks! Bneu2013 (talk) 16:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited East Tennessee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interstate 275.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello again,

I am in need of your assistance regarding obtaining clippings of Grainger County's involvement in the Rural Development Program. I have listed the following articles that discuss this topic that I would appreciate you clipping out for my usage.

https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/588134563/

https://www.newspapers.com/image/595998159/

https://www.newspapers.com/image/588134423/

https://www.newspapers.com/image/587663888/

https://www.newspapers.com/image/592468054/

https://www.newspapers.com/image/591653828/

https://www.newspapers.com/image/595833809/

https://www.newspapers.com/image/585953037/ (this one discusses the town of Rutledge's reincorporation for the econ-dev program.)

Thanks in advance,

--AppalachianCentrist (talk) 18:45, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

@AppalachianCentrist: - You're welcome.

• 2-12-56 - page 7-D

• 2-12-56 - page 1-D (related to previous link)

• 7-12-59 - page C-4

• 10-8-59 - page 12

• 8-7-68 - page 2D

• 2-24-66 - page 6

• 7-15-56 - page C-1

• 5-19-55 - page 1

- Bneu2013 (talk) 04:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tennessee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

The article Tennessee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tennessee for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:40, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

The article Tennessee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tennessee for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Bean Station, Tennessee, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Thank you for uploading File:Clarksville collage.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 05:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Howdy hello. Saw you make a revert at Arizona and you mentioned that there wasn't consensus on how to present 2020 Census data, could you point me to the conversation where that's being discussed? Thanks! CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:51, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

CaptainEek - Talk:United States. So far the discussion hasn't had much response, and more input would be strongly appreciated. Bneu2013 (talk) 01:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Blue Oval City, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

At Rutherford County, Tennessee, you added:

This area of the state was predominately Democratic following the American Civil War, but the significant minority of African Americans joined the Republican Party. The white-dominated state legislature in the 1880s passed four laws that effectively disenfranchised most blacks and many poor whites, particularly due to the requirement of payment of a poll tax in order to register to vote. This reduced the competitiveness of the Republican Party in the state for more than six decades, and thus it effectively held political power only in eastern Tennessee.

Since the late 20th century, the majority of white conservatives in Rutherford County shifted toward the Republican Party. After gaining enforcement of their voting rights under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, most local African Americans favored the Democratic Party.

You added this source to support your edit. Could please tell me specifically where in that source you found this information, per WP:CITEWEB? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: - I apologize for the delay in my reply, as I have not been very active the last few days. Most of the information on the historical voting patterns of this county can be found by manipulating the dropdowns on the source. I also added an additional source to support some of the information. However, I will add that the trends of specific voter demographics described in this article is well documented and cited on many other articles. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 640 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 23:40, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The article Interstate 640 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Interstate 640 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 02:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

The article Interstate 640 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 640 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 02:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2021 inflation crisis. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 22:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bneu2013, I have a subscription to the Wall Street Journal so if you need anything, just let me know. S0091 (talk) 22:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

@S0091: - Not at the moment, but if you're interested in improving the draft, please feel free to. I'm no economist; just interested in the current events aspect of this. Bneu2013 (talk) 22:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

I think expansion is more likely in mainspace so accepted the article. There is no doubt the subject is notable and as things evolve the title can be hashed out amongst the community. Thanks for creating it! S0091 (talk) 22:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

2021 inflation crisis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 22:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Red Clay State Historic Park you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 02:40, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

The article Red Clay State Historic Park you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Red Clay State Historic Park for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:20, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

The article Red Clay State Historic Park you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Red Clay State Historic Park for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 00:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Red Clay State Historic Park at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bahnfrend (talk) 07:34, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Could you also check your DYK review of Angela Cullen? Think it is OK now, if there is a misplaced comma then please just change it. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 14:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

@Victuallers: - yes I will. I have been busier than expected lately, and that's why I've taken long. Bneu2013 (talk) 15:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Victuallers (talk) 16:06, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 40 in Tennessee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 21:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

On 6 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Red Clay State Historic Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Red Clay State Historic Park was the last capital of the Cherokee Nation in the eastern United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Red Clay State Historic Park. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Red Clay State Historic Park), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

The article Interstate 40 in Tennessee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Interstate 40 in Tennessee for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 14:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

The article Interstate 40 in Tennessee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 40 in Tennessee for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 09:41, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

I provided retroactive attribution in this diff for the content you copied from Interstate 24. I realize that you wrote most of the content in the original article, but some of the copied text came from other contributors, such as from this diff. Just be sure to note it in the edit summary (with a wikilink to the original page) for future copying. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 05:44, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Not to mention, there was consensus to keep I-24 merged into one article until such time that a decent state-detail article could be created. Splitting off the Tennessee section would decimate the I-24 article. –Fredddie™ 23:33, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

I'd say that this is akin to the U.S. Route 8 situation. So much of the length of I-24 is in Tennessee compared to Illinois and Kentucky. (The Georgia length is negligible. I know that because I drove the length from Chattanooga northwesterly all the way to I-57 in early January.) Just as most of US 8 is in Wisconsin by an order of magnitude, so much of I-24 is in Tennessee that I just don't think it's necessary to split the article. There'd be so much overlap between a proper I-24 in TN article and the parent I-24 article, that I don't see the point in the duplication of content. Imzadi 1979 → 23:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

