User talk:Blitzenrupff

Hello, Blitzenrupff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 07:26, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is some stuff that might help: WP:CHEATSHEET, Help:Wiki markup, WP:Simplified Manual of Style and WP:Ignore all rules. --dsprc ^[talk] 00:24, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blitzenrupff! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:54, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there

For Draft:Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing we also need to have reliable independent references. The references that you include are reliable but not independent. You can use them to support the facts, but in themselves do not help the article over the WP:GNG. See if you can find something written by others not connected with the journal. If you can get two of these writings that will show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:15, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't The WAC Clearinghouse a publisher of the journal? That makes them not independent. The same story for the University, it is not an independent entity. If other journal articles are unreferenced, that is a problem for those articles. See WP:Other stuff exists for the essay on this kind of argument. Any way I hope you can find a couple more independent references about the journal so that progress can be made. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:55, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can certainly write about selection by WAC in the article. But I am still looking for some other independent reference. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:54, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the clue is " reliable sources", which means more than 1. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:08, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blitzenrupff. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —Anne Delong (talk) 12:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blitzenrupff. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]