The section about the stretch in Tennessee has expanded by at least fivefold since the merger (pretty sure the only information at the time was about the Monteagle stretch). I also plan to add even more missing information soon. I won't be done for at least another week, however. As such, if I do go through with this split, I would greatly condense the Tennessee section in the route description, as well as the history section. Bneu2013 (talk) 02:28, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

On 11 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Interstate 40 in Tennessee, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that community opposition to the routing of Interstate 40 through Memphis, Tennessee, led to a landmark United States Supreme Court ruling in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Interstate 40 in Tennessee. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Interstate 40 in Tennessee), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interstate 40 in Tennessee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malfunction Junction.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello Bneu2013,

I have been noticing your superb work on the expansion of the Tennessee-related articles up to good article standards. For this, I ask of an inquiry. Is it possible if you could assist me in the expansion and advancement of the 1982 World's Fair article? The fair's article has been expanded recently by me, and I would like to see it expanded with the coming 40th anniversary of the fair's opening on May 1st of 1982. I would greatly appreciate it if you could help me with this article's expansion given the topic's importance to the state and East Tennessee region.

Thanks, --AppalachianCentrist (talk) 21:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

@AppalachianCentrist: - Thanks. Here are some books I would recommend:

• Knoxville's 1982 World's Fair

• The Sunsphere in Knoxville, Tennessee

• Crossing the Aisle: How Bipartisanship Brought Tennessee to the Twenty-First Century and Could Save America

Here are some of my newspaper clippings about the fair:

• May 1, 1982, page A-1, A-2

• May 2, 1982, page A-1, A-10

• • page A-1

• • Page A-2: [4], [5]

• • page A-10

• • page B-1

• • Page C-2 (editorials): [6], [7], [8]

• October 31, 1982, page A-1, A-2

• • Page A-1, B-1

• November 1, 1982, page A-1, A-6

I know I have clipped more; I will post them as soon as I find them. In addition, here is a [ https://books.google.com/books?id=FYwnAQAAMAAJ technical report] about the transportation at the fair. Bneu2013 (talk) 09:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi There, I Was Just Trying To Figure A Way To Split I-24, TN State Without Breaking The Redirect Link Like U.S. Route 72 Where It Had West And East Tennessee, And US 72’s Link Never Break In TN For Some Reason 69.1.39.81 (talk) 02:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

If you think that the Georgia and Chattanooga segments should have separate subheaders, please discuss this on the talk page. I don't think that the Tennessee segment needs to be split into eastern and western segments; this isn't the same situation as US 72. Also, the segment of I-24 in Marion and Hamilton counties is in East Tennessee, and pretty much all of I-24 east of Nashville (excluding Georgia) is in eastern Tennessee. Bneu2013 (talk) 02:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi there. As the creator of the article 2021–2022 inflation surge I wanted to give you a heads up on this. I have tagged the article with the "Globalize" tag as it does not represent a worldwide view of the subject. I have two suggestions as possible remedies: move this page to 2021-2022 United States inflation surge or expand this to include other country's issues with inflation. On a personal note, I'm a Canadian experiencing similar effects of inflation on my own economy, so I just found this article to either be mislabeled, or too US-centric. CaffeinAddict (talk) 04:49, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

The article is still a stub, and needs to be expanded to include the worldwide effects of this event. I'm surprised it hasn't received as much attention as it has. Bneu2013 (talk) 19:54, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:I-24 ridgecut 1967.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 06:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tennessee State Route 396 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Floydian -- Floydian (talk) 02:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

The article Tennessee State Route 396 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tennessee State Route 396 and Talk:Tennessee State Route 396/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Floydian -- Floydian (talk) 02:43, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

The article Tennessee State Route 396 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tennessee State Route 396 for comments about the article, and Talk:Tennessee State Route 396/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Floydian -- Floydian (talk) 01:44, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Tennessee State Route 396 at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 00:50, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

On 12 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tennessee State Route 396, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tennessee State Route 396 was constructed to provide access to the Spring Hill Manufacturing plant of Saturn Corporation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tennessee State Route 396. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tennessee State Route 396), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

I've noticed that you're using the US index for inflation adjustments of capital expenditures. That index is the Consumer Price Index, which is good for consumer prices, or things like wages, tolls and smaller expenditures. Once you get a few orders of magnitude higher in cost, the economists say we shouldn't use that index. The index you should use for these large highway projects is US-GDP, which is based on a GDP deflator.

Another thing is that you're using {{CURRENTYEAR}}, but we should never use that as the inflation indices do not necessarily run to the current year. For the US indices, they can lag by about 18 months. Also, using that special word would flip the articles to indicate 2023 in just about a day and a half, and yet we won't have any updates for 2023 for quite a while. Instead, three is the {{inflation-year}} template that specifies to which year the price is being adjusted.

Lastly, {{formatprice}} works better than {{formatnum}}, and you can input the full original cost without using the  million trick.

To see this in action, take a look at this edit Imzadi 1979 → 14:04, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Bneu2013 (talk) 01:57, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bneu2013. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.